Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, May 2008, p. 1642-1646, Vol. 52, No. 5
0066-4804/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/AAC.01314-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Assistance Publique hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, Service de Pharmacie Clinique, Paris, France,1 Assistance Publique hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Service de Bactériologie-Virologie, Paris, France,2 Inserm, U897, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux School of Public Health (ISPED), Bordeaux, France,3 Assistance Publique hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Paris, France,4 Université Paris VI, Inserm, U552, Hôpital Bichat, Assistance Publique hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France5
Received 11 October 2007/ Returned for modification 28 November 2007/ Accepted 7 February 2008
The inhibitory quotient (IQ) of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (PIs), which is the ratio of drug concentration to viral susceptibility, is considered to be predictive of the virological response. We used several approaches to calculate the IQs of amprenavir and lopinavir in a subset of heavily pretreated patients participating in the French National Agency for AIDS Research (ANRS) 104 trial and then compared their potentials for predicting changes in the plasma HIV RNA level. Thirty-seven patients were randomly assigned to receive either amprenavir (600 mg twice a day [BID]) or lopinavir (400 mg BID) plus ritonavir (100 or 200 mg BID) for 2 weeks before combining the two PIs. The 90% inhibitory concentration (IC90) was measured using a recombinant assay without or with additional human serum (IC90+serum). Total and unbound PI concentrations in plasma were measured. Univariate linear regression was used to estimate the relation between the change in viral load and the IC90 or IQ values. The amprenavir phenotypic IQ values were very similar when measured with the standard and protein binding-adjusted IC90s. No relationship was found between the viral load decline and the lopinavir IQ. During combination therapy, the amprenavir and lopinavir genotypic IQ values were predictive of the viral response at week 6 (P = 0.03). The number of protease mutations (<5 or
5) was related to the virological response throughout the study. These findings suggest that the combined genotypic IQ and the number of protease mutations are the best predictors of virological response. High amprenavir and lopinavir concentrations in these patients might explain why plasma concentrations and the phenotypic IQ have poor predictive value.
Published ahead of print on 19 February 2008.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»