This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Other Versions of this Article: AAC.00676-06v1 50/12/4053    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Haenni, M. Articles by Moreillon, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Haenni, M. Articles by Moreillon, P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, December 2006, p. 4053-4061, Vol. 50, No. 12
0066-4804/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00676-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Mutations in Penicillin-Binding Protein (PBP) Genes and in Non-PBP Genes during Selection of Penicillin-Resistant Streptococcus gordonii

Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Switzerland

Received 2 June 2006/ Returned for modification 6 August 2006/ Accepted 15 September 2006

Penicillin resistance in Streptococcus spp. involves multiple mutations in both penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) and non-PBP genes. Here, we studied the development of penicillin resistance in the oral commensal Streptococcus gordonii. Cyclic exposure of bacteria to twofold-increasing penicillin concentrations selected for a progressive 250- to 500-fold MIC increase (from 0.008 to between 2 and 4 µg/ml). The major MIC increase (35-fold) was related to non-PBP mutations, whereas PBP mutations accounted only for a 4- to 8-fold additional increase. PBP mutations occurred in class B PBPs 2X and 2B, which carry a transpeptidase domain, but not in class A PBP 1A, 1B, or 2A, which carry an additional transglycosylase domain. Therefore, we tested whether inactivation of class A PBPs affected resistance development in spite of the absence of mutations. Deletion of PBP 1A or 2A profoundly slowed down resistance development but only moderately affected resistance in already highly resistant mutants (MIC = 2 to 4 µg/ml). Thus, class A PBPs might facilitate early development of resistance by stabilizing penicillin-altered peptidoglycan via transglycosylation, whereas they might be less indispensable in highly resistant mutants which have reestablished a penicillin-insensitive cell wall-building machinery. The contribution of PBP and non-PBP mutations alone could be individualized in DNA transformation. Both PBP and non-PBP mutations conferred some level of intrinsic resistance, but combining the mutations synergized them to ensure high-level resistance (2 µg/ml). The results underline the complexity of penicillin resistance development and suggest that inhibition of transglycosylase might be an as yet underestimated way to interfere with early resistance development.

Published ahead of print on 25 September 2006.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Haenni, M., Moreillon, P. (2008). Fitness Cost and Impaired Survival in Penicillin-Resistant Streptococcus gordonii Isolates Selected in the Laboratory. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52: 337-339 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Morand, B., Muhlemann, K. (2007). Heteroresistance to penicillin in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 14098-14103 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Haenni, M., Moreillon, P., Lazarevic, V. (2007). Promoter and Transcription Analysis of Penicillin-Binding Protein Genes in Streptococcus gordonii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51: 2774-2783 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Haenni, M., Majcherczyk, P. A., Barblan, J.-L., Moreillon, P. (2006). Mutational Analysis of Class A and Class B Penicillin-Binding Proteins in Streptococcus gordonii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 4062-4069 [Abstract] [Full Text]