Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, March 2000, p. 697-704, Vol. 44, No. 3
Novartis Pharma AG, Basel,
Switzerland1; Shoklo Malaria Research
Unit, Mae Sot, Tak Province,2 and
Hospital for Tropical Diseases4 and
Department of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Faculty of Tropical
Medicine, Mahidol University,5 Bangkok,
Thailand; Division of Infectious Diseases, Tropical Medicine,
and AIDS, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
The Netherlands3; and Centre for
Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, John
Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, United
Kingdom6
Received 3 November 1998/Returned for modification 11 August
1999/Accepted 1 December 1999
The objective of this study was to conduct a prospective population
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of lumefantrine during
blinded comparisons of artemether-lumefantrine treatment regimens in
uncomplicated multidrug-resistant falciparum malaria. Three combination
regimens containing an average adult lumefantrine dose of 1,920 mg over
3 days (four doses) (regimen A) or 2,780 mg over 3 or 5 days (six
doses) (regimen B or C, respectively) were given to 266 Thai patients.
Detailed observations were obtained for 51 hospitalized adults, and
sparse data were collected for 215 patients of all ages in a community
setting. The population absorption half-life of lumefantrine was
4.5 h. The model-based median (5th and 95th percentiles) peak
plasma lumefantrine concentrations were 6.2 (0.25 and 14.8) µg/ml
after regimen A, 9.0 (1.1 and 19.8) µg/ml after regimen B, and 8 (1.4 and 17.4) µg/ml after regimen C. During acute malaria, there was
marked variability in the fraction of drug absorbed by patients
(coefficient of variation, 150%). The fraction increased considerably
and variability fell with clinical recovery, largely because food
intake was resumed; taking a normal meal close to drug administration
increased oral bioavailability by 108% (90% confidence interval, 64 to 164) (P, 0.0001). The higher-dose regimens (B and C)
gave 60 and 100% higher areas under the concentration-time curves
(AUC), respectively, and thus longer durations for which plasma
lumefantrine concentrations exceeded the putative in vivo MIC of 280 µg/ml (median for regimen B, 252 h; that for regimen C, 298 h; that for regimen A, 204 h [P, 0.0001]) and higher
cure rates. Lumefantrine oral bioavailability is very dependent on food
and is consequently poor in acute malaria but improves markedly with
recovery. The high cure rates with the two six-dose regimens resulted
from increased AUC and increased time at which lumefantrine
concentrations were above the in vivo MIC.
0066-4804/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
of Lumefantrine (Benflumetol) in Acute Falciparum Malaria
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Faculty of
Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, 420/6 Rajvithi Rd., Bangkok
10400, Thailand. Phone: 66 2 246 0832. Fax: 66 2 246 7795. E-mail: fnnjw{at}diamond.mahidol.ac.th.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»