| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2008, p. 348-350, Vol. 52, No. 1
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00779-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology for Infectious Agents, Kitasato Institute for Life Sciences, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan,1 National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan,2 Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Miyagi, Japan,3 Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, Kitasato Institute for Life Sciences, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan4
Received 18 June 2007/ Returned for modification 10 August 2007/ Accepted 12 October 2007
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| TEXT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We subjected M. pneumoniae isolated from pediatric patients with CAP between 2002 and 2006 to susceptibility evaluation for eight agents, including ML. In strains showing ML resistance, the 23S rRNA gene was analyzed.
Between April 2002 and December 2006, 3,678 clinical samples were sent to our laboratory from pediatricians affiliated with 10 institutions participating in the Acute Respiratory Diseases Study Group. All samples originating from pediatric patients diagnosed with pneumonia according to clinical symptoms and chest X-ray images were collected after informed consent was given by the patients and/or their parents or guardians.
Immediately after receipt, the samples were suspended in 1.5 ml of pleuropneumonia-like organism (PPLO) broth (Difco, Detroit, MI). DNA then was extracted by using Extragen II (Tosoh, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Real-time PCR to detect M. pneumoniae was performed as described previously (2) using the extracted DNA. Culture of M. pneumoniae was carried out for PCR-positive samples using PPLO broth according to previously described methods (6).
The MICs of eight agents for M. pneumoniae isolates were determined with microdilution methods using PPLO broth. These agents were erythromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, josamycin, rokitamycin, telithromycin, minocycline, and levofloxacin. M. pneumoniae M129 strain was used as a control.
The full length of the 23S rRNA gene was sequenced by methods described previously (3) in 55 M. pneumoniae strains showing ML resistance.
For patients with adequate clinical information, clinical courses of CAP caused by MLr M. pneumoniae (n = 53) were compared to those of CAP with ML-susceptible (MLs) M. pneumoniae (n = 58). Variables compared included (i) the number of days from initiation of ML treatment until defervescence to 37°C and (ii) whether or not initial treatment with ML was changed later to another agent. Body temperature that exceeded 38°C at least once daily was defined as ongoing fever.
Table 1 shows the numbers of real-time PCR-positive samples for M. pneumoniae among samples tested from April 2002 to December 2006 (approximately 5 years). A total of 3,678 nasopharyngeal samples were collected from pediatric patients with CAP. Culture for M. pneumoniae using PPLO broth was performed in the 521 samples PCR positive for M. pneumoniae; 380 strains were isolated. In 2003 and 2006, M. pneumoniae infection was particularly prevalent in Japan, reflected by the occurrence of more PCR-positive cases and M. pneumoniae isolates than in other years. The percentages of culture positivity for M. pneumoniae in PCR-positive samples ranged from 66.7 to 85.7% during the 5-year period.
|
|
|
In our laboratory, MLr M. pneumoniae first was isolated from a patient with acute bronchitis in 2002 (3) and then began to be isolated from CAP cases in 2003. In parallel with the prevalence of M. pneumoniae infection, the prevalence of MLr isolates have increased rapidly, attaining a 30.6% prevalence in 2006.
A question might be posed as to whether MLr M. pneumoniae represents a serious clinical therapeutic issue, since M. pneumoniae infection typically produces mild symptoms that spontaneously diminish, with ultimate recovery. However, in CAP patients infected with MLr strains, ML frequently was changed to minocycline or levofloxacin because of persistent fever and cough or nonresolution or worsening of chest X-ray abnormalities. Levofloxacin and minocycline are not ordinarily recommended for children. Only in cases where other antibiotics cannot be used or are ineffective against organisms is the use of these antibiotics approved by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. If ML are ineffective against M. pneumoniae infection, pediatricians have little choice but to use minocycline. In the future, improvement or augmentation of treatment for patients with MLr M. pneumoniae infections should be considered promptly, including symptomatic measures such as steroid therapy.
In addition to affecting children, M. pneumoniae is a common pathogen among young adults with CAP (1, 6). No MLr M. pneumoniae was observed among 30 isolates from adult patients with CAP. Although the absence of resistant isolates is unexplained, the wide use of new quinolone agents for adult patients with acute respiratory tract infections may have contributed to this finding. Nonetheless, oral ML treatment still is a common choice for adult patients, amounting to 25% or more compared to ca. 24% for quinolones. In this population, MLr M. pneumoniae strains may also ultimately emerge and become more prevalent.
Based upon our results, we recommend increased worldwide surveillance for MLr M. pneumoniae and stress the need to establish the most appropriate chemotherapy against those infections.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This study was supported by a grant from Kawano Masanori Memorial Foundation for the Promotion of Pediatrics.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Published ahead of print on 22 October 2007. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |