Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

Mechanism of Resistance to Amikacin and Kanamycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

George J. Alangaden, Barry N. Kreiswirth, Arlette Aouad, Minoo Khetarpal, Felicitas R. Igno, Soraya L. Moghazeh, Elias K. Manavathu, Stephen A. Lerner
George J. Alangaden
Division of Infectious Diseases 1 and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry N. Kreiswirth
Public Health Research Institute TB Center, New York, New York 10016 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arlette Aouad
Division of Infectious Diseases 1 and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Minoo Khetarpal
Division of Infectious Diseases 1 and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Felicitas R. Igno
Division of Infectious Diseases 1 and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Soraya L. Moghazeh
Public Health Research Institute TB Center, New York, New York 10016 2
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elias K. Manavathu
Division of Infectious Diseases 1 and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen A. Lerner
Division of Infectious Diseases 1 and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 3 Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.42.5.1295
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

An A1400G mutation of the rrs gene was identified inMycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) strain ATCC 35827 and in 13 MTB clinical isolates resistant to amikacin-kanamycin (MICs, >128 μg/ml). High-level cross-resistance may result from such a mutation since MTB has a single copy of the rrs gene. Another mechanism(s) may account for high-level amikacin-kanamycin resistance in two mutants and lower levels of resistance in four clinical isolates, all lacking the A1400G mutation.

We examined resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) to the deoxystreptamine aminoglycosides amikacin (AK) and kanamycin (KM) in contrast to its resistance to streptomycin (SM), a streptidine drug. In MTB cross-resistance occurs between AK and KM (2) but not between AK-KM and SM (21).

High-level SM resistance in MTB is associated with alterations of the ribosomal target site resulting from mutations in the rpsLgene of the S12 ribosomal protein or in the 530 or 915 region of therrs gene of the 16S rRNA (4, 6-9, 13, 16, 17). In Escherichia coli, ribosomal binding of KM is affected by mutation in the 1400 region of the rrs gene (14), and mutations in this region produce resistance to various aminoglycosides (5). We had identified an A1400G mutation in the rrs gene in a KM-resistant strain of MTB (ATCC 35827) (1). To study further the mechanism(s) of AK-KM resistance, we selected AK-resistant mutants of H37Rv (a standard susceptible strain of MTB) and characterized the 1400 region of the rrsgene in these mutants and in clinical isolates of MTB resistant to AK-KM. A subsequent report (19) noted a similar mutation in AK-resistant strains of Mycobacterium smegmatis, M. bovis, and MTB.

(This study was presented in part at the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, New Orleans, La., September 15 to 18, 1996 [1].)

H37Rv served as the wild-type strain of MTB susceptible to all drugs. ATCC 35827 is an in vitro mutant of H37Rv resistant to KM. Aminoglycoside-resistant mutants of H37Rv were selected on Middlebrook 7H10 agar plates containing SM and AK at 1, 2, 4, and 8 μg/ml. Inoculum titers were determined by plating diluted aliquots of cells onto drug-free agar. Seventeen clinical isolates of MTB resistant to various antituberculosis agents, including AK and KM, were obtained from PHRI TB Center, New York, N.Y. Testing of susceptibility to AK, KM, and SM was performed twice by the proportional method (11). Susceptibilities of clinical isolates to other drugs were determined in various clinical laboratories. Resistance to AK, KM, or SM was defined as an MIC of >2 μg/ml. Resistance to other antituberculosis agents was as described elsewhere (11, 20).

Chromosomal DNA from each MTB strain was genotyped by using a standardized Southern blot hybridization method based on the insertion sequence IS6110 (22). DNA fingerprint patterns were compared by using a scanning densitometer with the BioImage Whole Band Analyzer software (version 3.3), and the strains were catalogued as described elsewhere (12). PCR amplification of the genomic DNA was performed with primers ML51 and ML52 for the rpsL gene (306-bp product) (9). Flanking primers RRS30 (GGCTCCCTTTTCCAAAGGGAG) and RRS1539 (GGGGCGTTTTGCTGGTGCTCC) were used to amplify the entirerrs gene (1,589-bp product) (10), or primers RRS1096 (GCGCAACCCTTGTCTCATGTTG) and RRS1539 were used to amplify just the 1400 region (464-bp product) of this gene (10). Amplification was carried out for 40 cycles (1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 60°C, and 1 min at 72°C) using Taqpolymerase. PCR products were cloned (18) with the pGEM-T vector system (Promega). Plasmid DNA of selected clones was sequenced by using T7 DNA polymerase (Sequenase 2.0; USB). Analysis of nucleotide sequences was performed with PC Gene software (IntelliGenetics). PCR amplification of DNA from each isolate was done in duplicate, and each product was sequenced. Numbering of nucleotides was based on the MTBrpsL and rrs genes (9, 10).

Mutants of parental strain H37Rv (MICs of AK, KM, and SM = 1 μg/ml) appeared at a frequency of 2 × 10−6 on agar containing 2 μg of AK or SM per ml. At 4 μg/ml of either drug, the frequency was 2 × 10−8. No mutants (<10−9) were obtained at 8 μg of AK or SM per ml.

Strain ATCC 35827 (Table 1) and strains A2B and A4B selected from H37Rv at 2 and 4 μg of AK per ml, respectively, displayed resistance to both AK and KM, but only modest cross-resistance to SM. The 17 clinical isolates (Table 1) included 14 strains differentiated on the basis of IS6110 DNA fingerprinting and displayed either low-level (MIC, 4 to 64 μg/ml) (four isolates) or high-level (MIC, >256 μg/ml) (13 isolates) cross-resistance to AK and KM. All 17 isolates were resistant to SM. Phenotypic differences in drug susceptibility among isolates within strain designations W and W1 may indicate these isolates are possibly different strains.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Drug susceptibility profile of amikacin-kanamycin-resistant laboratory strains and clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis and their mutations in therrs gene

AK-resistant mutants A2B and A4B had no mutations in either therpsL or rrs gene. However, strain ATCC 35827, which is resistant to KM, displayed an A1400G mutation in therrs gene (10) and had the wild-typerpsL gene. The same A1400G mutation was noted in all 13 clinical isolates with MICs of AK-KM of >256 μg/ml. None of our four clinical isolates with MICs of AK-KM of ≤64 μg/ml displayed any mutation in the 1400 region.

Mutants of strain H37Rv resistant to SM or AK appeared at frequencies of 2 × 10−6 and 2 × 10−8 at concentrations two and four times the parental MICs, respectively. The magnitude of frequencies for both SM (streptidine drug) and AK (deoxystreptamine drug) suggests that resistance to each subclass of aminoglycoside results from a single mutation. We found no mutants of H37Rv in the presence of SM and AK at 8 μg/ml, yet mutants A2B and A4B, selected with 2 and 4 μg of AK per ml, respectively, displayed MICs of AK of 64 to >128 μg/ml. The reason for our failure to obtain mutants by using 8 μg of AK per ml is not clear.

Mutants and clinical isolates displayed cross-resistance to AK and KM. The fourfold rise in MICs of SM among the AK-KM-resistant mutants is comparable to that noted in KM-resistant MTB (21). The SM resistance in many of the clinical isolates is associated with a mutation in the rpsL gene that produces a Lys-43-Arg mutation in the S12 ribosomal protein (4). The presence of the A1400G mutation in these isolates might contribute in part to the observed SM resistance.

Strain ATCC 35827, with high-level resistance to only AK-KM, had an A1400G mutation of the rrs gene of the 16S rRNA (10) (corresponding to position 1408 in the E. coli rrs gene) (5, 15). All 13 clinical isolates (10 different strains) with MICs of AK-KM of >256 μg/ml had this mutation. Ribosomal binding of KM in E. coli occurs in the 1400 region (15), and methylation of adenine at this position (1408) in Streptomyces tenjimariensis results in resistance to KM and apramycin (3, 5). MTB has only a single copy of the rrs gene (10), so such a point mutation results in resistance to AK-KM. A recent report (19) supports these findings. The same A-to-G mutation at position 1408 (E. coli numbering) was present in in vitro mutants of M. smegmatis and M. bovis resistant to AK, gentamicin, and tobramycin (MICs, >500 μg/ml) and in eight AK-KM-resistant clinical isolates of MTB (19). Allelic exchange experiments in an M. smegmatis mutant harboring a single rRNA operon demonstrated that the A1408G mutation confers resistance to AK, gentamicin, and tobramycin (19). Therefore, it seems that high-level resistance to both AK and KM in our MTB isolates results from a point mutation in the 1400 position of therrs gene.

Resistance to AK-KM apparently arises also from a mutation(s) in another gene(s), as in mutants A2B and A4B (MICs of AK-KM of 64 to >128 μg/ml). A similar mechanism or another mechanism(s) may account for AK-KM resistance in the four clinical isolates with MICs of AK-KM of ≤64 μg/ml and no mutations in the 1400 region of therrs gene, although we have not ruled out mutation in the other 73% of the nucleotide sequence of the gene that was not examined.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank William Brown for use of the Mycobacteriology Laboratory of the Detroit Medical Center and Karen Eckert for secretarial assistance.

This study was supported in part by the Wayne State University Research and Development Fund (S.A.L.).

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 26 June 1997.
    • Returned for modification 19 December 1997.
    • Accepted 25 February 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Alangaden G. J.,
    2. Igno F. R.,
    3. Zvonok N. M.,
    4. Manavathu E. K.,
    5. Lerner S. A.
    (1996) Mechanism(s) of amikacin and streptomycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, abstr. C136. Program and abstracts of the 36th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. (American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C), p 58.
  2. ↵
    1. Allen B. W.,
    2. Mitchison D. A.,
    3. Chan Y. C.,
    4. Yew W. W.,
    5. Allan W. G. L.,
    6. Girling D. J.
    (1983) Amikacin in the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. Tubercle 64:111–118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Beauclerk A. A. D.,
    2. Cundliffe E.
    (1987) Sites of action of two ribosomal RNA methylases responsible for resistance to aminoglycosides. J. Mol. Biol. 193:661–671.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Cooksey R. C.,
    2. Morlock G. P.,
    3. McQueen A.,
    4. Glickman S. E.,
    5. Crawford J. T.
    (1996) Characterization of streptomycin resistance mechanisms among Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from patients in New York City. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40:1186–1188.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. DeStasio E. A.,
    2. Moazed D.,
    3. Noller H. F.,
    4. Dahlberg A. E.
    (1989) Mutations in 16S ribosomal RNA disrupt antibiotic-RNA interactions. EMBO J. 8:1213–1216.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Douglass J.,
    2. Steyn L. M.
    (1993) A ribosomal gene mutation in streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. J. Infect. Dis. 167:1505–1506.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Finken M.,
    2. Kirschner P.,
    3. Meier A.,
    4. Wrede A.,
    5. Böttger E. C.
    (1993) Molecular basis of streptomycin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis alterations of the ribosomal protein S12 gene and point mutations within a functional 16S ribosomal RNA pseudoknot. Mol. Microbiol. 9:1239–1246.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Heym B.,
    2. Honoré N.,
    3. Truffot-Pernot C.,
    4. Banerjee A.,
    5. Schurra C.,
    6. Jacobs W. R. Jr.,
    7. Van Embden J. O. A.,
    8. Grosset J. H.,
    9. Cole S. T.
    (1994) Implications of multidrug resistance for the future of short-course chemotherapy of tuberculosis: a molecular study. Lancet 344:293–298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Honoré N.,
    2. Cole S. T.
    (1994) Streptomycin resistance in mycobacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:238–242.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Kempsell K. E.,
    2. Ji Y. E.,
    3. Estrada-G I. C. E.,
    4. Colston M. J.,
    5. Cox R. A.
    (1992) The nucleotide sequence of the promoter, 16S & RNA and spacer region of the ribosomal RNA operon of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and comparison with Mycobacterium leprae precursor rRNA. J. Gen. Microbiol. 938:1717–1727.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Kent P. T.,
    2. Kubica G. P.
    (1985) Public health mycobacteriology: a guide for level III laboratory. (Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga).
  12. ↵
    1. Kreiswirth B. N.,
    2. Moss A.
    (1996) Genotyping multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis in New York City. in Tuberculosis. eds Rom W. N., Garay S. M. (Little, Brown and Company, New York, N.Y), pp 199–209.
  13. ↵
    1. Meier A.,
    2. Kirschner P.,
    3. Bange F.-C.,
    4. Vogel U.,
    5. Böttger E. C.
    (1994) Genetic alterations in streptomycin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: mapping of mutations conferring resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:228–233.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Moazed D.,
    2. Noller H. F.
    (1987) Interaction of antibiotics with functional sites in 16S ribosomal RNA. Nature 327:389–394.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Moazed D.,
    2. Stem S.,
    3. Noller H. F.
    (1986) Rapid chemical probing of conformation in 16S ribosomal RNA and 30S ribosomal subunits using primer extension. J. Mol. Biol. 187:399–416.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Morris S.,
    2. Bai A. H.,
    3. Suffys P.,
    4. Porbillo-Gomez L.,
    5. Fairchok M.,
    6. Rouse D.
    (1995) Molecular mechanisms of multiple drug resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Infect. Dis. 171:954–960.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Nair J.,
    2. Rouse D. A.,
    3. Bai G.-H.,
    4. Morris S. L.
    (1993) The rpsL gene and streptomycin resistance in single and multiple drug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol. Microbiol. 10:521–527.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Sambrook J.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y), 2nd ed.
  19. ↵
    1. Sander P.,
    2. Prammananan T.,
    3. Böttger E. C.
    (1996) Introducing mutations into a chromosomal rRNA gene using genetically modified eubacterial host with a single rRNA operon. Mol. Microbiol. 22:841–848.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. ↵
    1. Siddiqui S. H.
    (1995) Radiometric (BACTEC) tests for slowly growing mycobacteria. in Clinical microbiology procedures handbook. ed Isenberg H. (American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C), pp 5.14.1–5.14.14.
  21. ↵
    1. Tsukamura M.,
    2. Mizuno S.
    (1975) Cross-resistance relationships among the aminoglycoside antibiotics in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 88:269–274.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. van Embden J. D. A.,
    2. Cave D. M.,
    3. Crawford J. T.,
    4. et al.
    (1993) Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting. Recommendations for a standardized methodology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:406–409.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Mechanism of Resistance to Amikacin and Kanamycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
George J. Alangaden, Barry N. Kreiswirth, Arlette Aouad, Minoo Khetarpal, Felicitas R. Igno, Soraya L. Moghazeh, Elias K. Manavathu, Stephen A. Lerner
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy May 1998, 42 (5) 1295-1297; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.42.5.1295

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mechanism of Resistance to Amikacin and Kanamycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
Share
Mechanism of Resistance to Amikacin and Kanamycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
George J. Alangaden, Barry N. Kreiswirth, Arlette Aouad, Minoo Khetarpal, Felicitas R. Igno, Soraya L. Moghazeh, Elias K. Manavathu, Stephen A. Lerner
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy May 1998, 42 (5) 1295-1297; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.42.5.1295
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596