Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, April 2008, p. 1559-1563, Vol. 52, No. 4
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.01052-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

CNRS UMR 5234, Université de Bordeaux 2, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France
Received 10 August 2007/ Returned for modification 10 October 2007/ Accepted 30 January 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The 4.7-Mb genome of A. hydrophila subsp. hydrophila ATCC 7966T has recently been sequenced (21). Ten RND systems have been detected, including seven belonging to the hydrophobe/amphiphile efflux-1 family (20, 21). Among them, AHA2910, renamed AheB (Aeromonas hydrophila efflux B), is the pump most closely related to that of the major AcrB system of Escherichia coli. The aheA (1,194 bp) and aheC (1,434 bp) genes are located immediately upstream and downstream of aheB (3,150 bp), respectively. aheA, aheB, and aheC are in the same orientation and are organized in an operon-like structure (Fig. 1). Their deduced protein sequences share the highest identities with the membrane fusion protein AcrA of Photorhabdus luminescens (54%), the RND efflux pump AcrB of E. coli (69%), and the outer-membrane protein TtgC of Pseudomonas entomophila (58%), respectively. Another open reading frame (642 bp), called aheR, situated 143 bp upstream and in the opposite orientation of aheABC, exhibits sequence identity with the transcriptional repressors of the TetR family, such as AcrR of E. coli (37.6%) (Fig. 1).
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the aheRABC gene cluster and aheB inactivation strategy. Open arrows show the position and orientation of the aheR, aheA, aheB and aheC genes. At the top of the figure, the horizontal thin arrows indicate the position and orientation of primers used for amplification experiments and are numbered as follows: 1, aheB1F1; 2, MotifD1; 3, MotifAF_KpnI; 4, MotifAR_SalI; 5, MotifDF_BamHI; 6, MotifDR_SphI; 7, yAheAdbt and 8, yAheCfnR. Oligonucleotides with a 5'-end modification (i.e., introduction of restriction site or DNA yeast sequences) are represented by horizontal thin black arrows with a tail. The amplicons A and D (white boxes) possess cohesive ends (in gray) when digested by KpnI and SalI (amplicon A) and by BamHI and SphI (amplicon D) restriction enzymes. After ligation with the kanamycin resistance gene (kanR, as a hatched box), the AKD fragment was obtained. By double crossover between the chromosomal aheB gene and the homologous sequences situated on pEX-AKD plasmid, a aheB::kan mutant was constructed.
|
At first, the transcription of the aheB gene in A. hydrophila ATCC 7966T (collection of Institut Pasteur, France) was assessed by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR amplification. RNA extracts (2 ng) were prepared from logarithmic and late-growth-phase cultures in Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth, with an SV Total RNA Isolation kit that includes a DNase treatment (Promega, France). The oligonucleotides used, AheB1F1 and MotifD1 (Table 1), targeted an internal fragment of aheB (Fig. 1). RT-PCR experiments were carried out with and without (as control) reverse transcriptase in a single RT-PCR system tube, using an AccessQuick RT-PCR kit and RT-PCR conditions as recommended by the manufacturer (i.e., one RT step of 45°C for 45 min and then 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 1 min, and 68°C for 1 min) (Promega). An RT-PCR fragment with the expected size of 947 bp was obtained for cells grown at both growth phases, demonstrating that aheB was constantly transcribed in A. hydrophila ATCC 7966T (data not shown). Further analysis by Northern blotting and/or quantitative RT-PCR would be necessary to evaluate expression variations at different growth phases, as previously shown for mexB in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primers used for PCR amplification
|
aheB::kan mutant, was selected. PCR amplification experiments, followed by sequencing, revealed that the kanamycin cassette was correctly inserted in chromosomal DNA at amino acid position 220 of AheB, leading to the deletion of amino acids 221 to 361 (data not shown).
To outline the substrate specificity of the AheABC efflux pump, complementation experiments were necessary. Despite several independent experiments, cloning a PCR product of the entire aheABC operon directly into pEX19Gm remained unsuccessful. Thus, we performed a previous cloning step with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. First, using a Phusion DNA polymerase (Finnzymes, Finland), the operon was amplified with the primer pair yAheAdbt and yAheCfnR (Table 1) (Fig. 1). The resulting fragment of 5,769 bp contained XbaI and EcoRI recognition restriction sites and an usual prokaryotic ribosome binding site (GGAGG) 6 bp upstream from the ATG initiation codon (Table 1). This fragment was mixed with the linearized yeast-bacteria shuttle vector pGB6 (an unpublished vector derived from pRS316, including URA3, encoding a uracil biosynthesis enzyme, and blaTEM-1, encoding ampicillin resistance). Cells of S. cerevisiae BY4742 (ura3
0; EUROpean S. cerevisiae ARchive for Functional collection, Germany) were transformed with the aheABC fragment and the pGB6 plasmid according to a one-step protocol based on an incubation of 30 min at 45°C in a medium containing thio compounds and alkali ions (2). The presence of the same 20-bp sequence at the ends of the amplicon (Table 1, primers yAheAdbt and yAheCfnR) and at the ends of the linearized vector allowed an efficient homologous recombination in yeast and led to the formation of the replicative circular plasmid pGB-AheABC. Yeast plasmids were extracted from the uracil-positive clones by a previously described procedure (19), and one of them was transferred by electroporation to E. coli SM10. After double digestion with XbaI and EcoRI, the insert of pGB-AheABC was introduced into pEX19Gm in the same orientation as the resident lacZ promoter for optimal expression, generating the pEX-AheABC plasmid. After verification by sequencing, this recombinant plasmid, which conferred gentamicin resistance due to the presence of an aacC1 determinant located on pEX19Gm was transferred by conjugation to the
aheB::kan mutant. Thus, Aeromonas transconjugants were selected and cultivated on an MH medium containing ampicillin (100 mg/liter) and gentamicin (10 mg/liter).
Aeromonas strains with native or recombinant plasmids were compared first by the agar diffusion method, using all 53 available antibiotic disks (amikacin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ampicillin, aztreonam, cefepime, cefoperazone, cefotaxime, cefotetan, cefoxitin, cefpirome, cefsulodin, ceftazidime, cefuroxime, cephalothin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, clindamycin, colistin, doxycycline, erythromycin, fosfomycin, fusidic acid, gentamicin, imipenem, levofloxacin, lincomycin, minocycline, moxalactam, nalidixic acid, netilmicin, nitrofurantoin, nitroxolin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, oxacillin, penicillin, pipemidic acid, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, pristinamycin, rifampin, sparfloxacin, spectinomycin, spiramycin, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, tobramycin, trimethoprim, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; Bio-Rad, France), corresponding to drugs currently in use for the treatment of human infections (15). Then, MICs were determined by an agar dilution method in MH medium, with a final inoculum of about 104 CFU per spot (15), for the nine compounds that showed variations (cefuroxime, cefoperazone, erythromycin, lincomycin, pristinamycin, minocycline, trimethoprim, fusidic acid, and rifampin). The MICs of 10 nonantibiotic agents were also determined. Four of them gave varied results (ethidium bromide, acridine orange, benzalkonium chloride, and tributyltin), while six gave no changes (sodium dodecyl sulfate, rhodamine 6G, crystal violet, sodium deoxycholate, tetraphenylphosphonium chloride, and acriflavine) (Table 2). The differences in MICs between the wild-type A. hydrophila strain and its hypersensitive mutant did not exceed fourfold, suggesting that AheB expression occurred at a moderate level in the wild-type strain. Consequently, AheABC might not be as critical in the species-specific resistance of A. hydrophila as AcrAB is in E. coli (23). Alternatively, these low MIC differences might be ascribed to the overproduction of other efflux pumps or a regulatory system(s) in A. hydrophila to compensate the nonfunctional AheB protein, as described for AcrB mutations in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (5). When the multicopy pEX-AheABC plasmid was introduced into the
aheB::kan mutant, the same compounds were affected, but differences in MICs were often higher, reaching 33-fold for cefoperazone and 16-fold for cefuroxime, pristinamycin, and tributyltin, and thus were considered the preferential substrates of AheB (Table 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Susceptibility to antibiotics and nonantibiotic compounds
|
acrAB (17). AheABC retained its substrate specificity in this heterologous host, except for rifampin and trimethoprim, which were not affected. The increases in MICs of some substrates (acridine orange and tributyltin) were lower in E. coli than in A. hydrophila strains, whereas the reverse was noted for other drugs (erythromycin, fusidic acid, and ethidium bromide). Consequently, these variations did not seem to be related to different levels of AheABC expression in both bacteria but rather resulted from differences in outer-membrane permeability, as previously suggested for MexAB-OprM in E. coli and P. aeruginosa (22). MIC variations for the two E. coli isogenic
acrAB and
acrAB(pUCAcrAB) strains (17) were higher than those for the
acrAB and
acrAB(pEXAheABC) strains for all AheABC substrates except pristinamycin and trimethoprim (Table 2). Thus, even if both RND pumps share sequence homologies, AheABC appears to have a narrower range of substrates than AcrAB-TolC (23). Indeed, in contrast to the latter pump, AheABC did not extrude acriflavine and quinolones, although RND family exporters are commonly involved in fluoroquinolone resistance in gram-negative bacteria (18). Similarly, AheABC did not accommodate bile salts, due maybe to the fact that the usual environment of this bacteria is not, as for E. coli, the human digestive tract (1). In contrast, AcrAB exported tributyltin much more efficiently than AheABC did, although this antifouling agent is a common pollutant of water sediments that can occasionally contaminate the Aeromonas sp. ecosystem (12).
The addition of PAβN (Sigma-Aldrich, France) (14) did not modify the MICs of some AheABC substrates (cefuroxime, cefoperazone, lincomycin, ethidium bromide, and benzalkonium chloride), whereas it strongly decreased the MICs of others, whether they were preferential substrates of this pump or not (Table 2). The considerable potentiation of some compounds by PAβN in the wild-type A. hydrophila strain as well as in its
aheB::kan mutant suggested that this inhibitor might block an additional RND efflux system(s).
In conclusion, this report is the first functional analysis of a multidrug efflux pump belonging to the RND family in Aeromonas spp. The AheABC system is involved in the MDR phenotype of A. hydrophila, albeit at low levels. However, inhibition tests using PAβN indicate that other RND-type efflux pumps also contribute to the intrinsic drug resistance of this species. Further experiments, facilitated by the methodology developed in this work, are warranted to explore the type of transport, substrate profile, and regulation mechanisms of these systems.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The nucleotide sequence of the 6,554-bp fragment containing the aheRABC genes of A. hydrophila ATCC 7966T has been deposited in the GenBank/EMBL sequence database under accession number EF613320.
acrAB with and without the pUCAcrAB, pEX19Gm, pTnModOKan, and pGB6 plasmids, respectively. We thank C. Vidaillac for helpful discussion. This work was supported by a grant from the French Research and Technology Minister.
Published ahead of print on 11 February 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»