Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 1998, p. 83-87, Vol. 42, No. 1
Institute for Animal Health, Compton,
Newbury, Berkshire RG20 7NN, United Kingdom,1
and
Bayer AG, Animal Health, Clinical Development, D-51368
Leverkusen, Germany2
Received 5 May 1997/Returned for modification 11 August
1997/Accepted 17 October 1997
This study compared the efficacy of continuous or pulsed-water
medication with enrofloxacin, danofloxacin, and sarafloxacin in eight
groups of 90 chicks each by using an infectious bronchitis virus-Escherichia coli model of colisepticemia. The model
produced lesions of typical those occurring in birds with severe
colisepticemia; for the infected, nonmedicated birds the mortality was
43.5% and the morbidity was 89%, 17.8% of birds had severe lesions,
and the birds had a mean air sac lesion score of 2.58. This experiment showed that continuous dosing and pulsed dosing are clinically equivalent. However, for all fluoroquinolones studied, there was a
trend for the continuously mediated birds to have lower mortality and
less severe disease than birds receiving pulsed doses. Compared with
infected, nonmedicated controls, only birds continuously medicated with
enrofloxacin had a significantly lower morbidity (32%), and only birds
medicated with enrofloxacin and danofloxacin (continuous and pulsed
treatments) had significantly lower mortality (6.7 and 11.0% and 16.8 and 19.2% for continuous and pulsed treatments with enrofloxacin and
danofloxacin, respectively). A significantly lower proportion of birds
only in the groups medicated with enrofloxacin had severe lesions (for
birds receiving continuous and pulsed treatments, 2.2 and 6.7%,
respectively). Birds medicated with any of the three fluoroquinolones
(continuous and pulsed treatments) except pulsed-water treatment with
sarafloxacin had significantly reduced mean air sac lesion scores
compared with the scores for nonmedicated birds (air sac lesion scores,
0.60 and 0.83, 1.38 and 1.63, and 1.80 and 2.05 for birds receiving
continuous and pulsed treatments with enrofloxacin, danofloxacin, and
sarafloxacin, respectively). The performance of the birds that survived
the challenge or that recovered after receiving medication was not compromised compared to the performance of noninfected birds. Enrofloxacin was more efficacious than either danofloxacin or sarafloxacin for the treatment of colisepticemia in chickens by medication in drinking water. Similarly, danofloxacin appeared to be
more effective than sarafloxacin in treating colisepticemia.
0066-4804/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Comparison of the Efficacies of Three
Fluoroquinolone Antimicrobial Agents, Given as Continuous or
Pulsed-Water Medication, against Escherichia coli Infection
in Chickens
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute for
Animal Health, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire RG20 7NN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1635-577300. Fax: 44-1635-577299. E-mail: BryanCharleston{at}bbsrc.ac.uk.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |