Previous Article | Next Article 
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2008, p. 37-44, Vol. 52, No. 1
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00551-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of Ceftobiprole Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections Caused by Gram-Positive Bacteria
Gary J. Noel,1*
Richard S. Strauss,1
Karen Amsler,1
Markus Heep,2
Rienk Pypstra,2 and
Joseph S. Solomkin3
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C., Raritan, New Jersey,1
Basilea Pharmaceutica Ltd., Basel, Switzerland,2
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio3
Received 25 April 2007/
Returned for modification 27 July 2007/
Accepted 12 September 2007
Ceftobiprole is the first broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) to be assessed in late-stage clinical trials. As a pivotal step in the clinical development of ceftobiprole, a multicenter, global, randomized, double-blind trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of ceftobiprole to that of vancomycin in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) caused by gram-positive bacteria. The primary objective was to assess noninferiority on the basis of the cure rates 7 to 14 days after the completion of therapy in patients administered ceftobiprole 500 mg every 12 h or vancomycin 1 g every 12 h. Of 784 patients randomized, 282 receiving ceftobiprole and 277 receiving vancomycin were clinically evaluable. Of these patients, 93.3% treated with ceftobiprole and 93.5% treated with vancomycin were cured (95% confidence interval of difference, –4.4%, 3.9%). The cure rates for patients with MRSA infections were 91.8% (56/61) with ceftobiprole treatment and 90.0% (54/60) with vancomycin treatment (95% confidence interval of difference, –8.4%, 12.1%). At least one adverse event (AE) was reported by 52% of the ceftobiprole-treated patients and 51% of the vancomycin-treated patients. The most common AEs reported by the ceftobiprole-treated patients were nausea (14%) and taste disturbance (8%). Discontinuation of the study drug because of treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 4% (n = 17) of the ceftobiprole-treated patients and 6% (n = 22) of the vancomycin-treated patients. The results of this trial support the use of ceftobiprole as an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with cSSSIs caused by a spectrum of gram-positive bacteria.
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C., 900 Route 202, Raritan, NJ 08869. Phone: (908) 704-4316. Fax: (908) 595-0843. E-mail:
GNoel1{at}prdus.jnj.com
Published ahead of print on 22 October 2007.
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, January 2008, p. 37-44, Vol. 52, No. 1
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.00551-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Llarrull, L. I., Fisher, J. F., Mobashery, S.
(2009). Molecular Basis and Phenotype of Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Insights into New {beta}-Lactams That Meet the Challenge. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 4051-4063
[Full Text]
-
Zhanel, G. G., Voth, D., Nichol, K., Karlowsky, J. A., Noreddin, A. M., Hoban, D. J.
(2009). Pharmacodynamic activity of ceftobiprole compared with vancomycin versus methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) using an in vitro model. J Antimicrob Chemother
64: 364-369
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kimko, H., Xu, X., Nandy, P., Samtani, M. N., Strauss, R. S., Bagchi, P., Noel, G. J.
(2009). Pharmacodynamic Profiling of Ceftobiprole for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 3371-3374
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Barbour, A., Schmidt, S., Sabarinath, S. N., Grant, M., Seubert, C., Skee, D., Murthy, B., Derendorf, H.
(2009). Soft-Tissue Penetration of Ceftobiprole in Healthy Volunteers Determined by In Vivo Microdialysis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 2773-2776
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kimko, H., Murthy, B., Xu, X., Nandy, P., Strauss, R., Noel, G. J.
(2009). Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Ceftobiprole for Treatment of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
53: 1228-1230
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Amsler, K. M., Davies, T. A., Shang, W., Jacobs, M. R., Bush, K.
(2008). In Vitro Activity of Ceftobiprole against Pathogens from Two Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 3418-3423
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Leonard, S. N., Cheung, C. M., Rybak, M. J.
(2008). Activities of Ceftobiprole, Linezolid, Vancomycin, and Daptomycin against Community-Associated and Hospital-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
52: 2974-2976
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Anderson, S. D, Gums, J. G
(2008). Ceftobiprole: An Extended-Spectrum Anti-Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Cephalosporin. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy
42: 806-816
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
(2008). Ceftobiprole vs. Vancomycin for Complicated Skin Infections. JWatch Infect. Diseases
2008: 1-1
[Full Text]