This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 2008, p. 1046-1051, Vol. 52, No. 3
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01210-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Effects of Escherichia coli Lipopolysaccharide on Telithromycin Pharmacokinetics in Rats: Inhibition of Metabolism via CYP3A{triangledown}

Joo H. Lee, Yu K. Cho, Young S. Jung, Young C. Kim, and Myung G. Lee*

College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, San 56-1, Shinlim-Dong, Kwanak-Gu, Seoul 151-742, South Korea

Received 13 September 2007/ Returned for modification 20 November 2007/ Accepted 16 December 2007


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
It has been reported that telithromycin is metabolized primarily via hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A1/2 in rats and that the expression of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A decreases in rats pretreated with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (ECLPS rats; an animal model of inflammation). Thus, it is possible that the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC0-{infty}) of intravenous and oral telithromycin is greater for ECLPS rats than for the controls. To assess this, the pharmacokinetic parameters of telithromycin were compared after intravenous and oral administration (50 mg/kg). After intravenous administration of telithromycin, the AUC0-{infty} was significantly greater (by 83.4%) in ECLPS rats due to a significantly lower nonrenal clearance (by 44.5%) than in the controls. This may have been due to a significantly decreased hepatic metabolism of telithromycin in ECLPS rats. After oral administration of telithromycin, the AUC0-{infty} in ECLPS rats was also significantly greater (by 140%) than in the controls and the increase was considerably greater than the 83.4% increase after intravenous administration. This could have been due to a decrease in intestinal metabolism in addition to a decreased hepatic metabolism of telithromycin in ECLPS rats.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Telithromycin, a ketolide antibiotic, is the first of a new class of semisynthetic agents derived from erythromycin by the replacement of the sugar cladinose at position C-3 with a keto group. This alteration resulted in both improved pharmacokinetic properties and an improved spectrum of activity against community-acquired upper and lower respiratory tract pathogens compared to those of erythromycin (4). Telithromycin inhibits bacterial protein synthesis via two mechanisms, first by directly blocking the translation of mRNA and second by interfering with the assembly of new ribosomal units (5). Telithromycin has potent activities both in vitro and in vivo against common respiratory tract pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and group A beta-hemolytic streptococci, irrespective of their β-lactam or macrolide susceptibility (1). Its spectrum of activity also extends to atypical and intracellular pathogens (23). Lotter et al. (17) reported that telithromycin has anti-inflammatory properties like those of conventional macrolides due to the inhibition of production of proinflammatory cytokines, which leads to a decreased formation of nitric oxide in Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (ECLPS)-treated mice.

LPS is an active component in the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria. ECLPS has been used as a classical inflammatory model for rats (9, 27). Changes in the expression and mRNA levels of hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes have been reported for rats pretreated with ECLPS (ECLPS rats). For example, the expression and mRNA levels of hepatic CYP2C11, -2E1, and -3A2 decreased in male rats of the Fisher 344 or Sprague-Dawley strain 24 h after intraperitoneal injection of ECLPS (20, 24, 25). Maezono et al. (18) also reported that intraperitoneal injection of ECLPS significantly reduced the activity of intestinal epithelial CYP3A by 41%, as assessed by nifedipine oxidation in male Wistar rats. Therefore, one might expect the pharmacokinetics of telithromycin to change after intravenous or oral administration to ECLPS rats.

Although changes in the pharmacokinetics of drugs in ECLPS rats have been reported (13, 26), the effects of ECLPS on the pharmacokinetics of telithromycin, which is metabolized primarily via CYP3A1/2 in rats (15), have not been published to date. The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic changes of telithromycin after intravenous or oral administration to ECLPS rats with respect to changes in hepatic and intestinal CYP3A. Changes in the expression of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A in ECLPS rats were also reported.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Chemicals. Telithromycin was supplied by sanofi-aventis (Paris, France). Quinine hydrochloride (an internal standard for the high-performance liquid chromatographic [HPLC] analysis of telithromycin), NADPH (as a tetrasodium salt), Tris buffer, EDTA, ECLPS (serotype 0127:B8), primary monoclonal antibody for β-actin, and Kodak X-Omat film were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (St. Louis, MO). Anti-human polyclonal 3A antibody and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody were products from Detroit R&D (Detroit, MI) and Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA), respectively. Enhanced chemiluminescence reagents were obtained from Amersham Biosciences Corporation (Piscataway, NJ). Other chemicals were of reagent grade or HPLC grade.

Animals. The protocol for this animal study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea. Male Sprague-Dawley rats, 6 to 8 weeks old and weighing 240 to 300 g, purchased from Taconic Farms, Inc. (Samtako Bio Korea, O-San, South Korea), were maintained according to previously reported methods (14, 15).

Treatment with ECLPS. The rats were randomly divided into two groups: control rats and ECLPS rats. ECLPS (dissolved in an injectable solution of 0.9% NaCl to produce a concentration of 1 mg/ml) at a dose of 1 mg/kg was injected intraperitoneally into the ECLPS rats (25). The same volume of injectable 0.9% NaCl solution was injected into the controls.

Preparation of rat hepatic and intestinal microsomal fractions. The procedures used for the preparation of hepatic (12) and intestinal (22) microsomal fractions were similar to previously reported methods. The protein contents in the hepatic and intestinal microsomal fractions were measured using a previously reported method (3).

Measurement of Vmax, Km, and the intrinsic clearance (CLint) for the elimination of telithromycin from the hepatic and intestinal microsomal fractions of control and ECLPS rats. The maximum rates of metabolism (Vmax) and the apparent Michaelis-Menten constants (Km; the concentration at which the rate is one-half of the Vmax) for the elimination of telithromycin from the hepatic and intestinal microsomal fractions were determined after incubation of the following in a water bath shaker (37°C, 500 oscillations/min): (i) the above-described microsomal fractions (equivalent to 1 mg protein for both hepatic and intestinal microsomes); (ii) either a 10-µl aliquot of hepatic microsomal buffer solution containing 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, or 1 µM telithromycin or a 20-µl aliquot of intestinal microsomal buffer solution containing 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, or 1 µM telithromycin; and (iii) either a 50-µl (for hepatic microsomes) or a 20-µl (for intestinal microsomes) aliquot of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 1.2 mM NADPH in a final volume of 300 µl (for hepatic microsomes) or 600 µl (for intestinal microsomes) by the addition of 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). All of the above-described microsomal incubation conditions were linear. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 300 µl (for hepatic microsomes) or 500 µl (for intestinal microsomes) of acetonitrile after a 30-min incubation. Then, a 50-µl aliquot of distilled water containing 50 µg/ml of quinine hydrochloride (an internal standard) was added.

The kinetic constants (Km and Vmax) for the elimination of telithromycin from the hepatic and intestinal microsomes were calculated using a nonlinear regression method (7). The CLint for the elimination of telithromycin from the hepatic or intestinal microsomes was calculated by dividing the respective Vmax by the respective Km.

Western blot analysis. The microsomal suspension (10 or 20 µg of protein per lane for the hepatic or intestinal microsomes, respectively) was loaded onto the Western blot apparatus. Other procedures were similar to a previously reported method (11).

Pretreatment of rats for intravenous and oral studies. In the early morning of the day after treatment with ECLPS or the injectable 0.9% NaCl solution, the body weights of the rats were measured. Then, the carotid artery (for blood sampling) and the jugular vein (for drug administration for intravenous study only) of each rat were cannulated with a polyethylene tube (inside diameter, 0.76 mm; outside diameter, 1.22 mm) (Clay Adams, Parsippany, NJ) while the rat was under light ether anesthesia. Both cannulas were exteriorized to the dorsal side of the neck, where each cannula was terminated with a long silastic tube (Dow Corning, Midland, MI). Both silastic tubes were covered with a wire sheath to allow free movement of the rats. Thus, the rats were not restrained during the present study. A heparinized injectable 0.9% NaCl solution (15 units/ml, 0.3 ml) was used to flush the cannulas to prevent blood clotting. Each rat was housed individually in a metabolic cage (Daejong Scientific Company, Seoul, South Korea) and allowed to recover from anesthesia for 4 to 5 h before the experiment was begun.

Intravenous study. Telithromycin (dissolved in distilled water with a few drops of acetic acid) at a dose of 50 mg/kg was infused (total infusion volume, approximately 0.6 ml) over 1 min via the jugular vein of control (n = 9) and ECLPS (n = 9) rats. A blood sample (approximately 220 µl) was collected via the carotid artery at 0 (control), 1 (at the end of infusion), 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, and 600 min after the start of the intravenous infusion of telithromycin. After centrifugation of the blood sample, a 100-µl aliquot of plasma sample was stored at –70°C until it was used for the HPLC analysis of telithromycin. The preparation and handling of urine samples and gastrointestinal tract samples (including contents of the tract and feces) taken at 24 h were similar to reported methods (14, 15).

Oral study. Telithromycin (the same solution used in the intravenous study) at a dose of 50 mg/kg was administered orally (total oral volume, approximately 1.5 ml) via a feeding tube to control (n = 9) and ECLPS (n = 10) rats. A blood sample was collected via the carotid artery at 0, 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, 360, 480, and 600 min after oral administration of telithromycin. Other procedures were similar to those for the intravenous study.

HPLC analysis of telithromycin. The procedures for the determination of concentrations of telithromycin were similar to a reported HPLC method (8) but with a slight modification: quinine hydrochloride instead of RU 66260 was used as an internal standard.

Pharmacokinetic analysis. The total area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC0-{infty}) was calculated using the trapezoidal rule-extrapolation method (6). The area from the last datum point to time infinity was estimated by dividing the last measured concentration in plasma by the terminal-phase rate constant.

Standard methods (10) were used to calculate the following pharmacokinetic parameters, using a noncompartmental analysis (WinNonlin; Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA) of the following: the time-averaged total body clearance (CL), renal clearance (CLR), and nonrenal clearance (CLNR); the terminal half-life; the apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vss); and the extent of absolute oral bioavailability (F). The maximum concentration of telithromycin in plasma (Cmax) and the time to reach Cmax (Tmax) were read directly from the experimental data.

Statistical analysis. A P value of <0.05 was deemed to be statistically significant using a t test (SigmaStat version 2.0) between two means for the unpaired data. If the data were not normally distributed, an alternative nonparametric Mann-Whitney rank sum test was performed to compare the means of the two groups. All results are expressed as means ± standard deviations, except for Tmax values, which are expressed as medians (ranges).


arrow
RESULTS
 
Measurement of Vmax, Km, and CLint for the elimination of telithromycin from the hepatic and intestinal microsomal fractions. The Vmax, Km, and CLint values for the elimination of telithromycin from the hepatic and intestinal microsomal fractions of both groups of rats are given in Table 1. In ECLPS rats, the Vmax and Km values for the livers were higher (by 70.5%; P = 0.177) and greater (by 119%; P = 0.114), respectively, than those of the controls. Thus, the CLint for the livers of ECLPS rats was significantly lower (by 18.5%) than that of the controls. The Vmax and Km values for the intestines were lower (by 30.1%; P = 0.421) and smaller (by 24.6%; P = 0.227), respectively, than those of the controls. Thus, the CLint for the intestines of ECLPS rats was significantly lower (by 10.0%) than that of the controls. The above-mentioned data suggest that the Vmax for the elimination (primarily due to metabolism) of telithromycin from the liver and intestine and the affinity for telithromycin of the enzyme(s) in the liver and intestine were not significantly altered by ECLPS. However, the metabolism of telithromycin in the liver and intestine was significantly lower in ECLPS rats.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Vmax, Km, and CLint values for elimination of telithromycin after incubation of telithromycin with microsomal fractions of control and ECLPS ratsa

Western blot analysis. The levels of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A measured by Western blot analysis with the hepatic and intestinal microsomes prepared from both groups of rats are shown in Fig. 1. In ECLPS rats, the expression of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A was significantly lower (by 53.2 and 52.6%, respectively) than that in the controls.


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Western blotting of hepatic (A) and intestinal (B) CYP3A in ECLPS rats (LPS) and control rats (CON). Representative blots are shown (top), and the relative level of each protein (100% as control) was measured by scanning densitometry of the immunoblot bands (bottom). Each lane was loaded with 10 and 20 µg of hepatic and small intestinal microsomal proteins, respectively. β-Actin was used as a loading control. Error bars represent standard deviations (n = 3); *, significant difference from control (P < 0.01).

Pharmacokinetics of telithromycin after intravenous administration. For the intravenous administration of telithromycin to control and ECLPS rats, the mean arterial plasma concentration-time profiles are shown in Fig. 2A, and relevant pharmacokinetic parameters are given in Table 2. After intravenous administration of telithromycin, changes in pharmacokinetic parameters for ECLPS rats compared to those for the controls were as follows: the AUC0-{infty} became significantly greater (by 83.4%); the CL (by 40.1%), CLR (by 19.3%), and CLNR (by 44.5%) became significantly lower; the Vss became significantly smaller (by 33.7%); and the percentage of the intravenous dose of telithromycin excreted in the urine at 24 h as unchanged drug (Ae0-24 h) became significantly greater (by 44.2%).


Figure 2
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Mean arterial plasma concentration-time profiles of telithromycin after its intravenous infusion at a dose of 50 mg/kg to control rats (n = 9; {circ}) and ECLPS rats (n = 9; •) (A) and after its oral administration at a dose of 50 mg/kg to control rats (n = 9; {circ}) and ECLPS rats (n = 10; •) (B). Error bars, standard deviations.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Pharmacokinetic parameters of telithromycin after intravenous and oral administration at a dose of 50 mg/kg to control and ECLPS ratsa

Pharmacokinetics of telithromycin after oral administration. For the oral administration of telithromycin to control and ECLPS rats, the mean arterial plasma concentration-time profiles are shown in Fig. 2B, and relevant pharmacokinetic parameters are given in Table 2. After oral administration of telithromycin, the levels of absorption of telithromycin from the rat gastrointestinal tract were high for both groups of rats; telithromycin was detected in plasma at the first blood sampling time (5 min). After oral administration of telithromycin, changes in pharmacokinetic parameters in ECLPS rats compared to those in the controls were as follows: the AUC0-{infty} became significantly greater (by 140%), the Cmax became significantly higher (by 114%), and the Ae0-24 h became significantly greater (by 99.6%).


arrow
DISCUSSION
 
The pharmacokinetic changes of drugs (compounds) seemed to be dependent on the gender and species of the rats (CD, Wistar, or Sprague-Dawley rats), the source (Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae) and dose (50, 250, 500, or 1,000 mg/kg) of LPS species, and the starting time of the experiment after LPS administration (2, 6, 10, 24, or 96 h) (reference 2 and references therein). For most studies, ECLPS was administered at a dose of 1 mg/kg and the experiment was started 24 h after the intraperitoneal injection of ECLPS into male rats (20, 25). Thus, the same protocol was employed for this study.

After intravenous administration of telithromycin, the contribution of the CLR to the CL of telithromycin was not considerable in rats; the values were 16.3% and 22.0% for control and ECLPS rats, respectively (Table 2), indicating that most of the intravenous telithromycin is extracted via the nonrenal (CLNR) route in rats. The contribution of gastrointestinal (including biliary) excretion of unchanged telithromycin to the CLNR of telithromycin was also not considerable; the total amount of the dose recovered from the entire gastrointestinal tract (including contents of the tract and feces) at 24 h (GI24 h) was less than 8.53% of the intravenous dose of telithromycin for all rats studied (Table 2). The small GI24 h values, less than 8.53%, were not likely due to chemical and enzymatic degradation of telithromycin in the rats' gastric fluids. Lee and Lee (14) reported that telithromycin was stable in various buffer solutions having pHs ranging from 1 to 13 (more than 92.0% of the spiked amount of telithromycin was recovered), except at pH 4 for up to 48 h of incubation (83.7% was recovered) and in three rats' gastric juices (pHs of 1, 2.5, and 3, respectively) for up to 4 h of incubation (more than 90.5% was recovered). The above-mentioned data suggest that the CLNR of telithromycin given in Table 2 could represent the metabolic clearance of the drug. Additionally, changes in the CLNR of telithromycin could be due to changes in the metabolic clearance of the drug in rats.

The AUC values for telithromycin were dose dependent after both intravenous and oral administration of doses of 20, 50, and 100 mg/kg to rats (14). Thus, an intravenous and oral dose of telithromycin of 50 mg/kg was arbitrarily chosen for the study.

After intravenous administration of telithromycin to ECLPS rats, the significantly greater AUC0-{infty} could have been due to a significantly lower CL (Table 2). The lower CL was attributable to lower CLNR and lower CLR values in ECLPS rats than in the controls (Table 2). The lower CLNR might result from a decrease in the expression of hepatic CYP3A (Fig. 1) in ECLPS rats, because telithromycin was metabolized via CYP3A1/2 in rats (15). Decreased expression of rat hepatic 3A2 has also been reported (24, 25). The hepatic first-pass effect of telithromycin was almost negligible following absorption into the portal vein, based on the AUC0-{infty} difference following intravenous and intraportal administration to male Sprague-Dawley rats (14). Because telithromycin is a drug with a low hepatic-extraction ratio, its hepatic clearance depends more on the CLint for the elimination of telithromycin than on the hepatic blood flow rate (28). The significantly lower CLNR of telithromycin in ECLPS rats (Table 2) might be supported by the significantly lower CLint in the liver (Table 1). The free fractions (unbound to plasma protein) of telithromycin in plasma were comparable between the two groups of rats. Nolan and O'Connell (21) reported that the hepatic blood flow rate was lower in ECLPS rats.

After intravenous administration of telithromycin, the Vss was significantly smaller in ECLPS rats than in the controls (Table 2). Although the exact reason is not clear, the smaller Vss of telithromycin in ECLPS rats was not due to the significant decrease in the free fraction of telithromycin in rat plasma; the plasma protein binding levels of telithromycin were not significantly different between the two groups of rats. The protein binding levels of telithromycin to plasma from control and ECLPS rats at a telithromycin concentration of 5 µg/ml were not significantly different (70.0% ± 12.5% and 66.4% ± 7.60%, respectively), as determined by a previously reported equilibrium dialysis process (14).

After oral administration of telithromycin to rats, the AUC0-{infty} was also significantly greater in ECLPS rats than in the controls (Table 2). However, this was not likely due to the increased absorption of telithromycin from the gastrointestinal tract. After oral administration of telithromycin, the GI24 h values were 5.73% and 9.63% of the oral dose for control and ECLPS rats, respectively (Table 2). It is possible that these unchanged values for telithromycin, 5.73% and 9.63%, might be partly attributed to gastrointestinal (including biliary) excretion of the absorbed drug. In comparison, the mean "true" fractions of the oral dose of unabsorbed telithromycin (Funabs) for this study could be estimated by the following equations (16): (i) 0.0573 = Funabs + (0.388 x 0.0853) for control rats and (ii) 0.0963 = Funabs + (0.507 x 0.0531) for ECLPS rats, where 0.388 (0.507), 0.0853 (0.0531), and 0.0573 (0.0963) are the F value (Table 2) and GI24 h values after intravenous and oral administration of telithromycin to control rats (and to rats pretreated with ECLPS), respectively (Table 2). The Funabs values thus estimated were 2.42% and 6.94% for control rats and ECLPS rats, respectively. Thus, more than 93% of the oral dose of telithromycin was absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract for both groups of rats.

After oral administration of telithromycin to ECLPS rats, the AUC0-{infty} was 140% greater than in the controls (Table 2); this 140% increase was also greater than the 83.4% increase after intravenous administration (Table 2). Thus, the greater AUC0-{infty} after oral administration could not be explained solely by lower hepatic CLNR values for the elimination of telithromycin, as explained in the intravenous drug study. This could have been due to a decreased intestinal first-pass effect of telithromycin in addition to a decreased hepatic first-pass effect of the drug in ECLPS rats. The intestinal first-pass effect of telithromycin (63.4%) was considerable after oral administration of telithromycin at a dose of 50 mg/kg in control rats (14). Because telithromycin is a drug with an intermediate intestinal extraction ratio, its intestinal first-pass effect depends on the intestinal blood flow rate, the CLint for the elimination of telithromycin, and the free fractions of the drug in plasma, assuming that the hepatic clearance concept could also be applied to the intestine (28). The decreased intestinal first-pass effect of telithromycin in ECLPS rats could be supported by significantly lower CLint values for the elimination of telithromycin from the intestine (Table 1). The lower CLint values could have been due to the decreased expression of intestinal CYP3A in ECLPS rats (Fig. 1). However, the contribution of the intestinal blood flow rate and the free fraction of telithromycin in plasma to the decreased intestinal metabolism of the drug did not seem to be considerable. Mailman (19) reported that mucosal villus blood flow rates were similar between control and ECLPS rats. The free fractions of telithromycin in plasma were also comparable between control and ECLPS rats, as mentioned above. The above-mentioned data could also explain the greater F values (by 30.7%) in ECLPS rats (Table 2). Hence, the greater AUC0-{infty} of telithromycin after oral administration to ECLPS rats could have been due to decreased hepatic and intestinal first-pass effects of telithromycin.

In summary, in ECLPS rats, the expression of hepatic and intestinal CYP3A was lower than that in the controls (Fig. 1). After intravenous administration of telithromycin, the AUC0-{infty} was significantly greater in ECLPS rats than in the controls (Table 2). This could have been attributable to a decreased hepatic metabolism. After oral administration, the AUC0-{infty} was also significantly greater in ECLPS rats than in the controls (Table 2), possibly due to a decreased intestinal metabolism combined with a decreased hepatic metabolism of telithromycin in ECLPS rats.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank the sanofi-aventis group for the supply of telithromycin.

This study was supported in part by the 2007 BK21 Project for Applied Pharmaceutical Life Sciences.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, San 56-1, Shinlim-Dong, Kwanak-Gu, Seoul 151-742, South Korea. Phone: 82 2 8807855. Fax: 82 2 8898693. E-mail: leemg{at}snu.ac.kr Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 26 December 2007. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Agouridas, C., A. Bonnefoy, and J. F. Chantot. 1998. In vivo antibacterial activity of HMR3647, a novel ketolide highly active against respiratory pathogens, p. 21-23. In Program and Abstracts of the Fourth International Conference on Macrolides, Azalides, Streptogramins and Ketolides, Barcelona, Spain. Wallace Communications, Inc., Atlanta, GA.
  2. 2
  3. Bae, S. K., S. J. Lee, J. W. Kwon, W. B. Kim, I. Lee, and M. G. Lee. 2004. Effects of bacterial lipopolysaccharide on the pharmacokinetics of DA-7867, a new oxazolidinone, in rats. J. Pharm. Sci. 93:2364-2373.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. 3
  5. Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248-254.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. 4
  7. Bryskier, A. 2000. Ketolides-telithromycin, an example of a new class of antibacterial agents. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 6:661-669.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. 5
  9. Champney, W. S., and C. L. Tober. 1998. Inhibition of translation and 50S ribosomal subunit formation in Staphylococcus aureus cells by 11 different ketolide antibiotics. Curr. Microbiol. 37:418-425.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. 6
  11. Chiou, W. L. 1978. Critical evaluation of potential error in pharmacokinetic studies using the linear trapezoidal rule method for the calculation of the area under the plasma level-time curve. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 6:539-546.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. 7
  13. Duggleby, R. G. 1995. Analysis of enzyme progress curves by nonlinear regression. Methods Enzymol. 249:61-90.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. 8
  15. Edelstein, P. H., and M. A. Edelstein. 1999. In vitro activity of the ketolide HMR 3647 (RU 6647) for Legionella spp., its pharmacokinetics in guinea pigs, and use of the drug to treat guinea pigs with Legionella pneumophila pneumonia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:90-95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. 9
  17. Ghiselli, R., O. Cirioni, A. Giacometti, F. Mocchegiani, F. Orlando, C. Silvestri, A. Licci, A. Della Vittoria, G. Scalise, and V. Saba. 2006. The cathelicidin-derived tritrpticin enhances the efficacy of ertapenem in experimental rat models of septic shock. Shock 26:195-200.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. 10
  19. Gibaldi, M., and D. Perrier. 1982. Pharmacokinetics, 2nd ed. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
  20. 11
  21. Kim, S. N., J. Y. Seo, D. W. Jung, M. Y. Lee, Y. S. Jung, and Y. C. Kim. 2007. Induction of hepatic CYP2E1 by a subtoxic dose of acetaminophen in rats: increase in dichloromethane metabolism and carboxyhemoglobin elevation. Drug Metab. Dispos. 35:1754-1758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. 12
  23. Kim, Y. C., A. K. Lee, J. H. Lee, I. Lee, D. C. Lee, S. H. Kim, S. G. Kim, and M. G. Lee. 2005. Pharmacokinetics of theophylline in diabetes mellitus rats: induction of CYP1A2 and CYP2E1 on 1,3-dimethyluric acid formation. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 26:114-123.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. 13
  25. Kokwaro, G. O., S. Ismail, A. P. Glazier, S. A. Ward, and G. Edwards. 1993. Effect of malaria infection and endotoxin-induced fever on the metabolism of antipyrine and metronidazole in the rat. Biochem. Pharmacol. 45:1243-1249.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. 14
  27. Lee, J. H., and M. G. Lee. 2007. Dose-dependent pharmacokinetics of telithromycin after intravenous and oral administration to rats: contribution of intestinal first-pass effect to low bioavailability. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 10:37-50.[Medline]
  28. 15
  29. Lee, J. H., and M. G. Lee. 2007. Effects of acute renal failure on the pharmacokinetics of telithromycin in rats: negligible effects of increase in CYP3A1 on the metabolism of telithromycin. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 28:157-166.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. 16
  31. Lee, M. G., and W. L. Chiou. 1983. Evaluation of potential causes for the incomplete bioavailability of furosemide: gastric first-pass metabolism. J. Pharmacokinet. Biopharm. 11:623-640.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. 17
  33. Lotter, K., K. Höcherl, M. Bucher, and F. Kees. 2006. In vivo efficacy of telithromycin on cytokine and nitric oxide formation in lipopolysaccharide-induced acute systemic inflammation in mice. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 58:615-621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. 18
  35. Maezono, S., K. Sugimoto, K. Sakamoto, M. Ohmori, S. Hishikawa, K. Mizuta, H. Kawarasaki, Y. Watanabe, and A. Fujimura. 2005. Elevated blood concentrations of calcineurin inhibitors during diarrheal episode in pediatric liver transplant recipients: involvement of the suppression of intestinal cytochrome P450 3A and P-glycoprotein. Pediatr. Transplant. 9:315-323.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. 19
  37. Mailman, D. 2002. Ileal luminal nitric oxide synthase inhibitors and E. coli lipopolysaccharide effects in the anesthetized rat. Dig. Dis. Sci. 47:190-200.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. 20
  39. Morgan, E. T. 1989. Suppression of constitutive cytochrome P-450 gene expression in livers of rats undergoing an acute phase response to endotoxin. Mol. Pharmacol. 36:699-707.[Abstract]
  40. 21
  41. Nolan, J. P., and C. J. O'Connell. 1965. Vascular response in the isolated rat liver. I. Endotoxin, direct effects. J. Exp. Med. 122:1063-1073.[Abstract]
  42. 22
  43. Peng, J. Z., R. P. Remmel, and R. K. Sawchuk. 2004. Inhibition of murine cytochrome P4501A by tacrine: in vitro studies. Drug Metab. Dispos. 32:805-812.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. 23
  45. Roblin, P. M., and M. R. Hammerschlag. 1998. In vitro activity of a new ketolide antibiotic, HMR 3647, against Chlamydia pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1515-1516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. 24
  47. Sewer, M. B., and E. T. Morgan. 1998. Down-regulation of the expression of three major rat liver cytochrome P450S by endotoxin in vivo occurs independently of nitric oxide production. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 287:352-358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. 25
  49. Sewer, M. B., D. R. Koop, and E. T. Morgan. 1996. Endotoxemia in rats is associated with induction of the P4504A subfamily and suppression of several other forms of cytochrome P450. Drug Metab. Dispos. 24:401-407.[Abstract]
  50. 26
  51. Tong, Y., R. Zhang, S. N. Ngo, and A. K. Davey. 2006. Alteration of fexofenadine disposition in the rat isolated perfused liver following injection of bacterial lipopolysaccharide. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 33:685-689.[Medline]
  52. 27
  53. Wang, H., X. Y. Yu, M. Sun, J. K. Pan, and H. Gao. 2006. Effects of glutamine on matrix metalloproteinase-3 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 expressions in myocardium of rats with sepsis. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 44:587-591.[Medline]
  54. 28
  55. Wilkinson, G. R., and D. G. Shand. 1975. A physiological approach to hepatic drug clearance. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 18:377-390.[Medline]


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 2008, p. 1046-1051, Vol. 52, No. 3
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01210-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. G.