AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 19 February 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AAC.01538-07v1
52/4/1430    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhanel, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hoban, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhanel, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by Hoban, D. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/AAC.01538-07
Copyright (c) 2008, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Antimicrobial Resistant Pathogens in Intensive Care Units in Canada: Results of the Canadian National Intensive Care Unit (CAN-ICU) Study, 2005/2006

George G. Zhanel*, Mel DeCorby, Nancy Laing, Barb Weshnoweski, Ravi Vashisht, Franil Tailor, Kim A. Nichol, Aleksandra Wierzbowski, Patricia J. Baudry, James A. Karlowsky, Philippe Lagacé-Wiens, Andrew Walkty, Melissa McCracken, Michael R. Mulvey, Jack Johnson, The Canadian Antimicrobial Resistance Alliance(CARA), and Daryl J. Hoban

Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, and Departments of Medicine and Clinical Microbiology, Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Canada; Nosocomial Infections Branch, National Microbiology Laboratory, Winnipeg, Canada, International Health Management Associates, Chicago, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: ggzhanel{at}pcs.mb.ca.


   Abstract

Between September 1, 2005 and June 30, 2006, 19 medical centres collected 4,180 isolates recovered from clinical specimens in Canadian intensive care units (ICUs). The 4,180 isolates were collected from respiratory, 2,292 (54.8%); blood, 738 (17.7%); wounds/tissue, 581 (13.9%); and urinary 569 (13.6%) specimens. The ten most common organisms isolated from 79.5% of all clinical specimens were methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA, 16.4%), Escherichia coli (12.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.0%), Haemophilus influenzae (7.9%), coagulase-negative staphylococci/Staphylococcus epidermidis (6.5%), Enterococcus spp. (6.1%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (5.8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (5.8%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, 4.7%), and Enterobacter cloacae (3.9%). MRSA made up 22.3% (197/884) of all S. aureus (90.9% of MRSA were healthcare-associated-HA-MRSA and 9.1% were community-associated-CA-MRSA) while vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) made up 6.7% (11/255) of all enterococci (88.2% of VRE had the vanA genotype). Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae occurred in 3.5% (19/536) and 1.8% (4/224) of isolates, respectively. All 19 ESBL-producing E. coli were PCR-positive for CTX-M, with blaCTX-M-15 occurring in 74% (14/19) of isolates. With MRSA, no resistance was observed to daptomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, and vancomycin, while resistance rates to other agents were: clarithromycin 89.9%, clindamycin 76.1%, fluoroquinolones 90.1-91.8%, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 11.7%. With E. coli, no resistance was observed to amikacin, meropenem and tigecycline, while resistance rates to other agents were: cefazolin 20.1%, cefepime 0.7%, ceftriaxone 3.7%, gentamicin 3.0%, fluoroquinolones 21.1%, piperacillin/tazobactam 1.9%, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 24.8%. Resistance rates with P. aeruginosa were: amikacin 2.6%, cefepime 10.2%, gentamicin 15.2%, fluoroquinolones 23.8-25.5%, meropenem 13.6%, and piperacillin/tazobactam 9.3%. A multi-drug resistant (MDR) phenotype (resistance to ≥ 3 of cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, amikacin or gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin) occurred frequently in P. aeruginosa (12.6%) but uncommonly in E. coli (0.2%), E. cloacae (0.6%) or K. pneumoniae (0%). In conclusion, S. aureus (MSSA and MRSA), E. coli, P. aeruginosa, H. influenzae, Enterococcus spp., S. pneumoniae, and K. pneumoniae are the most common isolates recovered from clinical specimens in Canadian ICUs. A MDR phenotype is common with P. aeruginosa in Canadian ICUs.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.