AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AAC.00089-08v1
52/6/2212    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehlotra, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, P. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mehlotra, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Zimmerman, P. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2008, p. 2212-2222, Vol. 52, No. 6
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00089-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Discordant Patterns of Genetic Variation at Two Chloroquine Resistance Loci in Worldwide Populations of the Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum {triangledown} ,{dagger}

Rajeev K. Mehlotra,1* Gabriel Mattera,1 Moses J. Bockarie,2 Jason D. Maguire,3 J. Kevin Baird,3 Yagya D. Sharma,4 Michael Alifrangis,5 Grant Dorsey,6 Philip J. Rosenthal,6 David J. Fryauff,7 James W. Kazura,1 Mark Stoneking,8 and Peter A. Zimmerman1

Center for Global Health and Diseases, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio,1 Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka, Papua New Guinea,2 U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 2, Jakarta, Indonesia,3 Department of Biotechnology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India,4 Centre for Medical Parasitology, Institute for International Health, Immunology, and Microbiology, Copenhagen, Denmark,5 Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California,6 U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Cairo, Egypt,7 Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany8

Received 21 January 2008/ Returned for modification 29 February 2008/ Accepted 4 April 2008


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Mutations in the chloroquine resistance (CQR) transporter gene of Plasmodium falciparum (Pfcrt; chromosome 7) play a key role in CQR, while mutations in the multidrug resistance gene (Pfmdr1; chromosome 5) play a significant role in the parasite's resistance to a variety of antimalarials and also modulate CQR. To compare patterns of genetic variation at Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci, we investigated 460 blood samples from P. falciparum-infected patients from four Asian, three African, and three South American countries, analyzing microsatellite (MS) loci flanking Pfcrt (five loci [~40 kb]) and Pfmdr1 (either two loci [~5 kb] or four loci [~10 kb]). CQR Pfmdr1 allele-associated MS haplotypes showed considerably higher genetic diversity and higher levels of subdivision than CQR Pfcrt allele-associated MS haplotypes in both Asian and African parasite populations. However, both Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 MS haplotypes showed similar levels of low diversity in South American parasite populations. Median-joining network analyses showed that the Pfcrt MS haplotypes correlated well with geography and CQR Pfcrt alleles, whereas there was no distinct Pfmdr1 MS haplotype that correlated with geography and/or CQR Pfmdr1 alleles. Furthermore, multiple independent origins of CQR Pfmdr1 alleles in Asia and Africa were inferred. These results suggest that variation at Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci in both Asian and African parasite populations is generated and/or maintained via substantially different mechanisms. Since Pfmdr1 mutations may be associated with resistance to artemisinin combination therapies that are replacing CQ, particularly in Africa, it is important to determine if, and how, the genetic characteristics of this locus change over time.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chloroquine-resistant (CQR) Plasmodium falciparum parasites were first detected in the late 1950s in Southeast Asia (Thailand-Cambodia border) and South America (Venezuela and Colombia) (64). Resistant parasites from these locations are thought to have spread steadily throughout Asia and South America, arriving in East Africa (Kenya and Tanzania) in the late 1970s and spreading across the African continent within a decade (64). Resistance to chloroquine arose on the island of New Guinea during the 1950s, when Dutch colonial officials implemented chloroquinized-salt programs on that island, long before it was detected in the mid-1970s (21, 60). Subsequent reports suggest that CQR had become widespread in Papua New Guinea (PNG) by the early 1980s (35).

CQR in P. falciparum is linked to point mutations in the CQR transporter gene (Pfcrt; chromosome 7) (24, 48). The Pfcrt K76T mutant allele confers resistance in vitro and is the most reliable molecular marker for CQR (13, 15, 24). Chloroquine-sensitive (CQS) strains from all geographic regions maintain an invariable wild-type CVMNK (amino acids 72 to 76) allele, while there are a number of predominant CQR-associated alleles: CVIET (Southeast Asia and Africa), SagtVMNT (SVMNT1; Asia, South America, and Tanzania), StctVMNT (SVMNT2; South America), CVMET (Colombia), and CVMNT (South America and the Philippines) (2, 12-14, 24, 34, 58, 61, 65).

Polymorphisms, including copy number variation and point mutations, in another transporter gene of the parasite, the multidrug resistance gene (Pfmdr1; chromosome 5), contribute to the parasite's susceptibility to a variety of antimalarial drugs (41, 46, 47). Point mutations in this gene play a modulatory role in CQR (25, 26). Two Pfmdr1 mutant alleles occur in CQR strains from different geographic regions: 86Y_184Y_1034S_1042N_1246D (predominant in Asia and Africa) and 86N_184F_1034C_1042D_1246Y (predominant in South America) (25, 59). Although a number of field studies have observed a significant nonrandom association between the CQR Pfcrt 76T and Pfmdr1 86Y alleles (28), suggesting a joint contribution of these two genes to the CQR phenotype, the results of other studies have suggested that additional parasite genes are likely to be involved (11, 36).

The major aims of the present study were (i) to compare the number of origins of CQR Pfcrt alleles with those of CQR Pfmdr1 alleles in different locations and (ii) to determine whether the distribution of microsatellite (MS) haplotypes associated with CQR Pfmdr1 alleles represents divergent or convergent evolution when compared with the distribution of MS haplotypes associated with CQR Pfcrt alleles. We have two main reasons to pursue these aims. First, there seem to be marked genetic differences between Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci. In their analysis of MS loci flanking Pfcrt, Wootton et al. (65) observed reduced allelic diversity and shared chromosomal segments (>100 kb on either side of Pfcrt) in 48 laboratory-adapted CQR isolates obtained worldwide, suggesting CQ selection-driven "sweeps." The selective sweeps were also seen in field studies conducted in Southeast Asia (12, 39) and South America (61), where the sweep sizes may be determined by the history and strength of CQ selection pressure and the genetic structure of parasite populations (39). Based on the MS data, at least five independent origins of CQR Pfcrt alleles worldwide have been suggested (12, 65). In contrast, the evolutionary dynamics of Pfmdr1 are far less clear. Duraisingh et al. (19) observed significantly lower levels of variation at an intragenic MS locus associated with Pfmdr1 N86Y alleles in Gambian parasites and suggested that a limited number of origins and a selective sweep might be responsible for this observation. On the other hand, Nair et al. (37) recently reported multiple independent origins of Pfmdr1 copy number variation and only limited reduction in MS allelic diversity within a 170- to 250-kb region flanking Pfmdr1, suggesting "soft" selective sweeps, in parasites from the Thailand-Burma border. MS data from Nair's study suggest that independent origins of the Pfmdr1 locus occur frequently, as five different haplotype groups showing 15 Pfmdr1 amplification events were observed within single parasite populations. Thus, the reduced variation at Pfcrt but high variation at Pfmdr1 indicates that polymorphisms in these two regions of the P. falciparum genome may be generated and/or maintained via different mechanisms.

The second reason to pursue these aims is that Pfmdr1 polymorphisms may be associated with resistance to newer artemisinin combination drugs, and it is therefore important to understand the evolutionary dynamics of the Pfmdr1 locus under swiftly changing drug pressures. Elevated Pfmdr1 copy number has been associated with resistance to artesunate-mefloquine (4) and artemether-lumefantrine (57) combinations in Southeast Asia. Recent clinical studies in Africa have implicated the Pfmdr1 86N allele as a potential marker of resistance to the artemether-lumefantrine combination (16, 30, 49). Also, a high prevalence of parasites containing a potentially novel allele, 86Y_1246Y, has been observed in East African patients after treatment with the artesunate-amodiaquine combination (40) and with amodiaquine alone (29, 30).

In this study, we analyzed 460 blood samples from P. falciparum-infected patients from diverse regions of Asia (PNG, Indonesia, Laos, and India), Africa (Kenya, Uganda, and Ghana), and South America (Brazil, Colombia, and Guyana) where malaria is endemic for both the Pfcrt and the Pfmdr1 alleles and their flanking MS haplotypes. Our results provide new insights into the evolutionary dynamics of Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci in the Asian and African parasite populations and also reveal contrasting genetic features of the Pfmdr1 locus in the populations from Asia/Africa and South America.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Blood samples. (i) Asia. In PNG, 143 samples were collected in the areas of Dreikikir (East Sepik Province; n = 36; July to September 1996), the Wosera (East Sepik Province; n = 76; July 1998 to January 1999), and Liksul (Madang Province; n = 31; May to July 2000) (34, 35). In Indonesia, 34 samples were collected from both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in Nias Island, located off the northwestern coast of Sumatra, in August 1998 (27, 53). In Laos, 29 samples were collected from malaria patients in Luang Namtha Province from October to December 2003 (14, 50). In India, 32 samples were collected from patients with fever attending malaria clinics in the states of Goa (medium levels of CQR; n = 2), Assam (high levels of CQR; n = 18), and Uttar Pradesh (low levels of CQR; n = 12) in 2001 (62).

(ii) Africa. In western Kenya, 39 samples were collected in the villages of Kabobo (Uasin Gishu district, Rift Valley Province; n = 8; August 1996 to March 1997) (31) and Kanyawegi (Kisumu district, Nyanza Province; n = 31; November 2000) (32). In Uganda, 30 samples were collected from children aged 7 years or younger with uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Kampala from August 1998 to March 1999 (17, 18). In Ghana, 51 samples were collected from children aged 2 years or younger in the Navrongo area of the Kassena-Nankana District (n = 25 in November 1996, dry season/low transmission, and n = 26 in May 1997, wet season/high transmission) (8).

(iii) South America. In Brazil, 29 blood samples were collected from symptomatic individuals visiting the clinic in Porto Velho, Rondônia, in July 1997 and July to September 1998. In Colombia, 40 samples were collected from symptomatic individuals visiting the clinic in El Bagre, Antioquia, in 1998. Details about the Brazilian and Colombian samples have been provided elsewhere (6). In Guyana, 33 samples were collected from an all-age population of people with clinical malaria seeking care at the Georgetown Public Hospital, Georgetown, in September 1998 (9).

Ethical approvals in these studies (6, 8, 9, 14, 17, 18, 27, 31, 32, 34, 35, 50, 53, 62) were obtained through their respective institutional review boards.

Laboratory-adapted parasite isolates. For MS analyses, genomic DNA preparations from nine P. falciparum laboratory isolates (HB3 [Honduras], 3D7 [unknown origin], Dd2 [Indochina], K1 [Thailand], 7G8 [Brazil], PNG1917 [PNG], PNG1905 [origin not confirmed], ECU1110 [Ecuador], and JAV [Colombia]) were included as references. Parasite strains HB3, 3D7, Dd2, K1, and 7G8 were obtained from MR4, American Type Culture Collection. Strains PNG1917 and PNG1905 were provided by Alan Cowman, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia. Parasite strains HB3, 3D7, Dd2, K1, 7G8, PNG1917, and PNG1905 were propagated in vitro (55). Genomic DNA preparations from strains ECU1110 and JAV were provided by Xin-zhuan Su, Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (National Institutes of Health [NIH]). DNA was extracted from cultured P. falciparum parasites by using a QIAamp DNA blood mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA).

PCR-based analysis of Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 mutations. Except for the samples from Laos, Pfcrt (codons 72 to 76 [CVMNK, CVIET, SVMNT1, SVMNT2, CVMNT, and CVMET]) and Pfmdr1 (codons 86 [N/Y], 184 [Y/F], 1034 [S/C], 1042 [N/D], and 1246 [D/Y]) mutations were determined by post-PCR, sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe hybridization assays (34). The samples from Laos were analyzed for Pfcrt (codons 72 to 76) and Pfmdr1 N86Y alleles by a recently developed PCR-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method (3).

Analysis of cg2 {omega} repeat region and MS loci flanking Pfcrt and Pfmdr1. PCR amplifications of the cg2 {omega} repeat region (chromosome 7) (52), MS loci B5M77, 2E10, 9B12, and 2H4 (flanking Pfcrt; chromosome 7), and MS loci 5-956456, 5-957861, 5-962445, and 5-966096 (flanking Pfmdr1; chromosome 5) were performed with seminested PCR strategies using three primers (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL). One of the primers in each nest-2 amplification reaction was 5' labeled with Cy5. All primer sequences, amplification conditions, and methods to evaluate single- versus multiple-allele infections at each MS locus and to construct allelic haplotypes are provided in Table S1 in the supplemental material and elsewhere (35). The MS haplotype on chromosome 7 (B5M77_2E10_Pfcrt_9B12_cg2_2H4) extends ~40 kb. The MS haplotype on chromosome 5 (5-956456_5-957861_Pfmdr1_5-962445_5-966096) extends ~10 kb. We first analyzed loci 5-957861 and 5-962445 (extending ~5 kb), and if the diversity was moderate at these loci (locus-by-locus diversity [h], <0.3), then we analyzed loci 5-956456 and 5-966096.

Statistical analysis. The Arlequin 3.0 package (http://cmpg.unibe.ch/software/arlequin3/) (22) was used to compute the haplotype diversity (H; mean value ± standard error), locus-by-locus diversity (value ± standard deviation), mean number of pairwise differences (MPD), measure of genetic differentiation (Fst), and linkage disequilibrium (LD) between MS loci. We considered LD between loci to be significant only after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The Arlequin program was also used to perform analyses of molecular variance (AMOVA) to quantify Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 MS haplotype variation within and among parasite populations (23). In order to understand the genetic relationships among CQR Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 alleles, median-joining networks based on the MS haplotypes flanking Pfcrt (four loci [B5M77_2E10_9B12_cg2]; ~28 kb) and Pfmdr1 (two loci [5-957861_5-962445]; 5 kb) were constructed by using the Network 4.2 program (http://www.fluxus-engineering.com/sharenet.htm) (10).


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 alleles and flanking MS haplotypes in P. falciparum laboratory isolates. We analyzed nine P. falciparum laboratory isolates from diverse geographic locations as references and compared their Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 alleles, as well as the flanking MS haplotypes (see Table S2 in the supplemental material), with those in the field samples from Asia, Africa, and South America. Among CQR isolates, different Pfcrt alleles occurred on the same MS haplotype (SVMNT1 [isolate 7G8] and SVMNT2 [isolate PNG1905], CVMNT [isolate ECU1110], and CVMET [isolate JAV]), and the same allele occurred on different haplotypes (SVMNT1 [isolates 7G8 and PNG1917]). Interestingly, CQS isolate HB3 and CQR isolates ECU1110 and JAV shared the same Pfmdr1 allele (NFSDD) and MS haplotype (see Table S2 in the supplemental material). For all these P. falciparum laboratory isolates, our results regarding Pfcrt alleles and flanking MS loci are concordant with those of Wootton et al. (65). For isolates HB3, 3D7, Dd2, K1, 7G8, PNG1917, and PNG1905, our results regarding Pfmdr1 alleles are concordant with those of the previous reports (25, 44); to the best of our knowledge, the data regarding Pfmdr1 alleles in isolates ECU1110 and JAV and flanking MS loci (all isolates) are reported here for the first time.

Overview of Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 alleles in field samples. The Pfcrt genotypes (codons 72 to 76) are summarized in Table 1. The CQS CVMNK allele was less prevalent than CQR alleles (Table 1). Among the CQR alleles, SVMNT1 was the predominant allele in parasites from Asia, and CVIET was the predominant allele in parasites from Africa. In parasites from South America, the predominant alleles were SVMNT2 (Brazil), CVMET (Colombia), and SVMNT1, as well as SVMNT2 (Guyana). We observed the CVIET allele in parasites from India (n = 2) and Guyana (n = 3), SVMNT1 in parasites from Brazil (n = 2), and SVMNT2 in parasites from Ghana (n = 2). The presence of the SVMNT2 allele in the parasites from Ghana was confirmed by direct DNA sequencing (34).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Prevalence of Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 alleles in Asia, Africa, and South America

 
The Pfmdr1 genotypes defined by codons 86_184_1034_1042_1246 are summarized in Table 1 (lower panel). The CQS NYSND allele was present in parasites from Asia and Africa but was completely absent in parasites from South America (Table 1). The CQR YYSND allele was more frequent in parasites from both Asia (except Laos) and Africa (except Kenya). We observed a high prevalence of the CQS Pfmdr1 86N alleles in the Laotian (94%) and Kenyan samples (56%), which also had very high prevalences of the CQR Pfcrt 76T alleles (91% and 92%, respectively). In the parasites from South America, we observed that the alleles NFCDY in parasites from Brazil and Guyana and NFSDY in parasites from Colombia were predominant. Two samples from Guyana were positive for the YYSND allele; these samples were also positive for the Pfcrt CVIET allele.

MS haplotypes flanking Pfcrt alleles. We observed predominant MS haplotypes (40 kb) associated with CQR Pfcrt alleles in parasites from Asia (SVMNT1; 3_6_3_5_10 [42%] and 3_6_3_5_7 [28%]), Africa (CVIET; 3_7_2_4_4 [76%]), and South America (both SVMNT1 and SVMNT2; 2_3_3_6_7 [92.5%] and CVMET; 3_2_4_7_10 [96%]) (see Table S3a in the supplemental material). The haplotype associated with the Indian CVIET allele (3_7_2_11_1; n = 2) differed from the haplotype associated with the most-common Southeast Asian/African CVIET allele (3_7_2_4_4; seen in isolates Dd2 and K1 [see Table S2 in the supplemental material]). We could not amplify all five MS loci in the parasites from Guyana (CVIET; n = 3) and Ghana (SVMNT2; n = 2); hence, complete haplotype determination for these samples was not possible. The MS haplotype associated with the Brazilian SVMNT1 allele (2_2_3_8_7; n = 2) differed from the predominant haplotypes observed in the Asian SVMNT1 samples and also from the SVMNT1 allele-carrying Brazilian laboratory isolate 7G8 (see Table S2 in the supplemental material).

The CQR Pfcrt allele-associated MS haplotype diversity (40 kb) and MPD for each country are shown in Fig. 1A. Overall, 23 haplotypes were associated with the Pfcrt SVMNT1 allele in parasites from Asia (H = 0.744 ± 0.03, MPD = 0.993), whereas 14 haplotypes were associated with the Pfcrt CVIET allele in parasites from Africa (H = 0.427 ± 0.075, MPD = 0.645) (see Table S3a in the supplemental material). When we performed locus-by-locus analysis, we found that the locus-specific diversity at MS 2H4 was much higher in parasites from Asia (h = 0.642 ± 0.027) than in parasites from Africa (h = 0.239 ± 0.067). When this locus was not included in the analysis, the 4-locus (28 kb) haplotype diversities in Asian (10 haplotypes; H = 0.314 ± 0.054, MPD = 0.35) and African (10 haplotypes; H = 0.337 ± 0.073, MPD = 0.406) parasites were similar (see Table S3b in the supplemental material), indicating that considerably higher variation at MS 2H4 is responsible for the overall high haplotype (40 kb) diversity in Asian parasites. Compared with the haplotype diversity in parasites from Asia or Africa, much-lower haplotype (40 kb) diversity was observed in parasites from South America (Fig. 1A). Overall, there is much-lower haplotype (40 kb) diversity associated with CQR alleles (Fig. 1A) than with CQS Pfcrt CVMNK alleles in parasites from PNG (H = 0.995 ± 0.01, MPD = 3.903) and Ghana (H = 1.000 ± 0.034, MPD = 4.076).


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. (A) Haplotype diversity and MPD of CQR Pfcrt allele-associated MS haplotypes. All Pfcrt MS haplotypes are ~40 kb in length. The Pfcrt (72 to 76) allele(s) and total number of associated MS haplotypes (in parentheses) for each region are Asia, SVMNT1 (23); Africa, CVIET (14); and South America, SVMNT1 and/or SVMNT2 (4) and CVMET (2). The number of unique haplotypes/total number of haplotypes for each country is PNG, 12/20; Indonesia, 1/6; India, 1/4; Laos, 1/3; Kenya, 1/4; Uganda, 7/8; Ghana, 3/6; Brazil, 1/2; Colombia, 2/2; and Guyana, 1/2 (see Table S3a in the supplemental material). (B) Haplotype diversity and MPD of CQR Pfmdr1 allele-associated MS haplotypes. Pfmdr1 MS haplotypes are ~5 kb in length in Asia and Africa and ~10 kb in length in South America. The Pfmdr1 (86_184_1034_1042_1246) allele(s) and total number of associated MS haplotypes (in parentheses) for each region are Asia, YYSND (18); Africa, YYSND (19); and South America, NFCDY (3) and NFSDY (2). The number of unique haplotypes/total number of haplotypes for each country is PNG, 9/10; Indonesia, 1/2; India, 6/6; Uganda, 5/7; Ghana, 12/12; Brazil, 0/1; Colombia, 1/1; and Guyana, 0/1 (see Table S4 in the supplemental material). Laos was omitted from the analysis because all the Laotian samples carried the CQS Pfmdr1 86N allele.

 
MS haplotypes flanking Pfmdr1 alleles. Among 2-locus (5 kb) haplotypes associated with CQR Pfmdr1 86Y alleles, 5_6 (26%), 11_8 (18%), and 9_5 (12%) in Asian and 8_9 (22%) in African parasites were the most frequent (see Table S4 in the supplemental material). Among 4-locus (10 kb) haplotypes associated with CQR Pfmdr1 86N (with downstream CDY or SDY) alleles in South American parasites, 9_7_8_2 (Brazil, 100%; Guyana, 92%) and 3_14_8_4 (Colombia, 83%) were the most frequent.

The CQR Pfmdr1 allele-associated MS haplotype diversity (5 kb) and MPD for each country are shown in Fig. 1B. Overall, the haplotype diversities were high in both Asian (18 haplotypes; H = 0.878 ± 0.023, MPD = 1.559) and African (19 haplotypes; H = 0.936 ± 0.027, MPD = 1.541) parasites, and only two haplotypes were common between these two geographic regions (see Table S4 in the supplemental material). Locus-by-locus analysis showed that diversities at both loci were high (h = 0.4 to 0.9). Within Asia, the 2-locus (5 kb) haplotype diversity was significantly higher in parasites from PNG and India than in parasites from Indonesia (Fig. 1B). However, the Indonesian samples exhibited high 4-locus (10 kb) haplotype diversity (H = 0.765 ± 0.075, MPD = 1.301), whereas in South American parasites, the 4-locus (10 kb) haplotype diversity was none (Brazil) to low (Colombia and Guyana) (Fig. 1B). CQS Pfmdr1 86N alleles exhibited high 2-locus (5 kb) haplotype diversity in parasites from PNG (H = 0.956 ± 0.061, MPD = 1.622) and Ghana (H = 0.978 ± 0.054, MPD = 1.733) but only moderate (H = 0.295 ± 0.156, MPD = 0.308) or no (4-locus, 10 kb) diversity in parasites from Laos.

Taken collectively, these results indicate that, unlike Pfcrt alleles (high genetic diversity for CQS and reduced genetic diversity for CQR Pfcrt alleles), the genetic diversity is high for both CQS and CQR Pfmdr1 alleles in parasites from Asia and Africa. However, similar to CQR Pfcrt alleles, the genetic diversity is low for CQR Pfmdr1 alleles in parasites from South America.

LD between Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci. In the samples showing single-allele infections, we observed various frequencies of the CQR Pfcrt 76T and Pfmdr1 86Y alleles occurring together in parasites from Asia (67% to 92%) and Africa (20% to 73%) and of the CQR Pfcrt 76T and Pfmdr1 86N alleles (with downstream CDY or SDY) occurring together in parasites from South America (79% to 100%) (Table 2). Significant associations were observed between CQR Pfcrt 76T and Pfmdr1 86Y alleles and between CQS Pfcrt 76K and Pfmdr1 86N alleles in parasites from PNG ({chi}2 test, 1 df = 13.99; P < 0.001) and Ghana ({chi}2 test, 1 df = 7.69; P < 0.01). This analysis could not be performed for samples from the other countries because the CQS Pfcrt 76K allele was absent or was low in prevalence (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Frequencies of CQR Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 alleles occurring togethera

 
We also tested the significance of LD for a complete data set of Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 MS loci which included samples with missing data for one or more loci and multiple-allele infections; the latter were coded as missing data. After correction for multiple comparisons, significant LD between Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 MS loci was observed only in parasites from India (9B12-962445, cg2-957861, and 2H4-962445 [total number of Pfcrt-Pfmdr1 pairwise comparisons was 10]) and Guyana (B5M77-957861, 2E10-966096, 2H4-956456, and 2H4-957861 [total number of Pfcrt-Pfmdr1 pairwise comparisons was 12]). These observations, although limited in their interpretation, suggest that the associations between Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 genetic polymorphisms may not correspond to the pattern and extent of LD between Pfcrt-Pfmdr1 MS loci.

Hierarchical analysis of genetic variation at CQR Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci. The worldwide comparison of genetic variation between CQR Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci using AMOVA shows substantial differences (Table 3). While the Pfcrt locus has only 25% of the variation within populations, the Pfmdr1 locus shows 50% of the variation within populations. Further, Pfcrt has much more between-group variation than between-population variation, whereas Pfmdr1 has much more between-population variation than between-group variation. In fact, the between-group variation in Pfmdr1 was not significantly different from zero. The AMOVA for each separate geographic region shows that most (Africa and South America) or almost all (Asia) of the variation in the Pfcrt locus was contained within populations, with a minimal subdivision among populations (Africa, 4.72%, and South America, 2.68%) (Table 3). For the Pfmdr1 locus, although the variation within populations was considerably higher than the variation among populations, higher subdivision among populations was noticed for Asia (37.26%) and Africa (11.47%) than for the Pfcrt locus (Table 3). Note that the results for parasites from South America depend on whether or not Colombia is included and that parasites from Brazil and Guyana are quite similar for both the Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 3. Distribution of Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 MS haplotype diversity among and within geographic populations by AMOVA

 
Genetic relationships among Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 MS haplotypes in parasites worldwide. We explored the genetic relationships among CQR Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 MS haplotypes in parasites sampled worldwide by constructing networks under the assumption of a stepwise mutation model for the MS loci. While many MS loci in P. falciparum parasites seem to be evolving in a manner consistent with a stepwise mutation model (7), the mode of MS evolution is uncertain (7, 38). Since the 2H4 locus exhibited much-higher diversity than other loci for most of the populations and may not conform to the stepwise mutation model, as it contains three types of repeat units (T, TA, and TTTA) (52), this locus was omitted from the Pfcrt network analysis.

Figure 2 displays the evolutionary relationships among all 24 Pfcrt haplotypes (four loci, 28 kb) (see Table S3b in the supplemental material). The median-joining network roughly separates into three groups, which correspond with geography. One group consists entirely of South American haplotypes (H301 [SVMNT1 and/or SVMNT2], H311 [SVMNT1], and H401 and H411 [both CVMET]). The second group contains all but two Asian haplotypes, and the third group contains all African haplotypes plus one Asian (H125 [SVMNT1]) and one shared Asian/African (H114 [CVIET]) haplotype. In the Asian group, all SVMNT1-associated haplotypes can be derived from the most-prevalent haplotype (H001; frequency, 83%) and are connected to each other mostly by one-step mutations, with the exception that H028-H031, H031-H030, and H062-H007 exhibit two-step mutations. In the African group, all CVIET-associated haplotypes can be derived from the most-prevalent haplotype (H201; frequency, 81%) and are connected to each other by one-step, two-step, or three-step mutations. H114, observed in one Ugandan and two Indian samples, seems to have arisen from the most-prevalent Southeast Asian/African haplotype (H201; seen in isolates Dd2 and K1 [see Table S2 in the supplemental material]) by either a multistep mutation pathway or a recombination event; distinguishing between these two explanations would require further analysis.


Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Median-joining network of CQR Pfcrt allele-associated MS haplotypes. All Pfcrt MS haplotypes are ~28 kb in length. H001 to H200, Asia; H201 to H300, Africa; and H301 to H400, South America (see Table S3b in the supplemental material); the associated Pfcrt allele and geographic distribution are indicated for each haplotype.

 
Even though information on Pfcrt (codons 72 to 76) alleles was not used in constructing the network, there is a considerable association between Pfcrt alleles and the groups in the network, with two exceptions, both involving the SVMNT1 allele: H311 (SVMNT1) is in the network with H301 (SVMNT1 and/or SVMNT2) and H401 (CVMET), and H125 (SVMNT1) is connected to H249 (CVIET). H311 is equidistant (three steps) from both H301 and H401. Although the origins of SVMNT2, the most-widespread Pfcrt allele in parasites from the Amazon region, and SVMNT1, with limited distribution, are uncertain (61), it is more likely that H311 has emerged from H301. H125 may reflect homoplasy, as it differs by one step from H249 and by only three steps from H001 (SVMNT1), which is in the range of variation of other SVMNT1-associated haplotypes.

Figure 3A displays the evolutionary relationships among all 37 Pfmdr1 haplotypes (two loci, 5 kb) (see Table S4 in the supplemental material). These haplotypes include those associated with the CQS Pfmdr1 86N allele from Laos. In a stark contrast with the Pfcrt network, the Pfmdr1 network shows many reticulations, even though there are only two loci, indicating that there have been many parallel changes at these loci. Moreover, there is no correlation with either geography or Pfmdr1 alleles; the one Brazilian/Guyanan haplotype (H101, NFCDY) is quite distant from the one Colombian haplotype (H201, NFSDY), which is identical to a haplotype observed in some Ghanaian samples (H033, YYSND; n = 3). All haplotypes from India (YYSND) and Laos (86N) are together with all of the haplotypes except one from PNG (YYSND), but haplotypes from Uganda and Ghana also are found in this part of the network. We also constructed a network for the Pfmdr1 4-locus (10 kb) haplotype data available for Indonesia (YYSND), Laos (86N), Brazil (NFCDY), Colombia (NFSDY), and Guyana (NFCDY). In this network, Brazilian/Guyanan haplotypes grouped with Laotian haplotypes and Colombian haplotyes grouped with Indonesian haplotypes (Fig. 3B).


Figure 3
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. (A) Median-joining network of Pfmdr1 allele-associated MS haplotypes (~5 kb in length). See Table S4 in the supplemental material for haplotype numbering information. Note that all samples, except those from Laos, carry CQR Pfmdr1 alleles. (B) Median-joining network of Pfmdr1 allele-associated MS haplotypes (~10 kb in length). H001 is 9_7_8_2 (Brazil, n = 17, and Guyana, n = 12), H002 is 3_14_8_4 (Colombia, n = 11), H003 is 4_14_8_4 (Colombia, n = 1), H004 is 15_7_8_2 (Guyana, n = 1), H005 is 4_11_5_3 (Indonesia, n = 2), H006 is 4_11_8_1 (Indonesia, n = 1), H007 is 5_11_8_1 (Indonesia, n = 7), H008 is 5_11_8_2 (Indonesia, n = 1), H009 is 5_11_8_3 (Indonesia, n = 5), H010 is 7_11_5_3 (Indonesia, n = 1), H011 is 7_8_7_4 (Laos, n = 11), H012 is 7_8_6_4 (Laos, n = 1), and H013 is 7_11_7_4 (Laos, n = 1). While samples from Brazil, Guyana, Colombia, and Indonesia carry CQR Pfmdr1 alleles, Laotian samples carry the CQS Pfmdr1 86N allele.

 
The principal outcome of the network analysis is that Pfcrt MS haplotypes correlate well with geography and CQR Pfcrt alleles, whereas there is no distinct Pfmdr1 MS haplotype that correlates with geography and/or CQR Pfmdr1 alleles. Also, these analyses suggest that CQR Pfmdr1 86Y alleles in parasites from Asia and Africa had multiple independent origins and have further diversified extensively, much more so than the CQR Pfcrt alleles.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the present study, utilizing samples from diverse regions where malaria is endemic, two major observations were made that are of relevance to public health: (i) in Asian and African P. falciparum parasite populations, CQR Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci exhibited strikingly different patterns of variation, with CQR Pfcrt loci exhibiting reduced variation and CQR Pfmdr1 loci exhibiting high variation, and (ii) in South American P. falciparum parasite populations, both the CQR Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci exhibited considerably lower variation.

Global distribution of CQR Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 alleles. Our results, together with the results of several previous studies, suggest that although various CQR Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 alleles predominate in P. falciparum populations in different geographic regions and countries, none of these alleles is restricted to any one particular location (2, 13, 14, 25, 34, 58, 61). Instead, a variety of alleles can be found in many populations worldwide. In this study, among the CQR Pfcrt alleles, SVMNT1 in Asian parasites and CVIET in African parasites were highly prevalent, with some CVIET and some SVMNT2, respectively. In South American parasites, the distribution of CQR alleles varied. In parasites from Brazil, SVMNT2 predominates, with some SVMNT1. The Colombian parasite population was fixed for the CVMET allele. The Guyanan parasite population was quite heterogeneous, with high frequencies of both the SVMNT1 and SVMNT2 alleles and lower but still appreciable frequencies of the CVIET allele. Regarding the distribution of CQR Pfmdr1 alleles, only YYSND in both Asian and African parasites, NFCDY in Brazilian parasites, and NFSDY in Colombian parasites were observed. In Guyanan parasites, NFCDY predominates, with some YYSND. Given modern means of transportation and greater frequency of travel throughout the world, such a distribution of parasite alleles is not surprising. On the other hand, certain alleles, such as SVMNT1 in parasite populations in Asia and South America, may have more than one origin (Fig. 2) (65). Furthermore, as observed with the Laotian and Kenyan samples in the present study, the prevalence of sensitive and resistant alleles of both Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 in the parasite population in any given location could be heterogeneous due to several local factors: the history of drug selection pressure (16, 30, 49), parasite population genetic structure (33), and, possibly, host-intrinsic factors (42, 54).

Genetic variation at CQR Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci in parasites from Asia and Africa. (i) Dissemination of Pfcrt SVMNT1 allele in parasites from Asia. Despite the fact that CVIET is the predominant CQR Pfcrt allele in parasites from Southeast Asia (13, 65), SVMNT1 was the predominant allele in our Asian samples. This Pfcrt SVMNT1 allele was associated with an MS haplotype, 3_6_3_5_10, that was observed to be predominant in all four countries (PNG [21%], Indonesia [64%], Laos [57%], and India [78%]) (see Table S3a in the supplemental material). Therefore, parasites with this or similar haplotypes are likely to be the source of the SVMNT1 founder allele in Asian parasites. The network analysis (Fig. 2) also supports the identification of the 4-locus haplotype 3_6_3_5 as the founder. In a previous study in which we analyzed samples collected in PNG between 1982 and 1984 (during the early years of the spread of CQR in PNG), we observed that 97% of the samples carried the SVMNT1 allele and 83% of those samples carried the 3_6_3_6_10 haplotype (35). The present predominant 3_6_3_5_10 haplotype can be derived from the earlier predominant 3_6_3_6_10 haplotype by just a one-step mutation. Previously, the SVMNT1 allele-carrying parasites from PNG were found to closely share the Pfcrt-flanking MS haplotypes with those from the Philippines and the Solomon Islands (12). Taking these data together, it appears that the SVMNT1 allele-carrying parasites, with similar genetic backgrounds flanking Pfcrt, are widespread in the Asia/Pacific region.

It is interesting to note that between the two CQR Pfcrt alleles, CVIET and SVMNT1, that are highly prevalent in Asian parasites, it is CVIET that moved into Africa and is now widespread in that continent (13, 65; this study). Recently, the SVMNT1 allele has been reported in parasites from Iran (58) and Tanzania (2). This may represent westward movement of the Asian SVMNT1 allele and may have significance from a malaria treatment standpoint. The SVMNT1 allele may be associated with resistance to amodiaquine (48, 63), and therefore, the efficacy of artesunate-amodiaquine treatment, which is becoming increasingly popular in Africa, might be compromised (2).

(ii) Genetic variation of Pfcrt versus Pfmdr1 in Asia and Africa. In contrast with CQR Pfcrt alleles, the haplotype diversities for CQR Pfmdr1 alleles were very high in both Asian and African parasites. Moreover, in the AMOVA analysis, the differentiation among both Asian (about 37%) and African (about 12%) populations for the CQR Pfmdr1 allele-associated haplotypes was significantly high (Table 3). These observations suggest that the mechanisms responsible for generating and/or maintaining genetic variation at Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci are very different. First, differences in the genomic characteristics of Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci may generate different patterns of genetic variation at these loci; Pfcrt is a single-copy locus (24), whereas Pfmdr1 can occur as a single- or multiple-copy locus (56). However, we did not evaluate the Pfmdr1 copy number in the present study. It is possible that the local recombination rate differs between Pfcrt (chromosome 7) and Pfmdr1 (chromosome 5). The genome average recombination rate in P. falciparum is 17 kb/centimorgan (51). However, recombination is unlikely to be even across the genome, and the impact of selective events will depend on the local recombination rate rather than the genome average recombination rate (5). In addition, it is known that the MS mutation rate in P. falciparum varies considerably for different types of loci (1.59 x 10–4 [95% confidence interval, 6.98 x 10–5 to 3.47 x 10–4]) (6, 7). However, whether the mutation rate varies between neutral loci and loci under selection, varies from one chromosome to another, or varies in different allelic lineages, which may contribute to the extent of hitchhiking around Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci, is not clear.

Second, differences in drug selection history, as well as selection strength, may alter patterns of genetic variation. It is possible that Pfmdr1 86Y alleles were already present at an appreciable frequency prior to the spread of resistant Pfcrt 76T alleles. A recent study conducted in Madagascar observed a high prevalence (67.5%) of the Pfmdr1 86Y allele, despite the absence of the Pfcrt 76T allele, in a population supposedly exposed to CQ for the last 60 years (43). The results of in vitro tests revealed that all isolates except one were sensitive to CQ, regardless of the status of Pfmdr1 codon 86 (43).

It is also possible that the strength of CQ selection is different for these genes; Pfcrt may be under strong selection pressure, whereas Pfmdr1 may be under weak selection pressure. Limited studies that have analyzed the prevalence of both the Pfcrt 76T and Pfmdr1 86Y alleles along with the spread of CQR in an area over a period of time have found that Pfcrt 76T alleles spread more rapidly and reached high frequencies faster than Pfmdr1 86Y alleles (1), suggesting that CQ selection acts more strongly on Pfcrt than on Pfmdr1. This is likely, considering the physiologic relevance of PfCRT in the case of CQ transport and CQR. Both PfCRT and PfMDR1 are integral membrane proteins, localized to the parasite's digestive vacuole membrane (59). While PfCRT is considered to be the primary transporter for CQ, PfMDR1 is considered to be the primary transporter for mefloquine and a variety of other antimalarials (20, 44). Although the precise mechanism of CQR is still not clear, the efflux of CQ out of the parasite's digestive vacuole via an energy-coupled transporter is one of the promising models of CQR (59). Using allelic-exchange mutant parasites, Sanchez et al. (45) showed that stimulated CQ accumulation was associated with Pfcrt alleles CVIET and SVMNT, but not with Pfmdr1 allele 184F_1034C_1042D_1246Y. They suggested that PfCRT is, but PfMDR1 is not, directly or indirectly involved in carrier-mediated CQ efflux from resistant parasites.

Finally, there may indeed be multiple origins of Pfmdr1 polymorphisms (37, 56), in contrast with only a few origins of CQR Pfcrt alleles (65). If resistance alleles have evolved repeatedly on different genetic backgrounds, then the difference in diversity associated with resistant versus sensitive alleles will be diminished and the association of individual haplotypes with resistance mutations will be less clear (5). That is exactly what we observed regarding Pfmdr1 alleles in parasites from PNG (for 86Y, H = 0.741 ± 0.066, and for 86N, H = 0.956 ± 0.06; Fst = 0.126) and Ghana (for 86Y, H = 0.958 ± 0.036, and for 86N, H = 0.978 ± 0.054; Fst = 0.085), further supporting multiple origins of CQR Pfmdr1 alleles. Considering that CQ selection strength may be weaker for Pfmdr1, multiple origins represent signs of "soft" selection of CQR Pfmdr1 alleles.

Thus, it is possible that reduced variation at Pfcrt is the result of strong CQ selection together with low local recombination rates and/or MS mutation rates, whereas high variation at Pfmdr1 is the result of weak CQ selection together with high local recombination rates and/or MS mutation rates. Regardless of the reasons, the results of the present study show that there are significant differences between the patterns of genetic variation at the Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci in Asian and African parasite populations.

Genetic variation at CQR Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci in South America. Compared with the Asian or African parasite populations, the South American parasite populations were relatively homogeneous for CQR Pfcrt, as well as Pfmdr1, loci.

Although the first reports of CQR came almost simultaneously from South America and Southeast Asia (64), the probable factors and/or mechanisms governing the dynamics of CQ-driven selective sweeps in South America may have been substantially different from those in Southeast Asia; a multifocal origin of CQR in South America due to high and widespread drug pressure in the form of chloroquinized salt may have led to the homogenization of CQR-associated genotypes in a short period of time (64; T. E. Wellems, personal communication). Furthermore, the background level of genetic variation in the P. falciparum population is quite low in South America (mean heterozygosities of 12 putatively neutral MS loci, H = 0.3 to 0.4) compared with the levels of variation in Southeast Asia/Pacific (H = 0.51 to 0.65) and Africa (H = 0.76 to 0.8) (6), due to small, structured parasite populations with fewer multiple-clone infections, high levels of inbreeding, and considerably lower recombination rates (5). Although we did not estimate the mean number of parasite clones per sample, MS genotyping revealed that only <1% and 2.9% of all samples from South America carried multiple alleles at the Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci, respectively (cf. Asia [5% and 5.5%, respectively] and Africa [15% and 18.5%, respectively]). By using one putatively neutral locus, PfPK2 (chromosome 12), we observed similar levels of multiple-allele infections in the samples from South America (3%), Asia (7.6%), and Africa (25.8%). Thus, it is not surprising to observe that both the CQR Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 alleles exhibited low diversities in South American parasites.

Conclusions and implication for malaria treatment. A number of studies, focused on Pfcrt, have provided convincing evidence regarding how this gene evolved under CQ selection pressure (39, 61, 65). So far, two studies, focused on the evolutionary dynamics of Pfmdr1 from two different angles, have reported different yet complementary outcomes (19, 37). While the results of the study by Duraisingh et al. (19), using an intragenic MS locus, indicate a limited number of origins and a strong selective sweep of Pfmdr1 N86Y alleles in Gambian parasites, the results of the study by Nair et al. (37), using flanking MS loci, indicate 5 to 15 independent origins and "soft" selective sweeps of Pfmdr1 amplification events in parasites from the Thailand-Burma border. Since we used the same sets of samples to analyze genetic variation at both the Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci, our results for samples from worldwide locations provide a unique insight into the evolutionary dynamics of these genes. We found that there are marked differences between the evolutionary dynamics of Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 in both Asia and Africa and in the evolutionary dynamics of both genes, particularly Pfmdr1, between Asia/Africa and South America. We observed strong selective sweeps and a limited number of origins of CQR Pfcrt alleles, a hallmark of selection at the Pfcrt locus, whereas high levels of variation and multiple origins of the most-prevalent CQR Pfmdr1 allele (86Y) were observed in Asia and Africa. In South America, we observed reduced variation and only a few origins of CQR Pfcrt, as well as Pfmdr1, alleles. It is most likely that genetic variation at Pfcrt and Pfmdr1 loci in both Asian and African parasite populations is generated and/or maintained via substantially different mechanisms.

CQ is being replaced by newer artemisinin-based combination drugs, such as artesunate-mefloquine, artemether-lumefantrine, and artesunate-amodiaquine, in several countries where malaria is endemic (http://www.rbm.who.int/). Pfmdr1 is a major modulator of resistance to these drugs. Understanding the mechanisms that regulate the genetic variation at Pfmdr1, separately or in conjunction with Pfcrt, is important, as this would usefully complement our current efforts to understand the evolution of the malaria parasite genome under changing drug pressure. With increased understanding, we might be able to augment our success in treating this global killer despite our limited arsenal of drugs.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (AI-52312) to P.A.Z. R.K.M. was supported by Fogarty International Center and, in part, by another grant from the National Institutes of Health (AI-36478 to J.W.K.).

We thank Tom Wellems, Dave McNamara, Brian Grimberg, Laurie Gray, and Jeana DaRe for their critical comments on the manuscript. We thank Tim Anderson for his critical comments on the manuscript and for providing the Brazilian and Colombian samples, collected by Marcelo Ferreira and Ivan Dario Velez, respectively. We are deeply grateful to all volunteers for contributing blood samples and, additionally, to all field staff members for collecting the samples.


    FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for Global Health and Diseases, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, Wolstein Research Building, room no. 4204, 2103 Cornell Road, Cleveland, OH 44106-7286. Phone: (216) 368-6172. Fax: (216) 368-4825. E-mail: rkm{at}case.edu Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 14 April 2008. Back

{dagger} Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aac.asm.org/. Back


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Abdel-Muhsin, A. M., M. J. Mackinnon, E. Ali, K. A. el Nassir, S. Suleiman, S. Ahmed, D. Walliker, and H. A. Babiker. 2004. Evolution of drug-resistance genes in Plasmodium falciparum in an area of seasonal malaria transmission in Eastern Sudan. J. Infect. Dis. 189:1239-1244.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Alifrangis, M., M. B. Dalgaard, J. P. Lusingu, L. S. Vestergaard, T. Staalsoe, A. T. Jensen, A. Enevold, A. M. Ronn, I. F. Khalil, D. C. Warhurst, M. M. Lemnge, T. G. Theander, and I. C. Bygbjerg. 2006. Occurrence of the Southeast Asian/South American SVMNT haplotype of the chloroquine-resistance transporter gene in Plasmodium falciparum in Tanzania. J. Infect. Dis. 193:1738-1741.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Alifrangis, M., S. Enosse, R. Pearce, C. Drakeley, C. Roper, I. F. Khalil, W. M. Nkya, A. M. Ronn, T. G. Theander, and I. C. Bygbjerg. 2005. A simple, high-throughput method to detect Plasmodium falciparum single nucleotide polymorphisms in the dihydrofolate reductase, dihydropteroate synthase, and P. falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter genes using polymerase chain reaction- and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based technology. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 72:155-162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Alker, A. P., P. Lim, R. Sem, N. K. Shah, P. Yi, D. M. Bouth, R. Tsuyuoka, J. D. Maguire, T. Fandeur, F. Ariey, C. Wongsrichanalai, and S. R. Meshnick. 2007. Pfmdr1 and in vivo resistance to artesunate-mefloquine in falciparum malaria on the Cambodian-Thai border. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 76:641-647.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Anderson, T. J. 2004. Mapping drug resistance genes in Plasmodium falciparum by genome-wide association. Curr. Drug Targets Infect. Disord. 4:65-78.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Anderson, T. J., B. Haubold, J. T. Williams, J. G. Estrada-Franco, L. Richardson, R. Mollinedo, M. Bockarie, J. Mokili, S. Mharakurwa, N. French, J. Whitworth, I. D. Velez, A. H. Brockman, F. Nosten, M. U. Ferreira, and K. P. Day. 2000. Microsatellite markers reveal a spectrum of population structures in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:1467-1482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Anderson, T. J., X. Z. Su, A. Roddam, and K. P. Day. 2000. Complex mutations in a high proportion of microsatellite loci from the protozoan parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol. Ecol. 9:1599-1608.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Baird, J. K., S. Owusu Agyei, G. C. Utz, K. Koram, M. J. Barcus, T. R. Jones, D. J. Fryauff, F. N. Binka, S. L. Hoffman, and F. N. Nkrumah. 2002. Seasonal malaria attack rates in infants and young children in northern Ghana. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 66:280-286.[Abstract]
  9. Baird, J. K., T. Tiwari, G. J. Martin, C. L. Tamminga, T. M. Prout, J. Tjaden, P. P. Bravet, S. Rawlins, M. Ferrel, D. Carucci, and S. L. Hoffman. 2002. Chloroquine for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Guyana. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 96:339-348.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Bandelt, H. J., P. Forster, and A. Rohl. 1999. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:37-48.[Abstract]
  11. Chen, N., B. Russell, E. Fowler, J. Peters, and Q. Cheng. 2002. Levels of chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum are determined by loci other than pfcrt and pfmdr1. J. Infect. Dis. 185:405-407.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Chen, N., D. W. Wilson, C. Pasay, D. Bell, L. B. Martin, D. Kyle, and Q. Cheng. 2005. Origin and dissemination of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum with mutant pfcrt alleles in the Philippines. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:2102-2105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Cooper, R. A., C. L. Hartwig, and M. T. Ferdig. 2005. pfcrt is more than the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance gene: a functional and evolutionary perspective. Acta Trop. 94:170-180.[Medline]
  14. Dittrich, S., M. Alifrangis, J. M. Stohrer, V. Thongpaseuth, V. Vanisaveth, R. Phetsouvanh, S. Phompida, I. F. Khalil, and T. Jelinek. 2005. Falciparum malaria in the north of Laos: the occurrence and implications of the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter (pfcrt) gene haplotype SVMNT. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 10:1267-1270.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Djimde, A., O. K. Doumbo, J. F. Cortese, K. Kayentao, S. Doumbo, Y. Diourte, A. Dicko, X. Z. Su, T. Nomura, D. A. Fidock, T. E. Wellems, C. V. Plowe, and D. Coulibaly. 2001. A molecular marker for chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria. N. Engl. J. Med. 344:257-263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Dokomajilar, C., S. L. Nsobya, B. Greenhouse, P. J. Rosenthal, and G. Dorsey. 2006. Selection of Plasmodium falciparum pfmdr1 alleles following therapy with artemether-lumefantrine in an area of Uganda where malaria is highly endemic. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1893-1895.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Dorsey, G., M. R. Kamya, G. Ndeezi, J. N. Babirye, C. R. Phares, J. E. Olson, E. T. Katabira, and P. J. Rosenthal. 2000. Predictors of chloroquine treatment failure in children and adults with falciparum malaria in Kampala, Uganda. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 62:686-692.[Abstract]
  18. Dorsey, G., M. R. Kamya, A. Singh, and P. J. Rosenthal. 2001. Polymorphisms in the Plasmodium falciparum pfcrt and pfmdr-1 genes and clinical response to chloroquine in Kampala, Uganda. J. Infect. Dis. 183:1417-1420.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Duraisingh, M. T., P. Jones, I. Sambou, L. von Seidlein, M. Pinder, and D. C. Warhurst. 2000. The tyrosine-86 allele of the pfmdr1 gene of Plasmodium falciparum is associated with increased sensitivity to the anti-malarials mefloquine and artemisinin. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 108:13-23.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Duraisingh, M. T., and P. Refour. 2005. Multiple drug resistance genes in malaria—from epistasis to epidemiology. Mol. Microbiol. 57:874-877.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Ebisawa, I., T. Fukuyama, and Y. Kawamura. 1976. Additional foci of chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria in East Kalimantan and West Irian, Indonesia. Trop. Geogr. Med. 28:349-354.[Medline]
  22. Excoffier, L., G. Laval, and S. Schneider. 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinform. Online 1:47-50.
  23. Excoffier, L., P. E. Smouse, and J. M. Quattro. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479-491.[Abstract]
  24. Fidock, D. A., T. Nomura, A. K. Talley, R. A. Cooper, S. M. Dzekunov, M. T. Ferdig, L. M. Ursos, A. B. Sidhu, B. Naude, K. W. Deitsch, X. Z. Su, J. C. Wootton, P. D. Roepe, and T. E. Wellems. 2000. Mutations in the P. falciparum digestive vacuole transmembrane protein PfCRT and evidence for their role in chloroquine resistance. Mol. Cell 6:861-871.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Foote, S. J., D. E. Kyle, R. K. Martin, A. M. Oduola, K. Forsyth, D. J. Kemp, and A. F. Cowman. 1990. Several alleles of the multidrug-resistance gene are closely linked to chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 345:255-258.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Foote, S. J., J. K. Thompson, A. F. Cowman, and D. J. Kemp. 1989. Amplification of the multidrug resistance gene in some chloroquine-resistant isolates of P. falciparum. Cell 57:921-930.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Fryauff, D. J., B. Leksana, S. Masbar, I. Wiady, P. Sismadi, A. I. Susanti, H. S. Nagesha, Syafruddin, S. Atmosoedjono, M. J. Bangs, and J. K. Baird. 2002. The drug sensitivity and transmission dynamics of human malaria on Nias Island, North Sumatra, Indonesia. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 96:447-462.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Hayton, K., and X. Z. Su. 2004. Genetic and biochemical aspects of drug resistance in malaria parasites. Curr. Drug Targets Infect. Disord. 4:1-10.[Medline]
  29. Holmgren, G., J. Hamrin, J. Svard, A. Martensson, J. P. Gil, and A. Bjorkman. 2007. Selection of pfmdr1 mutations after amodiaquine monotherapy and amodiaquine plus artemisinin combination therapy in East Africa. Infect. Genet. Evol. 7:562-569.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Humphreys, G. S., I. Merinopoulos, J. Ahmed, C. J. Whitty, T. K. Mutabingwa, C. J. Sutherland, and R. L. Hallett. 2007. Amodiaquine and artemether-lumefantrine select distinct alleles of the Plasmodium falciparum mdr1 gene in Tanzanian children treated for uncomplicated malaria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:991-997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. John, C. C., P. O. Sumba, J. H. Ouma, B. L. Nahlen, C. L. King, and J. W. Kazura. 2000. Cytokine responses to Plasmodium falciparum liver-stage antigen 1 vary in rainy and dry seasons in highland Kenya. Infect. Immun. 68:5198-5204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. John, C. C., J. S. Zickafoose, P. O. Sumba, C. L. King, and J. W. Kazura. 2003. Antibodies to the Plasmodium falciparum antigens circumsporozoite protein, thrombospondin-related adhesive protein, and liver-stage antigen 1 vary by ages of subjects and by season in a highland area of Kenya. Infect. Immun. 71:4320-4325.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Lim, P., S. Chy, F. Ariey, S. Incardona, P. Chim, R. Sem, M. B. Denis, S. Hewitt, S. Hoyer, D. Socheat, O. Merecreau-Puijalon, and T. Fandeur. 2003. pfcrt polymorphism and chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum strains isolated in Cambodia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:87-94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Mehlotra, R. K., H. Fujioka, P. D. Roepe, O. Janneh, L. M. Ursos, V. Jacobs-Lorena, D. T. McNamara, M. J. Bockarie, J. W. Kazura, D. E. Kyle, D. A. Fidock, and P. A. Zimmerman. 2001. Evolution of a unique Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine-resistance phenotype in association with pfcrt polymorphism in Papua New Guinea and South America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:12689-12694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Mehlotra, R. K., G. Mattera, K. Bhatia, J. C. Reeder, M. Stoneking, and P. A. Zimmerman. 2005. Insight into the early spread of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum infections in Papua New Guinea. J. Infect. Dis. 192:2174-2179.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Mu, J., M. T. Ferdig, X. Feng, D. A. Joy, J. Duan, T. Furuya, G. Subramanian, L. Aravind, R. A. Cooper, J. C. Wootton, M. Xiong, and X. Z. Su. 2003. Multiple transporters associated with malaria parasite responses to chloroquine and quinine. Mol. Microbiol. 49:977-989.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Nair, S., D. Nash, D. Sudimack, A. Jaidee, M. Barends, A. C. Uhlemann, S. Krishna, F. Nosten, and T. J. Anderson. 2007. Recurrent gene amplification and soft selective sweeps during evolution of multidrug resistance in malaria parasites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:562-573.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Nair, S., J. T. Williams, A. Brockman, L. Paiphun, M. Mayxay, P. N. Newton, J. P. Guthmann, F. M. Smithuis, T. T. Hien, N. J. White, F. Nosten, and T. J. Anderson. 2003. A selective sweep driven by pyrimethamine treatment in Southeast Asian malaria parasites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:1526-1536.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Nash, D., S. Nair, M. Mayxay, P. N. Newton, J. P. Guthmann, F. Nosten, and T. J. Anderson. 2005. Selection strength and hitchhiking around two anti-malarial resistance genes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 272:1153-1161.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Nsobya, S. L., C. Dokomajilar, M. Joloba, G. Dorsey, and P. J. Rosenthal. 2007. Resistance-mediating Plasmodium falciparum pfcrt and pfmdr1 alleles after treatment with artesunate-amodiaquine in Uganda. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:3023-3025.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Pickard, A. L., C. Wongsrichanalai, A. Purfield, D. Kamwendo, K. Emery, C. Zalewski, F. Kawamoto, R. S. Miller, and S. R. Meshnick. 2003. Resistance to antimalarials in Southeast Asia and genetic polymorphisms in pfmdr1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:2418-2423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Pillai, D. R., A. C. Labbe, V. Vanisaveth, B. Hongvangthong, S. Pomphida, S. Inkathone, K. Zhong, and K. C. Kain. 2001. Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Laos: chloroquine treatment outcome and predictive value of molecular markers. J. Infect. Dis. 183:789-795.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Rason, M. A., H. B. Andrianantenaina, F. Ariey, A. Raveloson, O. Domarle, and M. Randrianarivelojosia. 2007. Prevalent pfmdr1 N86Y mutant Plasmodium falciparum in Madagascar despite absence of pfcrt mutant strains. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 76:1079-1083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Rohrbach, P., C. P. Sanchez, K. Hayton, O. Friedrich, J. Patel, A. B. Sidhu, M. T. Ferdig, D. A. Fidock, and M. Lanzer. 2006. Genetic linkage of pfmdr1 with food vacuolar solute import in Plasmodium falciparum. EMBO J. 25:3000-3011.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Sanchez, C. P., J. E. McLean, P. Rohrbach, D. A. Fidock, W. D. Stein, and M. Lanzer. 2005. Evidence for a pfcrt-associated chloroquine efflux system in the human malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Biochemistry 44:9862-9870.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Sidhu, A. B., A. C. Uhlemann, S. G. Valderramos, J. C. Valderramos, S. Krishna, and D. A. Fidock. 2006. Decreasing pfmdr1 copy number in Plasmodium falciparum malaria heightens susceptibility to mefloquine, lumefantrine, halofantrine, quinine, and artemisinin. J. Infect. Dis. 194:528-535.[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Sidhu, A. B., S. G. Valderramos, and D. A. Fidock. 2005. pfmdr1 mutations contribute to quinine resistance and enhance mefloquine and artemisinin sensitivity in Plasmodium falciparum. Mol. Microbiol. 57:913-926.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Sidhu, A. B., D. Verdier-Pinard, and D. A. Fidock. 2002. Chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites conferred by pfcrt mutations. Science 298:210-213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Sisowath, C., J. Stromberg, A. Martensson, M. Msellem, C. Obondo, A. Bjorkman, and J. P. Gil. 2005. In vivo selection of Plasmodium falciparum pfmdr1 86N coding alleles by artemether-lumefantrine (Coartem). J. Infect. Dis. 191:1014-1017.[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Stohrer, J. M., S. Dittrich, V. Thongpaseuth, V. Vanisaveth, R. Phetsouvanh, S. Phompida, F. Monti, E. M. Christophel, N. Lindegardh, A. Annerberg, and T. Jelinek. 2004. Therapeutic efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-mefloquine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Luang Namtha Province, Lao People's Democratic Republic. Trop. Med. Int. Health 9:1175-1183.[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Su, X., M. T. Ferdig, Y. Huang, C. Q. Huynh, A. Liu, J. You, J. C. Wootton, and T. E. Wellems. 1999. A genetic map and recombination parameters of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Science 286:1351-1353.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Su, X., L. A. Kirkman, H. Fujioka, and T. E. Wellems. 1997. Complex polymorphisms in an approximately 330 kDa protein are linked to chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum in Southeast Asia and Africa. Cell 91:593-603.[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Syafruddin, D., P. B. Asih, G. J. Casey, J. Maguire, J. K. Baird, H. S. Nagesha, A. F. Cowman, and J. C. Reeder. 2005. Molecular epidemiology of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to antimalarial drugs in Indonesia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 72:174-181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Thomas, S. M., O. Ndir, T. Dieng, S. Mboup, D. Wypij, J. H. Maguire, and D. F. Wirth. 2002. In vitro chloroquine susceptibility and PCR analysis of pfcrt and pfmdr1 polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Senegal. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 66:474-480.[Abstract]
  55. Trager, W., and J. B. Jensen. 1976. Human malaria parasites in continuous culture. Science 193:673-675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Triglia, T., S. J. Foote, D. J. Kemp, and A. F. Cowman. 1991. Amplification of the multidrug resistance gene pfmdr1 in Plasmodium falciparum has arisen as multiple independent events. Mol. Cell. Biol. 11:5244-5250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Uhlemann, A. C., R. McGready, E. A. Ashley, A. Brockman, P. Singhasivanon, S. Krishna, N. J. White, F. Nosten, and R. N. Price. 2007. Intrahost selection of Plasmodium falciparum pfmdr1 alleles after antimalarial treatment on the northwestern border of Thailand. J. Infect. Dis. 195:134-141.[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Ursing, J., S. Zakeri, J. P. Gil, and A. Bjorkman. 2006. Quinoline resistance associated polymorphisms in the pfcrt, pfmdr1 and pfmrp genes of Plasmodium falciparum in Iran. Acta Trop. 97:352-356.[CrossRef][Medline]
  59. Valderramos, S. G., and D. A. Fidock. 2006. Transporters involved in resistance to antimalarial drugs. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 27:594-601.[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Van Dijk, W. J. 1958. Mass chemoprophylaxis with chloroquine additional to DDT indoor spraying; report on a pilot project in the Demta area, Netherlands New Guinea. Trop. Geogr. Med. 10:379-384.[Medline]
  61. Vieira, P. P., M. U. Ferreira, M. G. Alecrim, W. D. Alecrim, L. H. da Silva, M. M. Sihuincha, D. A. Joy, J. Mu, X. Z. Su, and M. G. Zalis. 2004. pfcrt polymorphism and the spread of chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum populations across the Amazon Basin. J. Infect. Dis. 190:417-424.[CrossRef][Medline]
  62. Vinayak, S., S. Biswas, V. Dev., A. Kumar, M. A. Ansari, and Y. D. Sharma. 2003. Prevalence of the K76T mutation in the pfcrt gene of Plasmodium falciparum among chloroquine responders in India. Acta Trop. 87:287-293.[C