AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 30 October 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AAC.00478-06v1
51/1/154    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vylkova, S.
Right arrow Articles by Edgerton, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vylkova, S.
Right arrow Articles by Edgerton, M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/AAC.00478-06
Copyright (c) 2006, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Human beta-defensins kill Candida albicans in an energy-dependent and salt-sensitive manner without causing membrane disruption

Slavena Vylkova, Namrata Nayyar, Wansheng Li, and Mira Edgerton*

Department of Oral Biology and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine; Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Health Professions

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: edgerto{at}buffalo.edu.


   Abstract

Human {beta}-defensins 2 and 3 (hBD-2 and hBD-3) have potent fungicidal activity in the micromolar range. Although little is known about their mechanism of action against Candida species, some similarities with the antifungal mechanism of salivary peptide histatin 5 (Hst 5) seem to exist. Since hBD-2 and hBD-3 have been reported to cause direct disruption of target cell membranes, we compared the effects of hBD-2 and hBD-3 on C. albicans membrane integrity. Incubation of calcein-loaded C. albicans cells with LD90 dose of hBD-2 resulted in maximal dye efflux of only 10.3 ± 2.8% at 90 min, similar to that induced by Hst 5. In contrast, an LD90 dose of hBD-3 more than doubled calcein release from cells, yet did not result in more than 24% of total release, showing that neither peptide caused gross membrane damage. As for Hst 5, killing of C. albicans cells by hBD-2 and hBD-3 was salt-sensitive, however Ca2+ and Mg2+, inhibited hBD-2, but not hBD3 fungicidal activity. Pretreatment of C. albicans cells with sodium azide resulted in significantly decreased ATP release and susceptibility of cells to hBD-2 and hBD-3. However, hBD-3 killing was partially restored at concentrations ≥ 0.8 µM, showing energy independent mechanisms at higher doses. C. glabrata resistance to Hst 5, hBD2 and hBD3 is not a result of loss of expression of cell wall ssa proteins. The candidacidal effects of hBD-2 - hBD-3, and Hst 5 - hBD-2 pairs was additive, while the interaction index between Hst 5 and hBD-3 was 0.717 (p < 0.05). Thus, candidacidal action of hBD-2 shares many similarities with Hst 5 in terms of salt-sensitivity, ion selectivity and energy requirements, while hBD3 exhibits biphasic concentration-dependent mechanisms of candidacidal action complementary to Hst 5.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.