Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Aug 1995, 1797-1801, Vol 39, No. 8
DM Cappelletty, SL Kang, SM Palmer and MJ Rybak
We compared the pharmacodynamics and killing activity of ceftazidime,
administered by continuous infusion and intermittent bolus, against
Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and ceftazidime-resistant P. aeruginosa
27853CR with and without a single daily dose of amikacin in an in vitro
infection model over a 48-h period. Resistance to ceftazidime was selected
for by serial passage of P. aeruginosa onto agar containing increasing
concentrations of ceftazidime. Human pharmacokinetics and dosages were
simulated as follows: half-life, 2 h; intermittent-bolus ceftazidime, 2 g
every 8 h (q8h) and q12h; continuous infusion, 2-g loading dose and
maintenance infusions of 5, 10, and 20 micrograms/ml; amikacin, 15 mg/kg
q24h. There was no significant difference in time to 99.9% killing between
any of the monotherapy regimens or between any combination regimen against
ceftazidime-susceptible P. aeruginosa. Continuous infusions of 10 and 20
micrograms/ml killed as effectively as an intermittent bolus of 2 g q12h
and q8h, respectively. Continuous infusion of 20 micrograms/ml and an
intermittent bolus of 2 g q8h were the only regimens which prevented
organism regrowth at 48 h, while a continuous infusion of 5 micrograms/ml
resulted in the most regrowth. All of the combination regimens exhibited a
synergistic response, with rapid killing of ceftazidime-susceptible P.
aeruginosa and no regrowth. Against ceftazidime-resistant P. aeruginosa,
none of the ceftazidime monotherapy regimens achieved 99.9% killing. The
combination regimens exhibited the same rapid killing of the resistant
strain as occurred with the susceptible strain; however, regrowth occurred
with all regimens.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Pharmacodynamics of ceftazidime administered as continuous infusion or intermittent bolus alone and in combination with single daily-dose amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in an in vitro infection model
Department of Pharmacy Services, Detroit Receiving Hospital/University Health Center, Michigan, USA.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»