Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2008, p. 1873-1875, Vol. 52, No. 5
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.01572-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Susceptibility Testing of Anidulafungin and Voriconazole Alone and in Combination against Conidia and Hyphae of Aspergillus spp. under Hypoxic Conditions
Susanne Perkhofer,*
Daniel Jost,
Manfred P. Dierich, and
Cornelia Lass-Flörl
Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Hygiene, Microbiology and Social Medicine, Division of Hygiene and Medical Microbiology, Innsbruck, Austria
Received 7 December 2007/
Returned for modification 29 December 2007/
Accepted 6 March 2008

ABSTRACT
MICs and fractional inhibitory concentrations were evaluated
for anidulafungin and voriconazole alone and in combination
against conidia and hyphae under hypoxic (1% oxygen-5% CO
2-94%
nitrogen) conditions against 31
Aspergillus isolates. Anidulafungin
exhibited excellent activity against conidia and hyphae of
Aspergillus spp. The visual reading of the MIC for anidulafungin was optimal
under hypoxic conditions.

TEXT
Filamentous fungal pathogens are recognized as a major and increasing
source of infection in immunocompromised hosts (
3). The most
common species causing disease are
Aspergillus fumigatus (90%)
followed by
Aspergillus flavus,
Aspergillus niger, and
Aspergillus terreus (
3). Due to the high mortality rate from mold infections
and the limited efficacies of the current agents, the use of
combination therapy is an interesting option in the treatment
of invasive aspergillosis (
11,
15). Since echinocandins and
triazoles are different classes of antifungal drugs with different
modes of action, the use of this two-drug combination has recently
received much attention in medical mycology (
2,
8,
12,
14).
Anidulafungin is a novel cyclic lipopeptide antifungal agent of the echinocandin class, which acts via inhibition of 1,3-β-D-glucan synthesis (18). The drug end point for the echinocandins is the minimum effective concentration (MEC) (1, 5). However, determination of MEC is difficult and labor intensive and requires expertise. Warn et al. (19) demonstrated that end point reading for caspofungin and micafungin under hypoxic conditions (1% oxygen) was superior and suggests reading MICs rather than MECs. Therefore, we investigated the in vitro activity of anidulafungin alone and in combination with the azole voriconazole against conidia and hyphae of Aspergillus spp. under hypoxic conditions.
Ten clinical isolates of A. fumigatus, nine of A. terreus, and six each of A. flavus and A. niger were investigated. Strains were obtained from patients suffering from invasive aspergillosis.
The MICs of anidulafungin (kindly provided by Pfizer, Vienna, Austria) and voriconazole (kindly provided by Pfizer, Vienna, Austria) for Aspergillus spp. were tested according to the proposed Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee of the European Committee on Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing broth microdilution method (9) but under hypoxic conditions. MICs for hyphae were evaluated by the method of Lass-Flörl et al. (10). Briefly, 100 µl of conidial solutions were added to 96-well plates (Costar, Vienna, Austria) and incubated at 30°C for 16 to 22 h to allow the formation of hyphae. The outgrowth of hyphal length (50 to 70 µm) was determined by using an inverted microscope. Wells were washed and refilled with 100 µl RPMI 2% glucose, and antifungal agents were added and incubated at 37°C for 48 h (10). The microdilution plates were incubated in a gas-tight jar with an oxygen concentration of 1% according to the protocol of Warn et al. (19), and MIC end points were read at 100% inhibition. Also, the metabolic activity of drug-treated hyphae was determined from their ability to reduce the tetrazolium compound 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2 H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide (XTT) as described elsewhere (4).
For selected experiments, the plates were incubated in ambient air conditions (20% oxygen). For voriconazole, MICs were read visually with no growth end point, and for anidulafungin, the MEC instead of the MIC was defined microscopically (6).
The synergy tests were evaluated by using MIC end points of each drug. The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) of each drug for an individual isolate was calculated as the ratio of the concentration of the drug in combination that achieves the MIC end point to the MIC of the drug alone using that end point. FIC index (FICI) values were interpreted as follows: FICI of
0.5, synergistic; FICI of >0.5 to
4, indifferent; and FICI of >4, antagonistic (7). All tests were performed twice and in duplicate.
In this study we determined the in vitro antifungal activity of anidulafungin either alone or in combination with voriconazole against conidia (Table 1) and hyphae (Table 2) by reading the MIC on the basis of a complete growth inhibition end point under hypoxic conditions. We found that the growth of Aspergillus spp. under these conditions in the presence of anidulafungin was almost totally inhibited, and the end point was clear and plain to define. The isolates tested were susceptible to anidulafungin and voriconazole, displaying lower MICs (
0.06 µg/ml) for anidulafungin than those found for voriconazole (
2 µg/ml) under hypoxic conditions, as shown in Tables 1 and 2.
A subset of
Aspergillus isolates (
n = 10) tested under ambient
air conditions demonstrated that MECs and MICs for conidia (
n = 10) and hyphae (
n = 10) of anidulafungin and voriconazole
correlated to 93% and 90% (data not shown) with the MICs tested
under hypoxic conditions. Hence, the hypoxic condition had no
influence on the MICs of voriconazole. MECs and MICs of anidulafungin
were also similar within the various testing conditions.
The onset of invasive Aspergillus infection is associated with the appearance of hyphae (6). Anidulafungin displayed excellent results against hyphae (Table 2), with MICs as low as those found for conidia (Table 1). Voriconazole also exhibited excellent in vitro activity against hyphae of Aspergillus spp. (Table 2) but at slightly higher concentrations than those needed to inhibit conidial growth (Table 1), which is in accordance with a previously published report (13). For hyphae, comparison of the visually determined end points with the results of the XTT method revealed that 80.7% of the visually determined MICs corresponded to a reduction in metabolic activity (data not shown).
As shown in Table 1, the in vitro interaction of anidulafungin with voriconazole in combination for a conidial suspension of Aspergillus spp. exerted partly synergy and a lack of antagonism. Similar results were obtained by others (14). Yet this report is the first to demonstrate the interaction of anidulafungin and voriconazole against hyphae of Aspergillus. Results for the majority of isolates were indifferent, whereas results for 4 of the 27 tested isolates showed antagonism (Table 2). Presently we lack in vivo data for this drug combination. The use of animal models to evaluate the usability of anidulafungin combined with voriconazole for combination therapy is warranted.
The fact that oxygen levels in wounds and deep-tissue foci are much lower (<1% oxygen) than in healthy tissues (16) may support testing under hypoxic conditions. Under hypoxic conditions, similar to those that might occur in tissue infected with Aspergillus (17), the end point for anidulafungin was clear and easy to define. The MEC and MIC were found to be similar, yet the MIC was easier to read.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Hygiene, Microbiology and Social Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Fritz-Pregl Str. 3, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Phone: 43 512 9003 70729. Fax: 43 512 9003 73700. E-mail:
Susanne.Perkhofer{at}i-med.ac.at 
Published ahead of print on 17 March 2008. 

REFERENCES
1 - Arikan, S., M. Lozano-Chiu, V. Paetznick, and J. H. Rex. 2001. In vitro susceptibility testing methods for caspofungin against Aspergillus and Fusarium isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:327-330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Cuenca-Estrella, M., A. Gomez-Lopez, G. Garcia-Effron, L. Alcazar-Fuoli, E. Mellado, M. Buitrago, and J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela. 2005. Combined activity in vitro of caspofungin, amphotericin B, and azole agents against clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:1232-1235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Denning, D. W. 1991. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of systemic fungal infections in the immunocompromised host. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 28(Suppl. B):1-16.[Free Full Text]
4 - Dotis, J., M. Simitsopoulou, M. Dalakiuridou, T. Konstantinou, A. Taparkou, F. Kanakoudi-Tsakalidou, J. T. Walsh, and E. Roilides. 2006. Effects of lipid formulations of amphotericin B on activity of human monocytes against Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:868-873.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - Espinel-Ingroff, A., A. Fothergill, M. Ghannoum, E. Manavathu, L. Ostrosky-Zeichner, M. A. Pfaller, M. G. Rinaldi, W. Shell, and T. J. Walsh. 2007. Quality control and reference guidelines for CLSI broth microdilution method (M38-A document) for susceptibility testing of anidulafungin against molds. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:2180-2182.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - Hogan, L. H., B. S. Klein, and S. M. Levitz. 1996. Virulence factors of medically important fungi. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 4:469-488.
7 - Johnson, M. D., C. MacDougal, L. O. Ostrosky-Zeichner, J. R. Perfect, and J. H. Rex. 2004. Combination antifungal therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:693-715.[Free Full Text]
8 - Kirkpatrick, W. R., S. Perea, B. J. Coco, and T. Patterson. 2002. Efficacy of caspofungin alone and in combination with voriconazole in a guinea pig model of invasive aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2564-2568.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Lass-Flörl, C., M. Cuenca-Estrella, D. W. Deninng, and J. L. Rodriguez-Tudela. 2006. Antifungal susceptibility testing in Aspergillus spp. according to EUCAST Methodology. Med. Mycol. 44(Suppl.):S319-S325.[CrossRef]
10 - Lass-Flörl, C., M. Nagl, E. Gunsilius, C. Speth, H. Ulmer, M. P. Dierich, and R. Würzner. 2002. In vitro studies on the activities of amphotericin B and lipid based amphotericin B formulations against Aspergillus conidia and hyphae. Mycoses 45:166-169.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Marr, K. A., M. Boeckh, R. A. Carter, H. W. Kim, and L. Corey. 2004. Combination antifungal therapy of invasive aspergillosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39:797-802.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 - Perea, S., G. Gonzalez, A. W. Fothergill, W. R. Kirkpatrick, M. G. Rinaldi, and T. F. Patterson. 2002. In vitro interaction of caspofungin acetate with voriconazole against clinical isolates of Aspergillus spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:3039-3041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Perkhofer, S., H. Lugger, M. P. Dierich, and C. Lass-Flörl. 2007. Posaconazole enhances the activity of amphotericin B against Aspergillus hyphae in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:791-793.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Philip, A., Z. Odabasi, J. Rodriquez, V. L. Paetznick, E. Chen, J. H. Rex, and L. Ostrosky-Zeichner. 2005. In vitro synergy testing of anidulafungin with itraconazole, voriconazole, and amphotericin B against Aspergillus spp. and Fusarium spp. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:3572-3574.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Polak, A. 1999. The past, present, and future of antimycotic combination therapy. Mycoses 42:355-370.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Simmen, H. P., and J. Blaser. 1993. Analysis of pH and pO2 in abscesses, peritoneal fluids, and drainage fluid in the presence or absence of bacterial infection during and after abdominal surgery. Am. J. Surg. 166:24-27.[CrossRef][Medline]
17 - Tarrand, J. J., X. Y. Han, D. P. Kontoyannis, and G. S. May. 2005. Aspergillus hyphae in infected tissue: evidence of physiologic adaptation and effect of culture recovery. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:382-386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Vazquez, J. A., and J. D. Sobel. 2006. Anidulafungin: a novel echinocandin. Clin. Infect. Dis. 43:215-222.[CrossRef][Medline]
19 - Warn, P. A., A. Sharo, J. Guinea, and D. Denning. 2004. Effect of hypoxic conditions on in vitro susceptibility testing of amphotericin B, itraconazole and micafungin against Aspergillus and Candida. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53:743-749.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2008, p. 1873-1875, Vol. 52, No. 5
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.01572-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
van de Sande, W. W. J., Mathot, R. A. A., ten Kate, M. T., van Vianen, W., Tavakol, M., Rijnders, B. J. A., Bakker-Woudenberg, I. A. J. M.
(2009). Combination Therapy of Advanced Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis in Transiently Neutropenic Rats Using Human Pharmacokinetic Equivalent Doses of Voriconazole and Anidulafungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 2005-2013
[Abstract]
[Full Text]