This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antachopoulos, C.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Antachopoulos, C.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, T. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2008, p. 321-328, Vol. 52, No. 1
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00699-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparative In Vitro Pharmacodynamics of Caspofungin, Micafungin, and Anidulafungin against Germinated and Nongerminated Aspergillus Conidia{triangledown}

Charalampos Antachopoulos,1 Joseph Meletiadis,1 Tin Sein,1 Emmanuel Roilides,1,2 and Thomas J. Walsh1*

Immunocompromised Host Section, Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland,1 Third Department of Pediatrics, Aristotle University, Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece2

Received 29 May 2007/ Returned for modification 9 July 2007/ Accepted 8 October 2007

The concentration-dependent effects of echinocandins on the metabolic activity of Aspergillus spp. were comparatively studied by using nongerminated and germinated conidia. The susceptibilities of 11 Aspergillus fumigatus, 8 A. terreus and 8 A. flavus isolates to caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin were studied by a CLSI (formerly NCCLS) M38-A broth microdilution-based method. After 48 h of incubation the minimum effective concentration (MEC) was defined microscopically. Metabolic activity was assessed by the 2,3-bis-(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide assay and modeled by using the sigmoid (Emax) or "bell-shaped" model. The median MEC values of caspofungin (0.5 to 1 µg/ml), micafungin (0.06 to 0.12 µg/ml), and anidulafungin (0.03 µg/ml) against nongerminated conidia increased by 0 to 1, 1 to 2, and 2 to 3 twofold dilutions, respectively (depending on the species), over those against germinated conidia. A similar shift to the right was demonstrated for the corresponding curves of metabolic activity. There was a significant correlation between the degrees of maximal metabolic inhibition caused by different echinocandins at both the species level (greater inhibition for A. flavus) and the strain level (r = 0.84 to 0.93; P < 0.0001). Paradoxical increases in metabolism in the presence of higher concentrations of caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin were detected in 6, 2, and 5 of the A. fumigatus isolates, respectively; 5, 1, and 2 of the A. terreus isolates, respectively; and 1, 0, and 0 of the A. flavus isolates, respectively. Based on the model, 50% of the maximal paradoxical increase was detected with 4.2, 11.1, and 10.8 µg/ml of caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin, respectively. All echinocandins therefore exerted comparable levels of maximal metabolic inhibition against Aspergillus spp. at concentrations that were differentially increased for germinated versus nongerminated conidia. The paradoxical increase in metabolism occurred more frequently and at lower concentrations with caspofungin than with micafungin and anidulafungin.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, CRC, Rm 1-5750, MSC 1100, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892. Phone: (301) 402-0023. Fax: (301) 480-2308. E-mail: walsht{at}mail.nih.gov

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 15 October 2007.


Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2008, p. 321-328, Vol. 52, No. 1
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AAC.00699-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ikawa, K., Nomura, K., Morikawa, N., Ikeda, K., Taniwaki, M. (2009). Assessment of micafungin regimens by pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis: a dosing strategy for Aspergillus infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 64: 840-844 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Pfaller, M. A., Boyken, L., Hollis, R. J., Kroeger, J., Messer, S. A., Tendolkar, S., Diekema, D. J. (2009). In Vitro Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates of Aspergillus spp. to Anidulafungin, Caspofungin, and Micafungin: a Head-to-Head Comparison Using the CLSI M38-A2 Broth Microdilution Method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 3323-3325 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Spreghini, E., Orlando, F., Santinelli, A., Pisa, E., Loretelli, C., Manso, E., Milici, M. E., Scalise, G., Barchiesi, F. (2009). Anidulafungin in Combination with Amphotericin B against Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 4035-4039 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cuenca-Estrella, M., Gomez-Lopez, A., Mellado, E., Monzon, A., Buitrago, M. J., Rodriguez-Tudela, J. L. (2009). Activity Profile In Vitro of Micafungin against Spanish Clinical Isolates of Common and Emerging Species of Yeasts and Molds. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 2192-2195 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nicasio, A. M., Tessier, P. R., Nicolau, D. P., Knauft, R. F., Russomanno, J., Shore, E., Kuti, J. L. (2009). Bronchopulmonary Disposition of Micafungin in Healthy Adult Volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 53: 1218-1220 [Abstract] [Full Text]