Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, February 2009, p. 748-755, Vol. 53, No. 2
0066-4804/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00841-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
,
Department of Biotechnology and Laboratory Science in Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taiwan, Republic of China,1 Department of Medical Research, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taiwan, Republic of China,2 Department of Clinical Pathology, Cheng Hsin Rehabilitation Medical Center, Taiwan, Republic of China3
Received 25 June 2008/ Returned for modification 14 August 2008/ Accepted 12 November 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rapid and sensitive immunological and PCR-based diagnostic assays have been developed for group-specific diagnosis of HEV infections (23, 27). Nevertheless, traditional culture-based assay remains the only method to detect infectious virus particles and to facilitate the analysis of antiviral susceptibility, given that a number of anti-HEV agents are available (1, 32, 34). However, HEV culture is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and relatively insensitive. The development of alternative cell-based methods for rapid and reliable determination of HEV infection remains a high priority.
HEVs are a group of plus-strand RNA viruses with a genome that comprises the untranslated regions at the 5' and 3' ends and a long open reading frame encoding a polyprotein (2). The polyprotein is processed into the mature virus proteins through a sequence of cleavages performed by two virus-encoded proteases, 2A (2Apro) and 3C (3Cpro). While 2Apro carries out the initial cleavage to liberate the capsid protein precursor, the majority of subsequent cleavages are accomplished by 3Cpro or its precursor, 3CDpro (2, 29). Since 3Cpro is essential in viral replication and shows a high degree of homology among the members of the picornavirus family, efforts have been made to develop compounds that target 3Cpro (1, 29, 32, 34). Among them, rupintrivir (formerly AG7088) has been shown to potently inhibit the replication of a number of human rhinovirus (HRV) and HEV serotypes tested in cell culture (3, 17, 28).
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) has been one of the most promising spectroscopic tools for investigating intracellular protease activity (14, 33, 35). FRET is a nonradioactive process in which energy from an excited donor fluorophore is transferred to an acceptor fluorophore when they have overlapping emission/absorption spectra with suitable orientations and distances (in the range of 1 to 10 nm) (16, 30). It was previously demonstrated that green fluorescent protein 2 (GFP2) and red fluorescent protein 2 (DsRed2) worked as the optimal donor and acceptor for FRET, respectively, permitting sufficient excitation and selective imaging (24). Based on the FRET pair, a genetically engineered biosensor cell line was generated and used for real-time measurement of EV 2Apro activity from infectious viruses (13).
In this study, we developed a stable cell line that expressed a recombinant 3Cpro substrate composed of the GFP2-DsRed2 pair linked by the 3Cpro cleavage motif. The FRET biosensor showed a real-time and quantifiable shift of fluorescence emission from a wavelength of
600 nm (red) to
510 nm (green) upon infection by the input HEVs. Sole expression of 3Cpro in the fusion substrate-expressing cells was sufficient to substantially abrogate FRET. EV71, the most common nonpoliovirus HEV associated with poliomyelitis-like paralysis (25), was used as a model virus. Furthermore, we have adapted the FRET biosensor for use as a rupintrivir susceptibility assay for the selected HEV serotypes.
|
|
|---|
Plasmids. The pG2AwtR plasmid, which encodes the GFP2-DsRed2 fusion protein with the EV71 2Apro-sensitive motif connected in between (13), was used as starting material for molecular cloning. A set of complementary oligonucleotides that encode the EV71 3Cpro cleavage motif (amino acid residues 1435 to 1446 in EV71 strain BrCr) were synthesized as follows: forward, 5'-AGCTTTATAGAAGCACTCTTTCAAGGACCCCCTAAATTCAGGGGGCC-3', and reverse, 5'-CCCTGAATTTAGGGGGTCCTTGAAAGAGTGCTTCTATAA-3'. Another set of oligomers encoding a mutant 3Cpro cleavage motif was synthesized as follows: forward, 5'-AGCTTTATAGAAAAACTCTTTCAACCTCCCCCTAAATTCAGGGGGCC-3', and reverse, 5'-CCCTGAATTTAGGGGGAGGTTGAAAGAGTTTTTCTATAA-3'. The engineered HindIII/ApaI restriction sites are underlined. Each set of oligonucleotides was annealed and cloned into the corresponding sites in the pG2AwtR plasmid in frame with the GFP2 and DsRed2 open reading frame. The resulting plasmids were referred to as pG3CwtR and pG3CmutR, harboring a linker region that encodes the wild-type and mutant 3Cpro cleavage motifs, respectively (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material).
The plasmids pCMV-FLAG-2A and pCMV-FLAG-3C, which bear the 2Apro and 3Cpro coding regions, respectively, were previously described (13).
Stable and transient transfections. To establish stable FRET cells, subconfluently grown HeLa cells in a 24-well dish were transfected with pG3CwtR or pG3CmutR plasmid at approximately 1.5 µg each using Lipofectamine (Gibco-BRL) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The transfected cells were grown in the presence of zeocin at 50 µg/ml 48 h after transfection. Zeocin-resistant cell lines were isolated further by plating the cells at limiting dilution onto 96-well tissue culture dishes. Each clone was maintained in the presence of 20 µg/ml zeocin.
To transiently express 2Apro or 3Cpro, approximately 70% confluent monolayers of the stable FRET lines grown on 24-well dishes were transfected with the related plasmids for 48 h using the Lipofectamine method.
FRET analysis. Both imaging and fluorometric methods were used for FRET measurements.
(i) Imaging analysis. The imaging process was performed under an inverted fluorescence microscope (Nikon TE200). The filters used for observing GFP2 allowed excitation at 390 nm and emission at 500 to 530 nm; for DsRed2, excitation at 540 nm and emission at 575 to 625 nm were used; for FRET of GFP2 and DsRed2, excitation was at 390 nm and emission was at 575 to 625 nm (13).
(ii) Fluorometry. Cells were washed and resuspended with phosphate-buffered saline and aliquoted into a black, 96-well, flat-bottom microplate (Nunc, Denmark). Fluorescence was measured on a fluorometer apparatus (Fluoroskan Ascent type 374; Labsystems, Rochester, NY) (13). The excitation wavelength was 390 nm (band pass, 20 nm), and the emission wavelengths for the fluorophore donor (GFP2) and acceptor (DsRed2) were 510 nm (band pass, 10 nm) and 590 nm (band pass, 14 nm), respectively.
Western blot analysis. Cells were harvested at the indicated time points following infection or transfection. Cell extracts were prepared by washing the cells with cold phosphate-buffered saline and scraping them in the lysis buffer (19). The cell extracts were mixed with 2x sample buffer in equal volumes, separated by 13% sodium dodecyl sulfate-gel electrophoresis, and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The blots were incubated with the Living Colors rabbit anti-GFP polyclonal antibody (1:1,000 dilution; no. 632459; BD Bioscience) or an anti-actin monoclonal antibody (1:1,000 dilution; MAB1501; Chemicon) as a loading control, followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:1,000 dilution; sc-2004; Santa Cruz) as the secondary antibody. Proteins were detected using the Enhanced Chemiluminescence Western blotting kit (Amersham).
Antiviral susceptibility testing. The susceptibilities to rupintrivir (Pfizer Global Research and Development) of EV71, CVA16, CVB1, CVB2, CVB4, and Echo9 strains were measured by the FRET-based method, plaque reduction assay (PRA), and dye reduction assay (DRA) as described below. For each method, the concentrations of rupintrivir tested were twofold serial dilutions ranging from 0.04 to 5.12 µM. Control groups included mock-infected cells and infected cells with no rupintrivir added. The 50% effective concentration (EC50) value from each method was calculated with the PRISM4 program (GraphPad Inc.).
(i) FRET-based assay. Approximately 80 to 90% confluent monolayers of the stable FRET cells were prepared in 24-well tissue culture plates. The cells were inoculated with each viral strain (100 µl) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.04. After 90-min of adsorption, the inoculum was aspirated and 500 liters of medium (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 2% FBS) alone or medium with rupintrivir at various concentrations was added to each well. At 36 to 48 h postinfection (p.i.), the infected, rupintrivir-free culture showed 80 to 95% FRET disruptions under the fluorescence microscope; cultures in all conditions were subjected to FRET measurement by fluorometry as described above. The data were expressed as the percentage of the FRET ratio obtained in rupintrivir-treated cells relative to the FRET ratio generated in wells of uninfected, rupintrivir-free cells. The EC50 was defined as the rupintrivir concentration that resulted in 50% of the FRET ratio from the infected cells compared with that from the uninfected, rupintrivir-free cells.
(ii) PRA. Confluent Vero cells grown in six-well tissue culture plates were infected with each HEV serotype by inoculating approximately 80 to 100 PFU of each virus inoculum. The cells were then overlaid with medium containing 0.8% agar, 2% FBS, and the various concentrations of rupintrivir. The assay cultures were incubated for 4 to 7 days, and the plaques were counted after fixation and staining with a crystal violet formalin solution. The EC50 was defined as the rupintrivir concentration that reduced the number of plaques by 50% compared with those of the untreated controls.
(iii) DRA. The DRA was used to measure EC50s following the protocol of Patick et al. (28) with some modifications. Approximately 70 to 80% confluent HeLa cells on 96-well dishes were infected with each HEV serotype at an MOI of 0.04 in the presence of the various concentrations of rupintrivir. Between 2 and 4 days p.i., when the cells in the rupintrivir-free wells showed 75 to 90% cytopathic effect (CPE), a cell survival assay (CellTiter 96 AQueous Cell Proliferation Assay; Promega) was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The absorbance value of each well was measured spectrophotometrically at 490 nm absorption for the soluble formazan product. The data were expressed as the percentage of formazan produced in the infected, rupintrivir-treated cells compared to the formazan produced in wells of uninfected, rupintrivir-free cells. The EC50 was calculated as the concentration of rupintrivir that reduced formazan production in infected, rupintrivir-treated cells to 50% of that produced by uninfected, rupintrivir-free cells.
|
|
|---|
GPPKFR; the arrow indicates the scissile bond) for EV71 3Cpro embedded. The linker contained the boundary region of EV71 2C-3A, the primary cleavage site of 3Cpro in many HEVs (26). Moreover, the importance of residues at the P1' (mostly Gly) and P4 (mostly Ala) positions of the cleavage motif was previously documented (5, 6, 26); consequently, a recombinant plasmid, pG3CmutR, that bears the mutant cleavage motif (IEKLFQPPPKFR; the underlined residues represent the mutations in the P4 and P1' positions) was also generated as a control (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). To continuously monitor fluorescence, we isolated two stable clones, the HeLa-G3CwtR and HeLa-G3CmutR lines, that were stably transfected with the pG3CwtR and pG3CmutR plasmids, respectively. Constitutive expression of the fluorescent substrate did not appear to retard the growth of the clones, as they propagated at a rate similar to that of parental HeLa cells (data not shown). The two stable lines showed identical susceptibilities to viral infections because similar levels of CPE were seen upon infection. The expression levels of GFP2 and DsRed2 were verified by inspecting the stable lines under a fluorescence microscope using filter sets with excitation at 390 nm and emission at 515 nm (390ex/515em) and 540ex/600em, respectively. More importantly, detection of FRET was achieved with the 390ex/600em filter set. As an indication of FRET efficiency, the images from 390ex/515em and 390ex/600em were superimposed and could be seen in yellow (Fig. 1A and B, leftmost columns). The two stable clones showed FRET signals that were relatively high among the clones and comparable to each other.
![]() View larger version (69K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. FRET image analysis. HeLa-G3CwtR (A) and HeLa-G3CmutR (B) cells grown in a 24-well dish were inoculated with EV71 stock at an MOI of 3 for 10 h. At the indicated time points, the cells were visualized with a fluorescence microscope (Nikon TE200) at 390ex/515em for GFP2, 540ex/600em for DsRed2, and 390ex/600em for FRET. The images from the 390ex/515em and 390ex/600em filter sets were merged. The cells were also observed with a phase-contrast microscope.
|
Quantitative measurements of FRET in vivo. We then quantitatively measured FRET efficiency by the fluorometric method (13, 33). Both stable FRET lines were inoculated with EV71 stocks at various MOIs ranging from 0.04 to 0.5 for up to 48 h. The infected HeLa-G3CwtR cells exhibited a progressive decline in the FRET ratio in a dose- and time-dependent fashion (Fig. 2A), while infection of HeLa-G3CmutR did not cause detectable FRET abrogation regardless of the titers and durations tested (Fig. 2B), consistent with the imaging analyses (Fig. 1). The quantitative data indicated that FRET from HeLa-G3CwtR cells was inversely correlated with EV71 multiplication.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Quantitative fluorometry measurement of EV71-infected FRET cells. HeLa-G3CwtR (A) and HeLa-G3CmutR (B) cells on 24-well dishes were infected with EV71 stocks at MOIs of 0.04, 0.2, and 0.5 or mock infected for 18, 36, and 48 h. Cells were harvested and subjected to measurement by a fluorescent-plate reader with the excitation wavelength at 390/20 nm and the emission wavelength at 510/10 nm (for GFP2) or 590/14 nm (for DsRed2). The FRET ratio was defined as the intensity of emission at 590/14 nm divided by that at 510/10 nm. For each infection, the percent FRET ratio was determined by comparing it with that of the mock-infected control. The data presented are mean values of experiments in triplicate, and the error bars represent the standard deviations.
|
60 kDa) was detected in the extracts of the mock- and HSV-1-infected HeLa-G3wtR cells (Fig. 3A), as well as those of the infected HeLa-G3CmutR cells (Fig. 3B). Conversely, for HeLa-G3CwtR cells infected by EV71, the full fusion substrate was strikingly lost, with concurrent appearance of the cleavage product (
30 kDa) in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3A).
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Western blot analysis of the fluorogenic fusion protein in the FRET cells. HeLa-G3CwtR (A) and HeLa-G3CmutR (B) cells were mock infected, infected with EV71 stock at MOIs of 0.5 and 2, or infected with HSV-1 stock at an MOI of 2 for 12 h. Total-protein extracts were prepared and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 13% gels and then probed with an anti-GFP polyclonal antibody (BD Bioscience). The bands corresponding to the full-size fusion protein (60 kDa) or its cleavage product (30 kDa) are indicated. The actin level was used as the loading control.
|
50%, while FRET remained unaffected for the remaining transfected cells (Fig. 4A). These findings were verified by a Western blot analysis in which the cleavage product (
30 kDa) was seen only in the extract of 3Cpro-expressing HeLa-G3CwtR cells and not in those of other transfected cells (Fig. 4B). Transient expression of EV71 2Apro or 3Cpro was reported to elicit apoptotic cell death (19, 20); based on that, the transfection efficiencies in this study for the 2Apro- and 3Cpro-transfected cells appeared to be comparable (at a level of
50%), since they induced similar levels of CPE (data not shown). The data indicated that 3Cpro alone, rather than 2Apro or any redundant proteolytic activity associated with EV71, was responsible for the FRET disruption.
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Expression of 3Cpro alone specifically causes FRET disruption. HeLa-G3CwtR and HeLa-G3CmutR cells were transfected with empty plasmid (pFLAG-CMV-2), pCMV-FLAG-2A (2Apro expression plasmid), or pCMV-FLAG-3C (3Cpro expression plasmid) at 1.5 µg each for 48 h. The percent FRET ratio (A) and Western analysis of the intracellular fusion substrate (B) were determined and demonstrated as described in the legends to Fig. 2 and 3, respectively. EP, empty plasmid.
|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Quantitative FRET detection of various HEV serotypes. HeLa-G3CwtR (A) and HeLa-G3CmutR (B) cells were mock infected or infected with stocks of EV71, CVA16, CVB1, CVB2, CVB3, CVB4, Echo9 (EV9), and HSV-1 at MOIs of 0.5 and 2 for 12 h. Analysis was conducted by the fluorometer assay, and the data are presented as described in the legend to Fig. 2.
|
10% (Fig. 2A), were used to infect HeLa-G3CwtR cells for 36 to 48 h. Representative HEV strains, including EV71, CVA16, CVB1, CVB2, CVB4, and Echo9, were used to assess the novel antiviral susceptibility testing system (Fig. 6). Moreover, two reference methods, namely, PRA and DRA, were conducted in parallel for comparison (Table 1). Good correlation was obtained for the EC50s between the FRET biosensor system and PRA (R2 = 0.985), higher than that between the FRET assay and DRA (R2 = 0.848). It was noted that while PRA and DRA took 4 to 7 days and 2 to 4 days, respectively, the FRET-based assay took only 36 to 48 h. This study underscores the usefulness of the FRET biosensor for rapid and quantitative determination of antiviral susceptibility.
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Evaluation of the EC50s of the HEV serotypes by the FRET-based assay. The HEV strains, EV71 (A), CVA16 (B), CVB1 (C), CVB2 (D), CVB4 (E), and Echo9 (F), were used to infect HeLa-G3CwtR cells at an MOI of 0.04 each for 36 to 48 h. Twofold serially diluted rupintrivir at the concentrations indicated was added to the cultures. For each rupintrivir concentration, the percent FRET ratio was determined by comparing it with the control devoid of the drug. For each viral serotype, a plot of the percentage of control versus the rupintrivir concentration was established, and the EC50 was thus deduced. The data represent the mean values of triplicate samples, with the error bars representing the standard deviations.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. In vitro antiviral activities of rupintrivir against HEV serotypes by three different methods
|
|
|
|---|
Several elements in the design of the FRET biosensor assay have contributed to its characteristics. First, FRET technology was applied by developing an intracellular fluorogenic substrate that, when processed by viral 3Cpro, resulted in FRET conversion that can be measured with the common detection modalities, fluorescence microscopy for imaging and a fluorescent-plate reader for quantitation. In this regard, the imaging method is sufficiently sensitive to detect FRET alteration early in the very first cycle of infection (6 to 8 h p.i.), unlike the routine method of inspecting the CPE, which normally takes more than one replication cycle to develop. Second, the HEV 2C-3A junction (12 amino acids in length) was utilized as the cleavage motif, since it was ranked the most efficient among the multiple cleavage sites in the viral polyprotein (26). Also, the primary sequence of this cleavage motif appears to be recognized by the 3Cpros of the HEVs tested but is distinct from the one recognized by the protease of HSV-1. Both features of the linker have contributed to the sensitivity and specificity of the biosensor system. Finally, the choice of HeLa cells as the parental cells permitted infections by several HEV serotypes, including those tested in this study. However, the HeLa-based biosensor cells were refractory to infections by some CVA and echovirus serotypes, as a prolonged infection led to neither the characteristic CPE nor FRET reduction (unpublished data). Future improvements to our system will include the generation of a stable cell line exhibiting susceptibility to other HEVs. Moreover, it was noted that infection by CVB3, among others, caused the most severe disruption of FRETs (Fig. 5A), a scenario that could be at least partly explained by its higher efficiency of replication, as it caused more extensive CPE in a certain period (data not shown), and consequently, potentially more 3Cpro was generated.
Compared with the conventional methods available for testing antiviral susceptibility, the HeLa-G3CwtR cell-based assay described here may represent a novel method with remarkable properties. The biosensor assay eliminates the tedium of manual counting and the variability in the resulting PRA data. It is analogous to the DRA used in this study in that objective quantitation is feasible. Unlike the DRA, however, the developed format of the biosensor assay can be performed in a microplate directly on cells without a time-consuming lysate preparation. It was noted that the DRA EC50s of this study were somewhat higher than those reported by Binford et al. (3), possibly owing to the differences in the dye used, viral-titer measurement (PFU versus 50% tissue culture infective dose), and relative viral replication in different cell types. Moreover, both conventional antiviral susceptibility assays are primarily limited to analyzing downstream gross cell damage caused by virus infection, possibly complicating the assessment of an antiviral compound that itself causes CPE. On the other hand, the gross cell damage did not appear to result in FRET decline, as evidenced by the control study with HSV-1 infection (Fig. 5). Finally, the availability of results in 36 to 48 h with the biosensor assay, compared to 4 to 7 days and 2 to 4 days for PRA and DRA, respectively, and high levels of concordance with the results from both conventional methods should make the HeLa-G3CwtR cell-based assay a valuable tool for determining the potencies of 3Cpro inhibitors against many HEV serotypes.
Proteolysis of a precursor protein carried out by viral protease is pivotal in the multiplication cycles of many viruses (12, 29). Picornavirus 3Cpro, the viral protease selected in this study, was originally employed as a target for anti-HRV compounds, and the application was extended to some HEV serotypes based on the three-dimensional structure (22) and the high degree of homology at the amino acid level (3, 34). Clinically, there is considerable interest in a broad-spectrum antiviral compound for the treatment of picornaviral diseases because no single serotype is exclusively associated with any particular disease and the treatment is primarily symptomatic. Furthermore, recent study has revealed that the presence of increasing concentrations of rupintrivir in the HRV cultures led to only little or moderate reduction in susceptibility (4), whereas in vitro selection with a capsid-binding inhibitor (pleconaril) conferred >200-fold reduction in susceptibility (11, 31). Therefore, picornaviral 3Cpro is considered an attractive molecular target despite the fact that rupintrivir was not licensed following the clinical trials (8). With the development of high-throughput fluorescence microscopy and its associated image analysis system (9, 15, 21), this FRET-based biosensor assay represents an ideal platform adaptable for anti-3Cpro drug screening. Any candidate compounds from the screening can be further validated by assaying them in HeLa-G3CwtR cells transfected with the 3Cpro expression plasmid to rule out those that inhibit virus replication due to their cytotoxic properties.
This study was supported in part by grant 97QC016 from the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Published ahead of print on 17 November 2008. ![]()
Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aac.asm.org/. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»