Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, July 2009, p. 2865-2870, Vol. 53, No. 7
0066-4804/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00114-09
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Institute for Antiviral Research, Department of Animal, Dairy, and Veterinary Sciences, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322,1 Division of Molecular Virology and Immunology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007,2 San Diego Veterans Medical Research Foundation,3 Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 920934
Received 26 January 2009/ Returned for modification 25 February 2009/ Accepted 16 April 2009
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
and coworkers first reported in 1986 (7, 8, 26). (S)-HPMPA was the first acyclic nucleoside phosphonate, a growing and important class of antiviral compounds which now includes cidofovir, adefovir [9-(2-phosphonomethoxyethyl)adenine], and tenofovir [9-(2-phosphonomethoxypropyl)adenine], which are used for the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections, respectively (6). In this paper, we report on the synthesis and evaluation of several alkoxyalkyl ester prodrugs of (S)-HPMPA in an attempt to find oral treatments for HBV infection more effective than the currently approved antivirals. (S)-HPMPA is a broad-spectrum antiviral which was shown to inhibit the replication of a wide variety of double-stranded DNA viruses, including orthopoxviruses, herpesviruses, adenoviruses, iridoviruses, and papovaviruses (6). (S)-HPMPA was also reported to be active in vitro against HBV replication in HB611 cells (29) and 2.2.15 cells (11) and to have 50% effective concentrations (EC50s) of 1.15 and 1.5 µM, respectively. Numerous reports have indicated that (S)-HPMPA lacks activity against HIV type 1 (HIV-1) (2, 5, 12). However, alkoxyalkyl esters of (S)-HPMPA, such as hexadecyloxypropyl-(S)-HPMPA [HDP-(S)-HPMPA] and octadecyloxyethyl-(S)-HPMPA [ODE-(S)-HPMPA], exhibit EC50s against HIV-1 in the low nanomolar range, while unmodified (S)-HPMPA is virtually inactive in vitro (13). HDP-(S)-HPMPA exhibits multiple-log increases in antiviral activity in vitro compared with the activity of unmodified (S)-HPMPA against vaccinia virus, cowpox virus, human CMV and murine CMV (3), and adenovirus (10). HDP-(S)-HPMPA is orally bioavailable and is active in vitro against lethal vaccinia virus and cowpox virus infections (24) and against lethal murine CMV infections (25). To assess the effect of alkoxyalkyl esterification of (S)-HPMPA on its in vitro and in vivo anti-HBV activity, we synthesized HDP-(S)-HPMPA, 15-methyl-HDP-(S)-HPMPA [15M-HDP-(S)-HPMPA], and ODE-(S)-HPMPA and evaluated their in vitro activities against HBV replication as well as the cellular uptake and conversion of HDP-(S)-[8-14C]HPMPA to (S)-HPMPA diphosphate (HPMPApp) in HepG2 cells. Using HDP-(S)-[8-14C]HPMPA, we also evaluated the oral pharmacokinetics and the level of drug exposure in the plasma, livers, and spleens of mice. Finally, the oral activities of the HDP, ODE, and 15M-HDP esters of (S)-HPMPA were assessed in HBV transgenic mice (15, 17, 21); and their activities were compared with the in vivo activity of adefovir dipivoxil, a compound licensed for use for the treatment of HBV infection.
|
|
|---|
98%) of the compounds were confirmed by 1H and 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), mass spectroscopy, and elemental combustion analysis (3). HDP-(S)-[8-14C]HPMPA (50 mCi/mmol) was prepared by custom synthesis at Moravek Biochemicals (Brea, CA). To make the penultimate branched methyl analog of HDP-(S)-HPMPA, the Grignard coupling reaction between isoamylmagnesium bromide and 12-bromo-1-dodecanol was carried out as described by Yuasa and Tsuruta (30), giving 15-methylhexadecanol, which was converted to the methanesulfonate and treated with 1,3-propanediol (NaH/N,N-dimethylformamide) to give 3-(15-methylhexadecyloxy)propan-1-ol, as previously described by Kini et al. (18). Cyclic (S)-HPMPA (cHPMPA) was prepared by a previously described method (14, 26).
The penultimate branched alkyl analog, 15-methyl-hexadecyloxypropyl-(S)-HPMPA, was then synthesized as follows: diethylazodicarboxylate (200 mg, 1.0 mmol) was added to a mixture of cHPMPA (200 mg, 0.7 mmol), 3-(15-methylhexadecyloxy)propan-1-ol (220 mg, 0.7 mmol), triphenylphosphine (265 mg, 1.0 mmol), and dry N,N-dimethylformamide (10 ml); and the mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. After evaporation of the solvent in vacuo, the residue was adsorbed on silica gel and purified by flash column chromatography. The product, 15M-HDP-cyclic-(S)-HPMPA was eluted with 15% ethanol-dichloromethane and recrystallized in p-dioxane to give 187 mg 15M-HDP-cHPMPA (46% yield). 1H NMR (CD3OD)
8.24 (d, 1H), 8.04 (d, 1H), 4.59-4.15 (m, 9H), 3.51 (t, 2H), 3.41 (t, 2H), 1.94 (quintet, 2H), 1.54 (m, 2H), 1.27 (broad s, 26 H), 1.16 (m, 1H), 0.87 (d, 6H). The 15M-HDP-cyclic-(S)-HPMPA (150 mg, 0.26 mmol) was suspended in 1 N NaOH (10 ml) and heated to 60°C for 1 h, during which time the solution became clear. The solution was cooled to 25°C and acidified with acetic acid to a pH of approximately 5. The precipitate was collected by vacuum filtration and purified by flash column chromatography. The product eluted with 20% methanol-dichloromethane to give 15M-HDP-(S)-HPMPA (110 mg, 72% yield). The following data were used to confirm the structure and purity (
98%) of the compound: 1H NMR (CD3OD)
0.88 (d, 6H), 1.16 (m,1H), 1.27 (br s, 26 H), 1.52 (m, 2H), 1.82 (quintet, 2H), 3.38 (t, 2H), 3.49 (t, 2H), 3.51-3.80 (m, 3H), 3.85-3.91 (m, 2H), 4.35-4.40 (m, 2H) 8.21 (s, 1H), 8.22 (s, 1H); 31P NMR
16.86; mass spectrometry (electrospray) m/z 600.32 [M + H]+.
Analysis of anti-HBV activity. Confluent cultures of 2.2.15 cells were maintained on 96-well flat-bottom tissue culture plates in RPMI 1640 medium with 2% fetal bovine serum, as described previously (19). Cultures were treated with nine consecutive daily doses of the test compounds (six for each test concentration on two replicate plates). The culture medium was changed every day with medium containing the indicated concentration of the test compounds. Extracellular HBV DNA levels were assessed by quantitative blot hybridization 24 h after the last treatment. No specific isolation of HBV particles was utilized. Prior to analysis, cellular material was pelleted out of the medium, and the culture medium was specifically not frozen and thawed (stored at 4°C) to minimize any potential for the release of viral DNA from residual cellular material that may have been released into the medium (19). Cytotoxicity was assessed by measurement of the uptake of neutral red dye and quantitative analysis of the absorbance of the internalized dye at 510 nM 24 h following the last treatment (three cultures per test concentration). The activities of the compounds against lamivudine-resistant and adefovir-resistant HBV mutants were determined in a 5-day assay by use of a transient transfection method with Huh7 cells, as described previously (16).
Cell uptake and metabolism of HDP-(S)-[8-14C]HPMPA. Radioactively labeled drugs were added at a final concentration of 10 µM (specific activity, 50 mCi/mmol) to 25-cm2 flasks of nearly confluent HepG2 cells, and the flasks were incubated for 24 h. The medium was removed and the monolayer was washed twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline, followed by addition of 0.6 ml of distilled water. The flasks were twice frozen and thawed and sonicated for 5 min in a cold sonicator bath, and the contents of the flasks were scraped into a glass tube. Cold trichloroacetic acid was added to a final concentration of 8%, and the contents were vortexed and centrifuged for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was removed, an aliquot was counted, and another aliquot was immediately subjected to high-pressure liquid chromatography analysis by Partisil SAX ion exchange, as described previously (1). The retention times of labeled HPMPA, (S)-HPMPA monophosphate (HPMPAp), and HPMPApp (32 to 33 min) were identical to those of the chemically pure reference standards.
Pharmacokinetics of orally administered drug in mice. Female Swiss-Webster mice (weight, approximately 25 g) received a single dose of 10 mg/kg of body weight HDP-(S)-[8-14C]HPMPA (specific activity, 50 mCi/mmol) in 0.7% saline by oral gavage or intraperitoneal injection, as reported previously (4). Blood was collected at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after treatment and placed in heparinized Microtainer tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The mice were killed; and the liver, spleen, kidney, lung, heart, and brain tissues were removed, diced, washed in cold phosphate-buffered saline, blotted dry, and weighed. The plasma was centrifuged, a volume of 50 µl of plasma was added to 10 ml of Ecolite liquid scintillation fluid, and the drug and metabolite contents in plasma were determined by liquid scintillation counting. The data are expressed as total µmol of HDP-(S)-[8-14C]HPMPA equivalents per liter of plasma (µM) or as nanomoles per gram of tissue. The value for each time point is the average of three replicates. Relative oral bioavailability was calculated by determining the areas under the curve (AUC) for the drug and metabolites and dividing the AUC obtained by the intraperitoneal route of administration by the AUC obtained by the oral route of administration.
Antiviral activity in HBV transgenic mice. (i) Animals and compounds. Homozygous female and male HBV transgenic mice (weight, 22.2 ± 2.8 g) were used. The transgenic mice (founder strain, 1.3.32) were originally obtained from Frank Chisari (Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA) (9). HDP-(S)-HPMPA, 15M-HDP-(S)-HPMPA, and ODE-(S)-HPMPA were dissolved in distilled water at the concentration suitable for delivery of the correct dosage by oral gavage in a 0.1-ml volume. Adefovir dipivoxil was obtained from Gilead Sciences (Foster City, CA) and prepared in citric acid (0.05 M, pH 2.0). The drugs were administered to the mice by oral gavage in a 0.1-ml volume per 10 g of body weight to obtain the indicated daily doses.
(ii) Liver HBV DNA assay. Liver HBV DNA was quantified by Southern blot hybridization or quantitative PCR (21). The PCR primers do not distinguish between different replicative intermediates or chromosomal transgenic DNA, but the background PCR signal of transgenic DNA is sufficiently low for the quantitation of extrachromosomal HBV DNA. For both assays, liver tissue (approximately 0.1 g) was homogenized in lysis buffer immediately upon necropsy. For extraction of the DNA, the samples were incubated at 55°C for 2 to 4 h, phenol-chloroform extracted, and alcohol precipitated. For Southern blot analysis, 40 µg DNA was digested with the HindIII enzyme, since HindIII does not cut within the HBV transgene sequence. The blotting procedure involved alkaline transfer onto positively charged nylon filters. The radioactive signals from the hybridization of the 32P-labeled HBV DNA genome were measured by a phosphorimaging method (Optiquant) with a Cyclone storage phosphorscreen (multisensitive medium; Perkin-Elmer). The ratio of the number of viral DNA bands to the number of transgene bands was used to determine the concentration of viral DNA per host DNA. This calculation was based upon the knowledge that there are 1.3 copies of the transgene present per host cell with this line of transgenic mice. A real-time duplex PCR (21) was performed with HBV-specific primers and an HBV-specific probe (forward primer, ATAAAACGCCGCAGACACATC; reverse primer, AACCTCCAATCACTCACCAACC; probe, 6-carboxyfluorescein-AGCGATAACCAGGACAAGTTGGAGGACA-BHQ1a-6-carboxyfluorescein) and mouse GAPDH-specific primers and a mouse GAPDH-specific probe (forward primer, GCATCTTGGGCTACACTGAGG; reverse primer, GAAGGTGGAAGAGTGGGAGTTG; probe, 4,4,7,2',4',5',7'-hexachloro-6-carboxy-fluorescein [HEX]-ACCAGGTTGTCTCCTGCGACTTCAACAG-BHQ1a-HEX). FullVelocity quantitative PCR master mix (Strategene, La Jolla, CA) was used. The assay was run with a series of 10-fold dilutions of pooled liver DNA from HBV transgenic mice to obtain a standard curve. The y axis was the log dilutions of the standard, and the x axis was the threshold cycle (CT) values. R2 values were used to measure the quality of the curve, which was always above 0.098. Mean CT values were obtained for duplicates of each sample. The mean CT values of each sample were used to obtain the relative log DNA value by using a formula of the fit line of the standard curve.
Statistical analysis. HBV DNA values and the corresponding doses of adefovir dipivoxil, HDP-(S)-HPMPA, 15M-HDP-(S)-HPMPA, and ODE-(S)-HPMPA in micromoles/kg/day were entered into Prism (version 4.0) software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). The compound doses were log transformed and normalized by setting the value of HBV DNA in control animals to 100%, and then inhibition curves were generated by fitting the data to a sigmoidal dose-response curve (variable slope). The 50% effective doses (ED50s) (±95% confidence interval [CI]) are reported for each curve fit to the data. ED90s (±95% CI) were obtained by using the following formula: log EC50 = [log ECf – (1/Hill slope)]·log[F/(100 – F)], where ECf is the effective concentration producing a fractional response, f, and F is the fraction of the control response (f = 100 – F) and where y = bottom + (top – bottom)/{1 + 10^[(log EC50 – x)·Hill slope]}, where top indicates the upper limit of the response range (set to 100) and bottom indicates the lower limit of the response range (set to 0), and inputting the EC50 and Hill slope from the curve fit for each individual compound. Since inhibition curves are represented as a percentage of the inhibition of the control (taken as 100%), the ED90 corresponds to an F value of 10. All curves were plotted by using Prism (version 4.0) software. The individual data points were expressed as the mean amount of HBV DNA, and error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Anti-HBV activities of (S)-HPMPA and alkoxyalkyl prodrugs in 2.2.15 cellsa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Antiviral activities of HDP-(S)-HPMPA, lamivudine, and adefovir against drug-resistant HBVa
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Uptake and conversion of [8-14C]-(S)-HPMPA and HDP-(S)-[8-14C]HPMPA to HPMPApp in HepG2 cells in vitro
|
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Plasma and tissue levels of 14C-labeled drug and metabolites were determined at various times after oral administration of 10 mg/kg HDP-(S)-[8-14C]HPMPA to mice, and the results are expressed as nanomoles per gram of tissue. The results are the averages of three separate determinations.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Pharmacokinetics of HDP-(S)-[8-14C]HPMPA after oral and intraperitoneal administration to micea
|
The oral administration of 4 mg/kg/day of HDP-(S)-HPMPA, ODE-(S)-HPMPA, and 15M-HDP-(S)-HPMPA, a second-generation, metabolically stable analog, for 14 days reduced the liver HBV DNA level compared with that in the vehicle-treated control (Fig. 2). The reduction in the total liver HBV DNA load compared with that in the vehicle-treated control was roughly 1 log unit (P < 0.001) and was similar to that produced by treatment with adefovir dipivoxil at the same dosage. Treatment with ODE-(S)-HPMPA was also more active than treatment with the vehicle (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the activities of the four compounds by analysis of variance. Evaluation by Southern blotting gave essentially the same results (data not shown). Since the dynamic range for the liver HBV DNA level in transgenic mice is small, further comparisons were done by assessment of the dose-responses to various compounds in vivo after the administration of a series of lower doses.
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. HBV transgenic mice were treated by oral gavage with 7 µmol/kg (4 mg/kg) of the test compounds daily for 14 days. The numbers of animals were as follows: controls, 8 per group; adefovir dipivoxil, 5 per group; HDP-(S)-HPMPA and 15M-HDP-(S)-HPMPA, 10 per group. The liver HBV DNA level was determined by quantitative PCR. The liver HBV DNA level is expressed in relative units/µg cell DNA. Statistical significance was determined by analysis of variance and Dunn's multiple-comparison test (Prism, version 5). ***, P < 0.001 compared with the results obtained for the animals treated with the vehicle control; *, P < 0.05 compared with the results obtained for the animals treated with the vehicle control. The results for the different compounds did not differ significantly from each other.
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Transgenic mice were treated orally for 14 days with vehicle or with the indicated doses of adefovir dipivoxil (closed squares), HDP-(S)-HPMPA (closed triangles), 15M-HDP-(S)-HPMPA (open circles), or ODE-(S)-HPMPA (open diamonds). Adefovir dipivoxil-treated group had 3 to 5 animals per group, while the groups treated with HDP-(S)-HPMPA and 15M-HDP-(S)-HPMPA had 4 to 13 animals per group. The liver HBV DNA level was determined by Southern blot hybridization and is expressed as a percentage of the level for the untreated controls.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Comparison of liver HBV DNA levels in HBV transgenic mice after oral administration of adefovir dipivoxil and the alkoxyalkyl esters of (S)-HPMPAa
|
|
|
|---|
The mechanism of action of HPMPApp on HBV DNA production is unknown, as there have been no detailed studies of the effects of HPMPApp on the HBV DNA polymerase. Regarding other viral polymerases, workers previously found that (S)-HPMPA blocked adenovirus DNA polymerase at the level of chain elongation (22). The mechanism of action against the vaccinia virus E9L DNA polymerase has recently been reported (20). We found that HPMPApp is an excellent substrate for the E9L polymerase, with Km and Vmax values similar to those of dATP. It is readily incorporated into the growing DNA strand and does not slow chain extension but blocks 3'-to-5' exonuclease activity when it is in the penultimate position. When it is at the primer terminus, HPMPA can still be excised. However, when it is incorporated into the template strand, these templates cannot be extended across the (S)-HPMPA residues, blocking further rounds of replication and leading to template strand inhibition (20).
HDP-(S)-HPMPA is highly orally bioavailable (Table 4), as has previously been shown with HDP-cidofovir (4) and HDP-tenofovir (23). Excellent liver exposure is also a benefit of oral administration, which seems to be particularly useful for the treatment of HBV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. The toxicity of oral HDP-(S)-HPMPA is primarily to the gastrointestinal tract and is characterized by weight loss and diarrhea in mice (K. Y. Hostetler and J. Trahan, unpublished data), while (S)-HPMPA itself is toxic to the liver and the kidney when it is given parenterally (27). Smeijsters et al. (27) studied (S)-HPMPA given parenterally to mice infected with Plasmodium berghei. They found that a cumulative dose of 28 mg/kg given via an osmotic minipump was lethal and that liver damage and kidney damage were the prominent toxicities (27). In this study, we gave an oral cumulative dose of 56 mg/kg over 14 days and did not detect any observable morbidity or mortality. Thus, HDP-(S)-HPMPA given orally appears to be less toxic than (S)-HPMPA given parenterally. Surprisingly, HDP-(S)-HPMPA and ODE-(S)-HPMPA have also been shown to have activity against HCV genotype 1a, 1b, and 2a replicons at low micromolar concentrations (28).
In summary, we compared the antiviral activities of HDP-(S)-HPMPA, ODE-(S)-HPMPA, and 15M-HDP-(S)-HPMPA administered orally with that of adefovir dipivoxil administered orally in the HBV transgenic mouse. All compounds were active in this animal model of HBV infection, and there was no statistically significant difference between the four treatments. Given their activities against both HBV and HCV, these compounds appear to be worthy of further investigation as possible treatments for HBV and HCV infections.
Dr. Hostetler has an equity interest and serves as a consultant to Chimerix Inc. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of California, San Diego, in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.
Published ahead of print on 27 April 2009. ![]()
|
|
|---|
, J. Jindrich, L. Naesens, R. Snoeck, D. Schols, and E. De Clercq. 1993. Differential antiherpesvirus and antiretrovirus effects of the (S) and (R) enantiomers of acyclic nucleoside phosphonates: potent and selective in vitro and in vivo antiretrovirus activities of (R)-9-(2-phosphonomethyoxypropyl)-2,6-diaminopurine. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:332-338.
, I. Rosenberg, T. Sakuma, J. Balzarini, and P. C. Maudgal. 1986. A novel selective broad-spectrum anti-DNA virus agent. Nature 323:464-467.[CrossRef][Medline]
. 1987. Antiviral activity of phosphonylmethoxyalkyl derivatives of purine and pyrimidines. Antivir. Res. 8:261-272.[CrossRef][Medline]
, A. 2003. Phosphonomethoxyalkyl analogs of nucleotides. Curr. Pharm. Des. 9:2567-2592.[CrossRef][Medline]
. 1987. Acyclic nucleotide analogs. Part II. Synthesis of potential prodrugs and metabolites of 9-(S)-(3-hydroxy-2-phophonylmethoxypropyl)adenine. Coll. Czech. Chem. Commun. 52:2792-2800.This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»