Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Research Article

Roles of ribosomal binding, membrane potential, and electron transport in bacterial uptake of streptomycin and gentamicin.

L E Bryan, S Kwan
L E Bryan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S Kwan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.23.6.835
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The effects of a set of conditions on aminoglycoside uptake were determined. Membrane vesicles either with a membrane potential (delta psi) of -125 mV (adequate to drive lysine uptake) or with succinate, lactate, or phenazine methosulfate did not accumulate gentamicin unless components of protein synthesis were included. Ribosomally resistant (rpsL) Escherichia coli cells demonstrated energy-dependent phase II uptake similar to that of a streptomycin-susceptible strain of E. coli when treated with 100 micrograms of puromycin per ml. Puromycin (100 micrograms/ml) also increased the uptake of the cationic compounds polyamine and arginine. These studies support a role of protein synthesis in aminoglycoside uptake and in the development of energy-dependent phase II. delta psi of cells did not increase either at the initiation of or during energy-dependent phase II, showing that energy-dependent phase II is not due to an elevation of delta psi. In a Bacillus subtilis system, significant streptomycin uptake requires a threshold value of delta psi which varies depending upon the concentration of streptomycin used. At 25 micrograms/ml, the uptake of streptomycin reached maximal levels after exceeding the threshold value, whereas at 100 micrograms/ml there was a gradual increase of the uptake to the maximal after the threshold value was exceeded. Several studies supported the view that electron transport has a specific role other than its requirement to produce the cellular delta psi. The uptake of gentamicin was stimulated to a greater extent by phenazine methosulfate-ascorbate than by the ionophore nigericin in strains of E. coli, although nigericin stimulated delta psi to a greater degree. Cells with 25% of the normal quinone concentration had delta psi values identical to cells with the normal quinone concentration, but the quinone-deficient cells had a significantly lower rate of gentamicin uptake. KCN prevented gentamicin uptake but did not prevent the development of delta psi. The effects of ubiquinone depletion in an E. coli strain were more evident on gentamicin uptake than on ATP-driven glutamine transport or proton motive force-driven proline transport, consistent with a specific requirement for quinones in aminoglycoside uptake. A detailed explanation of the mechanism of accumulation of streptomycin and gentamicin and a proposed mechanism for killing bacterial cells by these agents have been provided.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Roles of ribosomal binding, membrane potential, and electron transport in bacterial uptake of streptomycin and gentamicin.
L E Bryan, S Kwan
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jun 1983, 23 (6) 835-845; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.23.6.835

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Roles of ribosomal binding, membrane potential, and electron transport in bacterial uptake of streptomycin and gentamicin.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
Share
Roles of ribosomal binding, membrane potential, and electron transport in bacterial uptake of streptomycin and gentamicin.
L E Bryan, S Kwan
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jun 1983, 23 (6) 835-845; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.23.6.835
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596