Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 2009, p. 1170-1176, Vol. 53, No. 3
0066-4804/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.01117-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts,1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya,2 University of California, San Diego Pediatric Pharmacology Research Unit, 4094 4th Avenue, Room 201, San Diego, CA 92103-0979,3 Makerere University-Johns Hopkins University Research Collaboration, P.O. Box 23491,Kampala, Uganda,4 Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC, Mailstop E-45, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia 303335
Received 20 August 2008/ Returned for modification 24 November 2008/ Accepted 17 December 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
(This study was presented in part at the 14th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Los Angeles, CA, 27 February 2007.)
|
|
|---|
Maternal plasma and breast milk samples and infant dried blood spots were collected within 24 h of delivery and at four postpartum study visits (2, 6, 14, and 24 weeks after delivery). Dried blood spot samples were collected based on procedures described by Mei et al. (15) All infant single nevirapine doses were administered after the day-of-delivery sample had been collected. All study nevirapine was dispensed in pill bottles with Medication Event Monitoring System caps (Aardex, Ltd., Union City, CA), which were used to determine the dosing times for the last three maternal antiretroviral doses prior to sampling; timing was confirmed by pharmacy staff for both nevirapine and zidovudine/lamivudine through interview of the women. The three most-recent infant feedings were also recorded during the same interview. Maternal and infant clinical and demographic characteristics were recorded in the main study database.
Drug assays from breast milk and maternal plasma were performed as previously described (27). Zidovudine concentrations in maternal plasma, breast milk, and infant dried blood spots were determined by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or radioimmunoassay. The initial samples were assayed for zidovudine by EIA until part way through the study, when EIA plates became unavailable, and subsequent samples were assayed by radioimmunoassay. Cross-validation was done to establish the equivalency of the two assays, and proficiency testing samples (plasma from AIDS Clinical Trials Group [ACTG] and dried blood spots from CDC) were run for both assays. For dried blood spots, the zidovudine immunoassay methods were a modification of the method described by Mei et al. (16). The lower limits of quantitation for zidovudine in plasma, breast milk, and dried blood spots were 15, 5, and 30 ng/ml, respectively.
Liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (LC-MS) was used to measure lamivudine and nevirapine in maternal plasma and dried blood spots. Due to limitations in the availability of LC-MS equipment, LC-MS or high-performance LC was used to measure lamivudine and nevirapine in breast milk samples. The lower limits of quantitation for plasma, breast milk, and dried blood spots by LC-MS were 7, 17, and 16 ng/ml for lamivudine and 40, 17 and 43 ng/ml for nevirapine, respectively. The lower limit of quantitation for both lamivudine and nevirapine in breast milk by high-performance LC was 34.4 ng/ml. Assay proficiency was demonstrated by using samples provided by the ACTG for plasma and breast milk assays and the CDC for dried blood spot assays (10).
Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographic and clinical data for mothers and infants. Antiretroviral concentration and milk-to-plasma ratio data are presented as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR). Since maternal plasma, breast milk, and infant dried blood spot antiretroviral concentrations from different sampling days were collected at different times after the administration of maternal doses, they were treated independently for analysis and were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, which assumes independent samples. Linear mixed-effects regression analysis was used to analyze changes in maternal plasma and breast milk concentrations over a dosing interval. Calculations were performed by using Microsoft Excel 2003 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and SAS version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Infant daily doses from breast milk were estimated assuming a daily breast milk intake of 150 ml/kg/day (2, 12). Observed infant nevirapine concentrations were compared with those predicted using the estimated daily nevirapine dose and a previously developed population model of nevirapine pharmacokinetics in infants during the first year of life (17).
|
|
|---|
The dried blood spot concentrations for each antiretroviral at each study visit are presented numerically in Table 1 and graphically in Fig. 1. Maternal plasma and breast milk concentrations are presented numerically in Table 2 and graphically in Fig. 2 and 3. Zidovudine concentrations were assayed in nonrandomly selected groups of 82 infant dried blood spots, 45 maternal plasma samples, and 35 breast milk samples. Sixteen dried blood spots obtained on the day of delivery were assayed, and eight had quantifiable amounts of zidovudine, with a median zidovudine concentration of 24 ng/ml (IQR, below quantifiable limit [BQL] to 76 ng/ml). The zidovudine concentrations in the remaining 66 infant dried blood spots, collected at the 2-, 6-, 14-, and 24-week time points were all below the assay limit of detection. Due to the preponderance of dried blood spot samples with zidovudine concentrations below the assay limit of quantification, no further specimens were assayed for zidovudine.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Zidovudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine concentrations and IQRs in dried blood spots from infants in the Kisumu Breastfeeding Study, Kenya, 2004 to 2007a
|
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Infant concentrations (conc) of zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC), and nevirapine (NVP) on day of delivery (DEL) and at 2, 6, 14, and 24 weeks postpartum, Kisumu Breastfeeding Study, Kenya, 2004 to 2007. For comparative purposes, the IC50 for wild-type HIV type 1, subtype B, is 0.6 to 21 ng/ml for lamivudine and 17 ng/ml for nevirapine.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Zidovudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine concentrations in maternal plasma and breast milk and breast milk-to-plasma ratios in the Kisumu Breastfeeding Study, Kenya, 2004 to 2007
|
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Maternal plasma and breast milk concentrations (conc) of zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC), and nevirapine (NVP) plotted against time since last maternal dose, Kisumu Breastfeeding Study, Kenya, 2004 to 2007. Dashed lines are regression lines for maternal plasma data, and solid lines are regression lines for breast milk data.
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC), and nevirapine (NVP) breast milk (BM)-to-maternal plasma ratio plotted against time since last maternal dose, Kisumu Breastfeeding Study, 2004 to 2007. The filled circles represent samples with zidovudine breast milk concentrations below the limit of detection and represent the highest possible breast milk/plasma ratio. The P values represent the probability that the slope of the line is different than zero as calculated by linear mixed-effects regression analysis.
|
There were no differences across study visits for median maternal plasma or breast milk concentrations of any of the antiretrovirals. The median maternal plasma zidovudine concentration across all study visits was 23 ng/ml (IQR, 12 to 59 ng/ml). The median breast milk zidovudine concentration was 9 ng/ml (IQR, BQL to 26 ng/ml), and the median ratio of the breast milk-to-maternal plasma zidovudine concentrations was 0.44 (IQR, 0.23 to 0.65). The median estimated infant daily dose of zidovudine (based on an estimated daily breast milk intake of 150 ml/kg/day) was 1.35 µg/kg.
The median maternal plasma lamivudine concentration was 508 ng/ml (IQR, 290 to 800 ng/ml). The median breast milk lamivudine concentration was 1,214 ng/ml (IQR, 862 to 1,651), and the median ratio of the breast milk-to-maternal plasma lamivudine concentrations was 2.56 (IQR, 1.79 to 3.89). Over the course of the dosing interval, the rate of decline of the lamivudine concentration in breast milk was slower than in maternal plasma, resulting in an increasing lamivudine breast milk-to-plasma ratio (Fig. 2 and 3). Assuming a daily breast milk intake of 150 ml/kg/day, the median estimated infant daily dose of lamivudine was 182 µg/kg.
The median maternal plasma nevirapine concentration was 6,087 ng/ml (IQR, 4,895 to 7,518 ng/ml). The median breast milk nevirapine concentration was 4,546 ng/ml (IQR, 3,480 to 5,715 ng/ml), and the median ratio of the breast milk-to-maternal plasma nevirapine concentrations was 0.75 (IQR, 0.64 to 0.89). Assuming a daily breast milk intake of 150 ml/kg/day, the median estimated infant daily dose of nevirapine was 682 µg/kg. The distribution of the number of days required to receive a cumulative 2-mg/kg dose of nevirapine, the infant prophylactic dose administered as part of the single-dose nevirapine regimen, is presented in Fig. 4 (9). The observed infant nevirapine concentrations are plotted against those predicted using our estimates of daily infant nevirapine doses and our previous infant pharmacokinetic model in Fig. 5 (17).
![]() View larger version (9K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Proportion of breast-feeding infants receiving a cumulative breast milk nevirapine dose of 2 mg/kg plotted against number of days of breast feeding (estimated from day-of-delivery breast milk nevirapine concentrations), Kisumu Breastfeeding Study, Kenya, 2004 to 2007.
|
![]() View larger version (10K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Observed and model-predicted infant dried blood spot (DBS) nevirapine (NVP) concentrations (conc) at weeks 2, 6, and 14 postpartum, Kisumu Breastfeeding Study, Kenya, 2004 to 2007.
|
|
|
|---|
Our data demonstrate that the magnitude of infant drug concentrations from exposure to maternally administered drug differs for each individual antiretroviral agent studied, as well as with the time postpartum. For all antiretrovirals, infant concentrations were highest on the day of delivery compared to the other postnatal sampling times, consistent with transplacental passage of the antiretrovirals from mother to fetus prior to delivery. The infant concentrations of zidovudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine at delivery observed in this study are consistent in magnitude with those seen in other studies reporting infant antiretroviral concentrations at delivery following chronic maternal dosing during pregnancy and labor (18, 19, 24). In our current study, infant lamivudine and nevirapine concentrations declined over the study period despite constant breast milk concentrations, consistent with previously observed developmental increases in nevirapine and lamivudine clearances over the first 6 months of life (17, 32). The decreased drug concentrations at the 24-week visit may have been affected by the initiation of weaning prior to the collection date, though we do not have precise information on when weaning began for each woman.
The infant drug concentrations at the week 2 through week 14 postnatal visits reflect drug exposure from breast feeding during adherent maternal HAART administration and exclusive breast feeding. At these times, maternal plasma zidovudine concentrations were low, reflecting the very short (
1 h) half-life of zidovudine in adults and the resulting rapid clearance of an administered dose from plasma during a dosing interval. The median breast milk-to-plasma ratio for zidovudine was around 50%. While the standard daily zidovudine infant dose used for prevention of mother-to-child transmission in the first 4 to 6 weeks of life is 8 mg/kg (or 8,000 µg/kg), we estimated a median daily infant zidovudine dose from breast milk of 1.35 µg/kg, more than 1,000 times lower than the standard prophylactic dose (3). Given this extremely small breast milk dose, it is not surprising that zidovudine was not detectable in any of the infant samples obtained after the day of delivery. A limitation of our study is that very few of our samples were obtained within the first 2 h after maternal dosing, when maternal plasma and breast milk zidovudine concentrations are highest. We also did not assay for intracellular concentrations of phosphorylated zidovudine in the infants due to the large amount of blood required for this assay. The active form of zidovudine is its intracellular triphosphorylated metabolite, which has a longer half-life than unmetabolized plasma zidovudine. It is possible that some zidovudine may reach the infant from breast milk, entering and persisting inside the cells while plasma concentrations quickly fall below the limit of quantitation of our assay, especially if nursing takes place soon after maternal dosing.
The lamivudine plasma concentrations in the mothers were consistently higher than those of zidovudine, which is consistent with the longer plasma half-life of 5 to 7 h for lamivudine. The lamivudine concentrations in breast milk were generally greater than those in plasma, which is consistent with previous findings (8, 27). Lamivudine concentrations in breast milk declined more slowly than in plasma, leading to a gradual increase in the lamivudine milk-to-plasma ratio as the dosing interval progressed. The change in the lamivudine milk-to-plasma ratio over the course of the dosing interval demonstrates why breast milk and maternal plasma drug concentration data must be analyzed taking into account the time since maternal dosing (34). The estimated infant median daily dose of lamivudine from breast milk was 182 µg/kg, which is approximately 2% of the recommended daily treatment dose of lamivudine of 8 mg/kg divided into two doses in children over 3 months of age. Exposure to this amount of lamivudine via breast milk, as measured from weeks 2 to 24, resulted in a median infant lamivudine concentration of 23 ng/ml, which is just above the upper limit of the range of the lamivudine 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) for wild-type HIV (0.6 to 21 ng/ml) (4).
Nevirapine has a long half-life (20 to 30 h) with chronic dosing in adults. Maternal nevirapine concentrations were in the range typically seen with chronic nevirapine therapy in adults (10). The median nevirapine breast milk-to-plasma ratio was just over 70% and remained constant over the maternal dosing interval. The median estimated daily dose of nevirapine administered to the infants from breast milk was just over 600 µg/kg/day. Studies investigating the efficacy of direct administration of nevirapine to breast-feeding infants to prevent breast milk HIV transmission are ongoing (13, 20). The dose used in these studies is 4 mg/kg (or 4,000 µg/kg) once a day, and our estimated breast milk dose is about 15% of this dose (29). Using a previously developed model of nevirapine pharmacokinetics in infants, the predicted nevirapine concentrations were somewhat lower than those observed in the current study. This analysis suggests that our estimated dose of presumed daily breast milk intake derived from U.S. data may be conservative, underestimating the actual daily nevirapine dose from breast milk in these Kenyan infants. During weeks 2, 6, and 14, the median infant nevirapine concentration was 896.9 ng/ml, well above the median HIV IC50 of 17 ng/ml for nevirapine but below the suggested target trough nevirapine concentration of 3,000 ng/ml (1; Nevirapine package insert, revised April 2007 [Boehringer Ingelheim]). The maternal plasma, breast milk, and infant concentrations and the breast milk/plasma ratio observed for nevirapine in this study are very similar to those recently reported in a study of efavirenz transfer from breast milk. In that study, the median maternal plasma efavirenz concentration was 6,030 ng/ml, the median breast milk efavirenz concentration was 3,450 ng/ml, the mean efavirenz breast milk/plasma ratio was 0.54, and the median infant efavirenz concentration was 870 ng/ml, just below the suggested target trough efavirenz concentration of 1,000 ng/ml (1, 26). These data suggest that the transfer of either nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor from maternal breast milk to infants would have similar potential for beneficial or adverse effects.
The infant nevirapine concentrations we observed in the day-of-delivery samples reflect transplacental passage of nevirapine and were roughly equivalent to those in maternal plasma at the time of delivery. Based on the range of breast milk nevirapine concentrations observed in this study, we estimate that by day 3 of life, 50% of infants ingested from breast milk a total nevirapine dose exceeding the 2-mg/kg infant postnatal prophylactic dose and by day 4 of life, the breast milk nevirapine dose exceeded 2 mg/kg in over 70% of infants. As a result of this combined transplacental and breast milk nevirapine exposure over the course of the first week of life, nursing infants whose mothers received a chronic prenatal and postnatal nevirapine HAART regimen will have nevirapine concentrations that exceed those seen in infants exposed to the mother-infant single-dose prophylactic perinatal regimen. Administration of the single-dose postnatal infant prophylactic nevirapine may be unnecessary in these infants if the mother is adherent to combination therapy before and after delivery. However, there was no evidence that the nevirapine dose given to the infants in this study was harmful, and programmatically it may be difficult to determine which mothers are adherent to ART.
In countries with high per capita incomes where triple-combination antiretroviral regimens, elective cesarean section, and safe formula feeding are readily available and acceptable to pregnant women, rates of mother-to-child transmission as low as 0.6% have been reported (22). In resource-limited settings where some or all of these interventions are not available, the use of shorter, less-intensive antiretroviral regimens has been shown to result in smaller but still very significant reductions in antenatal and intrapartum mother-to-child HIV transmission (7). In resource-limited settings where formula feeding is not safe or practical and breast feeding substantially improves infant survival, prevention of postnatal HIV transmission via breast milk remains a major challenge (33). Although exclusive breast feeding has been shown to be associated with lower rates of HIV transmission than mixed feeding, the risk of transmission is not eliminated. Recent studies of the strategy of exclusive breast feeding for 4 to 6 months followed by early cessation of breast feeding and the use of replacement feeding and complementary foods have been associated with increased risks after weaning of morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases and malnutrition (30). The development of practical and effective strategies to allow continued breast feeding while minimizing the risk of mother-to-child HIV transmission is urgently needed.
One proposed strategy for the prevention of breast milk HIV transmission is the administration of HAART to nursing mothers. Treatment of nursing mothers with zidovudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine from 28 weeks of gestation through 1 month postpartum has been shown to reduce breast milk HIV viral RNA loads at delivery and at the end of the first postpartum week compared to the levels in untreated women, although breast milk HIV DNA may be not be suppressed (8, 28). Several studies of the efficacy of maternal HAART in preventing breast milk HIV transmission are under way. However, animal and human studies have demonstrated that antiretroviral agents are transferred into breast milk (5, 19, 21, 25). Because of the frequency of feeding and the reduced clearance of antiretrovirals in infants, even low concentrations of antiretrovirals in breast milk may result in biologically significant antiretroviral concentrations in the nursing infant (14). An understanding of infant drug exposure resulting from antiretrovirals received via breast milk is necessary before the use of antiretrovirals in nursing women becomes widespread.
Our data clearly show that lamivudine and nevirapine, but not zidovudine, are transmitted in biologically significant concentrations via breast milk to nursing infants when their mothers receive these drugs. The resulting infant antiretroviral drug exposure may have benefits, such as prevention of HIV infection or partial suppression of HIV replication in infants who become HIV infected. Alternatively, this drug exposure could result in potential drug side effects or, in infants who become HIV infected, the emergence of HIV drug resistance. Recent data from the parent Kisumu Breastfeeding Study demonstrate the emergence of HIV type 1 genotypic resistance mutations to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (primarily to lamivudine but, to a lesser degree, to zidovudine as well) and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors among children who are HIV infected at birth or during the first 6 months while breast feeding and whose mothers received treatment with zidovudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine during pregnancy and while nursing (35). While enhanced prophylactic strategies such as this are likely to reduce perinatal and postpartum HIV infections among infants, the extent of infant drug exposure via breast milk and the effects on infants of this exposure, especially the emergence of resistance mutations in those infants who become HIV infected despite maternal treatment, are important considerations for HIV treatment programs providing maternal HAART during breast feeding for prevention of mother-to-child transmission and for pediatric treatment programs that treat HIV-infected infants who have been exposed to these drugs via breast feeding.
Funding was provided by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health (1R21HD051470-01 and 5U10 HD031318-14). CDC staff participated in the design, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; the writing of the report; and the decision to submit the paper for publication.
M.M., T.T., E.C., P.J.W., and M.C.T. participated in the conception, design, conduct, and data analysis of the project and the writing of the manuscript; C.Z., R.M., and P.O. participated in the design and conduct of the project and the writing of the manuscript; D.H. participated in the conduct and data analysis of the project and the writing of the manuscript, and M.G.F. participated in the conception and design of the project and the writing of the manuscript. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of trade names is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Department of Health and Human Services.
The protocol for use of human subjects was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Kenya Medical Research Institute, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Boston University Medical Center, and University of California at San Diego.
Published ahead of print on 29 December 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»