This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Other Versions of this Article: AAC.00414-07v1 52/6/2226    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Google Scholar Articles by Huang, T.-S. Articles by Chen, B.-C. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Huang, T.-S. Articles by Chen, B.-C.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2008, p. 2226-2227, Vol. 52, No. 6
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00414-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Activities of Linezolid against Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Isolated in Taiwan over 10 Years

Section of Microbiology, Dept. of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine,¹ Section of Infectious Diseases, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan,² Department of Medical Technology, Foo-Yin Institute of Technology, Kaohsiung, Taiwan,³ School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan,⁴ Graduate Institute of Environmental Education, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan⁵

Received 26 March 2007/ Returned for modification 15 October 2007/ Accepted 22 March 2008

	ABSTRACT

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 
Significant increases in the MIC₉₀s of linezolid in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were seen between the baseline period of 2001 to 2003 (0.5 µg/ml) and 2004 (2 µg/ml). The MICs were 4 µg/ml in three strains. Both fluoroquinolones (except levofloxacin) and kanamycin were found to have statistically significant degrees of concordance with linezolid.

	TEXT

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 
Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the major causes of death worldwide. The global prevalence of mycobacterial infection has been estimated to be 32% (1.9 billion people), with 8 million new cases of TB diagnosed annually and an average case fatality rate of 23% (11). In the year 2003, the incidence and mortality rate of TB in Taiwan were reported at 62.38 and 5.80 per 100,000 people, respectively (2), and TB is considered a more serious public health problem in southern than in northern Taiwan.

Although TB can be cured with chemotherapy, the treatment is exceedingly lengthy and results in poor patient compliance, which is a frequent cause of selection of drug-resistant and even multidrug-resistant (MDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis complexes. If the treatment fails as a result of drug resistance, treatment with second-line drugs is necessary. In Taiwan, the overall rates of MDR M. tuberculosis among new cases and previously treated cases ranged from 1% to 3% and 15% to 46%, respectively (5). In our previous report, increases in the MIC₉₀s and rates of resistance to ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and levofloxacin were noted in the MDR group (6). Therefore, there is an increasing need for new antimicrobial agents against MDR M. tuberculosis.

Linezolid, the first oxazolidinone developed and approved for clinical use, is an inhibitor of bacterial ribosomal protein synthesis. It prevents the formation of a 70S initiation complex by binding to a site on the 50S ribosomal subunit near its interface with the 30S unit. This unique mechanism of action is believed to preclude its cross-resistance to currently available agents. In addition, as linezolid is a totally synthetic antimicrobial agent, there are no preexisting specific resistance genes among gram-positive bacteria (8). Linezolid was introduced to Taiwan recently, in 2002, for treatment of gram-positive-bacterial diseases. However, in vitro activity of linezolid against Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains is still scarce and has not been reported to occur in Asia.

We evaluated the in vitro activities of linezolid against M. tuberculosis by using the standard agar proportion method against 199 strains isolated from 1995 to 2004. These included 88 susceptible isolates, defined as fully susceptible to the four first-line drugs (isoniazid, rifampin, streptomycin, and ethambutol); 57 MDR isolates, resistant to rifampin and isoniazid; and 54 combination isolates, defined as isolates with other combinations of resistance patterns. We also examined the correlations of MICs between linezolid and other second-line drugs.

Antibiotic preparations used in this study, obtained as pure substances from their manufacturers, included ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin (Bayer, Wuppertal, Germany), levofloxacin (Daiichi Pharmaceutical Taiwan, Ltd.), rifabutin (Pharmacn Gruppo Pfuer, Inc.), and linezolid (Pfizer Taiwan). Kanamycin, ofloxacin, streptomycin, ethionamide, and para-aminosalicylic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO).

Quality control was carried out by concomitant determination of the MICs of the same antimicrobial agents against M. tuberculosis H37Rv and an MDR M. tuberculosis clinical isolate.

Linezolid has excellent in vitro activity against all of the M. tuberculosis isolates tested, including the MDR M. tuberculosis isolates. The MICs range from <0.125 to 4 µg/ml, with both MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ as 0.5 µg/ml. The MIC against M. tuberculosis H37Rv was 0.5 µg/ml and was in agreement with the published value (7). Three strains showed MICs of 4 µg/ml. One of them was also resistant to fluoroquinolones and rifabutin. Its fluoroquinolone resistance is associated with the D94A mutation in the gyrA gene.

Richter et al. (9) claimed that they had found the first linezolid-resistant strains with MICs of 8 µg/ml, 1 dilution higher than ours. However, the MIC of strain H37Rv was 1 µg/ml, also 1 dilution higher. In addition, three strains with MICs greater than 16 µg/ml were reported by Rodriguez et al. in 2002 (10).

The MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ results are similar to previous reports (1, 10). No difference was noted in different susceptibility groups or different periods of time.

The trends in the MIC₉₀s of linezolid in the susceptible, MDR, and combination groups during the 3-year periods are shown in Table 1. The only significant increase in MIC₉₀ was seen for the MDR strains. This was noted between the baseline period of 2001 to 2003 and 2004 when analyzed by the Mann-Whitney test on SPSS version 12 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) (P = 0.016). The MIC₉₀s were 0.5 µg/ml in 2001 to 2003 and 2 µg/ml in 2004.

We examined the correlations of MICs with linezolid MIC as an independent variable by calculating Goodman and Kruskal's measure (4), which is a commonly used measure of ordinal association in the two-way contingency tables in the SPSS version 12.0 software program. With this measure, linezolid showed significant concordance between both fluoroquinolones (except levofloxacin) and kanamycin when the fluoroquinolone MIC was used to predict linezolid MIC, with values of 0.057 (P = 0.000), 0.054 (P < 0.05), 0.059 (P < 0.05), and 0.053 (P < 0.05) for ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and kanamycin, respectively (Table 2).

In the current study, we found that the MICs of linezolid were increased in MDR M. tuberculosis isolates in patients with no prior exposure to this antimicrobial agent. The correlation between fluoroquinolones (except levofloxacin) and linezolid may be relevant to the trend of increasing fluoroquinolone resistance (6). Although the increase of MIC does not confer linezolid resistance, it may act additively with another mechanism to achieve clinically significant linezolid resistance through stepwise accumulation of resistance elements and mutations. The correlation between kanamycin and linezolid has not been reported previously.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
This study was supported by Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital grant VGHKS 96-071.

	FOOTNOTES

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Section of Infectious Diseases, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, 386 Ta-Chung 1st Rd., Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China. Phone: 886 (07)3468169. Fax: 886 (07)3468296. E-mail: ycliu{at}vghks.gov.tw

Published ahead of print on 7 April 2008.

	REFERENCES

Top ABSTRACT TEXT REFERENCES

 

1. Alcalá, L., M. J. Ruiz-Serrano, C. Pérez-Fernández Turégano, D. García De Viedma, M. Díaz-Infantes, M. Marín-Arriaza, and E. Bouza. 2003. In vitro activities of linezolid against clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that are susceptible or resistant to first-line antituberculous drugs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:416-417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Centers for Disease Control. 2004. Statistics of communicable diseases and surveillance report in Taiwan area, 2003. Centers for Disease Control, Taipei, Taiwan.
3. Escribano, I., J. C. Rodriguez, B. Llorca, E. Garcia-Pachon, M. Ruiz, and G. Royo. 2007. Importance of the efflux pump systems in the resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to fluoroquinolones and linezolid. Chemotherapy 53:397-401.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Hilderand, D. K., J. D. Laingand, and H. Rosenthal. 1977. Prediction analysis of cross classifications, p. 55-56. In J. Neter, W. Wasserman, and G. G. Whitmore (ed.), Applied statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
5. Hsueh, P. R., Y. C. Liu, J. So, C. Y. Liu, P. C. Yang, and K. T. Luh. 2006. Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Taiwan. J. Infect. 52:77-85.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Huang, T. S., C. M. Kunin, S. Shin-Jung Lee, Y. S. Chen, H. Z. Tu, and Y. C. Liu. 2005. Trends in fluoroquinolone resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in a Taiwanese medical centre: 1995-2003. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 56:1058-1062.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Ji, B., S. Lefrançois, J. Robert, A. Chauffour, C. Truffot, and V. Jarlier. 2006. In vitro and in vivo activities of rifampin, streptomycin, amikacin, moxifloxacin, R207910, linezolid, and PA-824 against Mycobacterium ulcerans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1921-1926.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Moellering, R. C. 2003. Linezolid: the first oxazolidinone antimicrobial. Ann. Intern. Med. 138:135-142.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Richter, E., S. Rusch-Gerdes, and D. Hillemann. 2007. First linezolid-resistant clinical of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:1534-1536.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Rodriguez, J. C., M. Ruiz, M. Lopez, and G. Royo. 2002. In vitro activity of moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin and linezolid against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 20:464-467.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. World Health Organization. 2000. Global tuberculosis control. Document no. WHO/CDS/TB/2000.275. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Other Versions of this Article: AAC.00414-07v1 52/6/2226    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Google Scholar Articles by Huang, T.-S. Articles by Chen, B.-C. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Huang, T.-S. Articles by Chen, B.-C.