| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Faculté de Médecine Pitié-Salpêtrière, and Centre National de Référence de la Résistance des Mycobactéries aux Antituberculeux, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 6, Paris, France.; Tibotec Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Johnson and Johnson, Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340 Beerse, Belgium
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email:
kandries{at}prdbe.jnj.com,
The objective of the present study was to identify the optimal R207910-containing regimen to administer to patients who cannot receive rifampin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) because of multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), concomitant use of antiretroviral drugs or toxicity. Mice were infected intravenously with 5x106 CFU of the H37Rv strain and treated 5x/week with R207910 alone, or various combinations of R207910 with the second line drugs amikacin (AMK), pyrazinamide (PZA), moxifloxacin (MXF) and ethionamide (ETH). All R207910-containing regimens were significantly more active than the non-R207910 containing regimens after one month of therapy. When given for 2 months, R207910 alone was more active than the WHO standard first line regimen RIF-INH-PZA. When combined with second line drugs, the combinations were more active than the current recommended regimen for MDR-TB AMK-ETH-MXF-PZA and culture negativity of the both lungs and spleens was reached after 2 months of treatment in almost every case.
Copyright (c) 2006, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.
Combinations of R207910 with drugs used to treat MDR-TB have the potential to shorten treatment duration
![]()
Abstract
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| J. Clin. Microbiol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |