Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2008, p. 3484-3491, Vol. 52, No. 10
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00344-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Limited Inhibitory Effects of Oseltamivir and Zanamivir on Human Sialidases
Keiko Hata,1,2
Koichi Koseki,1,2
Kazunori Yamaguchi,1,2
Setsuko Moriya,1,2
Yasuo Suzuki,2,3,4
Sangchai Yingsakmongkon,3
Go Hirai,5
Mikiko Sodeoka,5
Mark von Itzstein,6 and
Taeko Miyagi1,2*
Division of Biochemistry, Miyagi Cancer Center Research Institute, Natori, Miyagi 981-1293,1
CREST, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Kawaguchi-shi, Saitama,2
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Life and Health Sciences, Chubu University, Kasugai, Aichi 487-8501,3
Global COE Program for Innovation in Human Health Sciences, Yada, Shizuoka 422-8526,4
Synthetic Organic Chemistry Laboratory, RIKEN, Hirosawa, Wako 351-0198, Japan,5
Institute for Glycomics, Griffith University (Gold Coast Campus), PMB 50 Gold Coast Mail Centre, Queensland 9726, Australia6
Received 11 March 2008/
Returned for modification 30 May 2008/
Accepted 31 July 2008

ABSTRACT
Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza), two extensively
used clinically effective anti-influenza drugs, are viral sialidase
(also known as neuraminidase) inhibitors that prevent the release
of progeny virions and thereby limit the spread of infection.
Recently mortalities and neuropsychiatric events have been reported
with the use of oseltamivir, especially in pediatric cases in
Japan, suggesting that these drugs might also inhibit endogenous
enzymes involved in sialic acid metabolism, including sialidase,
sialyltransferase, and CMP-synthase, in addition to their inhibitory
effects on the viral sialidase. The possible inhibition could
account for some of the rare side effects of oseltamivir. However,
there has been little direct evidence in regard to the sensitivities
of animal sialidases to these drugs. Here, we examined whether
these inhibitors might indeed affect the activities of human
sialidases, which differ in primary structures and enzyme properties
but possess tertiary structures similar to those of the viral
enzymes. Using recombinant enzymes corresponding to the four
human sialidases identified so far, we found that oseltamivir
carboxylate scarcely affected the activities of any of the sialidases,
even at 1 mM, while zanamivir significantly inhibited the human
sialidases NEU3 and NEU2 in the micromolar range (
Ki, 3.7 ±
0.48 and 12.9 ± 0.07 µM, respectively), providing
a contrast to the low nanomolar concentrations at which these
drugs block the activity of the viral sialidases.

INTRODUCTION
The continuing threat of an influenza pandemic is a serious
worldwide concern. For the prevention of influenza, potent and
selective anti-influenza drugs have been developed. The currently
approved agents include inhibitors of the virus sialidase (
8,
25). Viral sialidases are membrane components that destroy the
sialic acid-containing receptors on the surfaces of infected
cells and are thus involved in the release of newly budded virions
from the host cell surface to begin a new round of infection.
They may thus play key roles in the spread of the viral infection
together with another viral surface glycoprotein, hemagglutinin,
involved in the binding of the virus particles to receptors
on the host cells. Studies of the crystal structures of some
of the viral sialidases have facilitated the rational designing
of sialidase inhibitors; the two potent inhibitors, oseltamivir
(Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza), are sialic acid analogues
that interact with the active sites on the enzymes. Oseltamivir
is a prodrug that is metabolized to its active form, oseltamivir
carboxylate, after oral administration, while zanamivir is designed
for delivery by inhalation. Recently mortalities and neuropsychiatric
events have been reported with the use of oseltamivir, especially
in pediatric cases in Japan (
1,
2,
6,
9,
12). With the drug
prescribed frequently for the treatment of influenza in Japan
and its consumption accounting for more than 70% of that around
the world, Tamiflu has been suspected to cause abnormal behavior
and deaths in Japan, particularly in teenagers, although no
statistically significant relationship has been established
up to the present. Since both of the drugs are targeted against
the viral sialidase, the question has arisen as to whether they
may also affect the activities of the endogenous sialidases
in humans. In fact, there have been a number of observations
(
5,
10,
18,
29) pointing to the inhibitory effects of oseltamivir
on the endogenous sialidases in rats and mice; however, the
question remains open, because direct validation of these findings
remains limited to one recent report (
11) of the effect of the
drug against a recombinant sialidase. Under these circumstances,
we were prompted to investigate the effects of these drugs on
the activities of endogenous human sialidases.
Up to now, four types of human sialidases have been identified and characterized, designated NEU1, NEU2, NEU3, and NEU4 (15). They differ in their subcellular localization and enzymatic properties and in the chromosomal localization of the genes encoding them; the enzymes are expressed in a tissue-specific manner. The major subcellular localizations of NEU1, NEU2, and NEU3 are the lysosomes, cytosol, and plasma membranes, respectively, while NEU4 is localized in the lysosomal lumina or mitochondria and intracellular membranes. We previously discovered (14) that the primary structure of rat cytosolic sialidase, the first example of mammalian sialidase, contain several Asp boxes (-Ser-X-Asp-X-Gly-X-Thr-Trp-) and the Arg-Ile-Pro sequence, the conserved sequences found in sialidases from microorganisms (22), despite having no particular similarity to those sialidases. The sequence alignment of other mammalian sialidases successively cloned revealed that they all contain the conserved sequences. A recent study of the crystal structure of human recombinant NEU2 (3) has provided further evidence of a canonical six-blade beta-propeller structure, as observed for viral sialidases, with the active site in a shallow crevice, but there are some differences from viral and bacterial sialidases in amino acid residues recognizing the N-acetyl and glycerol moieties of 2-deoxy-2,3-dehydro-N-acetylneuraminic acid (NeuAc2en). The lysosomal sialidase NEU1 acts effectively on oligosaccharides, glycopeptides, and a synthetic substrate, 4-methylumbelliferyl N-acetylneuraminic acid (4MU-NeuAc), and NEU3 is a plasma membrane-associated sialidase that almost specifically hydrolyzes gangliosides, while the other two enzymes possess broad substrate specificity, acting on oligosaccharides, glycopeptides, glycoproteins, and gangliosides, as well as on 4MU-NeuAc. Maximal activities are obtained at a pH of about 4.6 for NEU1, NEU3, and NEU4 and at pH 5.5 to 6.5 for NEU2. Sialidases of mammalian origin not only have been implicated in lysosomal catabolism, playing a role as general glycosidases, but are also believed to play roles in the modulation of functional molecules involved in many biological processes, whereas the roles of the sialidases from microorganisms appear to be limited to nutrition and pathogenicity (4). Although many functional aspects of the mammalian sialidases are not fully understood, partly due to the enzyme instability and low activity, recent developments in sialidase research have clarified their important biological roles, including their roles in events involved in cell differentiation, cell growth and apoptosis, and malignant transformation (16).
As described above, human sialidases, while differing from the viral enzymes in their primary structures and enzyme properties, show tertiary structures and active-site amino acids similar to those of the viral sialidases. Therefore, in this study, we examined whether the antiviral drugs might have effects on any of the four types of human recombinant sialidases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell culture and sialidase transfection.
Human kidney 293T cells (Riken BRC Cell Bank, Tsukuba, Japan)
were maintained in minimal essential medium supplemented with
nonessential amino acids and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine
serum. Eukaryote expression vectors for NEU1, NEU3, and NEU4
were prepared by inserting the respective human sialidase cDNAs
covering the open reading frames (
11,
28,
30) with the FLAG
epitope at the C termini into the EcoRI site of the pCAGGS vector
(a generous gift from Jun-ichi Miyazaki, Osaka University School
of Medicine) under the control of the chicken β-actin promoter.
To obtain the NEU2 cDNA, the first-strand cDNAs were synthesized from poly(A)+ RNA from human brain (Clontech) using oligo(dT)12-18 primers and murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (SuperscriptII reverse transcriptase; Invitrogen) and applied as templates for the PCR described previously (30). To cover the entire coding sequence, the cDNA was amplified with the two primer pairs with EcoRI sites (5'-ATGGCGTCCCTTCCTGTCCTG-3', forward, and 5'-TCACTGAGGCAGGTACTCAGC-3') using LA Taq polymerase (Takara), subcloned into pBluescript, sequenced, and cloned into the expression vector.
Transient DNA transfection into the HK-293T cells was accomplished using the Effectene reagent (Qiagen) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. After 48 h of transfection, the cells were collected and homogenized, and the homogenates were used as the enzyme sources or for further purification. For the NEU1 enzyme, a cDNA for a protective protein (carboxypeptidase A), which is known to be associated with the NEU1 protein (13) and β-galactosidase as a complex in the lysosomes to maintain the sialidase activity (7), was cotransfected.
Quantitative analysis of transcripts of human sialidases by real-time PCR.
Quantitative analysis of the transcripts for human sialidases was performed by real-time PCR using the LightCycler rapid thermal cycler system (Roche). The first-strand cDNAs were synthesized from poly(A)+ RNAs from human lung and brain (Clontech) using random primers and murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (SuperscriptII) and applied as templates for the PCR. The PCRs were carried out in glass capillary reaction vessels (Roche) in 20-µl volume reaction mixtures containing 0.5 µM primers, cDNA, and QuantiTect SYBR green PCR master mix (Qiagen) using porphobilinogen deaminase as an internal control. A standard curve for each cDNA was generated by seal dilution of the pBluescript vector containing the gene encoding the entire open reading frame, as described previously (30).
Preparation and purification of the recombinant sialidases.
The cells (2 x 107 to 5 x 107) transfected with FLAG-tagged sialidase cDNA as described above were collected, washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and sonicated on ice in 9 volumes of ice-cold lysis buffer. The lysates were centrifuged at 1,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C, and the resultant supernatants (homogenates) were then used for measurement of the sialidase activity or for further purification. The lysis buffer A for NEU1 and NEU2 contained 20 mM potassium phosphate (pH 6.8), 0.15 M NaCl, 1 mM phenymethylsulfonyl fluoride, and protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), and the lysis buffer B for NEU3 and NEU4 was buffer A containing 1 mM EDTA and 1% Triton X-100. Purification of the recombinant sialidase proteins was performed using FLAG tag affinity chromatography as follows: NEU2 was purified from the cytosolic fraction after centrifugation of the homogenates at 100,000 x g for 1 h, followed by affinity chromatography. The cytosolic fraction of the cells was applied to an anti-FLAG M2 agarose column (1 ml) (Sigma), washed with 20 ml of lysis buffer A and successively with 10 ml of the buffer containing 1 M NaCl, and eluted with buffer A containing the FLAG peptides (100 µg/ml) and 10% glycerol. For NEU3 purification, the solubilized fraction after centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 15 min was applied to the column and then washed with buffer B containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (buffer C), followed by buffer containing 1 M NaCl, and then eluted with buffer C plus FLAG peptides and 10% glycerol.
Sialidase activity assays.
The homogenates or purified fractions obtained above were used for measurement of sialidase activity using the synthetic substrate 4MU-NeuAc or ganglioside GM3 (NeuAc
2-3Galβ1-4Glcβ1-1Cer) (Alexis Biochemicals). The activities for NEU1, NEU2, and NEU4 were measured routinely in 0.1 ml of a reaction mixture containing 10 µmol sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.6 for NEU1 and NEU4; pH 5.5 for NEU2), 40 nmol 4MU-NeuAc, 0.1 mg bovine serum albumin, and enzyme. After incubation for 15 to 30 min at 37°C, the 4-methylumbelliferone released was determined fluorometrically (14). The reaction mixture for NEU3 activity contained 5 µmol sodium acetate buffer (pH 4.5), 10 nmol gangliosides GM3, 50 µg Triton X-100, 50 µg bovine serum albumin, and enzyme in 50 µl and was incubated for 20 to 30 min at 37°C. The sialic acids released from GM3 were measured by fluorometric high-performance liquid chromatography with malononitrile (27). Occasionally, NEU4 activity was also assayed with GM3 as the substrate in the same manner. Protein concentrations were determined by dye-binding assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories). One unit was defined as the amount of enzyme cleaving 1 nmol of sialic acid/h.
TLC.
After 48 h of transfection, the cells were cultured in serum-depleted medium for 5 h, followed by treatment of each drug for a further 5 h, and the cells were collected and subjected to thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Glycolipids were extracted from the cells (1 x 107) in sequence with 2 ml of isopropanol-hexane-water (55:25:20 [vol/vol/vol]) and hydrolyzed with 0.1 M NaOH-methanol. After desalting was done using a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge, total lipid extracts were fractionated by TLC on high-performance TLC plates (Baker, Phillipsburg, NJ) in C-M-0.5% CaCl2 (60:40:9 [vol/vol/vol]) and visualized with orcinol-H2SO4. Densitometric analyses were performed using the Scion Image (Scion Corp., Frederick, MD) and Quantity One (Bio-Rad Laboratories) software programs.
Lectin blotting.
To observe the changes in the amounts of the endogenous glycoproteins, lectin blot analysis was conducted with peanut agglutinin (PNA) and Ricinus communis agglutinin (RCA) (Honen, Tokyo, Japan). After 48 h of transfection, the cells were cultured in serum-depleted medium for 5 h, followed by treatment of each drug for a further 5 h, and the cells collected were subjected to lectin blotting. Cell homogenates were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The blots were washed in a solution containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20 and incubated with the solution containing biotinylated lectins. After washing, the lectin-bound glycoproteins were visualized with horseradish peroxidase-streptavidin (Vector, Burlingame, CA).
Inhibition assay of influenza virus sialidase activity.
Inhibitory activity against the influenza sialidase activity was assessed using a fluorometric method with slight modification (21). Influenza viruses from human and animal isolates were propagated in allantoic cavities of 11-day-old chicken eggs for 48 h at 35°C and purified by sucrose density gradient centrifugation as described previously (24). To obtain an appropriate virus concentration for use in the assay, the sialidase activity of each virus was first determined in a total volume of 10 µl containing 10 mM acetate buffer (pH 6.0), 80 µM 4MU-NeuAc substrate, and various concentrations of influenza virus solution. After incubation for 30 min at 37°C, the reaction was stopped and 100 µl of the solution was transferred to a 96-well black plastic plate, and the fluorescence was monitored. For the inhibition assay, 4 µl of each dilution of each inhibitor was preincubated with 4 µl of influenza virus solution for 1 h at 4°C before the addition of 2 µl of 400 µM 4MU-NeuAc substrate in 10 mM acetate buffer (pH 6.0) to begin the reaction.

RESULTS
Inhibition assays of human sialidase activities for oseltamivir and zanamivir.
Our previous results from quantitative real-time PCR indicated
that the expressions of NEU1, NEU3, and NEU4 are readily detectable
but expression of NEU2 is hardly detectable in human tissues
(
30). To determine whether NEU2 is actually expressed in humans,
we attempted to clone the cDNA, because NEU2 has been characterized
only using a genomic clone constructed by ligation of two genomic
fragment sequences (
17). A NEU2 cDNA clone was obtained from
a cDNA synthesized from poly(A)
+ RNA from the human brain as
the template by PCR and was employed for preparation of the
NEU2 enzyme protein. Consistent with our previous data, the
expression levels of four sialidases were found to be markedly
different. The endogenous levels of four sialidases were compared
with one another as they were measured quantitatively using
standard curves of respective cDNAs; those from the brain and
lung are shown in Fig.
1. NEU1, known as a target gene for sialidosis,
was expressed at the highest level, followed by NEU3 and NEU4,
which were generally expressed at 1/10 or 1/20 of the level
of NEU1. Expression of NEU2 was observed at extremely low levels,
being at most only 1/4,000 to 1/10,000 that of NEU1 in several
tissues.
To obtain preparations of all four enzymes, we transiently transfected
the respective expression plasmids into 293T cells. The cell
homogenates and the enzymes, highly purified by FLAG peptide
elution through FLAG affinity chromatography (Fig.
2A), were
assayed for sialidase activity in the presence of oseltamivir
phosphate, oseltamivir carboxylate (Toronto Research Chemicals
Inc., ON, Canada), or zanamivir (
26). Considering the substrate
specificity, the substrates exogenously added routinely were
4MU-NeuAc for NEU1, NEU2, and NEU4 and the ganglioside GM3 for
NEU3, because the former three can preferentially hydrolyze
4MU-NeuAc and NEU3 acts almost specifically on gangliosides
(
15). Due to the broad specificity of NEU4, the activity was
also assayed here with GM3 and 4MU-NeuAc to exclude the effects
of differences in the substrate. After 15 to 30 min of incubation,
the released 4MU and sialic acids were determined using a fluorometer
and using fluorometric high-performance liquid chromatography,
respectively. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC
50) of each
compound was calculated by plotting the decrease in activity
against the log of the agent concentration. Oseltamivir phosphate
did not affect any of the human sialidases (data not shown),
since the prodrug osetamivir is expected to be ineffective in
vitro, and oseltamivir carboxylate also showed no appreciable
inhibition of the sialidases even at the concentration of 1
mM (Table
1). Only the activity of NEU2 appeared to be inhibited,
but with a very high IC
50. In contrast, oseltamivir carboxylate
was fully active against the influenza virus sialidases, with
IC
50s in the nanomolar range under the conditions described
in Materials and Methods. In addition, a nonselective sialidase
inhibitor, NeuAc2en, showed clear inhibition in the micromolar
range. While zanamivir did cause substantial inhibition of the
human sialidases, the effects were much less marked than those
in testing against the viral enzymes. NEU2 and NEU3 seemed to
be more susceptible than the other two sialidases to zanamivir.
Interestingly, the IC
50 was the lowest for NEU3, which is expressed
abundantly in the brain and is colocalized in the plasma membrane
with its substrate gangliosides. The
Km and
Ki values of the
compounds for human sialidases were then compared using the
homogenates (Table
2). Zanamivir was less inhibitory against
NEU1 and NEU4, with
Ki values approximately 300- and 20-fold
higher, respectively, than against NEU3. On the other hand,
the
Ki value of oseltamivir carboxylate for NEU2 was much higher
than that of zanamivir. To confirm these results, NEU2 and NEU3,
which were found in this experiment to be a little more sensitive
to the drugs than the other enzymes, were then purified by FLAG
tag affinity chromatography. The final enzyme fractions were
determined to be apparently homogeneous by SDS-PAGE (Fig.
2A).
The specific activities of the purified fractions were 1,906
± 659 U/µg protein for NEU2 and 934 ± 183
U/µg protein for NEU3. The
Kcat values calculated were
22.92 ± 8.0/s for NEU2 and 13.0 ± 2.4/s for NEU3.
The
Ki values of oseltamivir carboxylate and zanamivir for purified
NEU2 were 8,373 ± 1,491 and 11.2 ± 0.89 µM,
respectively, and the
Km toward 4MU-NeuAc was 1,865 ±
285 µM. For NEU3, the
Ki of zanamivir was 5.12 ±
1.12 µM and the
Km 99.4 ± 15.2 mM with the GM3
substrate. These values are similar to those obtained with the
homogenates as the enzyme sources, as shown in Table
2. The
enzymes were assayed with increasing concentrations of substrates
in the presence or absence of the drugs, and the kinetic data
indicated the drug to be a competitive inhibitor, as expected.
It should be noted that the
Ki value of oseltamivir carboxylate
for NEU2 was much greater in this study (8,373 ± 1,491
µM) than that (432 µM) reported by Li et al. (
11).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1. IC50s of oseltamivir carboxylate, zanamivir, and NeuAc2en for activities of human and influenza virus sialidasesa
|
Effects of oseltamivir and zanamivir on desialylation of endogenous substrates in cells.
In addition to the inhibition test with an exogenously added
substrate in the assay tube described above, we examined whether
desialylation of endogenous substrates by NEU2 or NEU3 was blocked
in the presence of these drugs in the cell culture. The homogenates
of sialidase transfected and mock-transfected cells were subjected
to lectin blotting or TLC to analyze the changes in the amounts
of glycoproteins or gangliosides, respectively. As shown in
Fig.
3, the significant changes were observed in the transfected
cells compared with those in the control cells. A marked increase
in several bands of RCA and PNA lectins, recognizing Gal-GlcNAc
and Gal-GalNAc, respectively, was observed in the NEU2-transfected
cells. Considering that the increase in the intensities of the
glycoprotein bands occurred as a result of hydrolysis by the
transfected sialidase, it is in agreement with substrate preference
of NEU2. However, no significant changes were observed in the
intensities of the corresponding protein bands (Fig.
3A), either
after the addition of oseltamivir phosphate or after the addition
of oseltamivir carboxylate at a concentration of 500 µM,
as expected from the results of the activity assays. Although
zanamivir at this concentration was effective in the activity
assays, as shown in Tables
1 and
2, the drug did not seem to
inhibit NEU2-mediated hydrolysis of endogenous glycoproteins.
This may not be contradictory, because the activity of the drug
is known to be extracellular and the drug does not undergo metabolism.
In line with the substrate preference of NEU3 for gangliosides,
the glycolipid patterns were altered by NEU3 transfection, especially
in a marked decrease in GM3 amounts compared with that in the
mock-transfected cells (Fig.
3B). The reduction in the GM3 hydrolyzing
activity was scarcely detected in treatment with oseltamivir
phosphate nor in that with oseltamivir carboxylate, while zanamivir
significantly abrogated GM3 reduction by the NEU3 enzyme. The
zanamivir effects may be reasonable, because NEU3 is localized
in cell surface membranes. The cells did not show any morphological
changes after the addition of these drugs to the culture. These
results suggest that oseltamivir at this concentration inhibits
neither the hydrolytic reactions of the sialidases inside the
cells nor the sialidase activity following exogenous addition
of substrates.

DISCUSSION
In the present study, we explored the inhibitory effects of
oseltamivir and zanamivir on four human sialidases using their
recombinant proteins. The effects were examined by two methods,
namely, measurement of the inhibitory activity in sialidase
activity assays and estimation of the reduced desialylation
of endogenous glycoprotein and glycolipid substrates inside
the cells. Recent observations have suggested a possible inhibitory
potential of oseltamivir against endogenous sialidases. In mice,
the drug decreased the GM1 of activated CD8
+ T cells infected
with a respiratory syncytial virus (
18) and also blocked GM1-mediated
opioid hyperalgesia induced by low doses of morphine (
5). In
rats, it exhibited neuroexcitatory effects, especially under
conditions of simultaneous administration of ethanol (
10). With
these animal models, however, no direct inhibitory effects of
the drugs on endogenous sialidases could be shown. We do not
yet know the molecular mechanisms underlying these phenomena
at present, but our data suggest that they may not be the direct
consequences of sialidase inhibition. Decreased GM1 may not
always be due to sialidase inhibition and may also involve other
processes, such as disturbance of the ganglioside synthetic
pathway. In a report on the effects of the drugs on the sialidases
of PC12 cells, Tamiflu was found to inhibit the sialidase activity
induced by nerve growth factor-dependent Trk receptor activation
(
29). Although we tried to examine the inhibitory effects under
the same experimental conditions and confirmed induction of
sialidase activity toward 4MU-NeuAc in a nerve growth factor-dependent
manner, we were not able to detect any inhibition of the activity
in the cells at a Tamiflu dose of 1 mM. This ineffectiveness
of Tamiflu is probably due to the absence or low expression
of carboxyesterase 1 (
23) and P-glycoprotein (
19) in the cells,
which are involved in activation and transport of the prodrug
osetamivir, respectively. Studies using recombinant NEU2 sialidase
(
11) have shown that a variant with a nonsynonymous single nucleotide
polymorphism frequently observed in some Asian populations is
associated with lower sialidase activity and higher sensitivity
to oseltamivir than the wild-type enzyme. This is of particular
interest in the context of the frequent occurrence of abnormal
behavior and deaths associated with Tamiflu use in Japan. However,
in addition to the extremely low expression of NEU2 in human
tissues, including the brain, as shown in Fig.
1, our present
data demonstrate that very high concentrations of oseltamivir
carboxylate are needed to inhibit the sialidase activity, which
is 14- to 20-fold higher than the concentration reported by
Li et al. (
11). The other sialidases were not susceptible to
the drug, even in the millimolar range, despite the drug inhibiting
viral sialidases in the nanomolar range. In contrast, zanamivir
inhibited NEU3 at micromolar levels. In consistency with this,
Nan et al. (
20) reported that less than 1 mM zanamivir inhibited
the endogenous sialidase activity of human T lymphocytes, although
no information is available with regard to the type of sialidase
involved in this phenomenon.
Taken together, the data indicate that oseltamivir carboxylate does not significantly inhibit constitutively expressed NEU1, NEU3, or NEU4 human sialidases while zanamivir exhibits inhibitory effects in the micromolar range against NEU3 as the most sensitive form. We cannot arrive at any firm conclusions at present regarding the potential association between Tamiflu and the abnormal behavior and deaths reported among Japanese teenagers with influenza virus infection treated with the drug, but our results do indicate that the drug might not exert any direct effects on the ganglioside-specific plasma membrane-associated sialidase NEU3, expressed abundantly in the brain. The present results were obtained with only recombinant enzymes, and we also need to stress that the observed effects might not directly reflect the effects that might be observed under physiological conditions inside the cells. Since the plasma concentration of oseltamivir carboxylate is reported to be 1.2 µM following oral administration of the 75-mg capsule twice daily to patients (http://www.rocheusa.com/products/tamiflu/), endogenous sialidase is unlikely to be a direct target molecule. In the case of zanamivir, the plasma concentration is observed to be 0.05 to 0.43 µM within 1 to 2 h following administration of a 10-mg dose (http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_relenza.pdf). Our results also suggest negligible effects, although it should be borne in mind that the concentration in the respiratory tract after inhalation may be much higher than that achieved in the blood. In conclusion, it may be desirable to examine newly discovered drugs targeting viral sialidases for their effects on endogenous human sialidases, in order to minimize potential side effects in patients.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Biochemistry, Miyagi Cancer Center Research Institute, Natori 981-1293, Japan. Phone: 81-22-384-3151. Fax: 81-22-381-1195. E-mail:
miyagi-ta173{at}pref.miyagi.jp 
Published ahead of print on 11 August 2008. 

REFERENCES
1 - Anonymous. 2007. New concerns about oseltamivir. Lancet 369:1056.[Medline]
2 - Anonymous. 2007. Japan's health ministry calls for tests on Tamiflu. Nature 447:626-627.[CrossRef]
3 - Chavas, L. M., C. Tringali, P. Fusi, B. Venerando, G. Tettamanti, R. Kato, E. Monti, and S. Wakatsuki. 2005. Crystal structure of the human cytosolic sialidase Neu2. Evidence for the dynamic nature of substrate recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 280:469-475.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Corfield, T. 1992. Bacterial sialidases—roles in pathogenicity and nutrition. Glycobiology 2:509-521.[Free Full Text]
5 - Crain, S. M., and K. F. Shen. 2004. Neuraminidase inhibitor, oseltamivir blocks GM1 ganglioside-regulated excitatory opioid receptor-mediated hyperalgesia, enhances opioid analgesia and attenuates tolerance in mice. Brain Res. 995:260-266.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Fuyuno, I. 2007. Tamiflu side effects come under scrutiny. Nature 446:358-359.
7 - Galjart, N. J., N. Gillemans, A. Harris, G. T. van der Horst, F. W. Verheijen, and A. d'Azzo. 1988. Expression of cDNA encoding the human "protective protein" associated with lysosomal beta-galactosidase and neuraminidase: homology to yeast proteases. Cell 54:755-764.[CrossRef][Medline]
8 - Gubareva, L. V., L. Kaiser, and F. G. Hayden. 2000. Influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitors. Lancet 355:827-835.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Hama, R. 2007. Fifty sudden deaths may be related to central suppression. BMJ 335:59.[Free Full Text]
10 - Izumi, Y., K. Tokuda, K. A. O'Dell, C. F. Zorumski, and T. Narahashi. 2007. Neuroexcitatory actions of Tamiflu and its carboxylate metabolite. Neurosci. Lett. 426:54-58.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Li, C. Y., Q. Yu, Z. Q. Ye, Y. Sun, Q. He, X. M. Li, W. Zhang, J. Luo, X. Gu, X. Zheng, and L. Wei. 2007. A nonsynonymous SNP in human cytosolic sialidase in a small Asian population results in reduced enzyme activity: potential link with severe adverse reactions to oseltamivir. Cell Res. 17:357-362.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - Maxwell, S. R. 2007. Tamiflu and neuropsychiatric disturbance in adolescents. BMJ 334:1232-1233.[Free Full Text]
13 - Milner, C. M., S. V. Smith, M. V. Carrillo, G. L. Taylor, M. Hollinshead, and R. D. Campbel. 1997. Identification of a sialidase encoded in the human major histocompatibility complex. J. Biol. Chem. 272:4549-4558.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Miyagi, T., K. Konno, Y. Emori, H. Kawasaki, K. Suzuku, A. Yasui, and S. Tsuiki. 1993. Molecular cloning and expression of cDNA encoding rat skeletal muscle cytosolic sialidase. J. Biol. Chem. 268:26435-26440.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Miyagi, T., and K. Yamaguchi. 2007. Biochemistry of glycans: sialic acids, p. 297-322. In J. P. Kamerling, G. Boons, Y. C. Lee, A. Suzuki, N. Taniguchi, and A. G. J. Voragen (ed.), Comprehensive glycoscience. Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
16 - Miyagi, T., T. Wada, K. Yamaguchi, and K. Hata. 2004. Sialidase and malignancy: a minireview. Glycoconj. J. 20:189-198.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 - Monti, E., A. Preti, E. Rossi, A. Ballabio, and G. Borsani. 1999. Cloning and characterization of Neu2, a human gene homologous to rodent soluble sialidases. Genomics 57:137-143.[CrossRef][Medline]
18 - Moore, M. L., M. H. Chi, W. Zhou, K. Goleniewska, J. F. O'Neal, J. N. Higginbotham, and R. S. Peeble, Jr. 2007. Oseltamivir decreases T cell GM1 expression and inhibits clearance of respiratory syncytial virus: potential role of endogenous sialidase in antiviral immunity. J. Immunol. 178:2651-2654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Morimoto, K., M. Nakakariya, Y. Shirasaka, C. Kakinuma, T. Fujita, I. Tamai, and T. Ogihara. 2008. Osetamivir (Tamiflu) efflux transport at the blood-brain barrier via P-glycoprotein. Drug Metab. Dispos. 36:6-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Nan, X., I. Carubelli, and N. M. Stamatos. 2007. Sialidase expression in activated human T lymphocytes influences production of IFN-gamma. J. Leukoc. Biol. 81:284-296.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21 - Potier, M., L. Mameli, M. Belisle, L. Dallaire, and S. B. Melancon. 1979. Fluorometric assay of neuraminidase with a sodium (4-methylumbelliferyl-alpha-D-N-acetylneuraminate) substrate. Anal. Biochem. 94:287-296.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 - Roggentin, P., B. Rothe, J. B. Kaper, J. Galen, L. Lawrisuk, E. R. Vimr, and R. Schauer. 1989. Conserved sequences in bacterial and viral sialidases. Glycoconj. J. 6:349-353.[CrossRef][Medline]
23 - Shi D., J. Yang, D. Yang, E. L. LeCluyse, C. Black, L. You, F. Akhlaghi, and B. Yan. 2006. Anti-influenza prodrug oseltamivir is activated by carboxylesterase human carboxylesterase 1, and the activation is inhibited by antiplatelet agent clopidogrel. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 319:1477-1484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24 - Suzuki, Y., Y. Nagano, H. Kato, M. Matsumoto, K. Nerome, K. Nakajima, and E. Nobusawa. 1986. Human influenza A virus hemagglutinin distinguishes sialyloligosaccharides in membrane-associated gangliosides as its receptor which mediates the adsorption and fusion processes of virus infection. Specificity for oligosaccharides and sialic acids and the sequence to which sialic acid is attached. J. Biol. Chem. 261:17057-17061.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - von Itzstein, M. 2007. The war against influenza: discovery and development of sialidase inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 6:967-974.[CrossRef][Medline]
26 - von Itzstein, M., W. Y. Wu, G. B. Kok, M. S. Pegg, J. C. Dyason, B. Jin, T. van Ohan, M. L. Smythe, H. F. White, and S. W. Oliver. 1993. Rational design of potent sialidase-based inhibitors of influenza virus replication. Nature 363:418-423.[CrossRef][Medline]
27 - Wada, T., K. Hata, K. Yamaguchi, K. Shiozaki, K. Koseki, S. Moriya, and T. Miyagi. 2007. A crucial role of plasma membrane-associated sialidase (NEU3) in the survival of human cancer cells. Oncogene 26:2483-2490.[CrossRef][Medline]
28 - Wada, T., Y. Yoshikawa, S. Tokuyama, M. Kuwahara, H. Akita, and T. Miyagi. 1999. Cloning, expression and chromosomal mapping of a human ganglioside sialidase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 261:21-27.[CrossRef][Medline]
29 - Woronowicz, A., S. R. Amith, K. De Vusser, W. Laroy, R. Contreras, S. Basta, and M. R. Szewczuk. 2007. Dependence of neurotrophic factor activation of Trk tyrosine kinase receptors on cellular sialidase. Glycobiology 17:10-24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30 - Yamaguchi, T., K. Hata, K. Koseki, K. Shiozaki, H. Akita, T. Wada, S. Moriya, and T. Miyagi. 2005. Evidence for mitochondrial localization of a novel human sialidase (NEU4). Biochem. J. 390:85-93.[CrossRef][Medline]
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, October 2008, p. 3484-3491, Vol. 52, No. 10
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00344-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Tanaka, T., Nakajima, K., Murashima, A., Garcia-Bournissen, F., Koren, G., Ito, S.
(2009). Safety of neuraminidase inhibitors against novel influenza A (H1N1) in pregnant and breastfeeding women. CMAJ
181: 55-58
[Full Text]