This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Akova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Akalin, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Akova, M.
Right arrow Articles by Akalin, H. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 1999, p. 1298-1300, Vol. 43, No. 5
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

In Vitro Activities of Antibiotics Alone and in Combination against Brucella melitensis at Neutral and Acidic pHs

Murat Akova,* Deniz Gür,dagger David M. Livermore,Dagger Tanil Kocagöz,§ and H. Erdal Akalinparallel

Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, 06100 Ankara, Turkey

Received 17 September 1998/Returned for modification 7 January 1999/Accepted 20 February 1999

Brucellae survive acidic pHs in phagolysosomes. Azithromycin, streptomycin, and quinolones were active against Brucella melitensis at pH 7.0 but not at pH 5.0; rifampin and doxycycline retained activity at pH 5.0. Regardless of pH, azithromycin-rifampin and ofloxacin-rifampin showed less synergy than established streptomycin-doxycycline and rifampin-doxycycline combinations.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara 06100, Turkey. Phone: 90-312-311 1271. Fax: 90-312-310 4179. E-mail: ma08-k{at}tr-net.net.tr.

dagger Present address: Department of Pediatrics, Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Dagger Present address: Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring and Reference Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, Colindale, London NW9 5HT, United Kingdom.

§ Present address: Department of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

parallel Present address: Pfizer Ilaçlari A.Ş., Ortaköy 80840, Istanbul, Turkey.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 1999, p. 1298-1300, Vol. 43, No. 5
0066-4804/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Toth, M., Chow, J. W., Mobashery, S., Vakulenko, S. B. (2009). Source of Phosphate in the Enzymic Reaction as a Point of Distinction among Aminoglycoside 2''-Phosphotransferases. J. Biol. Chem. 284: 6690-6696 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Falagas, M. E., Bliziotis, I. A. (2006). Quinolones for Treatment of Human Brucellosis: Critical Review of the Evidence from Microbiological and Clinical Studies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 22-33 [Full Text]  
  • Vakulenko, S. B., Mobashery, S. (2003). Versatility of Aminoglycosides and Prospects for Their Future. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16: 430-450 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Maurin, M., Raoult, D. (2001). Use of Aminoglycosides in Treatment of Infections Due to Intracellular Bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45: 2977-2986 [Full Text]  
  • Gur, D., Kocagoz, S., Akova, M., Unal, S. (1999). Comparison of E Test to Microdilution for Determining In Vitro Activities of Antibiotics against Brucella melitensis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43: 2337-2337 [Full Text]