AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 18 June 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AAC.00262-07v1
51/9/3298    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruhe, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Menon, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruhe, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Menon, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/AAC.00262-07
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Tetracyclines as an Oral Treatment Option for Patients with Community-Onset Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections

Jörg J. Ruhe* and Anupama Menon

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; and Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, Arkansas, U.S.A.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: ruhejorgj{at}uams.edu.


   Abstract

Few data exist on the clinical utility of the second-generation tetracyclines doxycycline and minocycline for the treatment of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTI). We performed a retrospective cohort study on 282 patients who presented with MRSA SSTI to the emergency room or outpatient clinic at two tertiary medical centers between October 2002 and February 2007. Median MRSA susceptibility to tetracycline was 95%. Time zero was defined as the time of the first incision and drainage procedure or, if none was performed, the time of the first positive wound culture. The median patient age was 48 years. Abscesses constituted the majority of clinical presentations (75%), followed by furuncles or carbuncles (13%), and cellulitis originating from a purulent focus of infection (12%). 225 (80%) patients underwent incision and drainage. Doxycycline or minocycline was administered in 90 (32%) episodes; the other 192 SSTI were treated with {beta}-lactams. Treatment failure, defined as the need for a second incision and drainage procedure and/or admission to the hospital by at least two days after time zero, was diagnosed in 28 (10%) episodes at a median of three days after time zero. On logistic regression analysis, receipt of a {beta}-lactam agent was the only clinical characteristic associated with treatment failure (adjusted OR 3.94; 95% CI, 1.28-12.15; P=0.02). The second-generation tetracyclines appear to be a reasonable oral treatment option for patients with community-onset MRSA SSTI in areas where MRSA are susceptible to the tetracyclines.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.