Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2008, p. 1964-1969, Vol. 52, No. 6
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.01487-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Polyclonal Population Structure of Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolates in Spain Carrying mef and mef plus erm(B)
Elia Gómez G. de la Pedrosa,1
María-Isabel Morosini,1
Mark van der Linden,2
Patricia Ruiz-Garbajosa,1
Juan Carlos Galán,1
Fernando Baquero,1
Ralf René Reinert,2 and
Rafael Cantón1*
Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, and CIBER-ESP, Madrid, Spain,1
Institute for Medical Microbiology, National Reference Center for Streptococci, University Hospital (RWTH), Aachen, Germany2
Received 15 November 2007/
Returned for modification 4 February 2008/
Accepted 15 March 2008

ABSTRACT
The population structure (serotypes, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
[PFGE] types, and multilocus sequencing types) of 45
mef-positive
Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates [carrying
mef alone (
n = 17)
or with the
erm(B) gene
n = 28)] were studied. They were selected
from among all erythromycin-resistant isolates (
n = 244) obtained
from a collection of 712 isolates recovered from different Spanish
geographic locations in the prevaccination period from 1999
to 2003. The overall rates of resistance (according to the criteria
of the CLSI) among the 45
mef-positive isolates were as follows:
penicillin G, 82.2%; cefotaxime, 22.2%; clindamycin, 62.2%;
and tetracycline, 68.8% [mainly in isolates carrying
erm(B)
plus
mef(E);
P < 0.001]. No levofloxacin or telithromycin
resistance was found. Macrolide resistance phenotypes (as determined
by the disk diffusion approximation test) were 37.7% for macrolide
resistance [with all but one due to
mef(E)] and 62.2% for constitutive
macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance [cMLS
B; with
all due to
mef(E) plus
erm(B)]. Serotypes 14 (22.2%), 6B (17.7%),
19A (13.3%), and 19F (11.1%) were predominant. Twenty-five different
DNA patterns (PFGE types) were observed. Our
mef-positive isolates
were grouped (by eBURST analysis) into four clonal complexes
(
n = 18) and 19 singleton clones (
n = 27). With the exception
of clone Spain
9V-3, all clonal complexes (clonal complexes 6B,
Spain
6B-2, and Sweden
15A-25) and 73.6% of singleton clones carried
both the
erm(B) and the
mef(E) genes. The international multiresistant
clones Spain
23F-1 and Poland
6B-20 were represented as singleton
clones. A high proportion of
mef-positive
S. pneumoniae isolates
presented the
erm(B) gene, with all isolates expressing the
cMLS
B phenotype. A polyclonal population structure was demonstrated
within our Spanish
mef-positive
S. pneumoniae isolates, with
few clonal complexes overrepresented within this collection.

INTRODUCTION
Macrolide resistance among
Streptococcus pneumoniae clinical
isolates has risen to prominence. The rate of resistance to
macrolides is even higher than that to penicillin, particularly
in Spain and some other European countries, such as France,
Poland, Greece, and Portugal (
17,
23). In most European countries,
erythromycin resistance is mainly due to the presence of the
erm(B) gene. This gene encodes an rRNA methylase responsible
for the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance (MLS
B)
phenotype and is associated with conjugative transposons. The
clonal dispersion of
erm(B)-positive
S. pneumoniae isolates
and the horizontal transfer of transposable elements carrying
this determinant have been associated with the increase in the
rate of erythromycin resistance in this organism (
4,
12). Erythromycin
resistance may also be associated with the expression of efflux
pumps encoded by
mef genes that endow the macrolide resistance
(M) phenotype (
7). This phenotype has traditionally been more
prevalent in North America than in Europe (
7,
12).
In recent years, the presence of both the erm(B) and the mef(E) genes in S. pneumoniae clinical isolates has been increasingly recognized, but they are more prevalent in Asian countries than in Europe and the United States (10, 11). Despite the interest in this association on the evolution of macrolide and ketolide resistance, very few studies have investigated the population biology of a collection of isolates recovered during different time periods and/or from different geographic origins (13, 26). In Spain, population structure studies have shown that resistance in S. pneumoniae international clones, such as clones Spain9V-3 and England14-9, are mainly associated with those endowed with the M phenotype (1, 2), whereas clones Spain23F-1 and Spain6B-2 are associated with isolates endowed with the MLSB phenotype (14). This type of analysis with S. pneumoniae isolates with both the erm(B) and the mef genes has not been reported. In the present study, the population structure and clonal relatedness of 45 mef-positive isolates [62.2% of which had both the erm(B) and the mef genes] identified within a collection of 712 S. pneumoniae isolates recovered from different Spanish hospitals from 1999 to 2003 were fully investigated. Moreover, the corresponding resistance phenotypes and antibiotic susceptibility patterns were also studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial isolates.
Seven hundred twelve
S. pneumoniae clinical isolates (244 isolates
nonsusceptible to erythromycin) recovered during the prevaccination
period (in Spain, the conjugate heptavalent vaccine was accepted
for use in 2002, but it was rarely used until 2004) were studied.
Isolates were prospectively collected from 14 Spanish hospitals
representing 14 different geographic areas during the fall and
winter seasons of 1999 through 2003. Among these strains, a
total of 45
mef-positive isolates were detected, and all of
them were selected for further studies. The origins of these
45 isolates are included in Table
1. A total of 26.6% (12 of
45) of these isolates were of pediatric origin.
Susceptibility testing and erythromycin resistance phenotypes.
The MICs of penicillin G, cefotaxime, erythromycin, clindamycin,
telithromycin, tetracycline, and levofloxacin were determined
by the broth microdilution method, according to Clinical Laboratory
Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (
3). Incubation was performed
at 35°C in ambient air.
S. pneumoniae ATCC 49619 was used
as the reference strain in each run. The breakpoints were those
established by the CLSI guidelines (
3). The phenotypic detection
of
erm induction was performed by using the macrolide (erythromycin)-clindamycin
disk diffusion approximation test, as described previously (
17).
Detection of erythromycin resistance genes.
A real-time PCR approach was carried out for detection of the erm and mef genes among erythromycin-resistant isolates by using the conditions described previously (20). A subsequent scheme of multiplex PCR was followed to differentiate between the mef(A) and the mef(E) genes. Specific primers designed for this purpose were forward primer mefAF (5'-AATACAACAATTGGAAACTT-3'), forward primer mefEF (5'-AAGGAGTTGTGGTTCTGA-3'), and a reverse primer for both the mef(A) and the mef(E) genes, primer mefR (5'-AATCGTGTAAATCATTGG-3'). The expected sizes of the PCR products were 1,080 kb for mef(A) and 480 kb for mef(E). The PCR amplification mixture of 25 µl contained 15 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM KCl (pH 8.0), 25 mM MgCl2, 100 µM of each nucleotide, 0.15 pmol of the two forward primers mefAF and mefEF, 0.3 pmol of reverse primer mefR, 1.5 U of AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and 1 µl of genomic DNA. The PCR conditions (PTC-100 thermocycler; MJ Research Inc., Watertown, MA) comprised an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 12 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 52°C for 1 min, and elongation at 72°C for 1 min. After the amplification cycles, a final elongation step of 10 min at 72°C was included.
Population structure.
Serotyping was performed with the Neufeld Quellung reaction by using antisera provided by the Statens Seruminstitut (Copenhagen, Denmark). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed as previously described by del Campo et al. (6). Briefly, chromosomal DNA was prepared by following the standard protocol for gram-positive bacteria, with some modifications (6). The DNA was restricted with the SmaI endonuclease (Amersham Biosciences Europe GmbH, Freiburg, Germany). Electrophoresis was performed with CHEF DR-III equipment (Bio-Rad, Birmingham, United Kingdom) for 23 h at 14°C, and the following settings were applied: 6 V/cm and 1 to 30 s. The PFGE patterns obtained were compared with those for clones established by the Pneumococcal Molecular Epidemiology Network (16).
Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme for S. pneumoniae was carried out as described previously (9). Clusters of related sequence types (STs) were grouped into clonal complexes (CCs) by use of the eBURST program (http://www.mlst.net). STs were clustered with BioNumerics software (version 4.0; Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium) by using a categorical coefficient and a graphing method called the minimum-spanning tree, as described previously (24).
Statistical analysis.
Statistical associations were analyzed by the chi-square test. Differences were considered statistically significant when the two-tailed P value was less than 0.05.

RESULTS
Macrolide resistance genes, phenotypes, and susceptibility patterns.
Within the entire
S. pneumoniae population (
n = 712), 244 isolates
were nonsusceptible to erythromycin. Among those isolates, 80.7%
carried the
erm(B) gene as the sole genetic determinant and
showed the MLS
B phenotype. In addition, 45 (18.4%) of the erythromycin-resistant
isolates carried a
mef-type gene, and of these, 44 isolates
had the
mef(E) gene and the remaining one had the
mef(A) gene.
It is of note that 28 of 45
mef-positive isolates also carried
the
erm(B) gene (62.2%). In two isolates displaying erythromycin
and clindamycin MICs of 0.5 mg/liter, neither the
erm(B) gene
nor the
mef gene was detected. The constitutive MLS
B phenotype
was observed in all 28 isolates carrying both the
mef and the
erm(B) genes, whereas the M phenotype was detected in the remaining
17 isolates that carried only one of the
mef genes alone. No
temporal or local geographic association among the
mef-positive
or the
mef- plus
erm(B)-positive isolates was observed (data
not shown).
The overall rates of resistance to penicillin G, cefotaxime, tetracycline, and clindamycin among all 45 mef-positive isolates were 82.2% [35.5% for mef-positive isolates plus 46.7% for the mef- plus erm(B)-positive isolates], 22.2% [17.7% for the mef-positive isolates plus 4.4% for the mef- plus erm(B)-positive isolates], 68.8% [13.3% for the mef-positive isolates plus 55.5% the mef- plus erm(B)-positive isolates], and 62.2% [0% for the mef-positive isolates plus 62.2% for the mef- plus erm(B)-positive isolates], respectively. Neither telithromycin resistance nor levofloxacin resistance was found (MIC ranges, 0.03 to 1 mg/liter and 0.25 to 2 mg/liter, respectively).
Population structure in mef-positive S. pneumoniae isolates.
The serotype distribution among the 45 mef-positive isolates was as follows: serotype 14, 22.2%; serotype 6B, 17.7%; serotype 19A, 13.3%; serotype 19F, 11.1%; serotype 11A, 6.6%; serotype 9V, 6.6%; serotype 15A, 6.6%; serotype 23F, 4.4%; and other serotypes, 11.1%. With a single exception, all isolates belonging to serotype 14 (n = 10) harbored the mef gene alone. Six different PFGE patterns were found among the mef(E)-positive isolates, with 58.8% of them belonging to the Spain9V-3 clone. Among the erm(B)- plus mef(E)-positive isolates, 19 different PFGE patterns were found, with the Sweden15A-25, Spain6B-2, Spain23F-1, Poland6B-20, and NorwayNT-42 clones represented. Analysis of the MLST results by use of the eBURST program showed that our mef-positive isolates were grouped into 4 CCs and 19 singleton clones (Fig. 1). The serotypes, the PFGE type distribution according to analysis with the eBURST program, and the corresponding STs are shown in Table 1.
The CCs grouped 18 of the
mef-positive isolates; 10 of them
carried the
mef(E) gene as the sole resistance determinant and
belonged to the Spain
9V-3 international clone, and 8 isolates
carried both the
erm(B) and the
mef(E) genes. The latter isolates
were grouped into the Spain
6B-2 international clone (
n = 3);
the Sweden
15A-25 clone (
n = 2); and CC-6B, which includes two
different STs (ST135 and ST1638, which is a double-locus variant
of ST135) (
n = 3).
Twenty-seven isolates were grouped into singleton clones which included some international resistant clones, such as Spain23F-1 [two isolates harbored both the erm(B) and the mef(E) genes], Poland6B-20 and NorwayNT-42 [one isolate each carried both the erm(B) and the mef(E) genes], and England14-9 [represented by the only isolate that carried the mef(A) gene detected in this study]. With the exception of tetracycline (MIC, 4 mg/liter), this isolate was susceptible to all antibiotics tested. ST276 (a single-locus variant of the Denmark14-32 clone), ST549, and ST62 grouped more than one isolate each (four, three, and three isolates, respectively), while the other STs were each represented by a single isolate. The relationship between the STs and the macrolide resistance genes is shown in Table 1.
Serotype distribution according to analysis with the eBURST program showed that even though strains of some serotypes belonged to specific international clones, such as serotypes 6B, 14, 19A, and 15A, these serotypes were also found among the isolates grouped as singleton clones. The serotype distribution according to analysis with the eBURST program is shown in Table 1.
Coresistance to penicillin (MIC range, 0.12 to 4 mg/liter) was found among the isolates grouped into CCs. The only isolate intermediate for cefotaxime (MIC, 4 mg/liter) belonged to CC-Spain9V-3. This isolate also showed increased MICs for levofloxacin (2 mg/liter). This was also found among the CC-Spain6B-2 and CC-6B isolates. Only eight isolates (all of them belonging to CC-Spain9V-3) were susceptible to tetracycline. The susceptibility patterns among the CCs is shown in Table 2. Some differences in susceptibilities among the isolates grouped as singleton clones were observed between the mef-positive isolates and the isolates containing both erm(B) and mef(E).
Coresistance to penicillin G was more prevalent among the isolates
carrying
erm(B) plus
mef(E) (89.2%) than among the
mef(E)/
mef(A)-positive
(70.5%) isolates. The same trend, but with a high degree of
statistical significance (
P < 0.001), was observed for the
rate of tetracycline resistance among the isolates positive
for both
erm(B) plus
mef(E) (92.8%) compared with that among
the
mef(E)/
mef(A)-positive (29.4%) isolates. The rates of cefotaxime
resistance were similar between the two groups. The susceptibility
patterns of the singleton clones according to the macrolide
resistance genotype are shown in Table
3.

DISCUSSION
Typing studies are useful for providing an understanding of
the epidemiology and spread of resistant bacteria as well as
establishing control protocols against epidemics (
9). For
S. pneumoniae, capsular typing is commonly used in clinical laboratories
and has demonstrated that particular serotypes, such as serotypes
23F and 6B, are related to the worldwide spread of penicillin
G-resistant isolates (
5,
21). PFGE is useful as a means of observing
recent changes, and MLST is valuable for discriminating the
variations that slowly accumulate among the bacterial population
(
9). These techniques have been used in our study with all 45
erythromycin-resistant
S. pneumoniae isolates carrying
mef genes
recovered during a prospective study in different Spanish geographic
areas. With the aid of the MLST technique, the
mef-positive
isolates among our Spanish
S. pneumoniae isolates were demonstrated
to be polyclonal, with few CCs overrepresented within the collection
studied.
Resistance to macrolides in S. pneumoniae dramatically increased in Spain during the prevaccination period from 1999 to 2003 (17, 23). In our collection, 34.3% of the isolates were resistant to erythromycin, mainly due to the presence of the erm(B) gene. In recent years, an increase in the prevalence of efflux mechanisms (M phenotype) has been observed (13, 20). Among the macrolide-resistant isolates in our collection, the M phenotype was found in 6.9% of the isolates, and all of them carried a mef gene. However, the presence of this gene was even higher, since 11.5% (28 of 244 isolates) of the isolates with a constitutive MLSB phenotype concomitantly presented the erm(B) gene. This value is higher than that previously reported from other studies in Spain, in which mef isolates did not have the erm(B) gene (2). Such an increasing association between the mef(E) and the erm(B) genes was unexpected in a country with a high incidence of S. pneumoniae isolates harboring the erm(B) gene. It is indeed difficult to understand the possible selective advantage of these isolates harboring both determinants, as erm(B) alone provides higher MICs than those apparently needed to resist the actions of macrolides. In other countries, the increased prevalence of isolates carrying both determinants has been related to the spread of specific clones, such the Taiwan19F-14 clone, and members of a specific CC, CC-271, which includes ST271, ST236, and ST320 (8, 10). It is of note that ST271 was also found in our collection, but it was found as a singleton clone not related to the other STs (Fig. 1). In our study, the presence of isolates with both the erm(B) and the mef(E) genes was associated with three different CCs and 14 singleton clones (Table 1). These results demonstrated the nonclonal nature of the population studied and that horizontal gene transfer processes might have occurred, as may have the selection of resistant S. pneumoniae isolates harboring the mef(E) and the erm(B) genes.
In addition, most of the erm(B) plus mef(E) isolates were also resistant to penicillin, a fact that has also been found among isolates in geographic areas where isolates with this dual genotype are prevalent (10). On the other hand, tetracycline resistance was significant among the isolates positive for both erm(B) and mef(E). This fact could be related to the presence of conjugative transposons, like Tn2010, recently described in these isolates (4, 8). The participation of this trait in the maintenance of these isolates should be investigated.
Within the population with both the erm(B) and the mef determinants that we studied, we were able to identify multiresistant international clones (www.sph.emory.edu/PMEN) circulating in Spain (2, 14, 18), including clones Spain6B-2 and Sweden15A-25 among the CCs and clones Spain23F-1, Poland 6B-20 and NorwayNT-42 as singletons. Both the Spain6B-2 and Sweden15A-25 clones have been shown to be overrepresented among S. pneumoniae isolates that are highly resistant to penicillin or that have an MLSB phenotype (2, 14). Among the singleton clones, the Spain23F-1 clone was scarcely represented in our collection (two isolates of serotypes 19A and 23F), as were the Poland6B-20 and NorwayNT-42 clones, compared with their representations in other studies (2, 14). Moreover, we did not find the Spain14-5 clone, which also carries both genes and which has been found in some specific geographic areas of Spain over a 22-year period (15, 19). Among the isolates with the mef gene as the sole resistance determinant, only one isolate had the mef(A) subclass. This isolate belonged to the international resistant clone England14-9, also described in other European countries (1). The population of mef(E)-positive isolates was structured into four singleton clones and a CC belonging to the Spain9V-3 international resistant clone with capsular switching into serotype 14, as previously described by Ardanuy et al. (1), and also into serotype 19A, as has been observed in other studies (25). A rate of penicillin resistance of only 14.2% was found among the mef(E)-positive singleton clones, and the penicillin MIC range for isolates of the CC-Spain9V-3 clone was 0.12 to 4 mg/liter, in agreement with the findings of other Spanish studies (1).
In conclusion, the rate of macrolide resistance in our Spanish S. pneumoniae collection was high (34.3%). An increase in the presence of the mef gene compared with that in other studies was detected, but this was not associated with the M phenotype. Most of the mef-positive isolates also harbored the erm(B) gene (62.2% of the mef- positive isolates), with all of them showing the constitutive MLSB phenotype. Among the isolates showing the M phenotype only, one carried the mef(A) subclass and belonged to the England14-9 clone, as previously described in Europe (1). Population structure analysis showed that the mef-positive isolates are grouped in different clones and CCs and not in only a few clones, as previously described in other geographic areas (1, 14).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
E. Gómez G. de la Pedrosa is a recipient of a post-MIR
contract from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministry of
Health, Spain (ref. CM07/00147). Part of this study was funded
by an unrestricted grant from Sanofi-Aventis and by CIBER-ESP
(the Network Center for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology
and Public Health) and the Microbial Sciences Foundation.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, and CIBER-ESP, Madrid 28034, Spain. Phone: 34-91-3368330. Fax: 34-91-3368809. E-mail:
rcanton.hrc{at}salud.madrid.org 
Published ahead of print on 24 March 2008. 

REFERENCES
1 - Ardanuy, C., A. Fenoll, S. Berron, L. Calatayud, and J. Liñares. 2006. Increase of the M phenotype among erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from Spain related to the serotype 14 variant of the Spain9V-3 clone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3162-3165.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2 - Calatayud, L., C. Ardanuy, E. Cercenado, A. Fenoll, E. Bouza, R. Pallares, R. Martin, and J. Liñares. 2007. Serotypes, clones, and mechanisms of resistance of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates collected in Spain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:3240-3246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3 - Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2007. Performance and standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Seventeenth informational supplement. Document M100-S17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
4 - Cochetti, I., E. Tili, M. Vecchi, A. Manzini, M. Mingoia, P. E. Varaldo, and M. P. Montanari. 2007. New Tn916-related elements causing erm(B)-mediated erythromycin resistance in tetracycline-susceptible pneumococci. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 60:127-131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5 - del Campo, R., F. Cafini, M. I. Morosini, A. Fenoll, J. Liñares, L. Alou, D. Sevillano, R. Cantón, J. Prieto, F. Baquero, and the Spanish Pneumococcal Network (G3/103). 2006. Combinations of PBPs and murM protein variants in early and contemporary high-level penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in Spain. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57:983-986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6 - del Campo, R., M. I. Morosini, E. G. de la Pedrosa, A. Fenoll, C. Muñoz-Almagro, L. Maiz, F. Baquero, R. Canton, and the Spanish Pneumococcal Infection Study Network. 2005. Population structure, antimicrobial resistance, and mutation frequencies of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:2207-2214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Del Grosso, M., F. Iannelli, C. Messina, M. Santagati, N. Petrosillo, S. Stefani, G. Pozzi, and A. Pantosti. 2002. Macrolide efflux genes mef(A) and mef(E) are carried by different genetic elements in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:774-778.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8 - Del Grosso, M., J. G. Northwood, D. J. Farrell, and A. Pantosti. 2007. The macrolide resistance genes erm(B) and mef(E) are carried by Tn2010 in dual-gene Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates belonging to clonal complex CC271. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:4184-4186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9 - Enright, M. C., and B. G. Spratt. 1998. A multilocus sequence typing scheme for Streptococcus pneumoniae identification of clones associated with serious invasive disease. Microbiology 144:3049-3060.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Farrell, D. J., S. G. Jenkins, S. D. Brown, M. Patel, B. S. Lavin, and K. P. Klugman. 2005. Emergence and spread of Streptococcus pneumoniae with erm(B) and mef(A)resistance. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:851-858.[Medline]
11 - Isozumi, R., Y. Ito, T. Ishida, M. Osawa, T. Hirai, I. Ito, K. Maniwa, M. Hayashi, H. Kagioka, M. Hirabayashi, K. Onari, H. Tomioka, K. Tomii, I. Gohma, S. Imai, S. Takakura, Y. Iinuma, S. Ichiyama, M. Mishima, and the Kansai Community Acquired Pneumococcal Pneumonia Study Group. 2007. Genotypes and related factors reflecting macrolide resistance in pneumococcal pneumonia infections in Japan. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:1440-1446.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Leclercq, R., and P. Courvalin. 2002. Resistance to macrolides and related antibiotics in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2727-2734.[Free Full Text]
13 - Littauer, P., M. Sangvik, D. A. Caugant, E. A. Hoiby, G. S. Simonsen, A. Sundsfjord, and the Norwegian Macrolide Study Group. 2005. Molecular epidemiology of macrolide-resistant isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae collected from blood and respiratory specimens in Norway. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:2125-2132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Marimón, J. M., L. Iglesias, D. Vicente, and E. Pérez-Trallero. 2003. Molecular characterization of erythromycin-resistant clinical isolates of the four major antimicrobial-resistant Spanish clones of Streptococcus pneumoniae (Spain23F-1, Spain6B-2, Spain9V-3, and Spain14-5). Microb. Drug Resist. 9:133-137.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Marimón, J. M., E. Pérez-Trallero, M. Ercibengoa, A. Gonzalez, A. Fenoll, and the Spanish Pneumococcal Infection Study Network (G03/103). 2006. Molecular epidemiology and variants of the multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae Spain14-5 international clone among Spanish clinical isolates. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57:654-660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - McGee, L., L. McDougal, J. Zhou, B. G. Spratt, F. C. Tenover, R. George, R. Hakenbeck, W. Hryniewicz, J. C. Lefevre, A. Tomasz, and K. P. Klugman. 2001. Nomenclature of major antimicrobial-resistant clones of Streptococcus pneumoniae defined by the pneumococcal molecular epidemiology network. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2565-2571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17 - Morosini, M. I., R. Cantón, E. Loza, M. C. Negri, J. C. Galán, F. Almaraz, and F. Baquero. 2001. In vitro activity of telithromycin against Spanish Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates with characterized macrolide resistance mechanisms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:2427-2431.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Pérez-Trallero, E., C. García-Rey, A. M. Martin-Sanchez, L. Aguilar, J. García-de-Lomas, J. Ruiz, and the Spanish Surveillance Group for Respiratory Pathogens (SAUCE Program). 2002. Activities of six different quinolones against clinical respiratory isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae with reduced susceptibility to ciprofloxacin in Spain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2665-2667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Pérez-Trallero, E., J. M. Marimón, A. Gonzalez, D. Vicente, and J. M. García-Arenzana. 2004. Spectrum of antibiotic resistance of the Spain14-5 Streptococcus pneumoniae clone over a 22 year period. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53:620-625.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Reinert, R. R., C. Franken, M. van der Linden, R. Lutticken, M. Cil, and A. Al-Lahham. 2004. Molecular characterisation of macrolide resistance mechanisms of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes isolated in Germany, 2002-2003. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 24:43-47.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 - Reinert, R. R., S. Muckel, A. Al-Lahham, B. G. Spratt, A. B. Brueggemann, R. Hakenbeck, and R. Lutticken. 2003. Characterization of German penicillin non-susceptible serotype 23F pneumococci using multilocus sequence typing. J. Med. Microbiol. 52:981-987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22 - Reinert, R. R., A. Ringelstein, M. van der Linden, M. Y. Cil, A. Al-Lahham, and F. J. Schmitz. 2005. Molecular epidemiology of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates in Europe. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:1294-1300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23 - Schito, G. C., and D. Felmingham. 2005. Susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae to penicillin, azithromycin and telithromycin (PROTEKT 1999-2003). Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 26:479-485.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 - Schouls, L., M. van der Heide, H. G. Vauterin, L. Vauterin, and P. Mooi. 2004. Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis of Dutch Bordetella pertussis strains reveals rapid genetic changes with clonal expansion during the late 1990s. J. Bacteriol. 186:5496-5505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Singleton, R. J., T. W. Hennessy, L. R. Bulkow, L. L. Hammitt, T. Zulz, D. A. Hurlburt, J. C. Butler, A. Rudolph, and A. Parkinson. 2007. Invasive pneumococcal disease caused by nonvaccine serotypes among Alaska native children with high levels of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine coverage. JAMA 297:1784-1792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26 - van der Linden, M., A. Al-Lahham, S. Haupts, and R. R. Reinert. 2007. Clonal spread of mef-positive macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates causing invasive disease in adults in Germany. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:1830-1834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2008, p. 1964-1969, Vol. 52, No. 6
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.01487-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
de la Pedrosa, E. G. G., Baquero, F., Loza, E., Nadal-Serrano, J.-M., Fenoll, A., del Campo, R., Canton, R.
(2009). High clonal diversity in erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae invasive isolates in Madrid, Spain (2000-07). J Antimicrob Chemother
64: 1165-1169
[Abstract]
[Full Text]