This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spies, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Zaha, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spies, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Zaha, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2008, p. 2947-2949, Vol. 52, No. 8
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01570-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Identification of Mutations Related to Streptomycin Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Possible Involvement of Efflux Mechanism{triangledown} ,{dagger}

Fernanda S. Spies,1,2 Pedro E. Almeida da Silva,3 Marta O. Ribeiro,2 Maria Lucia Rossetti,2,4 and Arnaldo Zaha1,5*

Programa de Pós-graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil,1 Fundação Estadual de Produção e Pesquisa em Saúde do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil,2 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Campus da Saúde, Rio Grande, Brazil,3 Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências em Genética e Toxicologia Aplicada-Universidade Luterana do Brasil, Canoas, Brazil,4 Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil5

Received 6 December 2007/ Returned for modification 17 January 2008/ Accepted 3 June 2008


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
The MIC for streptomycin in the presence of efflux pump (EP) inhibitors and the sequencing of rpsL, rrs, and gidB genes provided evidence for the possible participation of EP in low-level streptomycin (STR) resistance of some isolates without mutations. Mutation in the gidB gene and an EP could act synergistically to confer low STR resistance.


arrow
TEXT
 
Streptomycin (STR), the first antibiotic used to control tuberculosis, acts by binding to the 30S ribosomal subunit, inhibiting polypeptide synthesis (5, 24). Mutations in genes rpsL and rrs, encoding the ribosomal protein S12 and the 16S rRNA, respectively, are responsible for most of the high-level STR resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (7, 9, 24). However, a low level of resistance is found in approximately one-third of the clinical isolates resistant to STR without mutations in these genes (7, 11, 17). Recently, a new STR resistance locus (gidB) that encodes a conserved 7-methylguanosine methyltransferase specific for the 16S rRNA was found to confer a low level of STR resistance (12).

Also possibly involved with a low level of STR resistance is the efflux system. This system can grant to bacteria a mechanism which favors their survival in a hostile environment (e.g., the presence of antibiotics), and those bacteria that overexpress efflux pumps (EPs) can be selected (23). It has been shown that the M. tuberculosis genome encodes multiple putative EPs (2, 6), and reports have suggested that EPs may also be involved in transporting fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, tetracycline, and possibly isoniazid and ethambutol (4, 14, 18, 22).

In this study we have evaluated the possible role of the efflux mechanism as a molecular basis of STR resistance in clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis, using carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) and verapamil as efflux pump inhibitors (EPI) (1, 10).

A total of 79 clinical isolates from the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, were studied. Resistance to drugs other than STR was found in 62 isolates (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The resazurin microtiter assay (13) was used for MIC determination. Microplates were divided into three equal parts: one with 7H9-oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase medium, one with medium and verapamil (100 µM), and one with medium and CCCP (11 µM). Serial 1:2 dilutions of STR (250 µg/ml to 0.25 µg/ml) were performed in each column. The breakpoint to determine STR resistance was a MIC of ≥8 µg/ml.

DNA was isolated from mycobacterial cultures by the lysozyme/proteinase K cetyltrimethylammonium bromide procedure (21). A 306-bp fragment of the M. tuberculosis rpsL gene (GenBank accession number L08011) and the 530 loop (238 bp) and 912 region (238 bp) of the rrs gene (GenBank accession number X52917) were amplified as described by Tracevska et al. (20). A 675-bp fragment of the gene gidB (GenBank accession number AAK48404) was amplified using primers gidB1 (5'GTCCCTCCACTCGCCATC3') and gidB2 (5'GCGGAGTGCGTAATGTCTC3'). PCR amplification was performed by the following steps: initial denaturation at 92°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 58°C for 1 min, and extension at 72°C for 1.5 min; and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. PCR was performed using 30 pmol of each primer, with 2.5 U of Taq polymerase (CBiot, UFRGS, Brazil), 200 µM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, and 1.5 mM magnesium chloride. Sequencing was performed in the ABI Prism 3100 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems) and MegaBACE 1000 DNA analysis system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). Nucleotide sequences were analyzed using the STADEN package. Nucleotide sequences with Phred values >20 were considered for analysis.

According to the MIC, 47 M. tuberculosis isolates were classified as STR resistant and 32 isolates as susceptible. To test the effect of the EPI on the STR MIC, verapamil and CCCP were separately added to the medium. In the presence of verapamil, 36 isolates (48%) had decreased MICs. In the presence of CCCP, 10 isolates (13%) had decreased MICs. For eight isolates (10%) the MIC was decreased by both inhibitors. The remaining 41 isolates (52%) exhibited no difference of MIC in the presence of the inhibitors (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).

The nucleotide sequences of the rpsL, rrs, and gidB genes were determined for all M. tuberculosis isolates included in the present work (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). We identified mutations in codons 43 (AAG->AGG; K43->R) and 88 (AAG->CAG; K88->Q) of the rpsL gene sequence as the most common mutations related to STR resistance due to rpsL (3, 8, 19). The other mutation found in the rpsL gene was a silent mutation in codon 81 (CTG->TTG; L81->L). Nine isolates presented multiple mutations in the rpsL gene sequence (90% silent mutations) (3) and did not have high-level STR resistance (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). In these nine isolates the few mutations that cause amino acid changes were not among the mutations described as related to STR resistance. It is possible that isolates with multiple mutations may have, primarily, alterations in genes involved in DNA repair (mut genes) (15). With the exception of isolates with multiples mutations, all isolates with mutations in rpsL were highly resistant to STR (MIC ≥ 250 µg/ml).

The following mutations were observed in the rrs genes of STR-resistant isolates: G to C at position 426 (426 G->C), 491 C->T (16), 513 A->C, 513 A->T, 516 C->T (20), and 905 A->G. The last one has not been described previously. The mutation 461 C->T was found in the rrs gene of only one STR-susceptible isolate and probably is not involved in STR resistance (3).

For the gidB gene, 58 (73%) isolates presented nucleotide mutations (see Table S1 in the supplemental material), which is in agreement with the data presented by Okamoto et al. (12). In the majority of the clinical isolates studied (49%, 39/79) an amino acid substitution due to mutation of gidB (CCT->CGT; L16->R) was observed. This substitution was also observed in STR-susceptible isolates without mutations in genes rpsL and rrs. Consequently, we do not consider this alteration related to STR resistance. The G102 deletion mutation and the mutation involving the deletion of GAGCCGAGGAG353, as well as the groups of mutations consisting of TGG->TGC (W45->C), GTG->GTT (V110->V), and TGG->CGG (W148->R) and of CCG->TCG (P75->S), GTG->GTT (V110->V), and GCG->GCA (A141->A), each occurred in one isolate (5%, 4/79) with a low level of STR resistance without alterations in the other studied genes (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).

Among the 38 M. tuberculosis isolates that presented decreased MICs in the presence of EPI, 27 (71%) had mutations in the rpsL, rrs, and/or gidB gene sequences, 11 (28%) had no mutations, 22 were resistant to STR, and 16 were susceptible (Table 1). Of the 41 M. tuberculosis isolates that had no decreased MIC in the presence of EPI, 34 (82%) carried mutations in the gene sequences analyzed, 7 (17%) presented no mutations, 25 were resistant to STR, and 16 were susceptible (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Overall profile of mutations within the rpsL, rrs, and gidB genes from M. tuberculosis clinical isolates and of STR MICs in the presence of EPIs

To compare the types of treatment (medium, medium plus verapamil, and medium plus CCCP), the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis statistical analysis was performed. The test was applied in three distinct groups: all of the isolates studied, only the mutated isolates (for gidB, only mutated resistant isolates were included), and only the isolates without mutations (P < 0.001). To identify the differences between the groups, the treatments were tested two by two and a chi-square test was performed. The P values for all comparisons were statistically significant. Among the 79 M. tuberculosis isolates analyzed in this study, 38 (48%) had decreased MICs when in the presence of EPI and this decrease occurred in both resistant and susceptible isolates, with or without mutations (P < 0.001). An important finding was the detection of five isolates (indicated in Table S1 in the supplemental material) with a low level of resistance that did not present any mutations in the rpsL, rrs, and gidB gene sequences but showed decreased MICs only in the presence of EPI. Another interesting result was the observation of four isolates that had low-level STR resistance (indicated in Table S1 in the supplemental material) with mutations only in the gidB gene sequence, reinforcing the relation of mutation in this gene to a low level of STR resistance (12). However, the mutations found are not identical to those previously described. The MICs for all four isolates were also diminished in the presence of inhibitors, indicating that both the gidB mutation and an EP could act synergistically to confer low STR resistance. Additional experiments are needed to elucidate this aspect.

The results presented in this work suggest that EPs could be involved in STR resistance in M. tuberculosis. However, further experimental work is required to determine the types of pumps involved and regulation of the expression of the genes involved.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was supported by the Centro de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico da Fundação Estadual de Produção e Pesquisa em Saúde (CDCT/FEPPS). F.S.S. was a recipient of a fellowship from CAPES.

We thank A. Schrank for the critical reading of the manuscript.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Centro de Biotecnologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Rua Bento Gonçalves 9500, Prédio 43421, CEP 91501-970 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Phone: 55 51 33086054. Fax: 55 51 33087309. E-mail: zaha{at}cbiot.ufrgs.br Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 9 June 2008. Back

{dagger} Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aac.asm.org/. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Banerjee, S. K., K. Bhatt, S. Rana, P. Misra, and P. K. Chakraborti. 1996. Involvement of an efflux system in mediating high level of fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 226:362-368.[CrossRef][Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Braibant, M., P. Gilot, and J. Content. 2000. The ATP binding cassette (ABC) transport systems of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 24:449-467.[CrossRef][Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Brzostek, A., A. Sajduda, T. Sliwinski, E. Augustynowicz-Kopéc, A. Jaworski, Z. Zowolska, and J. Dziadek. 2004. Molecular characterisation of streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated in Poland. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 8:1032-1035.[Medline]
    4. 4
  4. Colangeli, R., D. Helb, S. Sridharan, J. Sun, M. Varma-Basil, M. H. Hazbón, R. Harbacheuski, N. J. Megjugorac, W. R. Jacobs, A. Holzenburg, J. C. Sacchettini, and D. Alland. 2005. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis iniA gene is essential for activity of an efflux pump that confers drug tolerance to both isoniazid and ethambutol. Mol. Microbiol. 55:1829-1840.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Cole, S. T., and A. Telenti. 1995. Drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Eur. Respir. J. Suppl. 20:701s-713s.[Medline]
    6. 6
  6. De Rossi, E., P. Arrigo, M. Bellinzoni, P. A. Silva, C. Martín, J. A. Aínsa, P. Guglierame, and G. Riccardi. 2002. The multidrug transporters belonging to major facilitator superfamily in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol. Med. 8:714-724.[Medline]
    7. 7
  7. Finken, M., P. Krischner, A. Meier, A. Wrede, and E. C. Böttger. 1993. Molecular basis of streptomycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: alterations of the ribosomal protein S12 gene and point mutations within a functional 16S ribosomal RNA pseudoknot. Mol. Microbiol. 9:1239-1246.[Medline]
    8. 8
  8. Fukuda, M., H. Koda, H. Ohno, B. Yang, Y. Hirakata, S. Maesaki, K. Tomono, T. Tashiro, and S. Kohno. 1999. Relationship between genetic alteration of the rpsL gene and streptomycin susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Japan. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 43:281-284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Honoré, N., and S. T. Cole. 1994. Streptomycin resistance in mycobacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:238-242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Markham, P. N., and A. Neyfakh. 1996. Inhibition of the multidrug transporter NorA prevents emergence of norfloxacin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2673-2674.[Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Meier, A., P. Sander, K. J. Schaper, and E. C. Böttger. 1996. Correlation of molecular resistance mechanisms and phenotypic resistance levels in streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:2452-2454.[Abstract]
    12. 12
  12. Okamoto, S., A. Tamaru, C. Nakajima, K. Nishimura, Y. Tanaka, S. Tokuyama, Y. Suzuki, and K. Ochi. 2007. Loss of a conserved 7-methylguanosine modification in 16S rRNA confers low-level streptomycin resistance in bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 63:1096-1106.[CrossRef][Medline]
    13. 13
  13. Palomino, J. C., A. Martin, M. Camacho, H. Guerra, J. Swings, and F. Portaels. 2002. Resazurin microtiter assay plate: simple and inexpensive method for detection of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2720-2722.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. Pasca, M. R., P. Guglierame, F. Arcesi, M. Bellinzoni, E. De Rossi, and G. Riccardi. 2004. Rv2686c-Rv2687c-Rv2688c, an ABC fluoroquinolone efflux pump in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:3175-3178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Rad, M. E., P. Bifani, C. Martin, K. Kremer, S. Samper, J. Rauzier, B. Kreiswirth, J. Blazquez, M. Jouan, D. van Soolingen, and B. Gicquel. 2003. Mutations in putative mutator genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains of the W-Beijing family. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9:838-845.[Medline]
    16. 16
  16. Ramaswamy, S. V., S. Dou, A. Rendon, Z. Yang, M. D. Cave, and E. A. Graviss. 2004. Genotypic analysis of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Monterrey, Mexico. J. Med. Microbiol. 53:107-113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    17. 17
  17. Riska, P. F., W. R. Jacobs, and D. Alland. 2000. Molecular determinants of drug resistance in tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 4:S4-S10.[Medline]
    18. 18
  18. Silva, P. E., F. Bigi, M. P. Santangelo, M. I. Romano, C. Martín, A. Cataldi, and J. A. Aínsa. 2001. Characterization of P55, a multidrug efflux pump in Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:800-804.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    19. 19
  19. Sreevatsan, S., X. Pan, K. Stockbauer, D. L. Williams, B. N. Kreiswirth, and J. M. Musser. 1996. Characterization of rpsL and rrs mutations in streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from diverse geographic localities. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1024-1026.[Abstract]
    20. 20
  20. Tracevska, T., I. Jansone, A. Nodieva, O. Marga, G. Skenders, and V. Baumanis. 2004. Characterisation of rpsL, rrs and embB mutations associated with streptomycin and ethambutol resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Res. Microbiol. 155:830-834.[Medline]
    21. 21
  21. van Soolingen, D., P. E. de Hass, P. W. Hermans, and J. D. Van Embden. 1994. DNA fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Methods Enzymol. 235:196-205.[Medline]
    22. 22
  22. Viveiros, M., I. Portugal, R. Bettencourt, T. C. Victor, A. M. Jordaan, C. Leandro, D. Ordway, and L. Amaral. 2002. Isoniazid-induced transient high-level resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2804-2810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    23. 23
  23. Webber, M. A., and L. J. Piddock. 2003. The importance of efflux pumps in bacterial antibiotic resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 51:9-11.[Free Full Text]
    24. 24
  24. Zhang, Y. 2005. The magic bullets and tuberculosis drug targets. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 45:529-564.[CrossRef][Medline]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, August 2008, p. 2947-2949, Vol. 52, No. 8
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01570-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Louw, G. E., Warren, R. M., Gey van Pittius, N. C., McEvoy, C. R. E., Van Helden, P. D., Victor, T. C. (2009). A Balancing Act: Efflux/Influx in Mycobacterial Drug Resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 3181-3189 [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spies, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Zaha, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spies, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Zaha, A.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»