Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current Issue
• Archive
• Alerts
• About ASM
• Contact us
• Tech Support
• Journals.ASM.org

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ruppé, E. Articles by Ruimy, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ruppé, E. Articles by Ruimy, R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2009, p. 442-449, Vol. 53, No. 2
0066-4804/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00724-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Diversity of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Structures in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus Strains among Outpatients from Four Countries

Etienne Ruppé,^1,2 François Barbier,^1,2 Yasmine Mesli,^1,3 Aminata Maiga,^1,4 Radu Cojocaru,^1,5 Mokhtar Benkhalfat,⁶ Samia Benchouk,³ Hafida Hassaine,⁷ Ibrahim Maiga,⁴ Amadou Diallo,⁴ Abdel Karim Koumaré,⁸ Kalilou Ouattara,⁹ Sambou Soumaré,¹⁰ Jean-Baptiste Dufourcq,¹¹ Chhor Nareth,¹¹ Jean-Louis Sarthou,¹² Antoine Andremont,^1,2 and Raymond Ruimy^1,2*

Laboratoire Associé CNR Résistance Dans les Flores Commensales, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard (AP-HP), 75018 Paris, France,¹ EA 3469 University Paris 7-Diderot, Paris, France,² Service des Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Damerdji Tidjani, Tlemcen, Algeria,³ Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale et d'Hygiène, CHU point G, Bamako, Mali,⁴ National Center for Preventive Medicine, Chisinau, Moldova,⁵ Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Hôpital Damerdji Tidjani, Tlemcen, Algeria,⁶ Faculté des Sciences, Tlemcen, Algeria,⁷ Service de Chirurgie B, CHU point G, Bamako, Mali,⁸ Service d'Urologie, CHU point G, Bamako, Mali,⁹ Service de Chirurgie A, CHU point G, Bamako, Mali,¹⁰ Service des Urgences, Hôpital Calmette, Phnom Penh, Cambodia,¹¹ Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia,¹²

Received 3 June 2008/ Returned for modification 18 September 2008/ Accepted 29 October 2008

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
In staphylococci, methicillin (meticillin) resistance (MR) is mediated by the acquisition of the mecA gene, which is carried on the size and composition variable staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). MR has been extensively studied in Staphylococcus aureus, but little is known about MR coagulase-negative staphylococci (MR-CoNS). Here, we describe the diversity of SCCmec structures in MR-CoNS from outpatients living in countries with contrasting environments: Algeria, Mali, Moldova, and Cambodia. Their MR-CoNS nasal carriage rates were 29, 17, 11, and 31%, respectively. Ninety-six MR-CoNS strains, comprising 75 (78%) Staphylococcus epidermidis strains, 19 (20%) Staphylococcus haemolyticus strains, 1 (1%) Staphylococcus hominis strain, and 1 (1%) Staphylococcus cohnii strain, were analyzed. Eighteen different SCCmec types were observed, with 28 identified as type IV (29%), 25 as type V (26%), and 1 as type III (1%). Fifteen strains (44%) were untypeable for their SCCmec. Thirty-four percent of MR-CoNS strains contained multiple ccr copies. Type IV and V SCCmec were preferentially associated with S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus, respectively. MR-CoNS constitute a widespread and highly diversified MR reservoir in the community.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Methicillin (meticillin)-resistant (MR) staphylococci cause a wide variety of infections and raise high concerns, because often few therapeutic options are available. Among the staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus is much more virulent than the other species, which are grouped together under the generic name of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). CoNS usually are much more resistant to antibiotics than S. aureus (11), but in most cases they cause infections only in patients who carry indwelling devices and/or are immunocompromised (20). CoNS are believed to constitute a reservoir of resistance genes for S. aureus (16). The nares are an ecological niche for staphylococci (8), as 20 to 30% of humans are colonized by S. aureus (31, 48), although the few available data on CoNS carriage range from 46 to 65% of hospital patients (1, 42). The horizontal transfer of resistance genes from CoNS to S. aureus has been clearly demonstrated for fusidic acid, gentamicin, and mupirocin (2, 13, 21, 45, 46) and at least once for MR (47). MR in staphylococci is driven by the acquisition of the mecA gene, which encodes PBP2A, a transpeptidase with a low affinity for β-lactams (18, 33). mecA is part of the mec complex, which includes its repressor genes mecI and mecR1. Ten mec complex subclasses, divided into six main classes (A to E), have been described so far on the basis of the polymorphism of mecI and mecR1 (25, 28, 29, 44). The mec complex is carried by a mobile genetic element called the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) (26), a genomic island of variable size (range, 21 to 67 kb). This island is integrated at the 3' extremity of orfX (23), a gene of unknown function located near the chromosomal origin of replication. In addition to mecA, SCCmec also carries a set of cassette chromosome recombinase (ccr) genes encoding recombinases responsible for both its chromosomal integration and excision (26). Six ccr allotypes have been identified so far (10, 22, 24, 26, 38). The definition of an SCCmec type is based on the combination of a mec complex class and a ccr allotype (22). In S. aureus, six main types of SCCmec (I to VI) and several subtypes have been described (9, 22, 24, 32, 38). Much less is known about the genetics of MR in CoNS. Recent reports suggest that in CoNS, SCCmec structures are more diverse and include either mec-ccr combinations as-yet undescribed for S. aureus (35) or more than one ccr allotype (17). However, the epidemiological magnitude of these combinations has not yet been assessed. Country-to-country variations in the antibiotic susceptibility of staphylococci have been observed (1, 7, 27, 31, 50), but they may result from differences in the epidemiological and microbiological methods of investigation used. Here, we undertook a multiple-country study based on the same protocol designed to describe the nasal MR-CoNS reservoir in outpatients. We found that the prevalences of MR-CoNS carriage significantly differed according to geographical area, and that their SCCmec elements were much more diverse than those so far described for S. aureus.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Populations and bacterial strains. The present study was performed on a subset of nasal samples gathered during a large epidemiological study devoted to the analysis of S. aureus nasal carriage in a community of countries with different environments (41 and S. Mesli, L. Armand-Lefevre, S. Benchouk, H. Hassaine, K. Megueni, M. Benkalfat, J. C. Lucet, A. Andremont, and R. Ruimy, presented at the 26ème Réunion Interdisciplinaire de Chimiothérapie Anti-Infectieuse (RICAI), Paris, France, 7 to 8 December 2006). Nasal swabs were obtained using a standard procedure by an investigator trained in the coordinating center of the study. Swabs were taken within 8 h of the admission of 330, 338, 448, and 442 consecutive patients into the respective emergency wards of the major hospitals in the following four towns: Tlemcen, Algeria (June to October 2005); Chisinau, Moldova (June to October 2005); Bamako, Mali (March to August 2005); and Phnom Penh, Cambodia (June to October 2006). Swabs were rapidly discharged into 1.5 ml of brain heart infusion broth with 10% glycerol, stored at –80°C, and transported frozen to the coordinating center of the study, where 70 samples per site were randomly selected. Fifty microliters of the selected samples were plated on Chapman agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) for 48 h at 37°C. Four different mannitol-negative colonies were randomly chosen from each plate, subcultured, and screened by triplex real-time PCR (RT-PCR) using primers hybridizing a specific rrs region (located in the 16S RNA gene) for the Staphylococcus genus, the femA gene (specific for S. aureus) and the mecA gene (MR), as described previously (40). mecA gene-positive and femA gene-negative isolates (i.e., putative MR-CoNS) were further characterized by the disc diffusion method for susceptibility to 18 antibiotics: benzylpenicillin, oxacillin, cefoxitin, moxalactam, kanamycin, tobramycin, gentamicin, erythromycin, lincomycin, pristinamycin, levofloxacin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, tetracyline, cotrimoxazole, rifampin (rifampicin), fusidic acid, and fosfomycin, as recommended by the French Society for Microbiology (www.sfm.asso.fr). In the same isolates, species were identified by sequencing 1,300 bp located within the rrs gene, as described previously (39). The sequences were aligned using BioEdit 5.0.6 (http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit) with those of 38 Staphylococcus species obtained from GenBank and corresponding to the type strain of each species when it was available. Phylogenetic analysis was carried out using the neighbor-joining algorithm (Kimura 2-parameter distance estimation) as implemented in MEGA 4.0. This identification targeting rrs was sufficiently accurate in terms of Staphylococcus species found here, as described previously (3, 14). Coresistances to non-β-lactam antibiotics were scored in each strain, as described previously (36). One phenotype per patient was considered for further analysis.

SCCmec fragments were characterized in all nonreplicate isolates by typing ccr and mec complexes. ccr complexes were typed by multiplex PCR (M-PCR), as described previously (30), except that three primers were changed as follows: (i) R was replaced a new primer, ccrCU1 (Table 1), which generates amplicons of 607 bp with the primer F (517 bp for the original pair F/R), thus allowing the detection of all known ccrC allotypes; and (ii) primers 4.2 and β4.2 were replaced by two new primers, 4U and β4U (Table 1), respectively, which amplify a 1,304-bp fragment and target ccrAB4, to detect recently published ccrAB4 alleles (12). mec complexes were typed by M-PCR as described previously (30), except that a fifth newly designed primer, IS2L (Table 1), was added in order to detect the class C1 mec complexes described for Staphylococcus haemolyticus (28). All PCRs were performed in 50-µl mixtures containing 1x Taq DNA polymerase buffer (Roche), 2.5 mM MgCl₂, 0.5 pmol of each primer, 200 µM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 2.5 U of DNA Taq polymerase (Roche), and 2 µl of bacterial extract, and the mixtures were subjected to a denaturation step of 4 min at 94°C; 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 1 min of annealing at either 57°C (ccr M-PCR) or 60°C (mec M-PCR), and 2 min of extension at 72°C; and a final elongation step of 2 min at 72°C in the GeneAmp PCR system 2700 (Applied Biosystem, Courtaboeuf, France). PCR products were visualized after migration in 1.7% agar 0.5x Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) gel using SybrSafe (Invitrogen, Cergy-Pontoise, France) as the double-stranded DNA marker.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 1. Primers used in this study

From the seven strains harboring three ccr allotypes (see below), we selected three strains (A186-1, M327-2, and C327-2) whose mec-ccr contents were representative of the combinations found in the four others. These contents were as follows: class A mec complex, ccrAB3, ccrAB4, and ccrC; class B mec complex, ccrAB2, ccrAB4, and ccrC; and class C2 mec complex, ccrAB2, ccrAB4, and ccrC). In the three strains, we PCR amplified the long fragments located between mecA and ccr to ascertain whether or not they were located in the mecA environment by following the protocol given below. The 25 strains harboring SCCmec type V also were tested for ccrC positioning toward mecA. Primer mA1 or mA2 was used as an anchor on mecA, together with each of the ccr primers described in Table 1. The inferred location of all ccr genes, upstream/downstream and sense/antisense in relation to mecA, then was assessed in each strain by the size of the amplicons resulting from the above-described PCRs. The size of the fragments joining the ccr allotypes in a given strain also was tested. Long-range PCR experiments were performed using the GeneAmp XL PCR kit (Applied Biosystems). Reaction mixtures contained 1x XL buffer II, 1 mM MgOAc₂, 20 pmol of each selected primer (mA1 or mA2), one ccr primer (to test all of the putative positions of ccr toward mecA), 1 U of rTth DNA polymerase XL, 0.8 mM of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, and 2 µl of bacterial extract in a final volume of 50 µl. The mixtures were subjected to a first denaturation step of 4 min at 94°C; 10 cycles of 15 s of denaturation at 94°C, 30 s of annealing at 55°C, and 8 min of extension at 68°C; 20 cycles of 15 s of denaturation at 94°C, 30 s of annealing at 55°C, and an 8-min (with an increment of 15 s at each cycle) extension at 68°C; and a final elongation step of 10 min at 72°C. PCR products were visualized by a migration step in a 0.8% agar 0.5x TAE gel with SybrSafe as the double-stranded DNA marker. Control strains for long-range PCR are described below.

Reference strains. The following strains were used as references: S. aureus strains COL (SCCmec Type I), BK2464 (SCCmec Type II), ANS46c (SCCmec Type III), HU25 (SCCmec Type IIIA), and HDE288 (SCCmec Type VI), kindly provided by Herminia de Lencastre, and S. aureus strain WCH100 (SCCmec Type V), kindly provided by Michele Bes.

Statistical analysis. Epi-Info v3.2.2 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA) was used for statistical analysis. Associations between species, antibiotic profiles, country, mec complex class, ccr complex type, and SCCmec type were investigated using the chi-squared test. Continuous variables were compared by the analysis of variance test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
The mean (range) ages of the subjects from Algeria, Moldova, Mali, and Cambodia were 42 (17 to 79), 39 (16 to 69), 52 (17 to 80), and 32 (16 to 71) years (P < 0.0001), respectively, and their respective male/female ratios were 1.1, 1.2, 1.8, and 1.8 (Table 2). The overall prevalence of MR-CoNS carriage (a patient was considered an MR-CoNS carrier when at least one MR-CoNS isolate was isolated from a nasal sample) was 22%, and it ranged from 31% (Cambodia), 29% (Algeria), and 17% (Mali) to 11% (Moldova, P < 0.05). This prevalence was higher in men than women (27% for men and 18% for women; P < 0.05). The mean (range) age was not significantly different between noncarriers and carriers (39 [4 to 80] and 42 [14 to 79] years, respectively).

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 2. Characteristics of the populations studied and prevalence of nasal carriage of CoNS and MR-CoNS

Antibiotic susceptibility testing. In all, 1,120 mannitol-negative strains were screened, of which 120 were mecA-CoNS positive by RT-PCR. After duplicates had been excluded on the basis of species identification and antibiotic susceptibility patterns, there were 96 (8.6%) separate strains from 62 subjects (20, 8, 12, and 21 from Algeria, Moldova, Mali, and Cambodia, respectively). All of these strains expressed phenotypic MR. Ninety-two (96%) also were resistant to at least one of the non-β-lactam antibiotics tested, as follows: 57 (62%) were resistant to kanamycin, 38 (41%) to tobramycin and gentamicin, 44 (48%) to erythromycin, 45 (49%) to cotrimoxazole, 51 (55%) to tetracycline, 16 (17%) to rifampin, and 2 (2%) to fosfomycin. There were no significant differences in this respect between countries. In contrast, significant between-country differences (Table 2) were observed for resistance to fluoroquinolones (the lowest resistance was in Algeria), lincomycin (the highest resistance was in Moldova), cotrimoxazole (the highest resistances was in Cambodia and Mali), and fusidic acid (the highest resistance was in Algeria). Coresistance scores also were significantly different for the four countries, with mean scores of 24.2, 29.7, 32.7, and 39.9% for Algeria, Cambodia, Mali, and Moldova, respectively (P < 0.05) (Table 2). However, coresistances were not significantly different between S. haemolyticus and S. epidermidis, the two most frequently identified species (34.2 and 28.9%, respectively).

Species identification. The phylogenetic position of isolates (data not shown) within the genus Staphylococcus showed that 75 (78%) of the 96 strains isolated were identified as S. epidermidis, 19 (20%) as S. haemolyticus, 1 as Staphylococcus cohnii, and 1 as Staphylococcus hominis (1%). Differences in species distribution between countries were not significant (data not shown).

mec complex typing. Ten (10.4%), 47 (49.0%), 4 (4.2%), and 35 (36.4%) strains exhibited class A, B, C1, and C2 mec complexes, respectively. S. haemolyticus was combined with class C mec complexes significantly more frequently than S. epidermidis (P < 0.001), as classes C1 and C2 were found in 16/19 S. haemolyticus strains. However, there were no significant differences in mec complex distribution between countries (data not shown).

ccr complex typing. As many as 120 ccr complexes were detected in 86 out of 96 MR-CoNS strains (90%), including 1 ccrAB1, 52 ccrAB2, 10 ccrAB3, 7 ccrAB4, and 50 ccrC complexes (mean, 1.4 ccr complexes per strain; 34% of the strains had more than one complex). Four different combinations of two ccr complexes were observed (ccrAB2 and ccrAB3, ccrAB2 and ccrAB4, ccrAB3 and ccrC, and ccrAB4 and ccrC), and two combinations of three complexes were observed (ccrAB2, ccrAB4, and ccrC and ccrAB3, ccrAB4, and ccrC) (Fig. 1). ccrAB2 was significantly more prevalent in S. epidermidis than in S. haemolyticus (51/75 and 1/18, respectively; P < 0.0001). There were no significant between-country differences in ccr complex distribution (data not shown). No ccr gene was detected with the primers used in 10 (10%) of the confirmed positive mecA strains.

View larger version (70K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 1. Migration of PCR products obtained by the ccr typing by M-PCR used in this study (30) for the strains harboring three distinct ccr allotypes. Strains A186-1, A186-3, and A186-4 harbored three ccr allotypes: ccrAB3, ccrAB4, and ccrC. Strains A201-4, BB66-2, M327-2, and C327-1 harbored ccrAB4, ccrAB2, and ccrC. All strains were mecA positive. MMW, mass molecular weight (1 kb plus DNA ladder; Invitrogen).

SCCmec typing. Only 54 (56%) of the 96 strains could be assigned to known SCCmec types (Table 3), including 28 to type IV (27 S. epidermidis and 1 S. haemolyticus), 25 to type V (13 S. epidermidis and 12 S. haemolyticus), and 1 to type III (S. epidermidis). The remaining 42 strains (44%) had mec-ccr combinations that did not fit into the current classification scheme. They included 28 strains (29%) with more than one ccr complex (21 of them [20.8%] with two complexes and 7 [7.3%] with three complexes), 10 (10%) with untypeable ccr, 2 (2%) with already observed but not yet assigned mec-single-ccr combinations (class A mec and ccrAB1 and class A mec and ccrC [17, 35]), and 2 (2%) new class B mec and ccrC combinations.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]

TABLE 3. Types of SCCmec according to Ito et al. (22)

ccr allotype positions relative to mecA. The following strains were tested for ccr allotype positions: A186-1 (class A mec complex; ccrAB3, ccrAB4, and ccrC), M327-2 (class B mec complex; ccrAB2, ccrAB4, and ccrC), and C327-1 (class C2 mec complex; ccrAB2, ccrAB4, and ccrC). The full positioning of ccr allotypes in relation to mecA could be determined only in strain A186-1 (Fig. 2). A fragment amplified between primers 3 and mA2 was around 20 kb, so that the deduced distance between the end of ccrB3 and the beginning of mecA was 16 kb, with ccrAB3 being located upstream of mecA. A fragment amplified between primers mA1 and F was 10 kb, so that ccrC was deduced to be located 8 kb downstream from mecA. A fragment amplified between mA1 and β4U was 20 kb, so that the ccrAB4 complex was deduced to be located 17 kb downstream of mecA. In strain M327-2, ccrAB2 was deduced to be located 5 kb upstream from mecA, as described for type IV SCCmec (32) and ccrC, 8 kb downstream from mecA. ccrAB4 could not be located. In strain C327-1, ccrAB2 and ccrAB4 could not be located either, but surprisingly, we found two copies of ccrC located 8 kb upstream from mecA (as described for type V SCCmec [24]) and 6 kb downstream from mecA, respectively. Therefore, to assess the proportion of MR-CoNS strains harboring several copies of ccrC, we tested the 25 type V SCCmec strains harboring MR-CoNS in our collection and found that 9 had ccrC copies 8 kb upstream from mecA, 2 had ccrC copies 6 kb downstream from mecA, and 12 had 2 ccrC copies both 8 kb upstream and 6 kb downstream of mecA. We were unable to amplify the remaining two strains.

View larger version (31K): [in this window] [in a new window]

FIG. 2. Schematic representation of structural variations in type V SCCmec deduced from long-range PCR results. (A) Strain A186-1, harboring ccrAB3 16 kb upstream from mecA, ccrC 8 kb downstream from mecA, and ccrAB4 17 kb downstream from mecA; (B) ccrC located 8 kb upstream from mecA, as described for type V SCCmec (24); (C) ccrC located 6 kb downstream from mecA; and (D) two ccrC allotypes located 8 kb upstream and 6 kb downstream from mecA.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
As far as we know, the present study is the first multicountry report on the epidemiology and SCCmec characterization of nasal MR-CoNS in outpatients. Rates of MR-CoNS carriage ranged from 11 to 31%, with significant variations between the four countries studied. However, the species distribution, mostly limited to S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus, the most prevalent species colonizing the human nares (4, 8), did not change significantly with the geographical origin of the subjects. Our results showed that nasal MR-CoNS in the community may constitute a diversified reservoir of resistance genes not only for MR but also for many other antibiotics, as shown by the fact that many other resistance traits were present in MR-CoNS.

We did not find any difference between S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus in terms of coresistances, and these two species were homogeneously distributed among the four countries. In pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, country-to-country variations in resistance rates are closely related to overall antibiotic use (6). Our results suggest that this also applies to commensals such as CoNS. However, since the extent of antibiotic use is not known in the countries studied here, this hypothesis could not be tested.

The variations we observed also might be due to differences in the populations of patients attending each hospital. Although the male/female ratios of patients were similar among the four countries, their mean ages varied significantly. As strictly the same sampling and analysis methods were used in each country, we are confident that the differences and similarities observed between them were meaningful. The study was designed to ensure that the patients included were representative of community populations, as they were hospitalized under emergency conditions and sampled very soon afterwards to keep the risk of the hospital acquisition of resistant strains to a minimum. In addition, the local investigator in each country had been trained in the main investigator's laboratory to guarantee as much homogeneity as possible and to enable comparisons. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that different recruitment biases existed between countries, thus explaining some of the differences observed. Also, we cannot exclude that some MR-CoNS strains had been acquired during a previous healthcare stay.

The structural biodiversity of the SCCmec regions was striking. We found, mostly in S. epidermidis, 15 mec-ccr combinations, some of which had already been observed in this species (17, 35) but not in S. aureus. We also found that 34 MR-CoNS strains (35.4%) harbored two distinct ccr allotypes, including 12 with two copies of ccrC. In addition, seven (7.3%) strains had three ccr allotypes. S. aureus strains with multiple ccr genes have seldom been described (5, 12, 19, 22), possibly because the methods used to type MR S. aureus (34, 37, 51) could not detect ccr duplication. In MR-CoNS strains, recent studies (10, 17) showed that multiple ccr-carrying strains were not infrequent; nevertheless, their prevalence was not evaluated, and to the best of our knowledge it was assessed here for the first time.

The presence of multiple ccr genes in some MR-CoNS strains suggested the presence of non-mec SCC elements in addition to SCCmec. Composite SCC already have been described; for instance, type III SCCmec was found to carry what is known as an SCC mercury element driven by the ccrC3 allotype (22). A composite SCCmec, type V(T), harboring ccrAB2 and ccrC in community-acquired MR S. aureus (5) has been described, as well as a new SCCmec also harboring ccrAB2 and ccrC together with structures similar to those found in various known SCC elements (19). Our results suggest that SCC structures are composites, because SCCmec results from intra- and interspecies SCC exchanges probably mediated by the expression of ccr genes.

Long-range PCR experiments disclosed further information on the SCCmec backbone. The three strains tested carried partly structured SCCmec elements like SCCmec types III and IV. In strain A186-1, ccrAB3 was located 16 kb upstream from mecA, as was the case for type III SCCmec (22), and in strain M327-2, ccrAB2 was located 5 kb upstream from mecA, as was the case for all type IV SCCmec sequenced to date. Similarities between SCC elements found in S. epidermidis and S. aureus had been observed already (15, 49) and support the hypothesis of SCC transfers between these species.

Furthermore, we found that ccrAB2 complexes were more prevalent in S. epidermidis, and ccrC complexes were more prevalent in S. haemolyticus. Compared to ccr complexes, mec complexes were much less diverse, but we observed some species specificity, for instance, class C mec complexes (C1 and C2) predominated in S. haemolyticus, whereas class B mec complexes predominated in S. epidermidis. Class B mec-ccrAB2 (i.e., type IV SCCmec) complexes were found preferentially in S. epidermidis, and class C2 mec-ccrC (i.e., type V SCCmec) complexes were found in S. haemolyticus. Thus, S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus appeared to be major reservoirs of type IV and V SCCmec, respectively, whatever the country.

We found a high prevalence of new combinations of previously known mec complexes and ccr allotypes that formed SCCmec structures that were not typeable by the current classification scheme (22). The structural diversity of SCCmec also was recently described by others (12, 17). Since SCCmec was first described (26) and its classification introduced (22), as many as 10 mec complexes (19, 22, 25, 28, 43, 44) and six ccr allotypes (9, 10, 22, 24, 38) have been reported from staphylococci. However, our observation in the present study, that one mec complex was combined with one, two, or three different ccr allotypes, shows that mec and ccr combinations are much more diverse than was previously thought. In the future, descriptions of new types of SCCmec, in both S. aureus and CoNS, should include both quantitative data (e.g., the number of ccr copies) and qualitative data on their mec and ccr content. Our results underscore the importance, and also the complexity, of CoNS as a reservoir for MR genes.

 
We thank Herminia de Lencastre (Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Oeiras, Portugal) and Michèle Bes (Centre National de Référence des Staphylocoques, Faculté Laennec, Université Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France) for providing the reference strains used in this study. We are grateful to Nadine Richard and Patricia Lawson-Body for technical assistance, Sabine Couriol and Marie-Jeanne Julliard for secretarial work, and Mathilde Dreyfus for the English revision of the manuscript.

This work was supported in part by a grant from the Institut de Médecine et Epidémiologie Africaines (IMEA-Fondation MBA; grant no. 5710AND90) for Mali, by contract 05 MDU 666 for Algeria, and by COCOP 0209-MOL-413-014 for Moldova.

 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, AP-HP, 46, rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France. Phone: 33 (0) 1 40 25 85 00. Fax: 33 (0) 1 40 25 85 81. E-mail: raymond.ruimy{at}bch.aphp.fr

Published ahead of print on 10 November 2008.

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1
1. Aires De Sousa, M., I. Santos Sanches, M. L. Ferro, and H. De Lencastre. 2000. Epidemiological study of staphylococcal colonization and cross-infection in two West African Hospitals. Microb. Drug Resist. 6:133-141.[CrossRef][Medline]
2
2. Archer, G. L., and J. Scott. 1991. Conjugative transfer genes in staphylococcal isolates from the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:2500-2504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
3. Becker, K., D. Harmsen, A. Mellmann, C. Meier, P. Schumann, G. Peters, and C. von Eiff. 2004. Development and evaluation of a quality-controlled ribosomal sequence database for 16S ribosomal DNA-based identification of Staphylococcus species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:4988-4995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
4. Becker, K., I. Pagnier, B. Schuhen, F. Wenzelburger, A. W. Friedrich, F. Kipp, G. Peters, and C. von Eiff. 2006. Does nasal cocolonization by methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains occur frequently enough to represent a risk of false-positive methicillin-resistant S. aureus determinations by molecular methods? J. Clin. Microbiol. 44:229-231.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
5. Boyle-Vavra, S., B. Ereshefsky, C. C. Wang, and R. S. Daum. 2005. Successful multiresistant community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineage from Taipei, Taiwan, that carries either the novel Staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) type VT or SCCmec type IV. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:4719-4730.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
6. Bronzwaer, S. L., O. Cars, U. Buchholz, S. Molstad, W. Goettsch, I. K. Veldhuijzen, J. L. Kool, M. J. Sprenger, and J. E. Degener. 2002. A European study on the relationship between antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8:278-282.[Medline]
7
7. Choi, C. S., C. S. Yin, A. A. Bakar, Z. Sakewi, N. N. Naing, F. Jamal, and N. Othman. 2006. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus among healthy adults. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 39:458-464.[Medline]
8
8. Costa, S. F., M. H. Miceli, and E. J. Anaissie. 2004. Mucosa or skin as source of coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteraemia? Lancet Infect. Dis. 4:278-286.[CrossRef][Medline]
9
9. Daum, R. S., T. Ito, K. Hiramatsu, F. Hussain, K. Mongkolrattanothai, M. Jamklang, and S. Boyle-Vavra. 2002. A novel methicillin-resistance cassette in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates of diverse genetic backgrounds. J. Infect. Dis. 186:1344-1347.[CrossRef][Medline]
10
10. Descloux, S., A. Rossano, and V. Perreten. 2008. Characterization of new staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) and topoisomerase genes in fluoroquinolone and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:1818-1823.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11
11. Diekema, D. J., M. A. Pfaller, F. J. Schmitz, J. Smayevsky, J. Bell, R. N. Jones, and M. Beach. 2001. Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-1999. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32(Suppl. 2):S114-S132.[CrossRef][Medline]
12
12. Ender, M., B. Berger-Bachi, and N. McCallum. 2007. Variability in SCCmecN1 spreading among injection drug users in Zurich, Switzerland. BMC Microbiol. 7:62.[Medline]
13
13. Forbes, B. A., and D. R. Schaberg. 1983. Transfer of resistance plasmids from Staphylococcus epidermidis to Staphylococcus aureus: evidence for conjugative exchange of resistance. J. Bacteriol. 153:627-634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
14. Ghebremedhin, B., F. Layer, W. Konig, and B. Konig. 2008. Genetic classification and distinguishing of Staphylococcus species based on different partial gap, 16S rRNA, hsp60, rpoB, sodA, and tuf gene sequences. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:1019-1025.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
15. Gill, S. R., D. E. Fouts, G. L. Archer, E. F. Mongodin, R. T. Deboy, J. Ravel, I. T. Paulsen, J. F. Kolonay, L. Brinkac, M. Beanan, R. J. Dodson, S. C. Daugherty, R. Madupu, S. V. Angiuoli, A. S. Durkin, D. H. Haft, J. Vamathevan, H. Khouri, T. Utterback, C. Lee, G. Dimitrov, L. Jiang, H. Qin, J. Weidman, K. Tran, K. Kang, I. R. Hance, K. E. Nelson, and C. M. Fraser. 2005. Insights on evolution of virulence and resistance from the complete genome analysis of an early methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain and a biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strain. J. Bacteriol. 187:2426-2438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
16. Hanssen, A. M., and J. U. Ericson Sollid. 2006. SCCmec in staphylococci: genes on the move. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 46:8-20.[CrossRef][Medline]
17
17. Hanssen, A. M., and J. U. Sollid. 2007. Multiple staphylococcal cassette chromosomes and allelic variants of cassette chromosome recombinases in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci from Norway. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:1671-1677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
18. Hartman, B. J., and A. Tomasz. 1984. Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 158:513-516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19
19. Heusser, R., M. Ender, B. Berger-Bachi, and N. McCallum. 2007. Mosaic staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec containing two recombinase loci and a new mec complex, B2. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:390-393.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20
20. Huebner, J., and D. A. Goldmann. 1999. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: role as pathogens. Annu. Rev. Med. 50:223-236.[CrossRef][Medline]
21
21. Hurdle, J. G., A. J. O'Neill, L. Mody, I. Chopra, and S. F. Bradley. 2005. In vivo transfer of high-level mupirocin resistance from Staphylococcus epidermidis to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with failure of mupirocin prophylaxis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 56:1166-1168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22
22. Ito, T., Y. Katayama, K. Asada, N. Mori, K. Tsutsumimoto, C. Tiensasitorn, and K. Hiramatsu. 2001. Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1323-1336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23
23. Ito, T., Y. Katayama, and K. Hiramatsu. 1999. Cloning and nucleotide sequence determination of the entire mec DNA of pre-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus N315. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1449-1458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24
24. Ito, T., X. X. Ma, F. Takeuchi, K. Okuma, H. Yuzawa, and K. Hiramatsu. 2004. Novel type V staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec driven by a novel cassette chromosome recombinase, ccrC. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:2637-2651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25
25. Katayama, Y., T. Ito, and K. Hiramatsu. 2001. Genetic organization of the chromosome region surrounding mecA in clinical staphylococcal strains: role of IS431-mediated mecI deletion in expression of resistance in mecA-carrying, low-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:1955-1963.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26
26. Katayama, Y., T. Ito, and K. Hiramatsu. 2000. A new class of genetic element, staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec, encodes methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:1549-1555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27
27. Kenner, J., T. O'Connor, N. Piantanida, J. Fishbain, B. Eberly, H. Viscount, C. Uyehara, and D. Hospenthal. 2003. Rates of carriage of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in an outpatient population. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 24:439-444.[CrossRef][Medline]
28
28. Kobayashi, N., M. M. Alam, and S. Urasawa. 2001. Genomic rearrangement of the mec regulator region mediated by insertion of IS431 in methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45:335-338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29
29. Kobayashi, N., S. Urasawa, N. Uehara, and N. Watanabe. 1999. Distribution of insertion sequence-like element IS1272 and its position relative to methicillin resistance genes in clinically important Staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2780-2782.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30
30. Kondo, Y., T. Ito, X. X. Ma, S. Watanabe, B. N. Kreiswirth, J. Etienne, and K. Hiramatsu. 2007. Combination of multiplex PCRs for staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type assignment: rapid identification system for mec, ccr, and major differences in junkyard regions. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:264-274.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31
31. Kuehnert, M. J., D. Kruszon-Moran, H. A. Hill, G. McQuillan, S. K. McAllister, G. Fosheim, L. K. McDougal, J. Chaitram, B. Jensen, S. K. Fridkin, G. Killgore, and F. C. Tenover. 2006. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in the United States, 2001-2002. J. Infect. Dis. 193:172-179.[CrossRef][Medline]
32
32. Ma, X. X., T. Ito, C. Tiensasitorn, M. Jamklang, P. Chongtrakool, S. Boyle-Vavra, R. S. Daum, and K. Hiramatsu. 2002. Novel type of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec identified in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:1147-1152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33
33. Matsuhashi, M., M. D. Song, F. Ishino, M. Wachi, M. Doi, M. Inoue, K. Ubukata, N. Yamashita, and M. Konno. 1986. Molecular cloning of the gene of a penicillin-binding protein supposed to cause high resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 167:975-980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34
34. Milheiriço, C., D. C. Oliveira, and H. de Lencastre. 2007. Update to the multiplex PCR strategy for assignment of mec element types in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51:3374-3377.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35
35. Miragaia, M., J. C. Thomas, I. Couto, M. C. Enright, and H. de Lencastre. 2007. Inferring a population structure for Staphylococcus epidermidis from multilocus sequence typing data. J. Bacteriol. 189:2540-2552.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36
36. Murray, B. E., J. J. Mathewson, H. L. DuPont, C. D. Ericsson, and R. R. Reves. 1990. Emergence of resistant fecal Escherichia coli in travelers not taking prophylactic antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:515-518.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37
37. Oliveira, D. C., and H. de Lencastre. 2002. Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46:2155-2161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38
38. Oliveira, D. C., C. Milheirico, and H. de Lencastre. 2006. Redefining a structural variant of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec, SCCmec type VI. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3457-3459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39
39. Ruimy, R., V. Breittmayer, P. Elbaze, B. Lafay, O. Boussemart, M. Gauthier, and R. Christen. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis and assessment of the genera Vibrio, Photobacterium, Aeromonas, and Plesiomonas deduced from small-subunit rRNA sequences. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 44:416-426.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40
40. Ruimy, R., M. Dos-Santos, L. Raskine, F. Bert, R. Masson, S. Elbaz, C. Bonnal, J. C. Lucet, A. Lefort, B. Fantin, M. Wolff, M. Horstein, and A. Andremont. 2008. Accuracy and potential usefulness of triplex reverse transcription-PCR for improving antibiotic treatment in patients with blood cultures showing clustered gram-positive cocci on direct smears. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:2045-2051.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41
41. Ruimy, R., A. Maiga, L. Armand-Lefevre, I. Maiga, A. Diallo, A. K. Koumare, K. Ouattara, S. Soumare, K. Gaillard, J. C. Lucet, A. Andremont, and E. J. Feil. 2008. The carriage population of Staphylococcus aureus from Mali is composed of a combination of pandemic clones and the divergent PVL positive genotype ST152. J. Bacteriol. 190:3962-3968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42
42. Shobha, K. L., P. S. Rao, and J. Thomas. 2005. Survey of Staphylococcus isolates among hospital personnel, environment and their antibiogram with special emphasis on methicillin resistance. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 23:186-188.[Medline]
43
43. Shore, A., A. S. Rossney, C. T. Keane, M. C. Enright, and D. C. Coleman. 2005. Seven novel variants of the staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Ireland. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:2070-2083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44
44. Suzuki, E., K. Kuwahara-Arai, J. F. Richardson, and K. Hiramatsu. 1993. Distribution of mec regulator genes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus clinical strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:1219-1226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45
45. Townsend, D. E., S. Bolton, N. Ashdown, D. I. Annear, and W. B. Grubb. 1986. Conjugative, staphylococcal plasmids carrying hitch-hiking transposons similar to Tn554: intra- and interspecies dissemination of erythromycin resistance. Aust. J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci. 64:367-379.
46
46. Udo, E. E., L. E. Jacob, and E. M. Mokadas. 1997. Conjugative transfer of high-level mupirocin resistance from Staphylococcus haemolyticus to other staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:693-695.[Abstract]
47
47. Wielders, C. L., M. R. Vriens, S. Brisse, L. A. de Graaf-Miltenburg, A. Troelstra, A. Fleer, F. J. Schmitz, J. Verhoef, and A. C. Fluit. 2001. In-vivo transfer of mecA DNA to Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet 357:1674-1675.[CrossRef][Medline]
48
48. Williams, R. E. 1963. Healthy carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: its prevalence and importance. Bacteriol. Rev. 27:56-71.[Free Full Text]
49
49. Wisplinghoff, H., A. E. Rosato, M. C. Enright, M. Noto, W. Craig, and G. L. Archer. 2003. Related clones containing SCCmec type IV predominate among clinically significant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:3574-3579.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50
50. Zanelli, G., A. Sansoni, A. Zanchi, S. Cresti, S. Pollini, G. M. Rossolini, and C. Cellesi. 2002. Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in the community: a survey from central Italy. Epidemiol. Infect. 129:417-420.[CrossRef][Medline]
51
51. Zhang, K., J. A. McClure, S. Elsayed, T. Louie, and J. M. Conly. 2005. Novel multiplex PCR assay for characterization and concomitant subtyping of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec types I to V in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43:5026-5033.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

---

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2009, p. 442-449, Vol. 53, No. 2
0066-4804/09/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00724-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Chen, L., Mediavilla, J. R., Oliveira, D. C., Willey, B. M., de Lencastre, H., Kreiswirth, B. N. (2009). Multiplex Real-Time PCR for Rapid Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 3692-3706 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ruimy, R., Armand-Lefevre, L., Barbier, F., Ruppe, E., Cocojaru, R., Mesli, Y., Maiga, A., Benkalfat, M., Benchouk, S., Hassaine, H., Dufourcq, J.-B., Nareth, C., Sarthou, J.-L., Andremont, A., Feil, E. J. (2009). Comparisons between Geographically Diverse Samples of Carried Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 191: 5577-5583 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ruppé, E. Articles by Ruimy, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ruppé, E. Articles by Ruimy, R.