This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sevillano, D.
Right arrow Articles by Aguilar, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sevillano, D.
Right arrow Articles by Aguilar, L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2009, p. 267-270, Vol. 53, No. 1
0066-4804/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00402-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Genotypic versus Phenotypic Characterization, with Respect to β-Lactam Susceptibility, of Haemophilus influenzae Isolates Exhibiting Decreased Susceptibility to β-Lactam Resistance Markers{triangledown}

David Sevillano,1 María-José Giménez,1 Emilia Cercenado,2 Fabio Cafini,1 Amadeo Gené,3 Luis Alou,1 Francesc Marco,4 Luis Martínez-Martínez,5 Pilar Coronel,6 and Lorenzo Aguilar1*

Microbiology Department, School of Medicine, Univ. Complutense, Madrid, Spain,1 Microbiology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain,2 Microbiology Department, Hospital San Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain,3 Microbiology Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain,4 Microbiology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain,5 Scientific Department, Tedec-Meiji Farma S.A., Madrid, Spain6

Received 25 March 2008/ Returned for modification 24 June 2008/ Accepted 17 October 2008


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
Among 165 Spanish Haemophilus influenzae isolates with mutations in the ftsI gene (ftsI+) (2005 to 2007), 73% were β-lactamase negative and 26.7% were positive. The proportion of β-lactamase-negative isolates to β-lactamase-positive isolates was 2:1 to 4:1 in general, versus 1:3 in pediatric hospitals. Among 44 β-lactamase-positive strains, 8 strains produced ROB-1 (5 from the pediatric hospital). β-Lactamase-positive ftsI+ strains were phylogenetically closer than were β-lactamase-negative strains.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Since previous studies showed that ampicillin-susceptible β-lactamase-negative Haemophilus influenzae strains showing an ampicillin MIC of 1 µg/ml should be interpreted with caution because they may carry ftsI gene mutations (5), the presence of these mutations in β-lactamase-positive strains susceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid exhibiting MICs of 2/1 to 4/2 µg/ml can be suspected. The aim of this study was to genotypically and phenotypically characterize (with respect to β-lactam susceptibility) H. influenzae isolates with ampicillin MIC of ≥1 µg/ml for β-lactamase-negative or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid MIC of ≥2/1 µg/ml for β-lactamase-positive strains. Spanish hospitals were contacted with a request for isolates with these susceptibility characteristics that were collected from March 2005 to March 2007. Six hospitals sent isolates that were retested in triplicate, and those showing the required or 1-dilution-lower modal MICs were included. Of the 252 strains received, 199 were recovered and exhibited the susceptibility requirements. Susceptibility to β-lactams was determined by microdilution (1). The susceptibility breakpoints considered were ≤1 µg/ml for ampicillin, ≤4/2 µg/ml for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ≤8 µg/ml for cefaclor, ≤4 µg/ml for cefuroxime, ≤1 µg/ml for cefdinir, and ≤2 µg/ml for cefotaxime (2). Nonsusceptibility was considered when MICs were above the susceptibility breakpoints. β-Lactamase production was determined by the chromogenic cephalosporin test (7).

For amplification and sequencing of the ftsI gene, DNA was obtained using the QIAamp DNA kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). PCR amplification of the ftsI, acrR, blaTEM, and blaROB genes was performed using referenced primers (6, 8, 9). Strains with mutations in the ftsI gene were genotypically defined as BLNAR (β-lactamase negative, ampicillin resistant) or BLPACR (β-lactamase positive, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid resistant) that, when possible, were classified into the groups and subgroups proposed by Dabernat et al. (3) and Ubukata et al. (9). The ClustalW2 program (http://www.ebi.ac.uk) was used to construct phylogenetic trees of a 1,030-bp sequence from the ftsI gene.

Of the 199 strains exhibiting the susceptibility requirements, amplification failed in three isolates excluded for further analysis (all were β-lactamase negative; two strains had an ampicillin MIC of 2 µg/ml and one of 1 µg/ml).

Of the 196 strains tested, 31 (15.8%) did not present mutation in the ftsI gene, 10 were β-lactamase negative, and 21 were β-lactamase positive by the chromogenic cephalosporin test. Of the 165 strains showing ftsI mutations, 121 (73%) were β-lactamase negative (BLNAR), and 44 (26.7%) were β-lactamase positive (BLPACR). The proportion of BLNAR to BLPACR strains was approximately 2:1 to 4:1 in all general hospitals, but the proportion was reversed (approximately 1:3) in the pediatric hospital (H. S. Joan de Deu) (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1. Number of isolates exhibiting mutations in the ftsI gene, by institution

Table 2 shows the MIC50, MIC90, and nonsusceptibility rates to the different antibiotics tested. Susceptibility problems with cefaclor, cefuroxime, and cefdinir are present even in strains without mutations in the ftsI gene, with nonsusceptibility rates of 20% to cefuroxime, 33% to 40% to cefdinir, and 40% to 76% to cefaclor. It is remarkable that among isolates without ftsI gene mutations, three β-lactamase-negative strains were nonsusceptible to ampicillin, and one β-lactamase-positive strain was nonsusceptible to amoxicillin-clavulanic acid.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2. Antimicrobial susceptibility of strains with (ftsI+) and without mutations in the ftsI gene distributed by β-lactamase production

Among the 21 β-lactamase-positive isolates without mutations in the ftsI gene, 19 (90.5%) isolates produced TEM-1, concomitantly with ROB-1 in two strains. The remaining two strains were positive by the chromogenic cephalosporin test, but TEM and ROB β-lactamases were not detected. Among the 44 β-lactamase-positive isolates with mutations in the ftsI gene (BLPACR isolates), 37 (84.1%) strains produced TEM-1, and 8 (18.2%) produced ROB-1, with two strains (4.5%) producing both β-lactamases. The remaining strain was positive by the chromogenic cephalosporin test, but TEM and ROB β-lactamases were not detected. Of the eight BLPACR strains producing ROB-1 β-lactamase, five were from the pediatric hospital (H. S. Joan de Deu), representing 38.5% (5 out of 13) of the BLPACR strains from that center.

Nonsusceptibility rates in strains showing mutations in the ftsI gene were similar regardless of β-lactamase production, except in the case of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, where nonsusceptibility rates (MIC ≥ 8/4 µg/ml; resistance, in this case, since no intermediate category is CLSI defined) increased from 9.9% in β-lactamase-negative strains with mutations in the ftsI gene (ftsI+) to 25% in ftsI+ β-lactamase-positive strains (Table 2). More than 50% of these ftsI+ β-lactamase-positive strains (MIC range, 8/4 to 32/16 µg/ml) were from the pediatric hospital H. S. Joan de Deu. This hospital also showed the highest prevalence of β-lactamase production among ftsI+ strains (13/31 [41.9%], versus 31/165 [18.8%] in general hospitals) (Table 1) and the highest prevalence of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid resistance (MIC ≥ 8/4 µg/ml) among ftsI+ β-lactamase-positive strains (6/13 [46.2%], versus 5/31 [16.1%] in general hospitals). This may be related to different patterns of antibiotic consumption in children and adults. It has been suggested to be due to a relationship between amoxicillin-clavulanic acid consumption and the evolution of BLNAR strains (4), which can be extended to BLPACR strains and children, with higher amoxicillin-clavulanic acid consumption.

Cefotaxime exhibited MIC50/MIC90s of ≤0.06/≤0.5 µg/ml and cefditoren values of ≤0.06/≤0.06 µg/ml regardless the presence of ftsI mutations and/or β-lactamase production. Only one BLNAR strain was nonsusceptible to cefotaxime (cefotaxime MIC = 4 µg/ml, cefditoren MIC = 0.06 µg/ml).

Eleven strains presented changes that predicted early termination of the acrR reading frame. Of them, 10 strains had ftsI mutations (one of them is a β-lactamase producer). These strains, presumably hyperproducers of an AcrAB efflux pump, did not present higher ampicillin MICs, suggesting, as in previous studies (4), unrelatedness to high-level ampicillin resistance.

Figure 1 shows phylogenetic trees of a 1,030-bp sequence of the ftsI gene. The most frequent group was IIc in BLNAR (62/121 strains [51.2%]) and IIb in BLPACR (25/44 strains [56.8%]). Among BLPACR strains, the number of patterns of amino acid substitutions in the ftsI gene was 11, with 47% of isolates belonging to one single pattern (350N, 377I, 502V, 526K, 545I [phylogenetic no. 9]) that represented only 3% (phylogenetic no. 27) of BLNAR strains. Among BLNAR strains, the amino acid substitution profile 350N, 502T, 526K, 545I was the most prevalent pattern (27%) that was also represented in BLPACR strains (18%). BLPACR strains showed a closer phylogenetic relationship than did BLNAR strains, among which 33 patterns were found, only two of them (different than the prevalent pattern in BLPACR strains) showing >10% prevalence.


Figure 1
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Phylogenetic trees of a 1,030-bp sequence from the ftsI gene of ftsI+ β-lactamase-negative isolates (top tree) and of ftsI+ β-lactamase-positive isolates (bottom tree). Phylogenetic numbers, amino acid substitutions, numbers and percentages of strains are shown below each phylogenetic tree.

The study of the prevalence of resistance mechanisms (β-lactamase and ftsI gene mutations) to β-lactams in H. influenzae and its genetic relatedness may help to establish adequate therapeutic and preventive measures to counter their selection/diffusion.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
L.M.-M. is supported by Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Network for the Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD06/0008). This study was supported by an unrestricted grant from Tedec-Meiji Farma S.A., Madrid, Spain.

We thank M. Casal and J. L. Gómez-Garcés for participating in the study and M. Gimeno for her collaboration.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Microbiology Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Avda. Complutense s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain. Phone: 34-91-3941505. Fax: 34-91-3941511. E-mail: laguilar{at}med.ucm.es Back

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 27 October 2008. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2006. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 7th ed. Approved standard. CLSI document M7-A7. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  2. 2
  3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2008. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 18th informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S18. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
  4. 3
  5. Dabernat, H., C. Delmas, M. Seguy, R. Pelissier, G. Faucon, S. Bennamani, and C. Pasquier. 2002. Diversity of beta-lactam resistance-conferring amino acid substitutions in penicillin-binding protein 3 of Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2208-2218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. 4
  7. García-Cobos, S., J. Campos, E. Lázaro, F. Román, E. Cercenado, C. García-Rey, M. Pérez-Vázquez, J. Oteo, and F. de Abajo. 2007. Ampicillin-resistant non-beta-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae in Spain: recent emergence of clonal isolates with increased resistance to cefotaxime and cefixime. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:2564-2573.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. 5
  9. García-de-Lomas, J., M. Lerma, L. Cebrián, J. L. Juan-Bañón, P. Coronel, M. J. Giménez, and L. Aguilar. 2007. Influence of Haemophilus influenzae beta-lactamase production and/or ftsI gene mutations on in vitro activity of and susceptibility rates to aminopenicillins and second- and third-generation cephalosporins. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 30:190-192.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. 6
  11. Kaczmarek, F. S., T. D. Gootz, F. Dib-Hajj, W. Shang, S. Hallowell, and M. Cronan. 2004. Genetic and molecular characterization of beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae with unusually high resistance to ampicillin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1630-1639.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. 7
  13. O'Callaghan, C. H., S. M. Kirby, A. Morris, R. E. Waller, and R. E. Duncombe. 1972. Correlation between hydrolysis of the β-lactam bond of the cephalosporin nucleus and expulsion of the 3-substituent. J. Bacteriol. 110:988-991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. 8
  15. Scriver, S. R., S. L. Walmsley, C. L. Kau, D. J. Hoban, J. Brunton, A. McGeer, T. C. Moore, E. Witwicki, et al. 1994. Determination of antimicrobial susceptibilities of Canadian isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and characterization of their beta-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:1678-1680.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. 9
  17. Ubukata, K., Y. Shibasaki, K. Yamamoto, N. Chiba, K. Hasegawa, Y. Takeuchi, K. Sunakawa, M. Inoue, and M. Konno. 2001. Association of amino acid substitutions in penicillin-binding protein 3 with beta-lactam resistance in beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1693-1699.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2009, p. 267-270, Vol. 53, No. 1
0066-4804/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00402-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Gonzalez, N., Aguilar, L., Alou, L., Gimenez, M.-J., Sevillano, D., Torrico, M., Cafini, F., Coronel, P., Prieto, J. (2009). Influence of different resistance traits on the competitive growth of Haemophilus influenzae in antibiotic-free medium and selection of resistant populations by different {beta}-lactams: an in vitro pharmacodynamic approach. J Antimicrob Chemother 63: 1215-1222 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sevillano, D.
Right arrow Articles by Aguilar, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sevillano, D.
Right arrow Articles by Aguilar, L.