| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2007, p. 2359-2365, Vol. 51, No. 7
0066-4804/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.01395-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cátedra de Microbiología, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina,1 Cátedra de Microbiología General, Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina,2 Centro de Biología Molecular "Severo Ochoa," Madrid, Spain,3 Centro de Estudios en Antimicrobianos, Martínez, Argentina4
Received 7 November 2006/ Returned for modification 20 December 2006/ Accepted 6 April 2007
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among the members of the PER family, PER-1 (first identified in 1991) (16) has been responsible for the ESBL profiles in clinically important enterobacteria and nonfermenter gram-negative bacilli isolated in different locations around the world: France (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Providencia stuartii) (12, 16, 22, 23), Italy (P. aeruginosa, Alcaligenes faecalis, and P. mirabilis) (17, 18, 20), Turkey (Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, A. baumanii, and P. aeruginosa) (34-37), Belgium (P. aeruginosa) (7), and Korea (A. baumannii) (10, 39).
Recently, the genetic environment of the blaPER-1 gene has been elucidated for different species. In some strains, it is part of composite transposons bracketed by different arrangements of insertion sequences (IS), depending on whether it is chromosome or plasmid borne (13, 22). Although there is clear redundancy in the nomenclature for the same IS elements bracketing blaPER-1, which should be clarified in the future, we will retain both throughout the paper, as their descriptions were almost simultaneous.
Biochemical analysis and the crystal structure of PER-1 have also been reported (3, 16, 20, 33).
On the other hand, although PER-2 was first identified in 1996 from a Salmonella serovar Typhimurium isolate (1), there is evidence for its presence as early as 1989, from P. mirabilis isolated in Argentina, although a different name (ARG-1) was proposed for the enzyme at that time (30a). PER-2, sharing 86% amino acid sequence with PER-1, accounts for 10% and 5% of the oxyimino-cephalosporin-resistant K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolates (26). Since its first report, it has been found in Argentina in other species, such as K. pneumoniae, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter aerogenes, and Vibrio cholerae (14, 19, 21, 26), and in a few locations around the world (6, 29).
PER-2 was circulating as early as 1991 in community-acquired enteropathogenic E. coli isolates coproducing TEM-116 even before being responsible for nosocomial outbreaks in Montevideo (38).
The aim of this study was to determine the biochemical properties of PER-2, including a kinetic characterization, and to analyze the regulation and genetic structures associated with the plasmid-borne blaPER-2.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmid DNA from C. freundii 33587 (pCf587) was extracted by the Hansen-Olsen methodology (9). Plasmid vectors pCR2.1-TOPO (TOPO TA Cloning, Invitrogen) and kanamycin-resistant pET28a(+) (Novagen, Germany) were used for routine cloning experiments and as production vectors.
Antimicrobial susceptibility. MICs were determined by the agar dilution method, following CLSI guidelines (15), using a Steers multipoint inoculator. Detection of ESBLs was performed by a double-disk synergy test, using ampicillin/clavulanate disks (10 plus 10 µg) placed between 30-µg cefotaxime and ceftazidime disks. All the disks were from Britania, Argentina.
Analytical isoelectric focusing. Crude extracts were obtained from overnight cultures in LB supplemented with 100 µg/ml ampicillin and resolved by isoelectric focusing as described previously (30).
PCR screening of the blaPER-2 gene and insertion sequences. The PER-2-encoding gene was amplified using PER-2A and PER-2B primers, and blaPER-1-associated IS elements were screened using specific primers (Table 1). All PCRs were performed using pCf587 (50 ng) as a template, and PCR amplicons were resolved in 1% agarose gels, using commercial standards (1-kb DNA Ladder; MBI-Fermentas, Lithuania).
|
Determination of blaPER-2 flanking sequences. Two strategies were used for studying the blaPER-2 flanking regions. A PCR mapping approach was attempted by combining specific primers for blaPER-2 and the IS, which were detected by PCR screening, in order to assess the gene arrangement. When the blaPER-2 surroundings could not be detected by PCR mapping, a thermal asymmetric interlaced (TAIL)-PCR strategy was followed as described previously (11). TAIL-PCR consisted of three consecutive amplifications using nested primers complementary to blaPER-2, named PER2-DN1, PER2-DN2, and PER2-DN3, and each of the arbitrary degenerate primers (in separate reactions) AD1, AD3, AD6, and OPA-2, which randomly hybridize to adjacent sequences (Table 1). The resulting fragments were resolved in 1% agarose gels, and those above 1 kb were cloned in a pCR2.1-TOPO vector and sequenced, starting with universal primers.
Recombinant DNA methodology. Basic recombinant DNA procedures were carried out as described by Sambrook et al. (31). For cloning blaPER-2, a PCR was performed with pCf587, using 3 U Pfu polymerase (Promega) and 1 µM PER2-FS and PER2-RX primers (Table 1), and the purified amplicon was ligated in a pCR2.1-TOPO vector. The identity of the blaPER-2 gene, as well as the absence of aberrant nucleotides, was checked by double-strand sequencing of the insert using the same primers. The resulting recombinant plasmid (pT2P-C5) was digested with SacI and XhoI, and the released insert was cloned in a pET28a(+) vector. The ligation mixture was used to first transform competent E. coli Top10 F' cells, and after selection of recombinant clones, a second transformation was performed in E. coli BL21(DE3) cells in LB agar plates supplemented with 30 µg/ml kanamycin. Positive recombinant clones were screened by PCR with blaPER-2-specific primers, and the E. coli BLEP281-1 clone (harboring the pEPC281 plasmid) was used for the PER-2 production experiments.
Determination of transcription initiation sites. C. freundii 33587 total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Midi kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. 5' Rapid amplification of cDNA ends reactions were performed with 3.5 µg total RNA and a 5'-RACE system kit (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer's guidelines. cDNA synthesis was primed with PerP1-specific primer; dC-tailing at the cDNA 3' end was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Amplification of target cDNA was performed with tailed cDNA as templates using PerP2 and AAP primers. A nested amplification was carried out using PER2-UP2 or PER2-UP3 and AUAP primers.
DNA sequencing and sequence analyses. DNA sequences were determined in both strands by the automated dideoxy chain termination method of Sanger et al. (32) in an automated sequencer (ABI 3100; Applied Bio-System, Spain). Nucleotide and amino acid sequence analyses were performed with NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and European Bioinformatics Institute (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/) analysis tools.
Production and purification of PER-2. Overnight cultures of recombinant E. coli BLEP281-1 (containing the blaPER-2 gene) were diluted (1/50) in 400 ml LB containing 30 µg/ml kanamycin and grown at 37°C to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.8. In order to induce β-lactamase expression, 1 mM IPTG (isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside) was added, and cultures were grown at 37°C for 3 h. Crude extracts were obtained by freeze-thawing using a dry-ice-ethanol mixture. After centrifugation, clear supernatants containing PER-2 were dialyzed against 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.6, and loaded onto a Q-Sepharose column (XK 16/10; Pharmacia), connected to an ÁKTA-purifier (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with the same buffer. The column was extensively washed to remove unbound proteins, and β-lactamases were eluted with a linear gradient of NaCl (0 to 1 M) in the same buffer. β-Lactamase active fractions (detected by an iodometric system using 500 µg/ml ampicillin as a substrate) were pooled and loaded onto a Sephadex G-100 column (2.0 by 20 cm; Pharmacia-LKB, Sweden) equilibrated with 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.5. Elution was performed with the same buffer, and active fractions were collected. After purification, samples were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using 12% polyacrylamide gels, in order to assess the degree of purification.
Determination of β-lactamase activity. β-Lactamase activity was determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the hydrolysis of 100 µM nitrocefin as a substrate. One unit of β-lactamase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme, determined by the Bio-Rad Protein Assay kit (Bio-Rad), that hydrolyzes 1 µmol of substrate per min (in 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0) at 30°C.
Mass spectrometry. The molecular mass of PER-2 was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, using a C4 Vydac column (30 by 1.0 mm) in an LCQ Duo ESI-Ion Trap (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. [formerly Finnigan], Waltham, MA).
Determination of kinetic parameters. Hydrolysis of β-lactam antibiotics by purified PER-2 was monitored by following the absorbance variation, using a Shimadzu UV-2101 spectrophotometer equipped with thermostatically controlled cells. Reactions were performed in a total volume of 500 µl at 30°C. For good substrates, the steady-state kinetic parameters (Km and kcat) were determined under initial-rate conditions as described previously (2). In cases of low Km values, or for poor substrates and inactivators, apparent Km values were determined as competitive inhibitor constants (Ki) by monitoring the residual activity of the enzyme in the presence of the drug and 100 µM nitrocefin as a reporter substrate, while the kcat for poor substrates was determined by analyzing the complete hydrolysis time courses (8). Tested drugs, along with the wavelengths and extinction coefficients used, were the same as those described previously (24).
Nucleotide sequence accession number. Sequence data were deposited in the GenBank/EMBL nucleotide databases under the accession number AM409516.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The absence of additional bands compatible with AmpC enzymes (basic pI), even when extracts were obtained under induction conditions, is consistent with the unusual behavior of the isolate toward cefoxitin, which could be due to malfunctions in the ampC regulatory system.
PCR screening, sequencing of bla genes and IS elements, and genetic location.
An
900-bp amplicon was obtained by PCR screening with blaPER-2-specific primers from DNA extracts that yielded a large-molecular-size plasmid (pCf587), which was estimated as >54 kb, compared to plasmids of known size (25). DNA sequencing yielded a 927-bp fragment with 100% nucleotide identity with the blaPER-2 gene. By PCR, we were also able to detect a blaTEM gene from the same preparation (data not shown).
After attempting the detection of specific IS elements usually associated with blaPER-1, we obtained compatible amplicons only when ISPa12/IS1387a tnpA (transposase) gene-specific primers were used, suggesting that the other described blaPER-1-associated IS elements are absent in PER-2-producing strains.
We succeeded in transferring pCf587 by conjugation to E. coli CAG12177 host cells. The antimicrobial susceptibility of a selected transconjugant clone (E. coli 33587-TC9) is shown in Table 2. It is noteworthy that β-lactam resistance was cotransferred along with kanamycin, chloramphenicol, and TMS resistance, suggesting that these markers are harbored by the same plasmid.
Plasmid extraction on a transconjugant clone showed the presence of a plasmid having the same electrophoretic mobility as pCf587 from the donor C. freundii isolate. By PCR on a plasmid obtained from the E. coli 33587-TC9 clone, we were able to detect the presence of blaPER-2, as well as associated elements, such as the ISPa12/IS1387a tnpA gene.
These results confirm the plasmid location of both blaPER-2 and associated structures, as well as the ability to be transferred by conjugation, along with other resistance determinants.
blaPER-2 is associated with ISPa12/IS1387a. By a combination of PCR-mapping and TAIL-PCR strategies, we were able to analyze the genetic environment of the blaPER-2 gene.
Figure 1 shows the architecture of the PER-2-encoding gene and neighboring sequences, covering 3,294 bp. The structure is homologous to those associated with plasmid-borne blaPER-1 in Salmonella serovar Typhimurium and A. baumannii isolates (5, 22, 23).
|
Seventy-three nucleotides downstream of blaPER-2 lies a 576-bp open reading frame, gst-like, encoding a hypothetical protein having 51% amino acid identity to a putative glutathione S-transferase from the water microorganisms Alteromonas macleodii and Marinobacter aquaeloei. This gst-like gene is also present in the plasmid-borne blaPER-1 from Salmonella serovar Typhimurium and A. baumannii (22).
A second open reading frame, abct, is located downstream of the gst-like gene in both C. freundii 33587 and some isolates producing plasmid-borne PER-1 (Fig. 1). The deduced amino acid sequence possesses 87% identity with a putative ABC transporter from Shewanella oneidensis. Whether the abct gene is also present in the blaPER-1-harboring structures is not known, due to lack of sequence information far beyond the database entries.
Two transcripts may be involved in blaPER-2 expression. An initial +1 transcription start site was located 227 bp upstream from the blaPER-2 start codon (Fig. 2), embedded within ISPa12/IS1387a. We deduced a –35 consensus sequence (TTCAAA) separated by 17 bp from a –10 box (TAATTT), constituting the blaPER-2 PCf1 promoter (Fig. 2). These elements are homologous to that described for blaPER-1 in different P. aeruginosa isolates (12, 22), differing only in the +1 start site location (112 bp upstream from the blaPER-1 ATG) and the –10 consensus sequence (TAATCT).
|
It was previously suggested that ISPa12/IS1387a could drive expression of plasmid-borne blaPER-1 genes in Salmonella serovar Typhimurium and P. aeruginosa strains, provided the respective PSt and PPa promoters are part of the insertion sequence (22). Therefore, although speculative, a putative second promoter (PCf2) could enhance blaPER-2 expression independently of ISPa12/IS1387a.
Kinetic analysis of PER-2 revealed high oxyimino-cephalosporinase activity. A total of 9.7 mg (498.5 mU) of highly pure PER-2 β-lactamase was obtained by fast-protein liquid chromatography-based chromatography, with a final yield of 31%. The experimental molecular mass of PER-2 obtained by mass spectrometry was 30,780 Da, in good agreement with the theoretical mass (30,769 Da), and the predicted signal peptide was 26 amino acids long.
The main kinetic parameters of PER-2 are shown in Table 3. According to its extended-spectrum activity, PER-2 showed high catalytic efficiencies (kcat/Km) toward most of the tested antibiotics, generally characterized by low Km and high kcat values. Notably, the hydrolytic behavior with both tested oxyimino-cephalosporins was characterized by a sevenfold-higher affinity toward cefotaxime, which is nevertheless contrasted by a turnover constant (kcat) fourfold higher for ceftazidime, resulting in similar catalytic efficiencies and therefore phenotypic high-level resistance to both antibiotics.
|
The most poorly hydrolyzed antibiotics were cefoxitin, cefepime, and imipenem. On the other hand, PER-2 was strongly inhibited by lithium clavulanate and tazobactam, displaying 50% inhibitory concentrations of 0.068 and 0.096 µM, respectively.
Conclusions.
Considering the amino acid identity (82%), it is noteworthy that the highly conserved conformational structures of both PER-1 and PER-2 are observed in three-dimensional models (data not shown). It was demonstrated that PER-1 and other related β-lactamases possess a new fold in the
loop and an insertion of four residues at strand S3 compared to other class A enzymes, which generate a broader cavity and allow the accommodation of the bulky substituents of oxyimino-cephalosporins and a more efficient hydrolysis of these drugs (33). In addition, a modification at position 242 in PER-1, which represents the counterpart of the Glu240 residue in TEM or SHV β-lactamases, does not seem to result in changes in its kinetic properties, as does occur in TEM/SHV (3). On the other hand, PER-2 displays an amino acid shift at position 242 (Lys242Arg), and we observed some discrepancies in kinetic behavior between PER-2 and PER-1 (see above). If the above hypothesis is correct, then we can assume that other amino acid modifications are probably responsible for the differences in their kinetic properties.
The presence of similar structures upstream of blaPER genes suggests a common history of recruitment and mobilization. However, differences in the lengths of tnpA-blaPER intergenic regions are probably evidence of the presence of diverse target sequences used for the insertion of ISPa12/IS1387a.
Transcription of the blaPER-2 gene seems to be directed at least by a promoter embedded in the ISPa12/IS1387a upstream element. A second putative transcription site origin outside the IS backbone could probably also be implicated in the expression of blaPER-2, although the real biological role of this promoter is not known.
The presence of blaPER-2 in a conjugative plasmid explains the prevalence of PER-2 in Argentina and neighboring countries (26, 38). It is noteworthy that only PER-1 has been found outside South America. At least two opposing alternatives can account for these results, the first being that primers used for detection of PER-related enzymes are usually based on blaPER-1, explaining the possibilities for being underestimated; the second would be to consider that blaPER-1 association with ISPa13/IS1387b (absent in our case) or different plasmid backgrounds could be driving its dissemination. The coincidence of the isoelectric points (pI 5.4) could have made it difficult to differentiate it from most TEM-derived ESBLs.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank A. Ferrari from the Cátedra de Inmunología, FFyB-UBA, and G. Ferraro from the Cátedra de Farmacognosia, FFyB-UBA, for their collaboration in PER-2 purification and utilization of the spectrophotometer, respectively.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 16 April 2007. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |