Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, June 2008, p. 2232-2235, Vol. 52, No. 6
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.01245-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Nuclear Medicine,1 European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Karlsruhe, Germany,2 Department of Microbiology and Immunology,3 Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York4
Received 23 September 2007/ Returned for modification 13 January 2008/ Accepted 22 March 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
(These results were presented in part at the 106th General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Orlando, FL, 21 to 25 May 2006, abstr. F-023.)
Gamma radiation induced membrane permeability in a percentage of C. neoformans cells, while radiolabeled antibodies did not. We compared the damage to C. neoformans cells caused by gamma radiation to that caused by treatment with 213Bi- or 188Re-labeled 18B7, a mouse MAb (immunoglobulin G1) recognizing the polysaccharide capsule of C. neoformans (5). C. neoformans cells (strain 24067, obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were grown as described previously (6). Cells were irradiated with 137Cs at 14 Gy/min for up to 600 Gy, followed by plating for CFU, to measure the cells' clonogenic survival. During a 7-day observation of the plates with radiation-treated C. neoformans cells plated for clonogenic survival, the colonies appeared simultaneously on day 3, with no new colonies appearing during the rest of the 7-day observation period, a finding indicating no of reactivation of the dormant cells. Since in vitro there is no suppression of the cells by the host's immune system, it is unlikely that radiation treatment left behind any cells capable of reactivation. For RIT experiments MAb 18B7 was radiolabeled with 213Bi and 188Re as described earlier (6, 8). For that purpose, 213Bi, which emits primarily alpha as well as some beta particles, was eluted from a 225Ac generator from the Institute for Transuranium Elements, Karlsruhe, Germany (1); 188Re, a beta emitter, was eluted from a 188W/188Re generator (Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Oak Ridge, TN). C. neoformans cells were incubated with radiolabeled antibodies for 1 h at 37°C, the unbound antibodies were removed, and the cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline. For 188Re-18B7 MAb the cells were incubated with shaking in phosphate-buffered saline at 4°C for 2 days to allow 188Re with its physical half-life of 16.9 h to deliver its radiation dose; for 213Bi-18B7 MAb 3 h of incubation at room temperature was sufficient, since 213Bi has a short physical half-life of 46 min. All three forms of radiation decreased the clonogenic survival, with the doses that caused losses of 80 to 100% being 250 Gy for gamma radiation, 1 Gy for 188Re-18B7, and 0.5 Gy for 213Bi-18B7 (Fig. 1). The doses for radiolabeled MAbs were calculated by using an algorithm previously developed for RIT of fungal cells (7). We observed no killing of C. neoformans cells when gamma radiation was delivered to C. neoformans cells by 18B7 MAb radiolabeled with a pure gamma emitter 99m-technetium (99mTc; 140 keV gamma emission with 89% abundance) at the dose range of 0.7 to 45 µCi/105 cells (not shown).
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Comparison of the percentage of nonviable C. neoformans cells by CFU, PI permeability, and apoptosis levels by FLICA for radiation-treated cells. Panels A to D show CFU and PI permeability. (A) External gamma radiation; (B) 188Re-18B7; (C) 213Bi-18B7; (D) H2O2 controls. Panels E to H show CFU and apoptosis levels by FLICA. (E) External gamma radiation; (F) 188Re-18B7; (G) 213Bi-18B7; (H) H2O2 controls. (I) CFU and [35S]methionine incorporation by 213Bi-18B7-treated C. neoformans cells.
|
300 Gy (25% PI positive), with a decrease to 10% PI positive at the highest dose (Fig. 1A). This observation indicates again that membrane damage is not the primary lethal event, since 80% of the cells had lost clonogenic ability at these doses. The decrease in PI-positive cells at the highest dose may be due to protective effects from the shed capsule (4). Damage to the membrane as measured by PI permeability did not increase by 21 h. Treatment of C. neoformans with 188Re-18B7 did not make the cells PI permeable (Fig. 1B). Treatment with 213Bi-18B7 MAb led to ca. 7% of the cells becoming PI permeable, at a dose that caused 80% loss of CFU (Fig. 1C). Higher doses of 213Bi-18B7 MAb actually decreased the permeability. For comparison, the C. neoformans cells were treated with H2O2 for 3 h, which induced high CFU losses but did not make the cells permeable to PI (Fig. 1D). All radiation types initiated the process of apoptosis in C. neoformans cells. Fungal cells undergo apoptosis or programmed cell death (13). We investigated whether radiation increased levels of fungal caspase, as measured by FLICA (for fluorochrome-labeled inhibitor of caspase) binding, a membrane-permeable substrate that binds to caspases induced during early apoptosis. Earlier, we validated this technique for use with C. neoformans by comparing the FLICA results to those obtained using an APO-BrdU TUNEL apoptosis detection kit (6). Cell fluorescence was measured on the FL-1 channel of the FACScan. Gamma-irradiated cells were about 10% FLICA positive at 3 h (Fig. 1E), whereas 20 and 5% of C. neoformans cells exposed to 188Re-18B7 or 213Bi-18B7 MAbs, respectively, became FLICA positive (Fig. 1F and G). The number of FLICA-positive 213Bi-18B7 MAb-treated cells staining was higher at 17 h than at 3 h, indicating an ongoing process of apoptosis induction. Apoptosis is a dynamic process, and cells pass through several stages, not staying at any one stage for a long time. The decrease seen at 21 h for the gamma-radiation-treated cells may indicate that at 21 h the cells have finished the stage of apoptosis during which the caspases are available to bind the fluorescent inhibitors. This is in contrast to the increase with time observed for 213Bi-18B7 MAb-treated cells and may reflect a difference in pathways of cell death induced by the different forms of radioactivity. The levels of induction were similar to those after treatment with 1 to 3 mM H2O2, a standard positive control for apoptosis induction (Fig. 1H). Untreated cells had a 1 to 2% FLICA-positive population (not shown).
XTT assay detected the loss in metabolic activity only for cells "directly" hit with alpha-radiation. The cells ability to reduce the dye 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-[(phenylamino)carbonyl]-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide (XTT) depends on the availability of NADPH at the cell surface. XTT reduction is considered to be a measure of metabolic activity (3) and has been used to measure the antifungal activity of the drugs (10). Previously, we showed that gamma radiation did not affect XTT activity of C. neoformans cells even at doses as high as 830 Gy, whereas 188Re-18B7 treatment caused a detectable decrease in XTT activity only at doses 10 times higher than those required for a 50% loss of CFU (14). In contrast, the XTT activity of C. neoformans cells treated with 213Bi-18B7 MAb decreased to the same extent as their CFU (14). These results indicated that the damage required for the loss of XTT activity is distinct from the damage required for loss of the ability to replicate.
As another measure of metabolic activity, we used a [35S]methionine uptake assay to evaluate the metabolic activity of the cells treated with 213Bi-18B7. The results showed that [35S]methionine incorporation decreased in parallel with CFU, starting from 18 h of incubation with the 213Bi-18B7-treated cells (Fig. 1I).
In the present study we investigated the mechanism of this phenomenon by comparing the ability of RIT to the ability of its "crossfire" component to interfere with metabolism of C. neoformans as measured by an XTT assay. As assumed in the field of RIT, the cells could be killed by antibody-delivered radiation via a "direct-hit" (killing of a cell by radiation emanating from a radiolabeled molecule bound to this cell) or "crossfire" (killing of a cell by radiation emanating from a radiolabeled molecule bound to an adjacent or distant cell) effects or a combination of both. A "crossfire" effect is essential for the success of cancer RIT (12). Cells that would serve as sources of "crossfire" radiation were prepared by incubating heat-killed C. neoformans cells with radiolabeled MAbs for 1 h at 37°C. The unbound antibodies were removed by centrifugation, and the dead cells with bound radiolabeled MAb were mixed with live C. neoformans cells to deliver the "crossfire" radiation to live cells. The mixture was incubated for 1 h at 37°C and assayed as described above for CFU and for XTT activity as described previously (14). Both RIT with 188Re-18B7 MAb and its "crossfire" component, while equally decreasing CFU (Fig. 2B), did not change the levels of metabolism as compared to untreated cells (Fig. 2A). 213Bi-18B7 RIT, on the other hand, produced a large decrease in XTT activity (Fig. 2C) that was proportional to the decrease in CFU (Fig. 2D). Interestingly, "crossfire" from 213Bi-18B7 was unable to cause a decrease in XTT activity (Fig. 2C), indicating that there is a fundamental difference in the fungicidal mechanisms of "direct" RIT and its "crossfire" component for this radionuclide. The "crossfire" effect on CFU may be caused by the beta radiation component of 213Bi decay, which has a longer range in tissue and is much less damaging than its alpha decay component.
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Comparison of the percentage of nonviable C. neoformans cells by CFU and metabolic activity by XTT assay for treatment with radiolabeled MAbs and its "crossfire" component. (A) XTT results for 188Re-18B7; (B) CFU for 188Re-18B7; (C) XTT results for 213Bi-18B7; (D) CFU for 213Bi-18B7.
|
Published ahead of print on 31 March 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»