Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

Cefotaxime-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeIsolates from a Hospital in Warsaw, Poland: Identification of a New CTX-M-3 Cefotaxime-Hydrolyzing β-Lactamase That Is Closely Related to the CTX-M-1/MEN-1 Enzyme

Marek Gniadkowski, Ines Schneider, Andrzej Pal/ucha, Renate Jungwirth, Barbara Mikiewicz, Adolf Bauernfeind
Marek Gniadkowski
Sera and Vaccines Central Research Laboratory, 00-725 Warsaw, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ines Schneider
Max von Pettenkofer-Institut, 80336 Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrzej Pal/ucha
Sera and Vaccines Central Research Laboratory, 00-725 Warsaw, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Renate Jungwirth
Max von Pettenkofer-Institut, 80336 Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Mikiewicz
Health Care Center Praga-Pól/noc, 03-719 Warsaw, Poland, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adolf Bauernfeind
Max von Pettenkofer-Institut, 80336 Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.42.4.827
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

A group of cefotaxime-resistant Citrobacter freundiiand Escherichia coli isolates were collected by a clinical laboratory in a hospital in Warsaw, Poland, in July 1996. Detailed analysis has shown that all of these produced a β-lactamase (pI, 8.4) belonging to the CTX-M family, one of the minor extended-spectrum β-lactamase families with a strong cefotaxime-hydrolyzing activity. Sequencing has revealed that C. freundii isolates produced a new CTX-M-3 enzyme which is very closely related to the CTX-M-1/MEN-1 β-lactamase, sporadically identified in Europe over a period of 6 years. Amino acid sequences of these two β-lactamases differ at four positions: Val77Ala, Asp114Asn, Ser140Ala, and Asn288Asp (the first amino acid of each pair refers to CTX-M-1/MEN-1 and second refers to CTX-M-3). The partial sequence of the E. coli CTX-M gene was identical to the corresponding region ofblaCTX-M-3, but a transconjugant of theE. coli isolate expressed higher levels of resistance to β-lactams than did C. freundii transconjugants. These resistance differences correlated with differences in plasmid DNA restriction patterns. Our results suggest that CTX-M genes have been spread among different species of the familyEnterobacteriaceae in the hospital and that the CTX-M-3-expressing C. freundii strain causing routine urinary tract infections has been maintained for a relatively long time in the hospital environment.

Class A plasmidic CTX-M β-lactamases constitute one of the minor families of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) which are much more active against cefotaxime than ceftazidime (5). Three members of this group have been reported to date: CTX-M-1/MEN-1 (3, 5), CTX-M-2 (4), and Toho-1 (10). CTX-M-producing strains of the family Enterobacteriaceaewere isolated sporadically between 1989 and 1994 but over an extremely wide geographic area including Europe, South America, and the Middle and Far East (6, 7, 10).

Very little is known about the possible origins, evolution, or structural determinants of the CTX-M enzyme activity. Comparative analysis of protein sequences has revealed the similarity of these enzymes to the β-lactamases of Klebsiella oxytoca andCitrobacter diversus (>70% homology), which, to date, are known to be exclusively chromosomally encoded enzymes (2, 3, 7, 15, 16). The K. oxytoca β-lactamase was reported to possess a weak activity against oxyimino-β-lactams (2, 16). The amino acid residue(s) and the position(s) critical for the high cefotaxime-hydrolyzing activity of the CTX-M enzymes are not known; however, the Ser-237 residue, common to members of the family and not to the K. oxytoca and C. diversusenzymes, has been proposed to play this role (3).

At the beginning of July 1996, a clinical microbiology laboratory in the Praski Hospital in Warsaw, Poland, started to routinely test for ESBL activity in isolates of Enterobacteriaceae by the double-disc method (11). During this month, threeCitrobacter freundii isolates and one Escherichia coli isolate, collected from urine samples from different patients, were identified as ESBL producers expressing high resistance to cefotaxime and susceptibility to ceftazidime in in vitro susceptibility tests. In this paper, we present results of the detailed analysis of these strains which led to the identification of the next CTX-M variant and the first description for Europe of the persistence of CTX-M-producing microorganisms in the microflora of a given hospital environment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.Three C. freundii clinical isolates (2524/96, 2525/96, and 2526/96) and one E. coliclinical isolate (2527/96) resistant to cefotaxime and identified as ESBL producers were collected in July 1996 at the Praski Hospital from different patients with urinary tract infections: two from the internal medicine ward, one from the urological ward, and one from the surgical ward of the hospital. All the patients suffered from urological complications and/or were subjected to invasive procedures (catheterization, cystoscopy, and nephrostomy). Two patients were diabetic, and one had cancer. Species identification, routine susceptibility tests, and double-disc tests for ESBL activity (11) were performed by the hospital microbiology laboratory. Species identification was confirmed by the ID32E ATB test (bioMerieux).

Ribotyping and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD).Genomic DNA was extracted from 200 μl of the overnight cultures grown in tryptic soy broth (Oxoid) at 37°C with the Genomic DNA Prep Plus kit (A & A Biotechnology, Gdańsk, Poland). For ribotyping, a mixture of two DNA probes corresponding to the 23S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and 16S rDNA sequences of E. coli (9) was used. The probes were obtained in PCRs with genomic DNA of E. coliATCC 25922 as a template and the following primers: 5′-GGTTAAGCGACTAAGCGTAC-3′ and 5′-CAGCTTCGGCGTTGTAAGG-3′ for 23S rDNA amplification and 5′-GGGGGACCTTCGGGC-3′ and 5′-GGTGTGACGGGCGGTGTG-3′ for 16S rDNA amplification. The PCR products were gel purified and labelled with the DIG DNA labelling kit (Boehringer Mannheim) according to the manufacturer’s recommended procedure. Total DNA preparations of analyzed isolates were digested with EcoRI and HindIII restriction enzymes (MBI Fermentas), electrophoresed in a 1% agarose gel (FMC Bioproducts), and blotted onto a positively charged nylon membrane (Boehringer Mannheim). Chemiluminescent detection of the hybridization signal was performed with a DIG luminescent detection kit (Boehringer Mannheim) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

The RAPD analysis was performed with the RAPD-7 (18) primer. About 10 ng of total DNA, 50 pmol of the primer, 100 μM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 10 μg of bovine serum albumin, 2 U of Taq polymerase (MBI Fermentas), and buffer supplied by the manufacturer of the enzyme were used for each single reaction mixture. Reactions were run under the following conditions: 5 min at 94°C; five cycles of 15 s at 94°C, 30 s at 35°C, and 1.5 min at 72°C; and 30 cycles of 15 s at 94°C, 15 s at 55°C, 30 s at 72°C, and finally 7 min at 72°C in a GeneAmp PCR System 2400 (Perkin-Elmer). PCR products were electrophoresed in 2% agarose gels (FMC Bioproducts). C. freundii L-601, belonging to the culture collection of the Sera and Vaccines Central Research Laboratory, Warsaw, Poland, was used as an epidemiologically nonrelated control in both typing analyses. (The L-601 strain was isolated in January 1995 at the University Hospital in Szczecin, Poland).

Susceptibility testing.MICs of various antibiotics were determined by the agar dilution method according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines (14). The following antibiotics were used: ampicillin, cefotaxime, and gentamicin (Polfa, Tarchomin, Poland); aztreonam (Bristol-Myers Squibb, New Brunswick, N.J.); cefoxitin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.); ceftazidime (Glaxo Wellcome, Stevenage, United Kingdom); lithium clavulanate (SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Betchworth, United Kingdom); imipenem (Merck, Sharp & Dohme Research, Rahway, N.J.); piperacillin (Lederle Piperacillin Inc., Carolina, Puerto Rico); tazobactam (Lederle Laboratories, Pearl River, N.Y.); and tobramycin (Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Ind.). In all β-lactam–inhibitor combinations, the constant concentrations of clavulanate and tazobactam were 2 and 4 μg/ml, respectively. C. freundii 870/97, isolated at the Praski Hospital in May 1997, was used as a wild-type control strain for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of ESBL-producing C. freundii isolates. E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as the reference strain.

Resistance transfer.One-milliliter volumes of cultures of the donor and recipient strains (109 CFU of each strain per ml) grown in tryptic soy broth (Oxoid) were mixed and incubated for 18 h at 35°C. E. coli A15 R− resistant to rifampin was used as the recipient strain. Transconjugants were selected on MacConkey agar (Oxoid) supplemented with cefotaxime (2 mg/liter) and rifampin (128 mg/liter).

Isoelectric focusing (IEF) of β-lactamases and detection of cefotaxime-hydrolyzing activity within the IEF gel lane.Sonicates of clinical isolates and transconjugants were subjected to analytical IEF over the pH range of 3 to 10. IEF was performed according to the method of Matthew et al. (13) with modifications described previously (5), with a Multiphor apparatus (Pharmacia LKB). Following electrophoresis, gels were stained with nitrocefin (Oxoid). After IEF of transconjugant extracts, cefotaxime-hydrolyzing activity was assigned to specific β-lactamase bands by the bioassay approach as previously described (5).

Plasmid DNA preparation and plasmid fingerprinting.Plasmid DNA was purified from transconjugant cells with the Qiagen Plasmid Midi kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s recommended procedure, as described previously (8). For the fingerprinting analysis, about 5 μg of plasmid DNA was digested with 10 U of PstI restriction enzyme (Boehringer Mannheim) for 2 h at 37°C. DNA was electrophoresed in a 1% agarose gel (FMC Bioproducts).

PCR amplification of the blaCTX-M-3gene.For partial gene PCR amplification, primers P1 (5′-GCGATGTGCAGCACCAGTAA-3′) and P2 (5′-GGTTGAGGCTGGGTGAAGTA-3′), specific for theblaCTX-M-1 gene (7), were used in reactions with plasmid DNA preparations as templates. The entire coding sequence was amplified in a PCR with the P1C (5′-TCGTCTCTTCCAGA-3′) and P2D (5′-CAGCGCTTTTGCCGTCTAAG-3′) oligonucleotides as primers. A single reaction mixture contained about 1 μg of plasmid DNA, 50 pmol of each primer, 100 μM deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 1 U ofTaq polymerase (Boehringer Mannheim), and buffer with 2.5 mM MgCl2 supplied by the manufacturer of the enzyme. A Perkin-Elmer 9600 apparatus was used, and reactions were run under the following conditions: 3 min at 95°C; 30 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 30 s at 72°C; and finally 3 min at 72°C. The resulting products were run in a 1% agarose gel (FMC Bioproducts) and purified for direct sequencing reactions with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen).

DNA sequencing.Sequencing reactions were performed with consecutive primers specific for the blaCTX-M-1gene (7) according to the dideoxy chain termination method of Sanger et al. (17). An automatic sequencer (373A; Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany) was used.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.TheblaCTX-M-3 gene nucleotide sequence data will appear in the EMBL database under accession no. Y10278.

RESULTS

Typing.The three C. freundii isolates were typed by ribotyping and RAPD approaches. All the isolates were found to produce identical ribotyping patterns which were different from that of the epidemiologically nonrelated control strain (Fig.1). These results were confirmed by the RAPD analysis (data not shown).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Ribotyping of C. freundii isolates. The threeC. freundii isolates belonged to the same ribotype, which was different from that of the epidemiologically nonrelated control L-601 strain. Lanes: 1, 1-kb DNA ladder (Gibco BRL); 2, C. freundii 2524/96; 3, C. freundii 2525/96; 4, C. freundii 2526/96; 5, C. freundii L-601.

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinical isolates.Results of the analysis are shown in Table 1. Of the β-lactams tested, all the ESBL-producing isolates were resistant to ampicillin (MICs, >512 μg/ml), piperacillin (MICs, >512 μg/ml), cefotaxime (MICs, ≥512 μg/ml), and aztreonam (MICs, 32 or 128 μg/ml) but remained susceptible or intermediate to ceftazidime (MICs, 4 or 16 μg/ml) and susceptible to imipenem (MICs, 0.125 μg/ml). β-Lactamase inhibitors restored activities of piperacillin, cefotaxime, and aztreonam. C. freundii isolates were resistant to cefoxitin (MICs, 128 μg/ml) whereas E. coli2527/96 was intermediate to this antibiotic (MIC, 16 μg/ml). MICs of β-lactam antibiotics tested for the wild-type C. freundiistrain (C. freundii 870/97) were substantially lower than those for the three ESBL-producing isolates, except for cefoxitin (MIC, 128 μg/ml) and imipenem (MIC, 0.25 μg/ml). All the ESBL-expressing isolates were found to be resistant to both aminoglycosides tested, gentamicin and tobramycin (MICs, 256 μg/ml). MICs obtained for the three C. freundii isolates were identical; E. coli 2527/96 was usually characterized by higher MICs.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinical isolates, transconjugants, and control strains

Resistance transfer and susceptibility testing of transconjugant strains.Transconjugants were obtained for all the analyzed isolates. A very high frequency of conjugation (10−2 per donor cell) was observed with the C. freundii isolates. (ForE. coli 2527/96, the frequency was 10−6 per donor cell.) Susceptibility testing (Table 1) has revealed that the transconjugant of E. coli 2527/96 was characterized by substantially higher MICs of piperacillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam than those for transconjugants of C. freundiiisolates. The MICs of cefotaxime were higher than those of ceftazidime by 64 and 128 times for C. freundii and E. colitransconjugants, respectively. The cefoxitin resistance of C. freundii isolates was not transferred to recombinant strains. In all cases, resistance to gentamicin and tobramycin was cotransferred with the ESBL activity to the transconjugants.

IEF of β-lactamases and cefotaxime-hydrolyzing activity detection.Two major nitrocefin-hydrolyzing bands were visualized in extracts of all clinical isolates and transconjugants (results not shown). One band with a pI of 8.4 comigrated with the CTX-M-1 enzyme produced by the original E. coli GRI CTX-M-1 strain (5); the second one was characterized by a pI value of 5.4. The subsequent bioassay experiment revealed that only the β-lactamase with a pI of 8.4 possessed the cefotaxime-hydrolyzing activity (results not shown).

Plasmid fingerprinting.Plasmids isolated from transconjugants of all three C. freundii isolates revealed identicalPstI restriction patterns which were different from that of the plasmid isolated from the E. coli 2527/96 transconjugant cells (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Plasmid fingerprinting analysis. Plasmids isolated from transconjugants of C. freundii 2524/96, C. freundii 2525/96, and C. freundii 2526/96 were found to have identical PstI restriction patterns, and these were different from that of the R+ [E. coli2527/96] strain. Lanes: 1, DNA molecular weight marker set VI (Boehringer Mannheim); 2, DNA molecular weight marker set I (Boehringer Mannheim); 3, R+ [C. freundii 2524/96]; 4, R+ [C. freundii 2525/96]; 5, R+[C. freundii 2526/96]; 6, R+ [E. coli 2527/96].

PCR amplification and sequencing of theblaCTX-M-3 gene.Partial gene amplification products of the expected size of ca. 600 bp were obtained in all cases (results not shown). Sequencing the PCR products has revealed that within the region of about 450 to 500 bp all four nucleotide sequences were identical except for six positions (two amino acid differences in deduced protein sequences: Asp114Asn and Ser140Ala) compared with the homologous part of theblaCTX-M-1 gene.

The entire β-lactamase coding sequence was amplified in the PCR with the plasmid preparation from the C. freundii 2526/96 transconjugant. The PCR product of the expected size of about 1 kb was obtained (result not shown) and sequenced. Comparative analysis has revealed that the CTX-M coding sequence differs from that of theblaCTX-M-1 gene at 10 nucleotide positions (Fig.3). Four of the observed differences determine amino acid differences in deduced protein sequences. The analyzed enzyme was designated CTX-M-3, and its amino acid differences from the CTX-M-1 β-lactamase are as follows: Val77Ala, Asp114Asn, Ser140Ala, and Asn288Asp (the first amino acid in each pair refers to CTX-M-1, and the second refers to CTX-M-3).

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Nucleotide sequence of theblaCTX-M-3 coding region. The deduced amino acid sequence of CTX-M-3 is presented below. Nucleotide residues different from those in the blaCTX-M-1 gene are shown in boldface; residues characteristic of theblaCTX-M-1 gene are presented above these. The CTX-M-1 amino acid residues different from those of CTX-M-3 are presented in parentheses next to theblaCTX-M-1-specific nucleotides. Amino acid numbering is according to the work of Ambler (1).

DISCUSSION

In this study, we report the identification of CTX-M-3, an enzyme which expands one of the minor families of ESBLs. The CTX-M family includes class A cefotaxime-hydrolyzing enzymes and to date consists of three members: the CTX-M-1/MEN-1 (3, 5), the CTX-M-2 (4), and the Toho-1 (10) β-lactamases. DNA regions coding for CTX-M-2 (7) and Toho-1 (10) differ by only one nucleotide, which determines a single amino acid difference in their deduced protein sequences. The CTX-M-1/MEN-1 enzyme is less similar to the others, with an amino acid sequence homology with CTX-M-2 of about 84% (7). CTX-M-3 differs from CTX-M-1/MEN-1 by four amino acid residues (10 nucleotide differences in protein coding regions) and is therefore closely related to this enzyme.

The pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility caused by the production of the CTX-M-3 β-lactamase (Table 1) corresponds very well to those observed for the CTX-M-1/MEN-1 (4, 5), CTX-M-2 (4), and Toho-1 (10) enzymes. Its activity for cefotaxime is approximately 2 orders of magnitude higher than that for ceftazidime as evaluated with MICs for transconjugant strains. Recombinant strains expressing CTX-M-1/MEN-1, CTX-M-2, and Toho-1 β-lactamases were characterized by MICs of cefotaxime 8, 32, and more than 128 times higher than that of ceftazidime, respectively (4, 5, 10). The Toho-1 enzyme hydrolyzes cefotaxime with a relative maximum rate about 100 times higher than that for ceftazidime (10). Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibilities (Table 1) demonstrates that CTX-M-3-expressing C. freundii isolates are clearly distinguishable from wild-type strains present in the same hospital by much higher MICs of β-lactam antibiotics tested, except for cefoxitin and imipenem. The observed cefoxitin resistance ofC. freundii isolates was most probably due to induction of the chromosomal AmpC cephalosporinase (12) and certainly not to activity of CTX-M-3.

CTX-M ESBL-producing strains have been incidentally identified for 7 years as single clinical isolates in very distant geographic regions. CTX-M-2 was found in isolates from Argentina and Israel in 1992 and from Paraguay and again in two isolates from Argentina in 1994 (7). The almost identical Toho-1 enzyme was identified in 1993 in Japan (10). Isolation of CTX-M-1/MEN-1-producing strains has been restricted to Europe to date; the first isolates were found in 1989 in Germany (5) and in France (from a patient originating from Italy) (3), and the next two strains were collected in 1994 in two different cities in Germany (6). No outbreak caused by CTX-M-1/MEN-1-producing strains has ever been reported. The isolation of CTX-M-3-producing strains in Poland in 1996 suggests a wider distribution of CTX-M-1/MEN-1-related cefotaxime-hydrolyzing enzymes in Europe.

Isolates expressing the CTX-M-3 β-lactamase, collected in July 1996 in a single Warsaw hospital, may represent the first reported nosocomial epidemic caused by organisms producing a CTX-M-1/MEN-1-related enzyme in Europe. Ribotyping and RAPD approaches have suggested that the C. freundii isolates may be identical; moreover, this hypothesis is also supported by the same plasmid fingerprints, β-lactamase IEF patterns, and susceptibility data. These isolates were the only C. freundii isolates resistant to cefotaxime identified in the hospital in July 1996. Two were collected from patients hospitalized in the internal medicine ward, and one was from a patient in the urological ward. All patients were severely debilitated and predisposed to infections; the C. freundii isolates were identified as the etiological agents of urinary tract infections. It is impossible to say whether the CTX-M-3-producing C. freundii strain first appeared in the hospital in July 1996 or whether it was present prior to this time. Incidental isolations of cefotaxime-resistant C. freundiiwere reported by the hospital microbiological laboratory in the first half of 1996, but the isolates were neither collected nor typed at the time. The routine testing of Enterobacteriaceae isolates for the detection of ESBL activity was started in the laboratory at the beginning of July 1996. Over the next few months (August 1996 to January 1997), 19 new ESBL-producing, cefotaxime-resistant C. freundii isolates were identified in urine samples by the laboratory. Seven of them (November 1996 to January 1997) were collected and found to represent the same ribotypes and RAPD types as isolates 2524/96, 2525/96, and 2526/96 (data not shown). Most probably, the CTX-M-3-producing C. freundii strain has been persisting in the hospital environment for at least a year and regularly causing urinary tract infections in susceptible patients.

The second aspect of the CTX-M presence in the analyzed hospital isE. coli 2527/96. This strain is characterized by the same pattern of plasmid-mediated β-lactamases as those of the C. freundii isolates (enzymes with pIs of 8.4 and 5.4), and the partial (ca. 450 bp) nucleotide sequence of its CTX-M gene was identical to the corresponding region of theblaCTX-M-3 gene. However, MICs of piperacillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, and aztreonam characterizing the transconjugant R+ [E. coli 2527/96] were substantially higher than those for C. freundiitransconjugants. This effect could be due to eventual differences in coding sequences apart from the sequenced region of the E. coli blaCTX-M gene or differences in levels of CTX-M-3 production. Plasmid DNA purified from R+ [E. coli 2527/96] was actually found to have a differentPstI restriction map than that of plasmids extracted fromC. freundii transconjugants, and so, the different sequence context of the β-lactamase gene might be responsible for quantitative differences in the phenotypes of the strains. It is noteworthy that at least two different plasmids carrying CTX-M genes have been spread among strains of different Enterobacteriaceae species present in the hospital and that these plasmids also contain a gene encoding another β-lactamase (with a pI of 5.4; probably the TEM-1 enzyme) and determine resistance to aminoglycosides.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

M.G. was partially supported by the FEMS fellowship.

We thank Ewa Wasińska for her contribution in susceptibility testing and Waleria Hryniewicz and Stephen Murchan for critical reading of the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 14 July 1997.
    • Returned for modification 12 November 1997.
    • Accepted 2 February 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ambler R. P.
    The structure of β-lactamases. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 289 1980 321 331
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Arakawa Y.,
    2. Ohta M.,
    3. Kido N.,
    4. Mori M.,
    5. Ito H.,
    6. Komatsu T.,
    7. Fujii Y.,
    8. Kato N.
    Chromosomal β-lactamase of Klebsiella oxytoca, a new class A enzyme that hydrolyzes broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33 1989 63 70
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Barthélémy M.,
    2. Peduzzi J.,
    3. Bernard H.,
    4. Tancrède C.,
    5. Labia R.
    Close amino acid sequence relationship between the new plasmid-mediated extended-spectrum β-lactamase MEN-1 and chromosomally encoded enzymes of Klebsiella oxytoca. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1122 1992 15 22
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bauernfeind A.,
    2. Casellas J. M.,
    3. Goldberg M.,
    4. Holley M.,
    5. Jungwirth R.,
    6. Mangold P.,
    7. Röhnisch T.,
    8. Schweighart S.,
    9. Wilhelm R.
    A new plasmidic cefotaximase from patients infected with Salmonella typhimurium. Infection 20 1992 158 163
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bauernfeind A.,
    2. Grimm H.,
    3. Schweighart S.
    A new plasmidic cefotaximase in a clinical isolate of Escherichia coli. Infection 18 1990 294 298
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Bauernfeind, A., H. Grimm, I. Stemplinger, S. Ernst, and R. Jungwirth. 1995. Repeated incidence of CTX-M-1 (MEN) extended spectrum β-lactamase in Europe, abstr. 4210. Can. J. Infect. Dis. 6(Suppl. C):470C.
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bauernfeind A.,
    2. Stemplinger I.,
    3. Jungwirth R.,
    4. Ernst S.,
    5. Casellas J. M.
    Sequences of β-lactamase genes encoding CTX-M-1 (MEN-1) and CTX-M-2 and relationship of their amino acid sequences with those of other β-lactamases. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40 1996 509 513
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bauernfeind A.,
    2. Stemplinger I.,
    3. Jungwirth R.,
    4. Mangold P.,
    5. Amann S.,
    6. Akalin E.,
    7. Ang Ö.,
    8. Bal C.,
    9. Casellas J. M.
    Characterization of β-lactamase gene blaPER-2, which encodes an extended-spectrum class A β-lactamase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40 1996 616 620
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Brosius J.,
    2. Dull T. J.,
    3. Sleeter D. D.,
    4. Noller H. F.
    Gene organization and primary structure of a ribosomal RNA operon from Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 148 1981 107 127
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ishii Y.,
    2. Ohno A.,
    3. Taguchi H.,
    4. Imajo S.,
    5. Ishiguro M.,
    6. Matsuzawa H.
    Cloning and sequence of the gene encoding a cefotaxime-hydrolyzing class A β-lactamase isolated from Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39 1995 2269 2275
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Jarlier V.,
    2. Nicolas M.,
    3. Fournier G.,
    4. Philippon A.
    Extended broad-spectrum β-lactamases conferring transferable resistance to newer β-lactam agents in Enterobacteriaceae: hospital prevalence and susceptibility patterns. Rev. Infect. Dis. 10 1988 867 878
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Livermore D. M.
    β-Lactamases in laboratory and clinical resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8 1995 557 584
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Matthew M.,
    2. Harris A. M.,
    3. Marshall M. J.,
    4. Ross G. W.
    The use of analytical isoelectric focussing for detection and identification of β-lactamases. J. Gen. Microbiol. 88 1975 169 178
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard M7-A4. 1997 National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Wayne, Pa
  15. 15.↵
    1. Perilli M.,
    2. Franceschini N.,
    3. Segatore B.,
    4. Amicosante G.,
    5. Oratore A.,
    6. Duez C.,
    7. Joris B.,
    8. Frère J. M.
    Cloning and sequencing of the gene encoding the β-lactamase from Citrobacter diversus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 83 1991 79 84
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Reynaud A.,
    2. Peduzzi J.,
    3. Barthélémy M.,
    4. Labia R.
    Cefotaxime-hydrolysing activity of the β-lactamase of Klebsiella oxytoca D488 could be related to a threonine residue at position 140. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 81 1991 185 192
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. 17.↵
    1. Sanger F.,
    2. Nicklen S.,
    3. Coulson A. R.
    DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74 1977 5463 5467
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. van Belkum A.,
    2. Kluytmans J.,
    3. van Leeuwen W.,
    4. Bax R.,
    5. Quint W.,
    6. Peters E.,
    7. Fluit A.,
    8. Vandenbroucke-Grauls C.,
    9. van den Brule A.,
    10. Koeleman H.,
    11. Melchers W.,
    12. Meis J.,
    13. Elaichouni A.,
    14. Vaneechoutte M.,
    15. Moonens F.,
    16. Maes N.,
    17. Struelens M.,
    18. Tenover F.,
    19. Verbrugh H.
    Multicenter evaluation of arbitrary primed PCR for typing of Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33 1995 1537 1547
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Cefotaxime-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeIsolates from a Hospital in Warsaw, Poland: Identification of a New CTX-M-3 Cefotaxime-Hydrolyzing β-Lactamase That Is Closely Related to the CTX-M-1/MEN-1 Enzyme
Marek Gniadkowski, Ines Schneider, Andrzej Pal/ucha, Renate Jungwirth, Barbara Mikiewicz, Adolf Bauernfeind
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Apr 1998, 42 (4) 827-832; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.42.4.827

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cefotaxime-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeIsolates from a Hospital in Warsaw, Poland: Identification of a New CTX-M-3 Cefotaxime-Hydrolyzing β-Lactamase That Is Closely Related to the CTX-M-1/MEN-1 Enzyme
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Cefotaxime-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeIsolates from a Hospital in Warsaw, Poland: Identification of a New CTX-M-3 Cefotaxime-Hydrolyzing β-Lactamase That Is Closely Related to the CTX-M-1/MEN-1 Enzyme
Marek Gniadkowski, Ines Schneider, Andrzej Pal/ucha, Renate Jungwirth, Barbara Mikiewicz, Adolf Bauernfeind
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Apr 1998, 42 (4) 827-832; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.42.4.827
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

cefotaxime
Cephalosporin Resistance
cephalosporins
Enterobacteriaceae
Enterobacteriaceae Infections
beta-lactamases

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596