This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Effron, G.
Right arrow Articles by Perlin, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Effron, G.
Right arrow Articles by Perlin, D. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2008, p. 4181-4183, Vol. 52, No. 11
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00802-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Caspofungin-Resistant Candida tropicalis Strains Causing Breakthrough Fungemia in Patients at High Risk for Hematologic Malignancies{triangledown}

Guillermo Garcia-Effron,1 Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis,2* Russell E. Lewis,2 and David S. Perlin1*

Public Health Research Institute, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey,1 The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas2

Received 18 June 2008/ Returned for modification 23 August 2008/ Accepted 7 September 2008


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
We identified three cases of C. tropicalis strains causing breakthrough fungemia in allogeneic stem cell recipients receiving caspofungin prophylaxis and treatment. Three genetically unrelated isolates with high echinocandin MICs were identified. Each strain carried a characteristic mutation conferring an amino acid substitution within Fks1p hot spot 1.


arrow
TEXT
 
Echinocandins inhibit fungal cell wall biosynthesis through noncompetitive inhibition of 1,3-D-glucan synthase (GS) (4). These agents are widely used for treatment and prophylaxis of candidiasis in selected high-risk patients (2, 15). Although resistance in Candida species is uncommon (13, 14), clinical isolates of Candida spp. having increased echinocandin MICs and amino acid substitutions in Fksp have been described to occur in candidemic patients for whom caspofungin-based therapy has failed (1, 3, 6, 8, 11, 13). Candida tropicalis is an important pathogen in patients with hematologic malignancies (9). Recently, it was reported that a patient with acute myelogenous leukemia developed caspofungin-resistant C. tropicalis fungemia (12). Herein, we describe three additional cases of caspofungin-resistant C. tropicalis candidemia in patients at high risk for hematologic malignancies and characterize the resistance mechanism.

From March 2001, when caspofungin was introduced, until February 2007, we identified 40 C. tropicalis bloodstream isolates in 37 patients at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (isolates T1 to T40). The isolates were characterized as C. tropicalis by conventional and molecular methods (16). Three patients at high risk for hematologic malignancies who developed C. tropicalis fungemia breakthrough during caspofungin treatment were identified during this period, representing 8% (3/37) of the cases. Breakthrough C. tropicalis fungemia was defined as C. tropicalis septicemia during caspofungin administration (empirical or prophylactic).

Patient 1 (isolate T19). An 84-year-old male with acute lymphocytic leukemia started on intravenous caspofungin (50 mg/day) for persistent (despite broad-spectrum antibacterials) febrile neutropenia. Three sets of blood cultures obtained on days 15 and 16 of caspofungin treatment revealed low-grade (6 CFU) fungemia caused by C. tropicalis. During the course of fungemia, the patient remained clinically stable, afebrile, and normotensive. The patient cleared his cultures 1 day after removal of his central venous catheter and initiation of intravenous voriconazole treatment (caspofungin was discontinued). He did well clinically after completing 2 weeks of voriconazole treatment and showed no evidence of recurrence until his death 8 months later from leukemia.

Patient 2 (isolate T3). A 59-year-old male with large-cell lymphoma who received a matched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant had a complicated course with renal failure and persistent Acinetobacter bacteremia. The patient was on intravenous caspofungin at 50 mg/day as a posttransplant prophylaxis. Because of a persistent fever, all catheters were removed. However, on day 44 of caspofungin treatment, a peripheral blood culture was positive for both Pseudomonas aeruginosa and C. tropicalis. Antifungal treatment was changed to liposomal amphotericin B treatment (5 mg/kg of body weight/day). He cleared his blood cultures and showed no evidence of recurrent candidemia until his death 3 months later from lymphoma.

Patient 3 (isolate T26). A 45-year-old nonneutropenic male with a prior history of Hodgkin's lymphoma, renal cell carcinoma, and esophageal cancer had multiple courses of bacterial pneumonia. In addition, the patient developed catheter-related Candida parapsilosis fungemia and was treated with caspofungin at 50 mg/day, with clinical and mycologic responses. However, the patient developed recurrent fevers on day 21 of caspofungin. The catheter tip cultures grew 50 CFU/ml of C. tropicalis and 30 CFU/ml of Staphylococcus epidermidis. His antibiotics were adjusted, and caspofungin was switched to fluconazole (6 mg/kg/day). Although follow-up blood cultures became negative, he eventually succumbed to respiratory failure secondary to ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Echinocandin susceptibility testing of the 40 C. tropicalis strains was performed following CLSI (formerly NCCLS) document M27-A2 (10), with modifications (14). Echinocandin drugs exhibited potent in vitro activities against 92% (37/40) of the C. tropicalis strains tested, with MIC geometric means of 0.47 µg/ml (MIC90, 0.5; range, 0.02 to 4.0), 0.13 µg/ml (MIC90, 0.12 µg/ml; range, 0.06 to 2.0), and 0.23 µg/ml (MIC90, 0.12; range, 0.06 to 2.0) for caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin, respectively. However, the strains isolated from the patients described above showed 4- to 33-fold-higher MICs than a reference strain and exceeded or were at the maximum range reported for large collections of clinical isolates (14) (Table 1). The reduced in vitro susceptibilities to echinocandin drugs were confirmed in GS enzyme assays. Following GS isolation, echinocandin inhibition kinetics yielding 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) were obtained (6, 11). The product of the reaction mixture was characterized as 1,3-β-glucan (5). A standard inhibition curve (monophasic, with one IC50) was obtained for the reference strain (ATCC 750), three clinical susceptible strains, and the T26 strain. However, T26 GS yielded higher IC50s for all echinocandin drugs (Fig. 1 and Table 1). In contrast, biphasic inhibition kinetics (with two IC50s) was obtained for T3 and T19 GS enzymes (Fig. 1 and Table 1) (T3 data not shown). The highest IC50 was at least 50-fold higher than the IC50s obtained from susceptible GS enzymes. The presence of two inflection points in kinetic curves suggests mixed populations of wild-type and mutant GS enzymes (6, 11). Consistent with this notion, DNA sequence analysis of C. tropicalis FKS1 (GenBank accession no. EU676168) revealed a homozygous T-to-C mutation (in strain T26) and heterozygous T-to-C mutations (in strains T3 and T19) (equivalent to nucleotides T1923 and T1935 in Candida albicans FKS1 [GenBank accession no. XM 716336], respectively) (Fig. 2). These nucleotide changes resulted in deduced Phe-to-Leu (in the T26 strain) and Ser-to-Pro (in the T3 and T19 strains) amino acid changes. These amino acid substitutions are located in the highly conserved hot spot 1 region of Fks1p (Fig. 2), associated with echinocandin resistance in Candida spp. (3, 6, 11). These results provide additional support for Fks1p modification as a common mechanism for echinocandin resistance in Candida spp. (1, 3, 5, 6, 11, 13).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. In vitro susceptibility testing and GS inhibition profiles for echinocandin drugsa


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Echinocandin inhibition profiles for product-entrapped GCs. Enzyme complexes were obtained from reference C. tropicalis ATCC 750 (gray diamonds), C. tropicalis T19 (black squares), C. tropicalis T26 (triangles), and echinocandin-resistant C. albicans 205 (gray circles) strains. Inhibition curves and IC50s for anidulafungin (ANF) (A), caspofungin (CSF) (B), and micafungin (MCF) (C) (in nanograms per milliliter) were obtained using a sigmoidal response (variable-slope) curve (for strains ATCC 750, T26, and 205) and a two-site competition-fitting algorithm (for strain T19).


Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. DNA sequencing chromatograms and amino acid sequence alignment for C. tropicalis strains. (A) C. tropicalis Fks1p hot spot 1 strain ATCC 750. (B) Strain T3. (C) Strain T26. Arrows show mutations. (D) Sequence alignments of the Fks1p hot spot 1 region (boxed) in different Candida species. Line 1, C. tropicalis wild-type allele (GenBank accession no. pending); line 2, C. tropicalis T26 strain (F-to-L change); line 3, C. tropicalis T3 strain mutant allele (S-to-P change); line 4, C. albicans (GenBank accession no. XP_721429); line 5, C. parapsilosis (ABX80511); line 6, C. metapsilosis (ABY67254); line 7, C. orthopsilosis (ABY67253); line 8, C. glabrata (XP_446406); line 9, C. krusei (AAY40291).

Echinocandin resistance is uncommon (13), creating skepticism regarding the value of routine MIC determination for the management of candidemic patients with these agents. Moreover, there is no compelling evidence that the rates of response to echinocandins for Candida isolates having elevated echinocandin MICs are inferior to the rates for isolates having low echinocandin MICs (7). Our report contributes to such knowledge, as it links FKS1 mutation, high echinocandin MICs, and clinical failures of echinocandin-based therapy. Moreover, in our cases of caspofungin-resistant C. tropicalis, the clinical courses were rather benign, in contrast to what has been published before with respect to C. tropicalis fungemia in patients at high risk for hematologic malignancies (9).


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Jeffrey Tarrand and Nick Sipsas for useful information and N. A. Albert for technical assistance.

D.P.K. has received research support and honoraria from Schering-Plough, Pfizer, Astellas Pharma, Inc., Enzon Pharmaceuticals, and Merck & Co., Inc. R.E.L. has received research support and honoraria from Schering-Plough, Astellas Pharma, Inc., Enzon Pharmaceuticals, and Merck & Co., Inc. This work was supported in part by NIH grant AI069397 to D.S.P.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address for Dimitrios P. Kontoyiannis: Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, Unit 402, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 792-6237. Fax: (713) 745-6839. E-mail: dkontoyi{at}mdanderson.org. Mailing address for David S. Perlin: Public Health Research Institute, 225 Warren Street, Newark, NJ 07103. Phone: (973) 854-3200. Fax: (973) 854-3101. E-mail: perlinds{at}umdnj.edu Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 15 September 2008. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Balashov, S. V., S. Park, and D. S. Perlin. 2006. Assessing resistance to the echinocandin antifungal drug caspofungin in Candida albicans by profiling mutations in FKS1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:2058-2063.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. 2
  3. Chou, L. S., R. E. Lewis, C. Ippoliti, R. E. Champlin, and D. P. Kontoyiannis. 2007. Caspofungin as primary antifungal prophylaxis in stem cell transplant recipients. Pharmacotherapy 27:1644-1650.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. 3
  5. Cleary, J. D., G. Garcia-Effron, S. W. Chapman, and D. S. Perlin. 2008. Reduced Candida glabrata susceptibility secondary to a FKS1 mutation developed during candidemia treatment. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:2263-2265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. 4
  7. Denning, D. W. 2003. Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet 362:1142-1151.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. 5
  9. Garcia-Effron, G., S. K. Katiyar, S. Park, T. D. Edlind, and D. S. Perlin. 2008. A naturally occurring proline-to-alanine amino acid change in Fks1p in Candida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis accounts for reduced echinocandin susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:2305-2312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. 6
  11. Kahn, J. N., G. Garcia-Effron, M. J. Hsu, S. Park, K. A. Marr, and D. S. Perlin. 2007. Acquired echinocandin resistance in a Candida krusei isolate due to modification of glucan synthase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:1876-1878.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. 7
  13. Kartsonis, N., J. Killar, L. Mixson, C. M. Hoe, C. Sable, K. Bartizal, and M. Motyl. 2005. Caspofungin susceptibility testing of isolates from patients with esophageal candidiasis or invasive candidiasis: relationship of MIC to treatment outcome. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:3616-3623.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. 8
  15. Katiyar, S., M. Pfaller, and T. Edlind. 2006. Candida albicans and Candida glabrata clinical isolates exhibiting reduced echinocandin susceptibility. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:2892-2894.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. 9
  17. Kontoyiannis, D. P., I. Vaziri, H. A. Hanna, M. Boktour, J. Thornby, R. Hachem, G. P. Bodey, and I. I. Raad. 2001. Risk Factors for Candida tropicalis fungemia in patients with cancer. Clin. Infect. Dis. 33:1676-1681.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. 10
  19. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2002. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts. Approved standard M27-A2, 2nd ed. National Committee for Clinical and Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.
  20. 11
  21. Park, S., R. Kelly, J. N. Kahn, J. Robles, M. J. Hsu, E. Register, W. Li, V. Vyas, H. Fan, G. Abruzzo, A. Flattery, C. Gill, G. Chrebet, S. A. Parent, M. Kurtz, H. Teppler, C. M. Douglas, and D. S. Perlin. 2005. Specific substitutions in the echinocandin target Fks1p account for reduced susceptibility of rare laboratory and clinical Candida sp. isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:3264-3273.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. 12
  23. Pasquale, T., J. R. Tomada, M. Ghannoun, J. Dipersio, and H. Bonilla. 2008. Emergence of Candida tropicalis resistant to caspofungin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61:219.[Free Full Text]
  24. 13
  25. Perlin, D. S. 2007. Resistance to echinocandin-class antifungal drugs. Drug Resist. Updat. 10:121-130.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. 14
  27. Pfaller, M. A., L. Boyken, R. J. Hollis, J. Kroeger, S. A. Messer, S. Tendolkar, and D. J. Diekema. 2008. In vitro susceptibility of invasive isolates of Candida spp. to anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin: six years of global surveillance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:150-156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. 15
  29. van Burik, J. A., V. Ratanatharathorn, D. E. Stepan, C. B. Miller, J. H. Lipton, D. H. Vesole, N. Bunin, D. A. Wall, J. W. Hiemenz, Y. Satoi, J. M. Lee, and T. J. Walsh. 2004. Micafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections during neutropenia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39:1407-1416.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. 16
  31. White, T. J., T. D. Bruns, S. B. Lee, and J. W. Taylor. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics, p. 315-322. In: M. A. Innis, D. H. Gelfand, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White (ed.), PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, November 2008, p. 4181-4183, Vol. 52, No. 11
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00802-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Katiyar, S. K., Edlind, T. D. (2009). Role for Fks1 in the Intrinsic Echinocandin Resistance of Fusarium solani as Evidenced by Hybrid Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 1772-1778 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Effron, G.
Right arrow Articles by Perlin, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia-Effron, G.
Right arrow Articles by Perlin, D. S.