This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boucher, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Eliopoulos, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boucher, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Eliopoulos, G. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2001, p. 208-211, Vol. 45, No. 1
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.1.208-211.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

In Vivo Activity of Evernimicin (SCH 27899) against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Experimental Infective Endocarditis

Helen W. Boucher,1,2 Claudie Thauvin-Eliopoulos,1,2 David Loebenberg,3 and George M. Eliopoulos1,2,*

Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, 022151; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 021152; and Schering-Plough Research Institute, Kenilworth, New Jersey 070333

Received 27 March 2000/Returned for modification 31 July 2000/Accepted 26 October 2000

Currently, there exist few satisfactory alternatives to vancomycin for therapy of serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. We employed a rat model of aortic valve endocarditis to assess the potential efficacy of evernimicin (SCH 27899) compared with vancomycin against infection with a strain susceptible to both agents (MICs of 0.25 and 0.50 µg/ml, respectively). Infected animals were assigned to one of three groups: controls (no treatment), evernimicin at 60 mg/kg of body weight by intravenous (i.v.) infusion once daily, or vancomycin at 150 mg/kg of body weight per day by continuous i.v. infusion. Therapy was administered for 5.5 days. At the start of therapy, colony counts in vegetations were 6.63 ± 0.44 log10 CFU/g. In both treatment groups, bacterial density within vegetations was significantly reduced in comparison with control animals that had not been treated. Final colony counts were as follows (mean ± standard deviation): controls, 10.12 ± 1.51 log10 CFU/g of vegetation; evernimicin, 7.22 ± 2.91 log10 CFU/g of vegetation; vancomycin, 5.65 ± 1.76 log10 CFU/g of vegetation. The difference between the evernimicin and vancomycin groups was not significant. These results confirmed the bacteriostatic activity of evernimicin in vivo in an experimental model of severe MRSA infection.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, One Deaconess Rd., Boston, MA 02215. Phone: (617) 632-8586. Fax: (617) 632-7442. E-mail: geliopou{at}caregroup.harvard.edu.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2001, p. 208-211, Vol. 45, No. 1
0066-4804/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.1.208-211.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.