Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2008, p. 2435-2441, Vol. 52, No. 7
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00169-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

R. Suwanarusk,2,3,
R. Ruengweerayut,4
T. S. Skinner-Adams,5
F. Nosten,6,7,8
D. L. Gardiner,5
P. Boonma,1
K. A. Piera,2
K. T. Andrews,5
B. MacHunter,2
J. S. McCarthy,5
N. M. Anstey,2
R. N. Price,2,7 and
B. Russell2,3*
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand,1 International Health Program, Infectious Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia,2 Laboratory for Malaria Immunobiology, Singapore Immunology Network, Biopolis, Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore,3 Mae Sod Hospital, Tak, Thailand,4 Queensland Institute of Medical Research and Australian Centre for International and Tropical Health and Nutrition, Brisbane, Australia,5 Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mae Sod, Thailand,6 Centre for Clinical Vaccinology and Tropical Medicine, Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom,7 Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Rajvithi Road, Bangkok, Thailand8
Received 6 February 2008/ Returned for modification 26 March 2008/ Accepted 22 April 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The adverse effects of malaria and HIV infection are synergistic and bidirectional (32). Malaria-infected people have a higher viral load, an important cofactor in the pathogenesis and transmission of HIV-1, particularly in pregnant women (7, 17, 37). Although no published data exist on malarial parasite-HIV-1 coinfections in Thailand, data from sub-Saharan Africa suggest that HIV-infected individuals are at higher risk of clinical malaria (34). There are two important differences between the malaria situation in sub-Saharan Africa and the Thailand-Myanmar border; first, 50% of malaria cases in Tak Province are due to Plasmodium vivax, and second, there is a high prevalence of P. falciparum resistance to chloroquine (CQ), antifolates, mefloquine, and amodiaquine (6, 22, 28).
The emergence of multidrug-resistant P. falciparum parasites and the importance of understanding the consequences and interactions of malaria-HIV coinfection and treatment have recently provided an impetus for investigations of the antimalarial activity of antiretroviral agents (2, 8, 20, 21). These studies have shown that aspartic protease inhibitors (PIs) such as saquinavir (SQV) and ritonavir (RTV) can inhibit the in vitro development of P. falciparum at clinically relevant concentrations (20, 27, 33). It has also been demonstrated that these compounds act synergistically in combination with the well-known antimalarials mefloquine and CQ (31). To date, in vitro PI antimalarial studies have used laboratory clones of P. falciparum. The effectiveness of PIs against clinical isolates and against the other major Plasmodium species of human importance, P. vivax, has not been assessed (16, 24).
HIV PIs and antimalarials, such as mefloquine, are substrates for P glycoprotein (Pgp) efflux pumps; consequently, their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics are modulated by Pgp cellular transport (19, 38). Preliminary work on a Pgp in P. falciparum (Pfmdr1) suggests that its amplification is not associated with the synergistic action of PIs with mefloquine (31). As populations of P. falciparum and P. vivax on the Thailand-Myanmar border have an increased mdr1 copy number relative to that of other regions not subjected to mefloquine pressure (25, 35), it is important to better understand the PI sensitivity phenotype in relation to this Pgp polymorphism. As both RTV and SQV demonstrate effective Pgp efflux inhibition (10, 11), we would expect that any association with mdr1 copy number and Plasmodium sp. sensitivity to PIs would be detected by assessing the antimalarial activity of these drugs against field isolates.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the in vitro effectiveness of two antiretroviral PIs, RTV and SQV, against clinical isolates of P. vivax and P. falciparum in an area subjected to high levels of mefloquine and artesunate pressure and to determine if the RTV and SQV sensitivities of P. falciparum and P. vivax are associated with mdr1 copy number.
|
|
|---|
In vitro drug susceptibility assay.
A modified WHO schizont maturation assay was used to test the antimalarial susceptibility of P. vivax and P. falciparum isolates as described previously (29, 30). A 2% hematocrit blood-medium mixture (BMM) consisting of McCoy's 5A medium and 20% AB-positive human serum was made for P. vivax and P. falciparum isolates. A total of 200 µl of BMM was added to each well of predosed drug plates containing serial dilutions of RTV (34,676 nM), SQV (37,265 nM), CQ (2,992 nM), artesunate (67 nM), and mefloquine (338 nM) (maximum concentrations are shown in parentheses). Predosed drug plates containing the BMM were placed in a gas chamber containing 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2 at 37.5°C until
50% of parasites in the drug-free control had matured to schizonts (24 to 42 h). To minimize the loss of antimalarial action, the predosed plates were stored at 4°C and used within a month of their manufacture. Predosed plates were quality assured by using the K1 clone of P. falciparum before and after field trials.
Thick blood films made from each well were stained with 5% Giemsa stain for 30 min and examined microscopically. Differential counts of 200 asexual parasites in the preincubation and test slides were classified into ring stage (ring-shaped trophozoites), mature trophozoites (one or two chromatin dots and hemazoin pigment visible), and schizonts (three or more chromatin dots visible). Free merozoites and gametocytes were not included in the count. To ensure optimal maturity and ease of parasite identification and to reduce parasite classification error, only schizonts with at least five well-defined chromatin dots were classified as schizonts at the time of harvest. The number of schizonts (five or more chromatin dots visible) per 200 asexual-stage parasites was determined for each drug concentration and normalized to the number in the control well. The dose-response data were analyzed by using nonlinear regression analysis (WinNonlin 4.1; Pharsight), and 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were derived by using an inhibitory sigmoid Emax model.
Determining the mdr1 copy number. P. vivax mdr1 (Pvmdr1; GenBank accession no. AY618622) and Pfmdr1 (GenBank accession no. M29154) gene copy numbers were determined by quantitative real-time PCR using a Rotor-Gene 6000 (Corbett) as previously described (25, 35). The assessment of the copy number was repeated at least twice for all isolates. The repeatability coefficient was determined to be 0.30 (viz. 95% of repeated estimates of the mdr1 copy number were within 0.15 of the first estimate).
Data analysis. Plasmodium vivax results were stratified into two groups according to whether parasites were set up in culture with a predominance of rings (a ring-to-trophozoite stage ratio [RT] of >1) or trophozoites (RT < 1). Except for antimalarial stage specificity analysis, only P. vivax isolates with an RT of >1 were prospectively used for analysis, so that all erythrocytic stages of P. vivax were exposed to the therapeutic of interest. Analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows (version 14; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis method was used for nonparametric comparisons. The significance of nonparametric correlation coefficients was examined using a Spearman's rho. The statistical significance level of 0.05 was set prior to analysis. Scatter plots were constructed using GraphPad Prism (version 5; GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).
Ethical approval. All research was conducted in accordance with the national and institutional guidelines for human experimentation. Samples were taken only upon written consent after the study was explained in Karen, Burmese, or Thai. Consent and information forms were translated into Karen, Burmese, and Thai. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee for Research in Human Subjects, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand (reference no. 4/2549, 6 February 2006).
|
|
|---|
1 prior to culture. The median percentage of rings in P. vivax isolates with an RT of
1 was 75% (IQR, 60 to 91%), significantly higher than in isolates with an RT of <1 (26%) (IQR, 10 to 29%; P, <0.001). Plasmodium vivax isolates with an RT of <1 had a significantly higher median CQ IC50 of 442 nM (IQR, 157 to 2,034 nM) versus 38 nM (IQR, 19 to 51 nM) in isolates with an RT of >1 (Fig. 1). In view of the significant stage specificity of CQ and a similar trend with the other antimalarials, further analysis of P. vivax was restricted to isolates with an RT of >1 (29). The median IC50s of P. falciparum and P. vivax (RT > 1) for each of the PIs and control antimalarial agents are presented in Table 1. Plasmodium vivax was significantly more sensitive to RTV, SQV, CQ, and mefloquine (Table 1). The in vitro sensitivities of both species to RTV, SQV, and artesunate were significantly correlated; i.e., parasites with increased sensitivity to other PIs also had increased sensitivity to these PIs (Table 2).
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Effect of the initial development stage of the P. vivax isolate, either predominantly ring stage (RT > 1) (filled circles) or predominantly trophozoite stage (RT < 1) (open circles) on RTV, SQV, CQ, artesunate (AS), and mefloquine (MQ) sensitivity. Lines indicate median IC50s (nM) for an RT of >1 (solid) or an RT of <1 (dashed). NS, no significant difference. Subsequent analysis of P. vivax was restricted to isolates with an RT of >1.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Comparison of the in vitro antimalarial susceptibilities of P. vivax and P. falciparum isolates from Mae Sod, Thailand
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. In vitro susceptibility correlation coefficients (Spearman's rho) of P. vivax and P. falciparum to RTV, SQV, and three commonly used antimalarial therapeuticsb
|
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Effect of Pvmdr1 (A) and Pfmdr1 (B) copy amplification on the sensitivity of P. vivax and P. falciparum to RTV, SQV, CQ, artesunate (AS), and mefloquine (MQ). Filled triangles represent isolates with mdr1 amplification (solid lines represent median IC50s [nM]). Open triangles represent isolates with a single copy of mdr1 (dashed lines represent median IC50s [nM]).
|
|
|
|---|
The rise in the prevalence of HIV infection in many areas where malaria is endemic also increases the need for novel ways to effectively treat HIV-malaria parasite coinfections. For example, the recent adverse events observed in HIV-infected children following treatment with artesunate-amodiaquine for uncomplicated malaria demonstrate that more attention to this issue is required (13). In this study, we demonstrate the antimalarial activity of an important class of antiretroviral drugs, the PIs, at concentrations likely to be clinically relevant. The median IC50s for RTV and SQV in Thai P. falciparum isolates were higher than for the three standard antimalarials tested (Table 1) and higher than those previously reported for lab strains of P. falciparum (20, 31, 33). In contrast, the median IC50s for RTV and SQV against P. vivax (Table 1) were within the in vivo therapeutic range commonly seen in patients treated with these PIs (maximum concentration of RTV and SQV in serum, 15,500 nM and 3,700 to 5,500 nM, respectively) (20). Interestingly, P. vivax isolates were almost twice as sensitive to RTV as to SQV. RTV was also fourfold more effective at inhibiting P. vivax than P. falciparum, compared to an only twofold difference in effectiveness for SQV (Table 1).
Although the antimalarial actions of PIs are still not fully understood, it was initially thought that PIs inhibited the aspartic proteases associated with the food vacuole (12). The P. falciparum food vacuole-associated plasmepsins (PMs) I, II, and IV and histoaspartic protease are thought to be involved in the initial steps of hemoglobin degradation (4). However, more-recent data from isobologram and transgenic-parasite studies suggest that these food vacuole PMs are unlikely to be the primary targets of these drugs (5, 15, 18, 21, 31). Interestingly, PMIV (GenBank accession no. AAC15792) is the only digestive vacuole PM ortholog found in P. vivax (9, 14). However, it is unlikely that PMIV in P. vivax is associated with the vacuole, as it is transcribed only in the early schizont stage (Z. Bozdech and P. R. Preiser, personal communications). The effective absence of vacuolar PMs in P. vivax and the significant antimalarial efficacy of RTV and SQV against all stages of P. vivax erythrocytic development (including the early ring stage where PMIV is not yet present) (Fig. 1) support the current view that Plasmodium sp. vacuolar PMs are not the targets of PIs. Nonvacuolar aspartic proteases also exist in malaria parasites, and it may be that one or more of these enzymes are the targets for PIs.
An important molecular marker associated with drug resistance in P. falciparum is Pfmdr1. Multiple copy numbers of Pfmdr1 are associated with reduced sensitivity to mefloquine, lumefantrine, and artesunate in P. falciparum (1, 23, 36). An earlier study using laboratory clones with a known mdr1 amplification genotype suggested that mdr1 amplification does not affect PI sensitivity. In this study of clinical isolates, we provide additional evidence to support this assertion, demonstrating that an increase in the Pfmdr1 or Pvmdr1 copy number is not associated with changes in the in vitro sensitivity of P. vivax or P. falciparum to RTV or SQV. In keeping with previous observations, P. falciparum isolates with Pfmdr1 amplification were less sensitive to mefloquine. Although a similar trend appeared to be present for P. vivax, only two isolates with an increased Pvmdr1 copy number could be tested; hence, further studies will be required to confirm these findings. The absence of any cross-resistance between mefloquine and PIs suggests that PIs may be beneficial for patients coinfected with malaria and HIV in areas of mefloquine resistance, particularly given the possible synergistic interactions which may occur as a result of PI and mefloquine coadministration (31). PIs are not used as single-agent therapy for HIV but rather as components of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). While PI-based HAART is not generally considered frontline therapy in the developing world, the enhanced potency of some PI-based HAART regimens, such as RTV-boosted lopinavir, now available in a lower-cost thermostable formulation for marketing in developing countries (Aluvia; Abbott), indicates that usage will expand. RTV, which is generally used as a "low-dose" component of PI-based HAART, is used to boost the pharmacokinetic profile of its partner PI through its potent inhibition of cytochrome P450 enzymes. Our data showing the cross-Plasmodium sp. effectiveness of PIs suggest that the treatment of HIV-infected patients with PI-containing antiretroviral regimens might help prevent malarial parasite coinfection in regions where both P. falciparum and P. vivax are endemic. Furthermore, the differential sensitivities of P. vivax and P. falciparum isolates and the modulatory effect of RTV on antimalarial activity provide some further information on the likely mechanism of the antimalarial action of this class of drugs.
This study was supported by the Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, and the Wellcome Trust-NHRMC (Wellcome Trust ICRG GR071614MA-NHMRC ICRG ID 283321). B.R. is supported by an NHMRC Howard Florey fellowship; N.M.A. and J.S.M. are supported by NHMRC Practitioner Fellowships; D.L.G. is supported by NHMRC program grant 290208 and donations from Mark Nicholson, Alice Hill, and the Tudor Foundation; and R.N.P. is supported by a Wellcome Trust Career Development Award, affiliated to the Wellcome Trust-Mahidol University-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Programme (074637).
We declare no conflict of interest.
Published ahead of print on 28 April 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»