This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tam, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Coyle, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tam, V. H.
Right arrow Articles by Coyle, E. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2005, p. 4920-4927, Vol. 49, No. 12
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.12.4920-4927.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Optimization of Meropenem Minimum Concentration/MIC Ratio To Suppress In Vitro Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Vincent H. Tam,1* Amy N. Schilling,1 Shadi Neshat,2 Keith Poole,2 David A. Melnick,3 and Elizabeth A. Coyle1

University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Houston, Texas,1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada,2 AstraZeneca, Wilmington, Delaware3

Received 18 July 2005/ Returned for modification 31 August 2005/ Accepted 12 September 2005

Suppression of resistance in a dense Pseudomonas aeruginosa population has previously been shown with optimized quinolone exposures. However, the relevance to ß-lactams is unknown. We investigated the bactericidal activity of meropenem and its propensity to suppress P. aeruginosa resistance in an in vitro hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Two isogenic strains of P. aeruginosa (wild type and an AmpC stably derepressed mutant [MIC = 1 mg/liter]) were used. An HFIM inoculated with approximately 1 x 108 CFU/ml of bacteria was subjected to various meropenem exposures. Maintenance doses were given every 8 h to simulate the maximum concentration achieved after a 1-g dose in all regimens, but escalating unbound minimum concentrations (Cmins) were simulated with different clearances. Serial samples were obtained over 5 days to quantify the meropenem concentrations, the total bacterial population, and subpopulations with reduced susceptibilities to meropenem (>3x the MIC). For both strains, a significant bacterial burden reduction was seen with all regimens at 24 h. Regrowth was apparent after 3 days, with the Cmin/MIC ratio being ≤1.7 (time above the MIC, 100%). Selective amplification of subpopulations with reduced susceptibilities to meropenem was suppressed with a Cmin/MIC of ≥6.2 or by adding tobramycin to meropenem (Cmin/MIC = 1.7). Investigations that were longer than 24 h and that used high inocula may be necessary to fully evaluate the relationship between drug exposures and the likelihood of resistance suppression. These results suggest that the Cmin/MIC of meropenem can be optimized to suppress the emergence of non-plasmid-mediated P. aeruginosa resistance. Our in vitro data support the use of an extended duration of meropenem infusion for the treatment of severe nosocomial infections in combination with an aminoglycoside.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: University of Houston College of Pharmacy, 1441 Moursund Street, Houston, TX 77030. Phone: (713) 795-8316. Fax: (713) 795-8383. E-mail: vtam{at}uh.edu.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2005, p. 4920-4927, Vol. 49, No. 12
0066-4804/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.49.12.4920-4927.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • van den Anker, J. N., Pokorna, P., Kinzig-Schippers, M., Martinkova, J., de Groot, R., Drusano, G. L., Sorgel, F. (2009). Meropenem Pharmacokinetics in the Newborn. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 3871-3879 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Peleg, A. Y., Seifert, H., Paterson, D. L. (2008). Acinetobacter baumannii: Emergence of a Successful Pathogen. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 21: 538-582 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Burgess, D. S., Rapp, R. P. (2008). Bugs versus drugs: Addressing the pharmacist's challenge. Am J Health Syst Pharm 65: S4-S15 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tam, V. H., Schilling, A. N., Poole, K., Nikolaou, M. (2007). Mathematical modelling response of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to meropenem. J Antimicrob Chemother 60: 1302-1309 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Henrichfreise, B., Wiegand, I., Luhmer-Becker, I., Wiedemann, B. (2007). Development of Resistance in Wild-Type and Hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Exposed to Clinical Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Meropenem and Ceftazidime Simulated In Vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 3642-3649 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Li, C., Du, X., Kuti, J. L., Nicolau, D. P. (2007). Clinical Pharmacodynamics of Meropenem in Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 1725-1730 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tam, V. H., Louie, A., Deziel, M. R., Liu, W., Drusano, G. L. (2007). The Relationship between Quinolone Exposures and Resistance Amplification Is Characterized by an Inverted U: a New Paradigm for Optimizing Pharmacodynamics To Counterselect Resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 744-747 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pournaras, S., Ikonomidis, A., Markogiannakis, A., Spanakis, N., Maniatis, A. N., Tsakris, A. (2007). Characterization of clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa heterogeneously resistant to carbapenems. J Med Microbiol 56: 66-70 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lau, W. K., Mercer, D., Itani, K. M., Nicolau, D. P., Kuti, J. L., Mansfield, D., Dana, A. (2006). Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Study of Piperacillin-Tazobactam Administered by Continuous Infusion versus Intermittent Infusion for Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 3556-3561 [Abstract] [Full Text]