Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2008, p. 1556-1558, Vol. 52, No. 4
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.01458-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Division of Infectious Diseases, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California,1 David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California2
Received 10 November 2007/ Returned for modification 9 January 2008/ Accepted 14 January 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
BALB/c male mice were rendered diabetic with a single intraperitoneal injection of 210 mg of streptozotocin/kg of body weight in 0.2 ml citrate buffer 10 days prior to fungal challenge, as we have previously described (3-6, 9). Glycosuria and ketonuria were confirmed in all mice 7 to 10 days after streptozotocin injection. DKA mice were infected via the tail vein with Rhizopus oryzae 99-892, a clinical isolate known to be virulent in our model (6, 9). Pilot studies of micafungin or anidulafungin monotherapy were performed to determine the doses to be used in subsequent combination therapy studies. While no monotherapy doses of micafungin or anidulafungin significantly improved survival compared to the placebo dose, micafungin at 1 or 3 mg/kg/day and anidulafungin at 1 or 10 mg/kg/day trended toward benefit (data not shown).
To determine the efficacy of combination therapy, DKA mice were infected with R. oryzae and treated with liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) (5 mg/kg/day [initially dissolved in water and final concentration made in 5% dextrose water]), micafungin (1 or 3 mg/kg/day in phosphate-buffered saline), anidulafungin (1 or 10 mg/kg/day [initially dissolved in 20% ethanol and final concentration made in 5% dextrose water]), combinations thereof, or placebo (5% dextrose water or 5% dextrose water containing the appropriate amount of ethanol). The LAmB dose was chosen based on previously established low efficacy as monotherapy (6), thereby enabling statistical detection of the potentially enhanced efficacy of combination therapy. Treatments were administered intravenously for 4 days starting 24 h after infection.
The combination of LAmB and micafungin at 1 mg/kg/day synergistically improved survival compared to either monotherapy arm (Fig. 1A). Combination therapy with micafungin at 3 mg/kg/day was not similarly synergistic, consistent with our previous report of synergy with caspofungin at 1 mg/kg/day but not at 5 mg/kg/day (9). Monotherapy with micafungin at 3 mg/kg/day resulted in more surviving animals than monotherapy with micafungin at 1 mg/kg/day, but the difference in surviving animals or in time to death was not significant (P
0.1 for both comparisons).
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Combination therapy of LAmB and micafungin improves survival and reduces kidney fungal burden of DKA mice with mucormycosis. (A) Survival of DKA mice (n = 16 for placebo and combination arms and n = 8 for monotherapy arms) infected with R. oryzae (2.2 x 104 spores). *, P < 0.03 compared to placebo, LAmB, or micafungin by the log rank test. (B) Kidney fungal burden of DKA mice (n = 7 for all arms except for combination arm, which had 8) infected with R. oryzae (2.0 x 104 spores) and treated at 24 h postinfection for three consecutive days. Data are displayed as medians ± interquartile ranges. The y axis reflects the lower limit of detection of the assay. *, P < 0.03 compared to the placebo or monotherapy arms by the Mann-Whitney U test. d, day; Mica, micafungin.
|
Similarly, the combination of LAmB and anidulafungin synergistically improved survival compared to either monotherapy arm, but the benefit from anidulafungin was seen only at the 10-mg/kg/day dose (Fig. 2A). No benefit of combination therapy was seen at the 1-mg/kg/day dose of anidulafungin. Combination therapy with anidulafungin at 10 mg/kg/day significantly reduced tissue fungal burden compared to therapy with placebo or anidulafungin alone, and LAmB also reduced fungal burden compared to the placebo (Fig. 2B).
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Combination therapy of LAmB and anidulafungin improves survival and reduces kidney fungal burden of DKA mice with mucormycosis. (A) Survival of DKA mice (n = 16 for two separate experiments with similar results) infected with R. oryzae (2.0 x 104 spores). *, P < 0.05 compared to all other arms by the log rank test. (B) Kidney fungal burden of DKA mice (n = 9) infected with R. oryzae (4.0 x 104 spores) and treated at 24 h postinfection for three consecutive days. Data are displayed as medians ± interquartile ranges. The y axis reflects the lower limit of detection of the assay. *, P < 0.003 compared to placebo or anidulafungin (Anidula) by the Mann-Whitney U test; , P < 0.05 compared to placebo or anidulafungin by the Mann-Whitney U test.
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Combination therapy of LAmB and anidulafungin improves survival of neutropenic mice (n = 10) infected with R. oryzae (2.1 x 104 spores). *, P = 0.04 compared to placebo by the log rank test. Anidula, anidulafungin.
|
It is not known why echinocandins synergize with polyenes against mucormycosis infections. However, while the effect of combination therapy on tissue fungal burden has varied depending on the polyene and echinocandin used and on the fungal inoculum and technique used to measure fungal burden (quantitative PCR [9] versus colony counts, as used in this study), survival was improved in all experiments. These data suggest that enhanced clearance of fungus is not the predominant mechanism by which combination therapy improves efficacy against mucormycosis. The effect of combination echinocandin-polyene therapy on R. oryzae virulence and on host response (7, 8) to the fungus is under current investigation.
Given the poor outcomes of mucormycosis with current treatments, clinical investigation of the potential for combination echinocandin-polyene therapy to improve survival is warranted.
The research described in the paper was conducted at the research facilities of the Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center.
Published ahead of print on 22 January 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»