This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fung-Tomc, J
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, R E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fung-Tomc, J
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, R E

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 December; 35(12): 2652-2654

In vitro activities of cefepime alone and with amikacin against aminoglycoside-resistant gram-negative bacteria.

J Fung-Tomc, E Huczko, B Kolek, C Thater and R E Kessler

Department of Microbiology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492.

ABSTRACT

The in vitro activity of cefepime was compared with those of ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and cefpirome against aminoglycoside-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Cefepime was the most active cephalosporin, with a MIC for 90% of strains tested for all non-Pseudomonas aeruginosa species of less than or equal to 4 micrograms/ml. No cefepime resistance was encountered among members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Of the 40 aminoglycoside-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates, 15% were resistant to cefepime, compared with 18% for ceftazidime, 30% for cefpirome, and 35% for cefotaxime. Synergism between cefepime and amikacin was observed and occurred most frequently in P. aeruginosa strains resistant to cefepime but susceptible to amikacin. In no case did cefepime and amikacin exhibit antagonism against P. aeruginosa.


Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 December; 35(12): 2652-2654