Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Experimental Therapeutics

Efficacies of KY62 against Leishmania amazonensis andLeishmania donovani in Experimental Murine Cutaneous Leishmaniasis and Visceral Leishmaniasis

Hail M. Al-Abdely, John R. Graybill, Rosie Bocanegra, Laura Najvar, Eleanor Montalbo, Steven L. Regen, Peter C. Melby
Hail M. Al-Abdely
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, and
Audie Murphy Veterans Administration Hospital, San Antonio, Texas 78284, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John R. Graybill
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, and
Audie Murphy Veterans Administration Hospital, San Antonio, Texas 78284, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosie Bocanegra
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura Najvar
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eleanor Montalbo
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven L. Regen
Department of Chemistry, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter C. Melby
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, and
Audie Murphy Veterans Administration Hospital, San Antonio, Texas 78284, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.42.10.2542
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Current therapy for leishmaniasis is unsatisfactory because parenteral antimonial salts and pentamidine are associated with significant toxicity and failure rates. We examined the efficacy of KY62, a new, water-soluble, polyene antifungal, against cutaneous infection with Leishmania amazonensis and against visceral infection with Leishmania donovani in susceptible BALB/c mice. Mice were infected with L. amazonensis promastigotes in the ear pinna and in the tail and were treated with KY62 or amphotericin B. The cutaneous lesions showed a remarkable response to therapy with KY62 at a dose of 30 mg per kg of body weight per day. At this dose, the efficacy of KY62 was equivalent to or better than that of amphotericin B at 1 to 5 mg/kg/day. Mice infected intravenously with 107L. donovani promastigotes and treated with KY62 showed a 4-log reduction in the parasite burden in the liver and spleen compared to untreated mice. These studies indicate potent activity of KY62 against experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis caused byL. amazoniensis and against experimental visceral leishmaniasis caused by L. donovani.

The leishmaniases, caused by protozoa of the genus Leishmania, are distributed throughout the world. Cutaneous leishmaniasis, typically a slowly healing cutaneous ulcer, can result in deforming scars. Visceral leishmaniasis is characterized by fever, hepatosplenomegaly, pancytopenia, and cachexia and is associated with significant mortality (15). Current therapy for leishmaniasis is unsatisfactory (2). Antimonial compounds (sodium stibogluconate and meglumine antimoniate) are considered the drugs of first choice. These drugs are parenteral and are associated with significant side effects such as pancreatitis, myalgia, arthralgia, and, rarely, cardiac toxicity (6). Pentamidine, another alternative, causes renal toxicity and pancreatitis. These agents are also associated with significant failure and relapse rates, especially in the immunocompromised host (1).

Leishmania and fungi both have ergosterol-based sterols as essential components of their membrane structure. Antifungal agents, therefore, have potential in the treatment of leishmaniasis. The azole antifungals ketoconazole and itraconazole have been used to treat cutaneous leishmaniasis with variable success rates but have had no efficacy in cases of visceral disease (11, 16, 18). Amphotericin B interacts with leishmanial ergosterol and episterol, disrupting the membrane barrier and leading to loss of intracellular components and to cellular death (17). Amphotericin B has been successfully used in treating visceral leishmaniasis in animals and humans (9, 10). The use of amphotericin B is limited by substantial associated toxicity. Several recent reports also indicate success in treating leishmaniasis with lipid formulations of amphotericin B (4, 5, 21).

KY62 is a synthetic, water-soluble, polyene antifungal with structural resemblance to amphotericin B (Fig. 1). This drug has been administered to mice in high doses with no noticeable toxicity (7). We tested the activity of KY62 against Leishmania promastigotes in vitro, in experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania amazonensis, and in experimental visceral leishmaniasis caused byLeishmania donovani.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Chemical structure of KY62 and amphotericin B.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Parasites.The virulent strains L. donovani 1S (MHOM/SD/001S-2D) and L. amazonensisJOSEPHA were selected for the in vitro and in vivo studies. Additionally, L. major strain KK, L. mexicanastrains 68 and 390 (gifts from F. Andrade-Narvaez, Merida, Mexico), andL. panamensis strains LS94 and L334 (gifts from B. Travi, CIDEIM, Cali, Colombia) were included in the in vitro testing. Prior to mouse infection, the parasites were washed in phosphate-buffered saline, counted, and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline at the appropriate concentration.

Animals.Age matched, 4- to 6-week-old female inbred BALB/cnu/+ mice (veterinary medical unit breeding colony; Audie Murphy Veterans Administration Hospital, San Antonio, Tex.) were used in these studies. Ten mice were included in each treatment and control group and were housed five mice per cage with free access to water and food.

Drugs.KY62, a polyene antifungal, was chemically synthesized in the laboratory of S. L. Regen (Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pa.) (23). The drug was reconstituted from powder in sterile 5% dextrose in water (D5W); 0.2 ml of this solution was injected into the mice intraperitoneally (i.p.). Amphotericin B was purchased commercially (Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Princeton, N.J.) and was injected in a similar fashion.

In vitro susceptibility. Leishmania promastigotes were maintained in Grace’s insect culture medium supplemented with 15% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 1 μg of biotin per ml, 0.1 mM adenine, 5 μg of hemin per ml, 100 U of penicillin per ml, and 100 μg of streptomycin per ml. At log phase (3 days after passage in culture media), Leishmania promastigotes were harvested and counted with a hemacytometer. Promastigotes (5 × 106/ml) were incubated in microwell plates at 26°C in 250 μl of medium/well, with each well containing either a twofold dilution of one drug (0.125 to 8 μg/ml for KY62 and amphotericin B and 0.25 to 32 μg/ml for fluconazole) or control medium. The minimum protozoacidal concentration (MPC) was defined as the lowest concentration that reduced the number of viable promastigotes with respect to simultaneously growing controls by ≥90% after 18 h of incubation with the drug, as assessed by flagellar motility under indirect microscopy (14). In a few experiments, parasite death was also assessed by a [3H]thymidine incorporation assay. In these experiments, 1 μCi of [3H]thymidine was added to each well for the last 18 h of culture and the amount of incorporation was determined by scintillation counting.

Treatment of cutaneous L. amazonensis infection. (i) Two-week therapy.Three groups of 10 female inbred BALB/c mice each were selected randomly to receive KY62 at a daily dose of 30 mg/kg of body weight, amphotericin B at a daily dose of 1 mg/kg, or D5W by i.p. injection. KY62 previously had shown no toxicity for mice treated for candidiasis at a dosage of 30 mg/kg/day (7). All mice were injected with 5 × 106 promastigotes of L. amazoniensis in 0.01 ml in the right ear pinna and with 5 × 106 promastigotes in 0.02 ml subcutaneously in the proximal third of the tail. This infective dose was selected to ensure development of significant lesions. Treatments were started on the third day postinfection and continued for 14 days. Measurements of the ear pinna thickness and tail lesion thicknesses, with a fine-scale caliper (Fowler Precision Tools; Lux Scientific Instrument Corp., New York, N.Y.), were started on the fourth day postinfection and repeated weekly for 6 weeks. Lesion size was considered the difference between the thicknesses of the infected and uninfected ear pinnae. The size of the tail lesion was obtained by subtracting the average of the measurements of the tail diameter at points just rostral and caudal to the lesion site from the maximal tail diameter at the lesion site. Histopathology was performed on ear and tail lesions of three mice from each group at 6 weeks postinfection.

(ii) One-week dose-ranging study.Six groups of 10 BALB/c mice each were randomly selected to receive KY62 at daily doses of 30, 15, 5, or 1 mg/kg by i.p. injection for 7 days. A positive control group received amphotericin B at a daily dose of 5 mg/kg i.p., and the negative control group received D5W i.p. All mice were infected withL. amazonensis as described above. Treatments were started on the third day postinfection and continued for 7 days. Measurements of ear and tail lesions were started the first day postinfection and made weekly afterwards for 4 weeks.

(iii) Four-week therapy.Two groups of 10 age-matched, randomly selected female BALB/c mice each were infected with L. amazonensis in the ear pinna and tail as described above. Treatments with KY62 at a daily dose of 15 mg/kg or with D5W were started on the third day postinfection and continued for 28 days. Measurement of lesions was done weekly for 5 weeks. At 37 days postinfection, eight mice per group were sacrificed, their external sacral lymph nodes (which drain the tail) were harvested, and the lymph node parasite burden was determined by quantitative limiting dilution (8). Lymph nodes were harvested and homogenized between the frosted ends of sterile slides in 1 ml of complete culture medium and diluted with the same medium to a final concentration of 1 mg/ml. Fourfold serial dilutions of the homogenized tissue were then plated in a 96-well tissue culture plate and cultured at 26°C for 3 weeks. The wells were examined for viable promastigotes at 3-day intervals, and the reciprocal of the highest dilution which was positive for parasites was considered to be the concentration of parasites per milligram of lymph nodes (8).

Treatment of visceral L. donovani infection.Two groups of eight age-matched, randomly selected female BALB/c mice each were inoculated intravenously with 107 promastigotes ofL. donovani in 0.2 ml through the lateral tail vein. One group was treated i.p. with KY62 at a daily dose of 15 mg/kg, and the other group received D5W alone. Treatment was started on the third day postinfection and continued for 14 days. Thirty days postinfection, all mice were terminated, and hepatic and splenic parasite burdens were determined by the quantitative limiting dilution method described above (an approximately 30-mg piece of organ was homogenized).

Statistical analysis.For cutaneous infection, the means (± standard deviations) of the sizes of the ear and tail lesions between treatment groups and controls were compared by using the unpaired Student t test. For visceral infection, the mean log10 parasites per gram of liver and spleen of treatment groups and controls were compared by using the unpaired Studentt test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In vitro susceptibility to KY62, amphotericin B, and fluconazole.In vitro assessment of the protozoacidal activity indicated potent activity of both KY62 and amphotericin B againstLeishmania promastigotes of different species (Table1). Fluconazole was not effective against Leishmania promastigotes in culture media, having an MPC of more than 32 μg/ml. KY62 and amphotericin B showed equivalent in vitro antileishmanial activities. The MPCs of the drugs as determined by visual inspection were confirmed by the loss of [3H]thymidine incorporation in the drug-treated parasites (data not shown).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Activity of antifungal agents against leishmania

Efficacy of KY62 in experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis. (i) Two-week therapy.Six weeks postinfection, ear lesions of the control group were remarkably larger than those of the groups receiving KY62 or amphotericin B. The lesion sizes were 4.51 ± 1.40 mm, 1.15 ± 0.81 mm, and 3.33 ± 1.45 mm for controls, KY62 recipients, and amphotericin B recipients, respectively. The differences were significant for the KY62- treated group compared to controls (P = 0.00008) (Fig.2A). At the doses used, KY62 was significantly more effective than amphotericin B in reducing lesion size (P = 0.001).

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Efficacy of a 14-day treatment course with KY62 (30 mg/kg/day) or amphotericin B (1 mg/kg/day) in experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. amazonensis. Sizes of ear pinna lesions (A) and tail lesions (B) in the treated and untreated control mice are shown. Treatments were started on the third day postinfection and continued for 14 days. The ear lesion size was considered the difference between the thicknesses of the infected and uninfected ear pinna. The size of the tail lesion was obtained by subtracting the average of the measurements of the tail diameter at points just rostral and caudal to the lesion site from the maximal tail diameter at the lesion site.

The tail lesions at 6 weeks postinfection were smaller in the KY62 (0.25 ± 0.23 mm) and amphotericin B (0.50 ± 0.17 mm) groups compared to controls (0.98 ± 0.41 mm). These differences were significant (P = 0.0002 for KY62 and P = 0.003 for amphotericin B compared to controls) (Fig. 2B). The tail lesions in the KY62-treated mice were also significantly smaller than those in the amphotericin B-treated mice (P = 0.015).

Histopathologic analysis of the ear lesions revealed lymphocytic infiltration with few parasites in mice treated with KY62 but abundant, foamy macrophages with intracellular amastigotes in the untreated mice (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Wright’s stain of sections of an ear lesion in the control (A) and KY62-treated (B) mice. The section from the control mouse shows a predominance of the large, foamy macrophages with abundant amastigotes (arrow), whereas the section from the treated mouse shows a more lymphocytic predominance (arrow) and a markedly reduced number of amastigotes. Magnification, ×40 (for both panels).

During treatment, only one mouse (a KY62 recipient) died before the end of the study. Death was attributed to anesthesia with methoxyflurane during measurement of lesions.

(ii) One-week dose-ranging study.To determine if a shorter course of therapy and lower drug doses could be effective in the treatment of experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis, a study of KY62 and amphotericin B given at different doses for 7 days was conducted. At 30 days postinfection, smaller tail lesion sizes were found in mice treated with KY62 at dosages of 30 and 15 mg/kg/day, but not at dosages of 5 and 1 mg/kg/day. The mean diameters of the tail lesions were 0.32 ± 0.14 mm, 0.11 ± 0.07 mm, 0.14 ± 0.06 mm, 0.30 ± 0.10 mm, 0.29 ± 0.13 mm, and 0.28 ± 0.08 mm for controls, KY62 (30 mg/kg), KY62 (15 mg/kg), KY62 (5 mg/kg), KY62 (1 mg/kg), and amphotericin B (5 mg/kg) treatment groups, respectively.P values of 0.0005 and 0.0023 were calculated for KY62 at the 30- and 15-mg/kg doses, respectively, compared to controls (Fig. 4B). At 5 mg/kg/day for 7 days, amphotericin B was not significantly better than controls in either the ear or the tail infections. None of the treatment groups had significantly better outcomes of ear infections than control mice (Fig. 4A). A 7-day course of therapy was thus inferior to the 14-day course used in the first experiment.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Efficacy of a 7-day treatment course with various doses of KY62 or with amphotericin B (5 mg/kg/day) in experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. amazonensis. Sizes of ear pinna lesions (A) and tail lesions (B) are shown. Treatments were started on the third day postinfection and continued for 7 days. Lesions were measured as described in the legend to Fig. 2.

(iii) Four-week therapy.To determine if a lower dose of KY62 given for a longer duration could be effective, mice were treated for 28 days at 15 mg/kg/day. Five weeks postchallenge, the tail lesions were significantly smaller in KY62-treated mice than in controls (Fig.5B) (mean, 0.31 ± 0.10 mm and 0.73 ± 0.12 mm, respectively [P = 0.00001]). There was no significant difference between treated mice and controls in ear infections (Fig. 5A). The parasite burden in the external sacral lymph nodes was markedly lower in the KY62-treated group (mean log10, 7.29 ± 1.0 and 4.43 ± 1.4 parasites per lymph node for controls and KY62-treated mice, respectively).

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Efficacy of a prolonged treatment course with KY62 (15 mg/kg/day) in experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. amazonensis. Sizes of ear pinna lesions (A) and tail lesions (B) in the KY62-treated and control mice are shown. Treatments were started on the third day postinfection and continued for 28 days. Lesions were measured as described in the legend to Fig. 2.

Efficacy of KY62 in experimental visceral leishmaniasis. L. donovani-infected mice were treated for 14 days with KY62 (15 mg/kg/day), and the visceral parasite burden was determined at 30 days postinfection. The mean hepatic parasite burden (log10 per gram of liver) in the KY62-treated mice was 3.51 log10 lower than the parasite burden in controls (5.96 ± 0.91 and 9.47 ± 1.09 for KY62-treated and control groups, respectively [P = 0.00001]). The mean splenic parasite burden (log10 per gram of spleen) was 4.21 logs lower in the KY62-treated mice than controls (5.49 ± 0.96 and 9.66 ± 0.81 for KY62-treated and control groups, respectively [P = 0.000001]).

DISCUSSION

Efforts to find new agents for the treatment of leishmaniasis have been ongoing for several decades. Derivatives of antimony have been used with reasonable success for more than 50 years to treat leishmaniasis. Recently, an increased number of reports of treatment failures and relapses with antimonial therapy have been published (1, 9, 10, 20). This is due partly to leishmanial infection in patients with AIDS and partly to acquired resistance to the antimonial compounds (9, 10).

In this study, we have identified a new polyene antifungal drug, KY62, which had high leishmanicidal activity in vitro. Although in vitro activity of a drug against the promastigote stage may not necessarily correlate with activity against intracellular amastigotes, our in vivo studies demonstrated that KY62 was highly efficacious in experimental models of cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis. KY62, which differs from amphotericin B in one side chain, showed in vitro activity which was equivalent to that of amphotericin B. The mechanism of action of KY62 against Leishmania spp. is probably similar to that of amphotericin B, i.e., interaction with membrane sterols resulting in disruption in the cell membrane with leakage of intracellular components. KY62 has the advantage of having lower toxicity in mice than amphotericin B. The higher allowed doses may result in enhanced efficacy, but formal studies to address this issue are needed.

We studied the efficacy of KY62 in an experimental model of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by a highly virulent strain of L. amazonensis. Mice were infected at both relatively permissive (ear pinna) and nonpermissive (tail) sites (12, 13), and the response to therapy was assessed by measurement of lesion size and parasite burden in the draining lymph nodes. KY62, when used at higher doses, was consistently superior to standard, tolerated doses of amphotericin B in reducing the size of cutaneous lesions. However, the determination of the advantage of KY62 over amphotericin B will have to await more formal toxicity testing. The lower parasite burdens present in the draining lymph nodes in KY62-treated mice confirmed the results of the clinical response. When a shorter duration of therapy was used, the more permissive ear pinna infection was less responsive to therapy. In humans, leishmanial infections involving the ear are more chronic and progressive and are more difficult to treat than those involving other cutaneous sites (22). This may be due to the lower vascularity of this cartilaginous structure. A longer duration of therapy (28 days) did not eradicate the infection, but it should be noted that a very large parasite inoculum was used in these studies. In a study of treatment of experimental L. major infections, it was observed that amphotericin B-treated mice had a noticeably smaller lesion size as early as the end of the 2-week drug treatment period (3). In our study of L. amazonensis infections, the difference in lesion size between the KY62-treated and untreated mice was not observed until 10 to 20 days after the treatment period. Although we cannot exclude a delayed antileishmanial immune response as a contributor to this apparent delay in response to treatment, it appears that the difference in lesion size was not noticeable earlier because the lesions in the untreated mice had not developed to a sufficient size to be significantly different than the lesions in the treated mice. Thus, the lower rate of lesion development in our model than in the L. major model probably accounts for some of the observed differences in response to drug treatment. Differences in parasite strain, site of inoculation, dose and route of delivery of the drugs, and mouse strain are also likely to contribute to the slightly different results.

Treatment with KY62 in the ear was associated with a predominantly lymphocytic infiltration with few amastigotes. In contrast, the untreated animals had heavily parasitized, foamy macrophages and a sparse lymphocytic infiltration. The importance of an intact cellular immune response in concert with antileishmanial therapy has previously been demonstrated (19). Whether the histopathological changes seen in the KY62-treated lesions are a direct effect of the drug or are due merely to the destruction of parasites with release of proinflammatory mediators remains to be determined.

In the model of visceral leishmaniasis caused by L. donovani, the efficacy of KY62 was equally impressive, with reduction in parasite burdens of approximately 4 logs in the liver and spleen compared to untreated controls. These findings are significant because visceral leishmaniasis is difficult to treat and is associated with high mortality. Amphotericin B was superior to antimony and pentamidine in treating Indian kala-azar (9, 10). It was also significantly better than pentavalent antimony in HIV-infected patients with visceral leishmaniasis in southern France (20). Lipid formulations of amphotericin B were also shown to be effective in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in several different regions where it is endemic (4, 5, 21). Our results indicate that KY62 has efficacy equal to, if not greater than, that of amphotericin B. Since KY62 can be given to mice at a much higher dose than amphotericin B, it may offer an improvement in the current therapy of leishmaniasis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by funding from the Veteran Administration to P.C.M. and from DHHS (NIH AI28220) to S.L.R.

We are grateful to A. Fothergill (Fungus Testing Laboratory, San Antonio, Tex.) for her help in preparing drugs for in vitro testing and to Weigou Zhao for his help with preparation of the culture media.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 5 February 1998.
    • Returned for modification 24 March 1998.
    • Accepted 15 July 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Alvar J.,
    2. Cañavate C.,
    3. Gutiérrez-Solar B.,
    4. Jiménez M.,
    5. Laguna F.,
    6. López-Vélez R.,
    7. Molina R.,
    8. Moreno J.
    Leishmania and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection: the first 10 years. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10 1997 298 319
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Berman J. D.
    Human leishmaniasis: clinical, diagnostic, and chemotherapeutic developments in the last 10 years. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24 1997 684 703
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bjorvatn B.,
    2. Neva F. A.
    Experimental therapy of mice infected with Leishmania tropica. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 28 1979 480 485
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Castagnola E.,
    2. Davidson R. N.,
    3. Fiore P.,
    4. Tasso L.,
    5. Rossi G.,
    6. Mangraviti S.,
    7. di Martino L.,
    8. Scotti S.,
    9. Cascio A.,
    10. Pempinello R.,
    11. Gradoni L.,
    12. Giacchino R.
    Early efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 90 1996 317 318
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Davidson R. N.,
    2. di Martino L.,
    3. Gradoni L.,
    4. Giacchino R.,
    5. Gaeta G. B.,
    6. Pempinello R.,
    7. Scotti S.,
    8. Cascio A.,
    9. Castagnola E.,
    10. Maisto A.,
    11. Gramiccia M.,
    12. di Caprio D.,
    13. Wilkinson R. J.,
    14. Bryceson A. D.
    Short-course treatment of visceral leishmaniasis with liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome). Clin. Infect. Dis. 22 1996 938 943
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Gasser R. A. Jr.,
    2. Magill A. J.,
    3. Oster C. N.,
    4. Franke E. D.,
    5. Grogl M.,
    6. Berman J. D.
    Pancreatitis induced by pentavalent antimonial agents during treatment of leishmaniasis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 18 1994 83 90
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Graybill J. R.,
    2. Najvar L. K.,
    3. Fothergill A.,
    4. Hardin T.,
    5. Rinaldi M.,
    6. Lambros C.,
    7. Regen S. L.
    KY-62, a polyene analog of amphotericin B, for treatment of murine candidiasis. Antomicrob. Agents Chemother. 42 1998 147 150
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Melby P. C.,
    2. Yang Y.-Z.,
    3. Cheng J.,
    4. Zhao W.
    Regional differences in the cellular immune response to experimental cutaneous or visceral infection with Leishmania donovani. Infect. Immun. 66 1998 18 27
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Mishra M.,
    2. Biswas U. K.,
    3. Jha A. M.,
    4. Khan A. B.
    Amphotericin versus sodium stibogluconate in first-line treatment of Indian kala-azar. Lancet 344 1994 1599 1600
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Mishra M.,
    2. Biswas U. K.,
    3. Jha A. M.,
    4. Khan A. B.
    Amphotericin versus pentamidine in antimony-unresponsive kala-azar. Lancet 340 1992 1256 1257
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Momeni A. Z.,
    2. Jalayer T.,
    3. Emamjomeh M.,
    4. Bashardost N.,
    5. Ghassemi R. L.,
    6. Meghdadi M.,
    7. Javadi A.,
    8. Aminjavaheri M.
    Treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis with itraconazole. Randomized double-blind study. Arch. Dermatol. 132 1996 784 786
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Mortatti R. C.,
    2. Henriques A.
    Experimental cutaneous leishmaniasis by Leishmania amazonensis: course of fast-growth infection in the mouse ear. Parasitol. Res. 76 1990 729 730
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Neal R. A.
    Chemotherapy of cutaneous leishmaniasis: Leishmania tropica infection in mice. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 58 1964 420 430
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Pearson R. D.,
    2. Manian A. A.,
    3. Harcus J. L.,
    4. Hall D.,
    5. Hewlett E. L.
    Lethal effect of phenothiazine neuroleptics on the pathogenic protozoan Leishmania donovani. Science 217 1982 369 371
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Pearson R. D.,
    2. Sousa A. Q.
    Clinical spectrum of leishmaniasis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 22 1996 1 13
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Pirson P.,
    2. Leclef B.,
    3. Trouet A.
    Activity of ketoconazole derivatives against Leishmania mexicana amazonensis within mouse peritoneal macrophages. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 84 1990 133 139
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Ramos H.,
    2. Valdivieso E.,
    3. Gamargo M.,
    4. Dagger F.,
    5. Cohen B. E.
    Amphotericin B kills unicellular Leishmania by forming aqueous pores permeable to small cations and anions. J. Membr. Biol. 152 1996 65 75
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Rashid J. R.,
    2. Wasunna K. M.,
    3. Gachihi G. S.,
    4. Nyakundi P. M.,
    5. Mbugua J.,
    6. Kirigi G.
    The efficacy and safety of ketoconazole in visceral leishmaniasis. East Afr. Med. J. 71 1994 392 395
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Reiner S. L.,
    2. Locksley R. M.
    The regulation of immunity to Leishmania major. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13 1995 151 77
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Rosenthal E.,
    2. Marty P.,
    3. Poizot-Martin I.,
    4. Reynes J.,
    5. Pratlong F.,
    6. Lafeuillade A.,
    7. Jaubert D.,
    8. Boulat O.,
    9. Dereure J.,
    10. Gambarelli F.
    Visceral leishmaniasis and HIV-1 co-infection in southern France. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 89 1995 159 162
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Seaman J.,
    2. Boer C.,
    3. Wilkinson R.,
    4. de Jong J.,
    5. de Wilde E.,
    6. Sondorp E.,
    7. Davidson R.
    Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in the treatment of complicated kala-azar under field conditions. Clin. Infect. Dis. 21 1995 188 193
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Walton B. C.
    American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis The leishmaniases in biology and medicine Peters W., Killick-Kendrick R. II 1987 644 Academic Press London, United Kingdom
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. Yarnasita K.,
    2. Janout V.,
    3. Bernard E. M.,
    4. Armstrong D.,
    5. Regen S. L.
    Micelle/monomer control over the membrane-disrupting properties of an amphiphilic antibiotic. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 1995 6249 6253
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Efficacies of KY62 against Leishmania amazonensis andLeishmania donovani in Experimental Murine Cutaneous Leishmaniasis and Visceral Leishmaniasis
Hail M. Al-Abdely, John R. Graybill, Rosie Bocanegra, Laura Najvar, Eleanor Montalbo, Steven L. Regen, Peter C. Melby
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Oct 1998, 42 (10) 2542-2548; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.42.10.2542

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Efficacies of KY62 against Leishmania amazonensis andLeishmania donovani in Experimental Murine Cutaneous Leishmaniasis and Visceral Leishmaniasis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Efficacies of KY62 against Leishmania amazonensis andLeishmania donovani in Experimental Murine Cutaneous Leishmaniasis and Visceral Leishmaniasis
Hail M. Al-Abdely, John R. Graybill, Rosie Bocanegra, Laura Najvar, Eleanor Montalbo, Steven L. Regen, Peter C. Melby
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Oct 1998, 42 (10) 2542-2548; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.42.10.2542
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

amphotericin B
antifungal agents
Leishmania donovani
Leishmania mexicana
Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous
Leishmaniasis, Visceral

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596