This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paeshuyse, J.
Right arrow Articles by Neyts, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paeshuyse, J.
Right arrow Articles by Neyts, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2008, p. 3433-3437, Vol. 52, No. 9
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01534-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparative In Vitro Anti-Hepatitis C Virus Activities of a Selected Series of Polymerase, Protease, and Helicase Inhibitors{triangledown} ,{dagger}

Jan Paeshuyse,1 Inge Vliegen,1 Lotte Coelmont,1 Pieter Leyssen,1 Oriana Tabarrini,3 Piet Herdewijn,1 Harald Mittendorfer,2 Johnny Easmon,2 Violetta Cecchetti,3 Ralf Bartenschlager,4 Gerhard Puerstinger,2 and Johan Neyts1*

Rega Institute for Medical Research, K.U. Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium,1 Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria,2 Dipartimento di Chimica e Tecnologia del Farmaco, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy,3 Department of Molecular Virology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany4

Received 28 November 2007/ Returned for modification 16 January 2008/ Accepted 8 July 2008


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
We report here a comparative study of the anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) activities of selected (i) nucleoside polymerase, (ii) nonnucleoside polymerase, (iii) {alpha},{gamma}-diketo acid polymerase, (iv) NS3 protease, and (v) helicase inhibitors, as well as (vi) cyclophilin binding molecules and (vii) alpha 2b interferon in four different HCV genotype 1b replicon systems.


arrow
TEXT
 
Worldwide, more than 170 million people are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and are thus at increased risk of developing serious, life-threatening liver disease. Current standard therapy for chronic hepatitis C consists of pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin (26). Unfortunately, this therapy results in a sustained virological response in only about 50 to 60% of the patients treated and is associated with serious side effects. There is an urgent need for new therapeutic strategies (10).

Small-molecule inhibitors that target, in particular, the NS3 protease or the NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) have been pursued as potential new therapies. BILN 2061 (culprivir), a peptidomimetic inhibitor of the HCV NS3 protease, was the first selective inhibitor of HCV to be administered to patients chronically infected with HCV (genotype 1). Administration of the compound resulted in a rapid and pronounced decline in viral replication (11, 12), but the drug was not developed further because of toxicity issues (11).

Following the pioneering studies with BILN 2061, numerous anti-HCV compounds progressed toward clinical studies; three other NS3 protease inhibitors, i.e., VX-950 (telaprevir), SCH 503034 (boceprevir), and TMC435350, entered clinical trials. VX-950 has shown good efficacy both in monotherapy (29) and in combination with the current standard therapy (8) and is currently in phase II clinical studies. Boceprevir treatment reduced the mean viral load by 1.1 to 2.7 log10 during a 14-day trial in HCV genotype 1-infected patients (32). Recently reported data by Schering-Plough from an ongoing phase I study reveal a high rate of early virological response when SCH 503034 was combined with pegylated interferon and ribavirin (32). TMC435350, when given as a single dose of 200 mg for 5 consecutive days, reduced the HCV viral load by 3.9 log10 (28).

Besides protease inhibitors, a number of nucleoside or nonnucleoside polymerase inhibitors are or have been in development. 2'-C-Methylcytidine (the active component of valopicitabine) inhibits, as its 5'-triphosphate metabolite, the HCV polymerase. Clinical development of the compound was stopped in phase II clinical studies due to side effects. Treatment with R1626, the prodrug of the nucleoside analog 4'-azidocytidine (R1479), resulted in an up to 3.7-log10 viral load reduction (30). R7128 (the prodrug of PSI-6130) resulted in a mean 2.7-log10 viral load decline during 14 days of monotherapy (27). Also, treatment with the nonnucleoside polymerase inhibitor HCV 796, a benzofuran, resulted in a marked viral load reduction. However, clinical development of this compound has been stopped because of adverse effects. VCH-759, a new nonnucleoside thiophene-2-carboxylic acid RdRp inhibitor, caused a 2.5-log10 decrease in HCV RNA after 10 days of treatment in HCV-infected patients and was generally well tolerated in early clinical studies (5). Debio-025, a nonimmunosuppressive analogue of cyclosporine A, is a potent inhibitor of HCV replication (24). During a 15-day phase 1b study of human immunodeficiency virus-HCV-coinfected patients, treatment with Debio-025 resulted in an average 3.6-log10 HCV viral load reduction (7). Various other inhibitors of in vitro HCV replication have been reported but were not developed further.

A direct comparative study of the in vitro anti-HCV activities of various antiviral drugs has so far not been reported. It may, however, be useful to have information available about the relative potency of molecules with reported anti-HCV activity. Therefore, we collected a variety of HCV replication inhibitors with different targets and evaluated their anti-HCV activities side by side either in Huh-7 cells carrying the genotype 1b bicistronic reporter replicon I389luc-ubi-neo/NS3-3'/5.1 (Huh-5-2 cells), the bicistronic selectable replicon I377/NS3-3'/wt (Huh-9-13 cells), or the monocistronic selectable replicon I389/hygro-ubi-NS3-3'/5.1 (Huh-Mono cells) (1, 20, 21, 36) or in HuH6 cells carrying a replicon (HuH6*) similar to that carried by Huh-5-2 cells (38). For detailed descriptions of the genetic makeup of the different replicons and methods used, see the supplemental material.

BILN 2061 proved to be significantly more potent than the other two protease inhibitors studied (P < 0.05 [Mann-Whitney U test] for all data set pairs in each replicon-containing cell line) (Table 1). BILN-2061 is about 15- to 250-fold more potent than VX-950 and 13- to 200-fold more potent than SCH 503034. Comparable differences in potency between BILN 2061 and VX-950 were reported earlier (17). The in vitro anti-HCV activity of BILN 2061 reported here is comparable to the activity reported by Lin and colleagues (17), whereas VX-950 proved about threefold less potent in our study. Lin et al. generated their data by using a replicon that is very comparable to the Huh-9-13 system; the difference observed may be the result of a variety of factors, such as the higher number of cells seeded at the start of the assay (10,000 cells/well versus 5,000 cells/well in our assay), the lower amount of serum in the culture medium (2% versus 10% in our assay), or a shorter assay duration (48 h versus 72 h in our assay) (17, 18). The activity of SCH 503034 in Huh-5-2 cells was comparable to the activity reported by Malcolm et al. (0.2 µM) (22); only in the Huh-Mono replicon system did this molecule prove about sevenfold less effective than the published data (22). Again, comparable replicon systems were used in a slightly altered assay format (4,000 cells/well versus 5,000 cells/well in our assay and daily refreshing of the inhibitor). These slight alterations might explain the difference in 50% effective concentrations (EC50s) for Huh-Mono cells; however, they do not explain why these parameters did not affect the data obtained with other replicon constructs.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Effects of selected compounds on HCV replicon replicationa

Overall, most of the nucleoside inhibitors have an anti-HCV activity that is comparable to that of SCH 503034 or VX-950. Our data are consistent with those reported in the literature for genotype 1b replicons (3, 12, 14, 33, 34). 4'-Azidocytidine proved to be about six- to eightfold less active than the 2'-C-methyl analogues in HuH6* cells. A possible explanation for this difference can be a different nucleoside/nucleotide metabolism in HuH6 cells compared to Huh-7 cells affecting phosphorylation of the compound(s).

The other RdRp inhibitors studied had activities largely comparable to those of the protease inhibitors VX-950 and SCH 503034, except for HCV 796 benzofuran, which proved significantly more potent than VX-950 and SCH 503034 (P < 0.05, except for SCH 503034 versus HCV 796 in Huh-Mono cells [P = 0.057]). The benzofuran HCV 796 proved to be the most potent nonnucleoside inhibitor in all of the replicon-containing cell lines studied (for all data pairs of HCV 796 with other nonnucleoside inhibitors in different cell lines, P < 0.01, except for HCV 796 versus GSK-4 or versus JT16 in Huh-Mono or HuH6* cells and HCV 796 versus thiophene carboxylic acid in Huh-9-13 cells [P > 0.05]), with a potency comparable to that of the protease inhibitor BILN 2061 (for all HCV 796 versus BILN 2061 pairs with both data sets obtained in the same cell line, P > 0.05, except for HCV 796 versus BILN 2061 in HuH6* cells [P < 0.01]). The thiophene carboxylic acid was significantly more active in Huh-Mono cells than both protease inhibitors VX-950 (P = 0.01) and SCH 503034 (P = 0.001) in the same cell line. The thiophene carboxylic acid proved also to be more potent in HuH6* cells than VX-950 (P = 0.002). Overall, the thiophene carboxylic acid inhibitor had comparable activities in different replicon systems and was slightly less active than reported in the literature (15). Factors that may explain this variation include differences in the fetal bovine serum concentration or the detection method used (Renilla reniformis luciferase instead of firefly luciferase or quantitative reverse transcription-PCR). All other parameters are essentially the same in our study and in the previously published report. The benzothiadiazine RdRp inhibitor proved, overall, to be as potent as VX-950. However, the benzothiadiazine was about 5- to 20-fold less active in HuH6* cells and roughly 3-fold less potent in Huh-5-2 or Huh-Mono cells compared to the activity reported by Dhanak et al. (EC50 = 0.5 ± 0.1 µM) (6). A possible explanation for the differences observed might be the different cell lines used and/or the difference in the experimental setups (number of cells per well, normalization procedure, or assay duration). The activity of the nonnucleoside RdRp inhibitor JT-16 proved comparable to that of either VX-950 or SCH 503034. However, published data report the compound to be about threefold more potent than in the present study (9).

Although the diketo acid (compound 30) was reported to be a nanomolar (i.e., 45 nM) in vitro inhibitor of the HCV RdRp (35), we show here that the molecule exhibits very little activity in cell culture. 4,5,6,7-Tetrabromobenzotriazole (TBBT) and 5,6-dichloro-1-(β-D-ribofuranosyl)benzotriazole (DRBT) were reported to inhibit HCV helicase in an in vitro assay (50% inhibitory concentration of 20 to 60 µM for TBBT [2] and 0.1 to 1.5 µM for DRBT [2], depending on the nature of the template). TBBT resulted in some inhibitory effect in the replicon system which was comparable to the inhibition in the enzymatic assay. DRBT, however, proved much less effective in the HCV subgenomic replicon system than anticipated from the activity in the enzymatic system.

The anti-HCV activity of cyclosporine A was comparable to published data (EC50 = 0.25 µM) (23, 24, 37). The nonimmunosuppressive cyclophilin binding molecule Debio-025 inhibited HCV replication in all of the assay systems tested, with EC50s ranging from 8 to 60 nM. The compound proved equipotent to BILN 2061 in both Huh-5-2 and Huh-9-13 cells; however, in Huh-Mono (P = 0.023) and HuH6* (P = 0.005) cells, Debio-025 proved less (~4- to 12-fold) potent than BILN 2061.

Alpha 2b interferon proved to be a very potent inhibitor of HCV replicon replication in all of the systems used. In genotype 1-infected patients, however, host factors (for example, age, sex, race, body weight, insulin resistance, etc.) and viral factors (for example, HCV genotype and initial HCV RNA level) decrease the efficacy of interferon therapy to a mere 50 to 60% sustained virological response rate (4).

Overall, no significant differences were observed between the EC50s of all of the compounds studied in the different replicon systems (H = 0.131, df = 3, P = 0.988 [Kruskal-Wallis test]). The interreplicon variation of the average EC50 appears to be random and not inherent to a specific replicon construct, as shown by the location of the median EC50 in the box plots and the similar distribution of the data sets for each cell line (see Fig. S6 in the supplemental material). Employing a single HCV 1b replicon construct should thus suffice to detect the anti-HCV activity of a particular compound. However, parallel analysis with a number of replicon constructs and cell lines might be of use in excluding a potential inhibitory effect on heterologous elements (for example, luciferase, encephalomyocarditis virus internal ribosome entry site, etc.) required for optimal function of the replicon.

Most, if not all, of the inhibitors included in this study were discovered following lead optimization with (due to technical limitations) a genotype 1b subgenomic replicon system. However, more than six genotypes and 50 subtypes of HCV have been identified (19). Furthermore, within one patient, the virus (a specific subtype of a specific genotype) exists as a quasispecies. This genetic diversity can also result in amino acid diversity in drug binding pockets. Therefore, molecules optimized for genotype 1b are not necessarily (equally) active against other genotypes (13, 16, 25, 31). Furthermore, variants resistant to selective HCV drugs may readily emerge. For example, HCV 796-resistant variants were readily selected during the dosing period of the phase I clinical trial in which patients received this drug as monotherapy. VX-950-resistant viruses were also readily selected with suboptimal dosing of VX-950 (31). Thus, a drug should (i) be effective against as many genotypes as possible and (ii) have a high barrier to resistance selection (16) to be used in a specifically targeted antiviral therapy regimen for HCV. Moreover, inhibitors that comprise a successful specifically targeted antiviral therapy regimen for HCV should not have an overlapping resistance profile.

In conclusion, we report on a side-by-side comparison of the anti-HCV activities of a selection of anti-HCV compounds that have various molecular targets. Overall, no significant differences in an inhibitor between different replicon-containing cell lines were observed. If any variation of the average EC50s was observed, it appeared to be random and not inherent to a specific replicon construct. To rapidly exclude the possibility that newly identified inhibitors exert their activity via an effect on heterologous elements, parallel analysis with cell lines containing different HCV subgenomic replicon constructs may be warranted. Our data show that activity in enzymatic assays (as was shown for the helicase inhibitors DRBT and diketo acid compound 30) do not necessarily guarantee activity in cell culture-based assays. The data presented here may serve as a reference panel to estimate the potency of novel HCV inhibitors that may be discovered in the future, as well as for other available molecules that were not included in this study.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We acknowledge Katrien Geerts for excellent technical assistance and Dominique Brabants for dedicated editorial help.

This work was supported by a postdoctoral position in part from the Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Vlaanderen, and from the Onderzoeksfonds of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven to Jan Paeshuyse and by VIRGIL, the European Network of Excellence on Antiviral Drug Resistance (grant LSHM-CT-2004-503359 from the Priority 1 Life Sciences, Genomics and Biotechnology).


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Rega Institute for Medical Research, Minderbroedersstraat 10, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. Phone: 32-16-337341. Fax: 32-16-337340. E-mail: johan.neyts{at}rega.kuleuven.be Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 14 July 2008. Back

{dagger} Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aac.asm.org/. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Blight, K. J., J. A. McKeating, and C. M. Rice. 2002. Highly permissive cell lines for subgenomic and genomic hepatitis C virus RNA replication. J. Virol. 76:13001-13014.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    2. 2
  2. Borowski, P., J. Deinert, S. Schalinski, M. Bretner, K. Ginalski, T. Kulikowski, and D. Shugar. 2003. Halogenated benzimidazoles and benzotriazoles as inhibitors of the NTPase/helicase activities of hepatitis C and related viruses. Eur. J. Biochem. 270:1645-1653.[Medline]
    3. 3
  3. Carroll, S. S., J. E. Tomassini, M. Bosserman, K. Getty, M. W. Stahlhut, A. B. Eldrup, B. Bhat, D. Hall, A. L. Simcoe, R. LaFemina, C. A. Rutkowski, B. Wolanski, Z. Yang, G. Migliaccio, R. De Francesco, L. C. Kuo, M. MacCoss, and D. B. Olsen. 2003. Inhibition of hepatitis C virus RNA replication by 2'-modified nucleoside analogs. J. Biol. Chem. 278:11979-11984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Chung, R. T., M. Gale, Jr., S. J. Polyak, S. M. Lemon, T. J. Liang, and J. H. Hoofnagle. 2008. Mechanisms of action of interferon and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C: summary of a workshop. Hepatology 47:306-320.[CrossRef][Medline]
    5. 5
  5. Cooper, C., E. J. Lawitz, P. Ghali, M. Rodriguez-Torres, F. H. Anderson, S. S. Lee, and L. Proulx. 2007. Antiviral activity of the non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor, VCH-759, in chronic hepatitis C patients: results from a randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, ascending multiple dose study. Hepatology 46(S1):LB11.
    6. 6
  6. Dhanak, D., K. J. Duffy, V. K. Johnston, J. Lin-Goerke, M. Darcy, A. N. Shaw, B. Gu, C. Silverman, A. T. Gates, M. R. Nonnemacher, D. L. Earnshaw, D. J. Casper, A. Kaura, A. Baker, C. Greenwood, L. L. Gutshall, D. Maley, A. DelVecchio, R. Macarron, G. A. Hofmann, Z. Alnoah, H. Y. Cheng, G. Chan, S. Khandekar, R. M. Keenan, and R. T. Sarisky. 2002. Identification and biological characterization of heterocyclic inhibitors of the hepatitis C virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 277:38322-38327.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    7. 7
  7. Flisiak, R., A. Horban, J. Kierkus, J. Stanczak, I. Cielnak, G. P. Stanczak, A. Wiercinska-Drapalo, E. Siwak, J. Higersberger, C. Aeschlimann, P. Grosgurin, V. Nicolas, J. M. Dumont, H. Porchet, R. Crabbé, and P. Scalfaro. 2006. The cyclophilin inhibitor DEBIO-025 has a potent dual anti-HIV and anti-HCV activity in treatment-naïve HIV/HCV co-infected subjects. Hepatology 44:609A.
    8. 8
  8. Forestier, N., H. W. Reesink, C. J. Weegink, L. McNair, T. L. Kieffer, H. M. Chu, S. Purdy, P. L. Jansen, and S. Zeuzem. 2007. Antiviral activity of telaprevir (VX-950) and peginterferon alfa-2a in patients with hepatitis C. Hepatology 46:640-648.[CrossRef][Medline]
    9. 9
  9. Hashimoto, H., K. Mizutani, and A. Yoshida. 2005. (WO/2003/000254) Fused cyclic compounds and medicinal use thereof. World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
    10. 10
  10. Hayashi, N., and T. Takehara. 2006. Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C: past, present, and future. J. Gastroenterol. 41:17-27.[CrossRef][Medline]
    11. 11
  11. Hinrichsen, H., Y. Benhamou, H. Wedemeyer, M. Reiser, R. E. Sentjens, J. L. Calleja, X. Forns, A. Erhardt, J. Cronlein, R. L. Chaves, C. L. Yong, G. Nehmiz, and G. G. Steinmann. 2004. Short-term antiviral efficacy of BILN 2061, a hepatitis C virus serine protease inhibitor, in hepatitis C genotype 1 patients. Gastroenterology 127:1347-1355.[CrossRef]
    12. 12
  12. Klumpp, K., V. Leveque, S. Le Pogam, H. Ma, W. R. Jiang, H. Kang, C. Granycome, M. Singer, C. Laxton, J. Q. Hang, K. Sarma, D. B. Smith, D. Heindl, C. J. Hobbs, J. H. Merrett, J. Symons, N. Cammack, J. A. Martin, R. Devos, and I. Najera. 2006. The novel nucleoside analog R1479 (4'-azidocytidine) is a potent inhibitor of NS5B-dependent RNA synthesis and hepatitis C virus replication in cell culture. J. Biol. Chem. 281:3793-3799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Le Guillou-Guillemette, H., S. Vallet, C. Gaudy-Graffin, C. Payan, A. Pivert, A. Goudeau, and F. Lunel-Fabiani. 2007. Genetic diversity of the hepatitis C virus: impact and issues in the antiviral therapy. World J. Gastroenterol. 13:2416-2426.[Medline]
    14. 14
  14. Le Pogam, S., W. R. Jiang, V. Leveque, S. Rajyaguru, H. Ma, H. Kang, S. Jiang, M. Singer, S. Ali, K. Klumpp, D. Smith, J. Symons, N. Cammack, and I. Najera. 2006. In vitro selected Con1 subgenomic replicons resistant to 2'-C-methyl-cytidine or to R1479 show lack of cross resistance. Virology 351:349-359.[CrossRef][Medline]
    15. 15
  15. Le Pogam, S., H. Kang, S. F. Harris, V. Leveque, A. M. Giannetti, S. Ali, W. R. Jiang, S. Rajyaguru, G. Tavares, C. Oshiro, T. Hendricks, K. Klumpp, J. Symons, M. F. Browner, N. Cammack, and I. Najera. 2006. Selection and characterization of replicon variants dually resistant to thumb- and palm-binding nonnucleoside polymerase inhibitors of the hepatitis C virus. J. Virol. 80:6146-6154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. Le Pogam, S., A. Seshaadri, A. Kosaka, S. Chiu, H. Kang, S. Hu, S. Rajyaguru, J. Symons, N. Cammack, and I. Najera. 2008. Existence of hepatitis C virus NS5B variants naturally resistant to non-nucleoside, but not to nucleoside, polymerase inhibitors among untreated patients. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61:1205-1216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    17. 17
  17. Lin, C., C. A. Gates, B. G. Rao, D. L. Brennan, J. R. Fulghum, Y. P. Luong, J. D. Frantz, K. Lin, S. Ma, Y. Y. Wei, R. B. Perni, and A. D. Kwong. 2005. In vitro studies of cross-resistance mutations against two hepatitis C virus serine protease inhibitors, VX-950 and BILN 2061. J. Biol. Chem. 280:36784-36791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Lin, C., A. D. Kwong, and R. B. Perni. 2006. Discovery and development of VX-950, a novel, covalent, and reversible inhibitor of hepatitis C virus NS3.4A serine protease. Infect. Disorders Drug Targets 6:3-16.
    19. 19
  19. Lindenbach, B. D., and C. M. Rice. 2001. Flaviviridae: the viruses and their replication, p. 991-1041. In D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, D. E. Griffin, M. A. Martin, R. A. Lamb, B. Roizman, and S. E. Straus (ed.), Fields virology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
    20. 20
  20. Lohmann, V., F. Korner, A. Dobierzewska, and R. Bartenschlager. 2001. Mutations in hepatitis C virus RNAs conferring cell culture adaptation. J. Virol. 75:1437-1449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    21. 21
  21. Lohmann, V., F. Korner, J. Koch, U. Herian, L. Theilmann, and R. Bartenschlager. 1999. Replication of subgenomic hepatitis C virus RNAs in a hepatoma cell line. Science 285:110-113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    22. 22
  22. Malcolm, B. A., R. Liu, F. Lahser, S. Agrawal, B. Belanger, N. Butkiewicz, R. Chase, F. Gheyas, A. Hart, D. Hesk, P. Ingravallo, C. Jiang, R. Kong, J. Lu, J. Pichardo, A. Prongay, A. Skelton, X. Tong, S. Venkatraman, E. Xia, V. Girijavallabhan, and F. G. Njoroge. 2006. SCH 503034, a mechanism-based inhibitor of hepatitis C virus NS3 protease, suppresses polyprotein maturation and enhances the antiviral activity of alpha interferon in replicon cells. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:1013-1020.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    23. 23
  23. Nakagawa, M., N. Sakamoto, N. Enomoto, Y. Tanabe, N. Kanazawa, T. Koyama, M. Kurosaki, S. Maekawa, T. Yamashiro, C. H. Chen, Y. Itsui, S. Kakinuma, and M. Watanabe. 2004. Specific inhibition of hepatitis C virus replication by cyclosporin A. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 313:42-47.[CrossRef][Medline]
    24. 24
  24. Paeshuyse, J., A. Kaul, E. De Clercq, B. Rosenwirth, J. M. Dumont, P. Scalfaro, R. Bartenschlager, and J. Neyts. 2006. The non-immunosuppressive cyclosporin DEBIO-025 is a potent inhibitor of hepatitis C virus replication in vitro. Hepatology 43:761-770.[CrossRef][Medline]
    25. 25
  25. Pauwels, F., W. Mostmans, L. M. Quirynen, L. van der Helm, C. W. Boutton, A. S. Rueff, E. Cleiren, P. Raboisson, D. Surleraux, O. Nyanguile, and K. A. Simmen. 2007. Binding-site identification and genotypic profiling of hepatitis C virus polymerase inhibitors. J. Virol. 81:6909-6919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    26. 26
  26. Pawlotsky, J. M. 2006. Therapy of hepatitis C: from empiricism to eradication. Hepatology 43(2 Suppl. 1):S207-S220.[CrossRef][Medline]
    27. 27
  27. Reddy, R., M. Rodriguez-Torres, E. Gane, R. Robson, J. Lalezari, G. T. Everson, E. DeJesus, J. G. McHutchison, H. E. Varagas, A. Beard, C. A. Rodriguez, G. Hill, W. Symonds, and M. Berrey. 2008. Antiviral activity, pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of R7128, a novel nucleoside HCV RNA polymerase inhibitor, following multiple, ascending, oral doses in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection who have failed prior interferon therapy. Hepatology 46:882A-901A.
    28. 28
  28. Reesink, H. W., R. Verloes, K. Abou Farha, A. van Vliet, C. Weegink, G. van't Klooster, F. Aharchi, K. Marien, P. Van Remoortere, H. de Kock, F. Broeckaert, G. Fanning, P. Meyvisch, E. Van Beirendonck, and K. Simmen. 2008. Safety of the HCV protease inhibitor TMC435350 in healthy volunteers and safety and activity in chronic hepatitis C infected individuals: a phase I study, abstr. 64. 43rd Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), Milan, Italy, 23-27 April 2008.
    29. 29
  29. Reesink, H. W., S. Zeuzem, C. J. Weegink, N. Forestier, A. van Vliet, van de Wetering de Rooij, L. McNair, S. Purdy, R. Kauffman, J. Alam, and P. L. Jansen. 2006. Rapid decline of viral RNA in hepatitis C patients treated with VX-950: a phase Ib, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Gastroenterology 131:997-1002.[CrossRef][Medline]
    30. 30
  30. Roberts, S., G. Cooksley, R. Robson, D. Shaw, H. Berns, M. Brandl, S. Fettner, G. Hill, D. Ipe, K. Klumpp, M. Mannino, E. O'Mara, Y. Tu, and C. Washington. 2006. Results of a phase 1B, multiple dose study of R1626, a novel nucleoside analog targeting HCV polymerase in chronic HCV genotype 1 patients. Hepatology 44:692A.[CrossRef]
    31. 31
  31. Sarrazin, C., T. L. Kieffer, D. Bartels, B. Hanzelka, U. Muh, M. Welker, D. Wincheringer, Y. Zhou, H. M. Chu, C. Lin, C. Weegink, H. Reesink, S. Zeuzem, and A. D. Kwong. 2007. Dynamic hepatitis C virus genotypic and phenotypic changes in patients treated with the protease inhibitor telaprevir. Gastroenterology 132:1767-1777.[CrossRef][Medline]
    32. 32
  32. Sarrazin, C., R. Rouzier, F. Wagner, N. Forestier, D. Larrey, S. K. Gupta, M. Hussain, A. Shah, D. Cutler, J. Zhang, and S. Zeuzem. 2007. SCH 503034, a novel hepatitis C virus protease inhibitor, plus pegylated interferon alpha-2b for genotype 1 nonresponders. Gastroenterology 132:1270-1278.[Medline]
    33. 33
  33. Stuyver, L. J., T. R. McBrayer, P. M. Tharnish, J. Clark, L. Hollecker, S. Lostia, T. Nachman, J. Grier, M. A. Bennett, M. Y. Xie, R. F. Schinazi, J. D. Morrey, J. L. Julander, P. A. Furman, and M. J. Otto. 2006. Inhibition of hepatitis C replicon RNA synthesis by β-D-2'-deoxy-2'-fluoro-2'-C-methylcytidine: a specific inhibitor of hepatitis C virus replication. Antivir. Chem. Chemother. 17:79-87.[Medline]
    34. 34
  34. Stuyver, L. J., T. R. McBrayer, P. M. Tharnish, A. E. Hassan, C. K. Chu, K. W. Pankiewicz, K. A. Watanabe, R. F. Schinazi, and M. J. Otto. 2003. Dynamics of subgenomic hepatitis C virus replicon RNA levels in Huh-7 cells after exposure to nucleoside antimetabolites. J. Virol. 77:10689-10694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    35. 35
  35. Summa, V., A. Petrocchi, P. Pace, V. G. Matassa, R. De Francesco, S. Altamura, L. Tomei, U. Koch, and P. Neuner. 2004. Discovery of {alpha},{gamma}-diketo acids as potent selective and reversible inhibitors of hepatitis C virus NS5b RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J. Med. Chem. 47:14-17.[CrossRef][Medline]
    36. 36
  36. Vrolijk, J. M., A. Kaul, B. E. Hansen, V. Lohmann, B. L. Haagmans, S. W. Schalm, and R. Bartenschlager. 2003. A replicon-based bioassay for the measurement of interferons in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J. Virol. Methods 110:201-209.[CrossRef][Medline]
    37. 37
  37. Watashi, K., M. Hijikata, M. Hosaka, M. Yamaji, and K. Shimotohno. 2003. Cyclosporin A suppresses replication of hepatitis C virus genome in cultured hepatocytes. Hepatology 38:1282-1288.[CrossRef][Medline]
    38. 38
  38. Windisch, M. P., M. Frese, A. Kaul, M. Trippler, V. Lohmann, and R. Bartenschlager. 2005. Dissecting the interferon-induced inhibition of hepatitis C virus replication by using a novel host cell line. J. Virol. 79:13778-13793.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2008, p. 3433-3437, Vol. 52, No. 9
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.01534-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lin, T.-I, Lenz, O., Fanning, G., Verbinnen, T., Delouvroy, F., Scholliers, A., Vermeiren, K., Rosenquist, A., Edlund, M., Samuelsson, B., Vrang, L., de Kock, H., Wigerinck, P., Raboisson, P., Simmen, K. (2009). In Vitro Activity and Preclinical Profile of TMC435350, a Potent Hepatitis C Virus Protease Inhibitor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 1377-1385 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paeshuyse, J.
Right arrow Articles by Neyts, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Paeshuyse, J.
Right arrow Articles by Neyts, J.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»