This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Avila, J L
Right arrow Articles by Casanova, M A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Avila, J L
Right arrow Articles by Casanova, M A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 September; 22(3): 380-385

Comparative effects of 4-aminopyrazolopyrimidine, its 2'-deoxyriboside derivative, and allopurinol on in vitro growth of American Leishmania species.

J L Avila and M A Casanova

ABSTRACT

When assayed on promastigotes of 10 American Leishmania isolates (including Leishmania brasiliensis and mexicana species), 4-aminopyrazolopyrimidine (AAP) was severalfold more active than allopurinol as a leishmanistatic drug. There were some intraspecific and interspecific differences among the isolates in their susceptibility to the inhibitory effects of APP and allopurinol. APP-2'-deoxyriboside did not affect the 10 isolates tested. This was surprising, because allopurinol riboside has previously been shown to be more active than allopurinol. In all of the American Leishmania isolates tested, the metabolism of [14C]6-APP resulted in a high level of HPP-ribose-5'-P and lower levels of APP-ribose-5'-P, APP-ribose-5'-PP, and APP-ribose-5'-PPP. MP, LR, LBY, and JAP isolates strongly converted APP into APP derivatives, thus perhaps explaining their greater susceptibility to the inhibitory effects of APP. With the 10 American Leishmania isolates tested, several purines reversed the inhibitory effects of allopurinol, but only adenine countered the inhibitory effects of APP. This suggests biochemical differences in the mechanisms of action of allopurinol and APP. Finally, and contrary to previous claims, the reversal by purines of the allopurinol-induced growth inhibition was not a Leishmania species-specific effect.


Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 September; 22(3): 380-385




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Amato, V. S., Tuon, F. F., Siqueira, A. M., Nicodemo, A. C., Neto, V. A. (2007). Treatment of Mucosal Leishmaniasis in Latin America: Systematic Review. Am J Trop Med Hyg 77: 266-274 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Croft, S. L., Sundar, S., Fairlamb, A. H. (2006). Drug Resistance in Leishmaniasis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19: 111-126 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Al-Salabi, M. I., de Koning, H. P. (2005). Purine Nucleobase Transport in Amastigotes of Leishmania mexicana: Involvement in Allopurinol Uptake. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 3682-3689 [Abstract] [Full Text]