AAC
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
AAC Accepts, published online ahead of print on 21 May 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AAC.01623-06v1
51/8/2716    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hecht, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gerding, D. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hecht, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gerding, D. N.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. doi:10.1128/AAC.01623-06
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro activity of Fifteen Antimicrobial Agents Against 110 Toxigenic Clostridium difficile Clinical Isolates Collected from 1983-2004

David W. Hecht*, Minerva A. Galang, Susan P. Sambol, James R. Osmolski, Stuart Johnson, and Dale N. Gerding

Loyola University Medical Center and Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL and Edward Hines Jr. Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines IL

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: dhecht{at}lumc.edu.


   Abstract

The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) is increasing and standard treatment is not always effective. Therefore more effective antimicrobial agents and treatment strategies are needed. We used the agar dilution method to determine the in vitro susceptibility of the following antimicrobials against 110 toxigenic, clinical isolates of C. difficile from 1983 to 2004, primarily from the US : doripenem, meropenem, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, OPT-80, ramoplanin, rifalazil, rifaximin, nitazoxanide, tizoxanide, tigecycline, vancomycin, tinidazole and metronidazole. Included in the isolates tested were 6 strains of the toxinotype III, NAP1/BI/027 group implicated in recent US, Canadian and European outbreaks. The most active agents in vitro were rifaximin, rifalazil, tizoxanide, nitazoxanide, and OPT-80 with MIC50/MIC90 (µg/ml) values of 0.0075/0.015, 0.0075/0.03, 0.06/0.125, 0.06/0.125, 0.125/0.125, respectively. However, three isolates demonstrated very high MICs to rifalazil and rifaximin (MIC >256 µg/ml). Ramoplanin, vancomycin, doripenem, and meropenem were also very active in vitro with narrow MIC50/MIC90 ranges. None of the isolates were resistant to metronidazole, the only agent for which there are breakpoints, with tinidazole showing nearly identical results. These in vitro susceptibility results are encouraging and support continued evaluation of selected antimicrobials in clinical trials of treatment for CDAD.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
J. Clin. Microbiol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.