This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oluola, O.
Right arrow Articles by Weisman, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oluola, O.
Right arrow Articles by Weisman, L. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2007, p. 2198-2200, Vol. 51, No. 6
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00506-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Lysostaphin in Treatment of Neonatal Staphylococcus aureus Infection{triangledown}

Okunola Oluola,{dagger} Lingkun Kong, Mindy Fein, and Leonard E. Weisman*

Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, and Texas Children's Hospital, 6621 Fannin St., FC830.17, Houston, Texas 77030-2799

Received 24 April 2006/ Returned for modification 9 August 2006/ Accepted 26 March 2007


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
This study describes lysostaphin's effect against methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus in suckling rats. Standard techniques determined minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy. The numbers of surviving rats after vancomycin, oxacillin, and lysostaphin treatment were comparable and were different from that of controls (P < 0.00001). Lysostaphin appears effective in the treatment of neonatal S. aureus infection.


arrow
TEXT
 
Additional antibacterial agents for staphylococcal infection are needed (3, 9, 10, 12, 13, 21, 27). Lysostaphin, first identified in 1944 (20), is an endopeptidase which specifically cleaves the cell wall cross-linking pentaglycine bridges of Staphylococcus aureus (25) and is active against nondividing organisms (17, 19). We describe the effect of lysostaphin against S. aureus in a neonatal animal model.

A clinical methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) serotype 5 strain (Hernandez) was stored in tryptic soy broth at –80°C and grown before each experiment. An MSSA strain allowed comparison of lysostaphin to oxacillin and vancomycin. Minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) and MICs of vancomycin, oxacillin, and lysostaphin were determined (7, 18).

Fourteen-day timed-pregnancy Wistar rats (Charles River Laboratories) received antibiotic-free water and food ad libitum and delivered at 21 to 22 days of gestation. Pups remained with their dams throughout the experiment. The Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Animal Use Committee approved the research.

Three-day-old pups received 1 mg/kg of body weight/dose of lysostaphin at 1, 6, 24, and 30 h. Blood was obtained by cardiac puncture at 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 23, 25, 26, 27, 31, 32, 72, and 96 h after the first dose. Three pups' blood was pooled for each data point, and each time point had two data points. Lysostaphin serum concentration was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (26).

Plates were coated with 100 µl (1 µg/ml) of rabbit antilysostaphin for 2 h at room temperature and washed with phosphate-buffered saline plus 0.01% Tween 20, and 100 µl of standard or sera was added. After 60 min, plates were washed and incubated with biotinylated rabbit antilysostaphin and ExtrAvidin (catalog no. 81K4875; Sigma) for 30 min separately. Substrate tetramethylbenzidine (catalog no. TMBW0100-01; BioFx) was added. Absorbances were measured and converted to concentrations.

Three-day-old pups received 0.2 ml subcutaneously (1 x 107 CFU/ml) of S. aureus cephalad to the tail. The bacterial concentration was determined by optical density and confirmed by quantitative culture. In the first experiment, littermate pups were randomly assigned to either earlier treatment at 0.5, 6.5, 24, and 30 h after infection or later treatment at 6, 24, 30, and 48 h after infection. Each pup received 0.2 ml intraperitoneally of lysostaphin (1 mg/kg) or an equal volume of normal saline. In the second experiment, littermate pups randomly received 0.2 ml intraperitoneally of lysostaphin (1 mg/kg), vancomycin (15 mg/kg), oxacillin (50 mg/kg), or normal saline at 0.5, 6.5, 24, and 30 h after infection. Pups were evaluated daily for 7 days or until death for survival and weight. Tail vein quantitative blood cultures were obtained from each pup in randomly selected litters 24 h after infection.

Survival data were analyzed by a chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Blood culture data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Growth data were analyzed with a two-way analysis of variance. Statistical significance was defined as a P value of ≤0.05.

MICs and MBCs were 0.125 µg/ml and 0.25 µg/ml for oxacillin, 0.125 µg/ml and 0.25 µg/ml for vancomycin, and 0.031 µg/ml and 0.125 µg/ml for lysostaphin. To ensure adequate lysostaphin serum levels, our goal was to achieve trough levels greater than four times the MIC or 0.125 µg/ml. Serum lysostaphin levels (µg/ml) were greater than or equal to the target concentration from <1 to >96 h after the initial dose (Fig. 1). With the series of standard curves, the coefficient of variation was 6.9% and lower limit of detection was 0.92 ng/ml (three times the background activity). The kinetics of elimination appears to decrease from the first dose to the fourth dose. This may reflect the varied dosing interval or drug accumulation.


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 1. Serum levels of lysostaphin (mean concentrations [µg/ml], with error bars representing ranges) after the injection of 1 mg/kg/dose of lysostaphin intraperitoneally at 0 h (first dose) and then 6, 24, and 30 h later. Arrows indicate time of each dose. There are two data points for each time point. The lysostaphin target trough concentration was >0.125 µg/ml (dotted line).

Lysostaphin treatment 30 min or 6 h after infection significantly improved survival (Fig. 2a). Treatment with lysostaphin, vancomycin, or oxacillin after infection resulted in similar rates of survival (Fig. 2b). Blood cultures confirmed bacteremia in all groups. Lysostaphin, vancomycin, or oxacillin treatment did not affect weight gain (data not shown).


Figure 2
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		FIG. 2. (a) Survival curves for rat pups receiving lysostaphin treatment. •, noninfected pups treated with lysostaphin (n = 17); {blacklozenge}, S. aureus-infected pups with lysostaphin treatment beginning 30 min after infection (n = 22); {blacktriangleup}, S. aureus-infected pups with lysostaphin treatment beginning 6 h after infection (n = 19); {blacksquare}, S. aureus-infected and untreated pups (n = 17). Lysostaphin treatment significantly improved survival in infected rats treated 30 min (P < 0.00001) and 6 h (P < 0.0044) after S. aureus infection. Lysostaphin treatment without infection had no associated morbidity. (b) Survival curves for S. aureus-infected rat pups receiving lysostaphin (•) (n = 18), vancomycin ({blacklozenge}) (n = 18), oxacillin (n = 20) ({blacktriangleup}), or normal saline ({blacksquare}) (n = 16) 30 min after infection are shown. Each antibiotic treatment group was significantly different from saline-treated infected pups (P < 0.00001).

This is the first use of lysostaphin in a neonatal animal model of infection. This is important because staphylococci are the most common cause of neonatal late-onset (>3 days after birth) sepsis, with coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS) occurring in about 48% of infections and S. aureus organisms occurring in 7.8% of infections (23); the cause of persistent bacteremia in CONS (48%) and S. aureus (25%) neonatal infections (4); and associated with neonatal mortality rates of 9.1% (CONS) and 17.2% (S. aureus) and increased morbidities (such as hospitalization and high treatment costs) (23).

Lysostaphin use in humans is limited to a case report of a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-induced pneumonia and abscesses (22) and a study using lysostaphin spray that eradicates 80% of S. aureus from the nares of carriers (15). Other reports suggest that lysostaphin is effective in the treatment of bovine mastitis (19), eradication of S. aureus nasal colonization in rodents (11), and treatment of rabbit staphylococcal endophthalmitis (8) and endocarditis (6).

Lysostaphin appears as effective as vancomycin or oxacillin in the treatment of severe MSSA neonatal infection at levels consistently above the MIC. Our MIC is within the range reported for 17 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in rabbits with aortic endocarditis (0.007 to 0.125 µg/ml) (6). More than 95% of the lysostaphin was reported cleared from adult CF-1 mice blood within one hour. However, the 40-mg/kg dose resulted in peak levels of only 0.02 µg/ml. The lysostaphin pharmacokinetics for adults appears different than that for neonates (26).

Adult rats receiving 30 mg/kg of vancomycin subcutaneously had serum levels of 36 µg/ml 1 h after administration (2), those receiving 100 mg/kg of vancomycin intravenously had levels of 179.9 µg/ml and 44.98 µg/ml 0.5 and 2 h after administration, respectively (16), and 25 mg/kg intramuscular of nafcillin resulted in serum levels of 20.6 µg/ml (1). Our pups received 15 mg/kg of vancomycin or 50 mg/kg of oxacillin intraperitoneally, and we speculate they had serum levels substantially greater than the MIC of 0.125 µg/ml.

In vitro lysostaphin was effective against over 50 S. aureus strains independent of phage type, antibiotic resistance, cell wall, or capsule condition (20, 25). Lysostaphin resistance has developed following chronic exposure to low subinhibitory levels in vitro (24) and among oxacillin-resistant S. aureus strains in vitro and in vivo (5). Resistance appears to be due to femA or femB mutations; however, these strains become hypersusceptible to beta-lactam antibiotics (5, 24). Thus, combining lysostaphin with a beta-lactam antibiotic should be investigated further (14). In addition, lysostaphin's ability to disrupt staphylococcal biofilms on plastic (28) may allow prevention or treatment of neonatal infection without removing the device.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported in part by Biosynexus Incorporated, who provided the lysostaphin, lysostaphin antibodies, and a grant to support these experiments.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Baylor College of Medicine and Perinatal Center, Texas Children's Hospital, 6621 Fannin St., FC830.17, Houston, TX 77030-2799. Phone: (832) 824-1387. Fax: (832) 825-2799. E-mail: lweisman{at}bcm.edu Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 9 April 2007. Back

{dagger} Present address: Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Agapitova, I. V., V. I. Bobrov, V. I. Trubnikov, and V. P. Iakovlev. 1984. Penetration of ampicillin and oxacillin into the tissues of rats with aseptic inflammation. Antibiotiki 29:370-373. (In Russian.)[Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Cantoni, L., A. Wenger, M. P. Glauser, and J. Bille. 1989. Comparative efficacy of amoxicillin-clavulanate, cloxacillin, and vancomycin against methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in rats. J. Infect. Dis. 159:989-993.[Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Chambers, H. F. 1997. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10:781-791.[Abstract]
    4. 4
  4. Chapman, R. L., and R. G. Faix. 2003. Persistent bacteremia and outcome in late onset infection among infants in a neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 22:17-21.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Climo, M. W., K. Ehlert, and G. L. Archer. 2001. Mechanism and suppression of lysostaphin resistance in oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1431-1437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Climo, M. W., R. L. Patron, B. P. Goldstein, and G. L. Archer. 1998. Lysostaphin treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus aortic valve endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1355-1360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    7. 7
  7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2005. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 15th informational supplement. M100-S15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
    8. 8
  8. Dajcs, J. J., B. A. Thibodeaux, E. B. Hume, X. Zheng, G. D. Sloop, and R. J. O'Callaghan. 2001. Lysostaphin is effective in treating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis in the rabbit. Curr. Eye Res. 22:451-457.[CrossRef][Medline]
    9. 9
  9. Karchmer, T. B., L. J. Durbin, B. M. Simonton, and B. M. Farr. 2002. Cost-effectiveness of active surveillance cultures and contact/droplet precautions for control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Hosp. Infect. 51:126-132.[CrossRef][Medline]
    10. 10
  10. Kaufman, D., and K. D. Fairchild. 2004. Clinical microbiology of bacterial and fungal sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17:638-680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Kokai-Kun, J. F., S. M. Walsh, T. Chanturiya, and J. J. Mond. 2003. Lysostaphin cream eradicates Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in a cotton rat model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:1589-1597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Kopp, B. J., D. E. Nix, and E. P. Armstrong. 2004. Clinical and economic analysis of methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Ann. Pharmacother. 38:1377-1382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Lodise, T. P., and P. S. McKinnon. 2005. Clinical and economic impact of methicillin resistance in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 52:113-122.[CrossRef][Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Lowy, F. D. 1998. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 339:520-532.[Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Martin, R. R., and A. White. 1967. The selective activity of lysostaphin in vivo. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 70:1-8.[Medline]
    16. 16
  16. Mori, H., T. Nakajima, A. Nakayama, M. Yamori, F. Izushi, and Y. Gomita. 1998. Interaction between levofloxacin and vancomycin in rats—study of serum and organ levels. Chemotherapy 44:181-189.[CrossRef][Medline]
    17. 17
  17. Navarre, W. W., and O. Schneewind. 1999. Surface proteins of gram-positive bacteria and mechanisms of their targeting to the cell wall envelope. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:174-229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. NCCLS/CLSI. 2003. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, 6th ed. M7-A6. NCCLS, Wayne, PA.
    19. 19
  19. Oldham, E. R., and M. J. Daley. 1991. Lysostaphin: use of a recombinant bactericidal enzyme as a mastitis therapeutic. J. Dairy Sci. 74:4175-4182.[Abstract]
    20. 20
  20. Schindler, C. A., and V. T. Schuhardt. 1964. Lysostaphin: a new bacteriolytic agent for the staphylococcus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 51:414-421.[Free Full Text]
    21. 21
  21. Schito, G. C. 2006. The importance of the development of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12(Suppl. 1):3-8.
    22. 22
  22. Stark, F. R., C. Thornsvard, E. P. Flannery, and M. S. Artenstein. 1974. Systemic lysostaphin in man-apparent antimicrobial activity in a neutropenic patient. N. Engl. J. Med. 291:239-240.[Medline]
    23. 23
  23. Stoll, B. J., N. Hansen, A. A. Fanaroff, L. L. Wright, W. A. Carlo, R. A. Ehrenkranz, et al. 2002. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 110:285-291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    24. 24
  24. Stranden, A. M., K. Ehlert, H. Labischinski, and B. Berger-Bachi. 1997. Cell wall monoglycine cross-bridges and methicillin hypersusceptibility in a femAB null mutant of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 179:9-16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    25. 25
  25. Trayer, H. R., and C. E. Buckley III. 1970. Molecular properties of lysostaphin, a bacteriolytic agent specific for Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biol. Chem. 245:4842-4846.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    26. 26
  26. Walsh, S., A. Shah, and J. Mond. 2003. Improved pharmacokinetics and reduced antibody reactivity of lysostaphin conjugated to polyethylene glycol. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:554-558.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    27. 27
  27. Weisman, L. E. 2004. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal disease: emerging therapies for the neonatal and pediatric patient. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 17:237-241.[CrossRef][Medline]
    28. 28
  28. Wu, J. A., C. Kusuma, J. J. Mond, and J. F. Kokai-Kun. 2003. Lysostaphin disrupts Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms on artificial surfaces. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3407-3414.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2007, p. 2198-2200, Vol. 51, No. 6
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00506-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Tan, Y. P., Giffard, P. M., Barry, D. G., Huston, W. M., Turner, M. S. (2008). Random Mutagenesis Identifies Novel Genes Involved in the Secretion of Antimicrobial, Cell Wall-Lytic Enzymes by Lactococcus lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 7490-7496 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kokai-Kun, J. F., Chanturiya, T., Mond, J. J. (2007). Lysostaphin as a treatment for systemic Staphylococcus aureus infection in a mouse model. J Antimicrob Chemother 60: 1051-1059 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oluola, O.
Right arrow Articles by Weisman, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oluola, O.
Right arrow Articles by Weisman, L. E.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»