Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Chemistry; Biosynthesis

The Genes degQ, pps, and lpa-8(sfp) Are Responsible for Conversion of Bacillus subtilis 168 to Plipastatin Production

Kenji Tsuge, Takashi Ano, Mitsuyo Hirai, Yoshiyuki Nakamura, Makoto Shoda
Kenji Tsuge
Research Laboratory of Resources Utilization, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takashi Ano
Research Laboratory of Resources Utilization, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mitsuyo Hirai
Research Laboratory of Resources Utilization, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshiyuki Nakamura
Research Laboratory of Resources Utilization, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Makoto Shoda
Research Laboratory of Resources Utilization, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.43.9.2183
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Bacillus subtilis YB8 produces the lipopeptide antibiotic plipastatin. B. subtilis MI113, which is a derivative of strain 168, was converted into a new plipastatin producer, strain 406, by competence transformation with the chromosomal DNA of YB8. Transposon mini-Tn10 insertional mutagenesis was applied to strain 406, which revealed that lpa-8(sfp) (encoding 4′-phosphopantetheinyl transferase) and thepps operon (located between 167 and 171°) are essential for plipastatin production. The pps operon was previously suggested to encode putative peptide synthetases (A. Tognoni, E. Franchi, C. Magistrelli, E. Colombo, P. Cosmina, and G. Grandi, Microbiology 141:645–648, 1995) and was thought to be the fengycin operon (V. Tosato, A. M. Albertini, M. Zotti, S. Sonda, and C. V. Bruschi, Microbiology 143:3443–3450, 1997). We claim that the pps operon is the pli operon, encoding plipastatin synthetase. By using a new high-performance liquid chromatography system, we revealed that strain 168 expressing onlylpa-8 can also produce plipastatin, although the yield is very low. However, the introduction of the pleiotropic regulatordegQ of strain YB8 into strain 168 expressinglpa-8 resulted in a 10-fold increase in the production of plipastatin.

Bacillus strains produce many kinds of bioactive peptides as secondary metabolites. Some of them are synthesized nonribosomally by a large multifunctional enzyme complex. Among them, surfactin (4), tyrocidine (21), gramicidin S (42), and bacitracin (15) are well characterized at the genetic level. Surfactin is a lipopeptide produced by Bacillus subtilis(14). Genetic studies of surfactin biosynthesis were performed extensively following the transfer of a genetic locus responsible for surfactin production to strain JH642, a derivative ofB. subtilis 168 (24).

The B. subtilis genome project determined the DNA sequence of strain 168 and revealed that there are two large operons which encode nonribosomal peptide synthetases (17). The surfactin operon is located between 32 and 35°. The other operon, located between 167 and 171° (pps operon), was thought to be the fengycin operon, because significant homology was observed between the fengycin synthetase gene of fengycin-producing B. subtilisF29-3 (2) and the operon from strain 168 (2, 38, 39). Fengycin is a lipopeptide fungicide which consists of almost the same kind of amino acids and β-hydroxy fatty acids as plipastatin (36, 45). However, there is no direct evidence which indicates a correlation between the operon of strain 168 and the production of fengycin at the product level.

Strain MI113 is a derivative of strain 168 which was generated by the transformation of strain RM125 (leuB8 arg-15 hsdRM) with BD224 (trpC2 thr-5 recA4) DNA (13, 36a) and does not show any clear fungicidal effect in vitro. In hybridization experiments performed by Chen et al. (2) on MI113 chromosomal DNA with the fengycin synthase gene of F29-3 as a probe, no hybridization signal was detected. From these results, it was determined that there was no fengycin operon in strain MI113 (2).

We isolated B. subtilis YB8, which suppresses the growth of phytopathogenic fungi in vitro (32). The suppressive effect of strain YB8 is mainly due to production of the antifungal lipopeptide antibiotic plipastatin (41, 46). Plipastatin was originally isolated from Bacillus cereus BMG302-fF67 as an inhibitor of phospholipase A2 (44).

The structure of plipastatin is as follows: RCO→L­Glu→D­Orn→L­Tyr→D­allo­Thr→L­Glu→D­Ala/Val‖↓O←L­Ile←D­Tyr←L­Gln←L­Prowhere R is a β-hydroxy fatty acid (26-28). We discovered that strain YB8 produces surfactin as well as plipastatin (40) and cloned and characterized the gene lpa-8(sfp [23]), which is required for the production of both plipastatin and surfactin in strain YB8 (41). The gene lpa-8 encodes 4′-phosphopantetheinyl transferase, which converts inactive apoenzyme peptide synthetases to their active holoenzyme forms by posttranslational transfer of the 4′-phosphopantetheinyl moiety of coenzyme A to the synthetases (19). Strains 168 and MI113 have an inactive sfp allele (sfp0), which is why they cannot produce surfactin even though they have the intact surfactin operon. Although lpa-8 is essential for the production of two lipopeptides in YB8, the introduction oflpa-8 into MI113 or 168 induced only surfactin production, and in our previous study, plipastatin was not detectable either by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or by an assay for antifungal activity in vitro (41).

In this study, MI113 was converted into a coproducer of plipastatin and surfactin by transformation with YB8 chromosomal DNA. We applied transposon mutagenesis to the resultant transformant, strain 406, and determined that the pps operon and lpa-8 are both essential for plipastatin production.

To prove directly that the pps operon in strain 168 encodes plipastatin synthetases, we improved the HPLC system so as to enable the detection of a trace amount of plipastatin production from strain 168 supplied with lpa-8. This is the first report showing that although the pps operon in strain 168 is still active, this strain cannot produce plipastatin because of thesfp0 mutation.

We had previously cloned the degQ gene of YB8 (designateddegQYB8) as an enhancer of extracellular protease production in strain 168. degQ is a pleiotropic regulatory gene which controls the production of degradative enzymes, an intracellular protease and several secreted enzymes (levansucrase, alkaline proteases and metalloproteases, α-amylase, β-glucanase, and xylanase) (16, 22). When we ablated the genedegQYB8 in strain YB8, plipastatin production in YB8 was severely reduced but no significant change was observed in surfactin production, indicating that degQYB8 is necessary for plipastatin production in YB8. Therefore, the role ofdegQYB8 in the production of plipastatin was investigated in strain 168 expressing plasmid-borne lpa-8.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and media.The B. subtilis strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table1. Plasmid pHV1249 was obtained from the Bacillus Genetic Stock Center of Ohio State University, and plasmids pNEXT24, pNEXT44, and pNEXT24A were obtained from M. Itaya. Low-salt Luria-Bertani (LB) medium contained (per liter) 10 g of Polypeptone (Nippon Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), 5 g of yeast extract, and 5 g of NaCl and was adjusted to pH 7.2. ACS medium (45) containing (per liter) 100 g of sucrose, 11.7 g of citric acid, 4 g of Na2SO4, 5 g of yeast extract, 4.2 g of (NH4)2HPO4, 0.76 g of KCl, 0.420 g of MgCl2 · 6H2O, 10.4 mg of ZnCl2, 24.5 mg of FeCl3 · 6H2O, and 18.1 mg of MnCl2 · 4H2O was adjusted to pH 6.9 with NH4OH and was used in the production of plipastatin. When necessary, antibiotics were added at the following concentrations: ampicillin, 50 μg/ml; chloramphenicol, 5 μg/ml; erythromycin, 10 μg/ml; tetracycline, 20 μg/ml; and neomycin, 20 μg/ml.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Strains and plasmids used in this study

Plipastatin production in vitro was detected by the formation of a clear inhibitory zone on LB agar medium containing a spore suspension of a phytopathogenic fungus, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.lycopersici J1 SUF119, as described previously (41).

Purification of plipastatins.The purification of plipastatin was carried out by using a modification of a method developed previously (41). B. subtilis 406 was cultivated in 200 ml of ACS medium in a 500-ml shake flask for 2 days at 30°C. The 60 liters of culture collected from 300 flasks was adjusted to pH 2.0 with HCl, and the acid precipitate was collected and extracted with 3 liters of 95% ethanol. The extract was concentrated under reduced pressure and extracted with a solution of butanol and H2O (1 liter:1 liter). The butanol phase was recovered, and 3 volumes (3.3 liters) of hexane were added. After separation of the suspension, the aqueous phase was recovered and 300 ml of butanol-hexane (1:1 [vol/vol]) was added. After centrifugation (8,000 × g for 10 min), the supernatant was concentrated to produce a brown crude powder, which was then dissolved in 12 ml of propanol. This solution was loaded on a propanol-filled column of Silica Gel 60 (Merck) (×20 [wt/wt] powder) and was successively eluted with 1 column volume of propanol, 2 column volumes of 90% propanol, and 2.5 column volumes of 80% propanol. The 80% propanol eluate was further purified by reversed-phase preparative HPLC with a Prep-ODS column (GL Sciences, Tokyo, Japan; 2-cm diameter by 25 cm at a flow rate of 10 ml/min with detection at 205 nm) with a mixture of acetonitrile and 1 mM trifluoroacetic acid (1:1 [vol/vol]). The main peak was concentrated and subjected to the same HPLC system with a mixture of acetonitrile and 10 mM ammonium acetate (1:1 [vol/vol]). Two main fractions, called fractions A and B, were collected. Fraction A was further separated into peaks 1 and 2 by using the same HPLC system with a mixture of acetonitrile and acetate buffer (2% potassium acetate plus 6% acetic acid) (1:1 [vol/vol]). Fraction B was separated into peaks 3 and 4 by using the same HPLC system with a mixture of 40 mM ammonium acetate and acetonitrile (1:1 [vol/vol]). All of these fractions were passed through Sephadex LH-20 columns with 80% methanol to remove the salts.

HPLC analysis of plipastatin.Plipastatin was extracted as follows. After 2 days’ cultivation of a B. subtilis strain in 40 ml of ACS medium, the culture was acidified to pH 2.0 with 12 N HCl. Then the precipitate was collected by centrifugation and was extracted with ethanol. The extracted solution was filtered through a 0.2-μm-pore-size polytetrafluoroethylene membrane (Advantec, Tokyo, Japan).

Plipastatin was detected and quantified by reversed-phase HPLC as follows: the filtrate described above was injected into an HPLC column (Inertsil ODS-2 [4.6-mm diameter by 250 mm]; GL Sciences), which was eluted at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min with two solvent gradients of 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid (eluent A) and acetonitrile-isopropyl alcohol (3:7 [vol/vol]) plus 0.02% trifluoroacetic acid (eluent B). The gradient conditions were as follows: starting at 60% eluent A and 40% eluent B, eluent A was linearly decreased to 0% by increasing the amount of eluent B over 30 min and was kept at 0% for over 5 min.

Mass spectrometry and 1H NMR.Collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) mass spectra of protonated molecular ions [M+H]+ by fast atom bombardment (FAB) ionization were obtained by the B/E linked scanning method with a JMS-700 MStation (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) under the following conditions: 6 keV of xenon for impacting particles, glycerol plusm-nitrobenzylalcohol for the matrix, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid for the solvent, and helium for the collision gas. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of purified substances were recorded on a JNM-GX500 NMR spectrometer (JEOL Ltd.) at 500 MHz and 55°C in methanol-d4.

Transformation and DNA manipulation.The preparation of competent cells, transformation of Escherichia coli andB. subtilis, and routine DNA manipulations were performed by the method of Anagnostopoulos and Spizizen (1) with slight modifications, as described previously (41).

Transposon mutagenesis.Transposon mini-Tn10mutagenesis was carried out as described by Petit et al. (31). The transposon-carrying plasmid pHV1249 was introduced into B. subtilis 406 by the competent cell method (41), and the resultant chloramphenicol-resistant (Cmr) colonies were inoculated into LB medium containing chloramphenicol and incubated at 30°C. When the culture reached the logarithmic phase (optical density at 660 nm of 0.6 to 0.8), it was plated on LB agar medium containing chloramphenicol, followed by incubation at 51°C. Thermoresistant Cmr colonies were regarded as mini-Tn10 insertional mutants.

Southern blot analysis.For NotI restriction analysis, DNA was purified in agarose plugs as described by Itaya and Tanaka (12). DNA fragments were separated by using a hand-made contour-clamped homogeneous electric field pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) apparatus (3) with a 1% agarose gel (Sigma; type II) with 0.5× TBE (1× TBE is 89 mM Tris–89 mM boric acid–2 mM EDTA) at 5 V/cm for 20 h at 13°C with a switching ramp of 6 to 15 s, which was designed to optimally separate DNA fragments in the range from 9 to 300 kb. Concatemers of λ phage (New England Biolabs, Inc.) were used as standard molecular weight markers. The digoxigenin DNA labeling and detection kit (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany) was used for hybridization and detection according to the methods described by the manufacturer, and disodium 3-(4-methoxyspiro {1,2-dioxetane-3,2′-(5′-chloro)tricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decan}-4-yl) phenyl phosphate (CSPD; Tropix, Inc., Bedford, Mass.) was used as a chemiluminescent substrate of alkaline phosphatase. Prehybridization was carried out for 1 h at 42°C in a solution containing 5× SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M sodium chloride plus 0.015 M sodium citrate [pH 7.0]), 50% formamide, 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), 7% sodium dodecyl phosphate, 2% skim milk, 0.1% lauroylsarcosine, and 50 μg of fish sperm DNA per ml. Hybridization was performed overnight at 42°C in a prehybridization solution containing a denatured digoxigenin-labeled DNA probe. Filters were washed twice for 15 min at 68°C in 0.1× SSC containing 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate.

Construction of degQ-related mutants.The 0.8-kbEcoRV fragment containing degQ of YB8 (degQYB8) was cloned into the HincII site of pUC19, creating plasmid pUC19HP1. The BamHI fragment of the neomycin resistance (Nmr) gene cassette from pUCN1 was inserted into the FbaI site in thedegQYB8 coding region of pUC19HP1 which was prepared from strain JM110, generating plasmid pUCdegQYB8::Nmr. Plasmid pUCdegQYB8::Nmr was digested with Sse8387I and ligated into the PstI site of pE194, forming pEdegQYB8::Nmr (Fig.1).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Disruption of degQYB8 in strain YB8 by insertional plasmid mutagenesis. Details are described in Materials and Methods.

The disruption of the degQYB8 coding region in YB8 was performed by using the thermosensitive replication origin of pE194 as follows (Fig. 1). First, pEdegQYB8::Nmr was transformed into YB8 by electroporation, as described previously (41). The strain YB8(pEdegQYB8::Nmr) was plated on LB agar medium containing neomycin and erythromycin and then incubated at 48°C. The resultant strain, YB8::pEdegQYB8::Nmr, was cultivated in a liquid medium without selective pressure at 30°C for 10 generations. The culture was diluted and plated on LB agar medium to obtain single colonies. The neomycin and erythromycin resistance of the resultant colonies was assayed. Finally, thedegQYB8-disrupted mutant, designated YB8degQYB8::Nmr, was isolated by the selection of neomycin-resistant and erythromycin-sensitive colonies. For complementation, plasmid pCRV was constructed by the insertion of a 0.8-kb EcoRV fragment containing degQYB8 into the PvuII site of pC194 and transformed into YB8degQYB8::Nmr by electroporation.

Strain 791(pC81AP), which contains degQYB8, was constructed from strain 168(pC81AP) by the Campbell-type integration of plasmid pUC19HP1NmrF in which the Nmr cassette was ligated into the PstI site of pUC19HP1 (Table 1).

Strain 786, a degQYB8-disrupted mutant of strain 406, was constructed from strain 406 by double crossover recombination of plasmid pUCdegQYB8::Nmr.

DNA sequencing of the degQ region.ThedegQ region of each B. subtilis strain was cloned by PCR with primers 5′-CCTATTGAGATTTGCGGTGTCACGCAGGAC-3′ and 5′-CCCCCCTCCCATTCCATTTTACTAAATGGGA-3′. PCR was performed with TaKaRa LA PCR kit, version 2 (Takara Shuzo, Kyoto, Japan). PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 4 min at 94°C, 30 cycles of 20 s at 98°C, and 1 min at 68°C in a model TP480 TaKaRa PCR thermal cycler.

The PCR products were blunted with the DNA blunting kit (Takara Shuzo) and were cloned into the HincII site of pUC19. The resultant plasmids were sequenced on a model 4000L DNA sequencer (Li-Cor) with the Thermo Sequenase cycle sequencing kit (Amersham) and IRD41-labeled primers.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.The DNA sequence data from the degQ region of YB8 have been deposited in the DDBJ, EMBL, and GenBank nucleotide sequence databases under accession no.AB010576.

RESULTS

Conversion of strain MI113 into a plipastatin producer.In order to convert strain MI113 into a plipastatin producer, the transformation of MI113 with the chromosomal DNA of strain YB8 was necessary. However, due to the absence of proper markers, the detection of the transformants was not possible. Therefore, congression was done as follows. Cotransformation of MI113 with the chromosomal DNA of YB8 and a replicative plasmid DNA of pTB522 conferring tetracycline resistance (9) was performed and tetracycline-resistant transformants were selected. Colonies exhibiting growth suppression of the fungus F. oxysporum on a solid medium were selected as plipastatin producers. The plasmid was cured by overnight cultivation without selective pressure. A plipastatin-producing clone (designated strain 406) was selected and further characterized.

Transposon mutagenesis of strain 406.Strain 406 was transformed with the transposon-carrying plasmid pHV1249, and Tn10 insertion mutants were isolated by selection for Cmr. Among 6,000 mini-Tn10 insertion mutants assayed for the loss of growth suppression of F. oxysporumin vitro, 39 mutants showed defective production of plipastatin on the plate assay. All these mutants except one (mutant strain 706) exhibited hemolytic activity on blood-agar plates, which was evidence for surfactin production. The location of the mini-Tn10insertion in mutant strain 706, which produces neither plipastatin nor surfactin, was confirmed to be in lpa-8 (sfp), which is required for the production of both plipastatin and surfactin (41), because the production of both lipopeptides was recovered by the introduction of an intact lpa-8 gene carried on a plasmid.

Nine of the 38 mutants with both Cmr and Emrwere removed because their phenotypes might be due to integration of the entire pHV1249 into the chromosome as described earlier (31). The other 29 Cmr and Emsmutants were used in further experiments.

Isolation and identification of the antifungal antibiotic produced by strain 406.We compared the HPLC peak pattern of the culture extract of strain 406 with that of a mutant strain with a transposon insertion. Figure 2 shows HPLC peak patterns of strain 703, which is representative of 29 Cmrand Ems mutants, and of wild-type strain 406. There were several peaks from the extract of strain 406 which could not be detected from the extract of strain 703. Assuming that these peaks from strain 406 were antifungal substances, we isolated and purified four substances corresponding to peaks 1 to 4 as described in Materials and Methods, and their structures were determined. Amino acid analysis of the hydrolysates of the purified substances, as well as chirality analysis, showed that the hydrolysate contained d-Ala(1) [d-Val(1) in peak 3],d-allo-Thr(1), l-Glx(3),l-Pro(1), l-Ile(1), l-Tyr(1),d-Tyr(1), and d-Orn(1) in molar ratios.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

HPLC analysis of ethanol extracts of the acid precipitate from culture broths of B. subtilis 406 (left) and mutant strain 703 with a transposon inserted (right). Arrows indicate the peaks which were isolated and purified. SF and PL indicate the surfactin group and plipastatin group, respectively. OD, optical density.

The FAB-mass spectrometry analysis resulted in protonated molecular ion peaks [M+H]+ (m/z is 1463.8, 1463.8, 1491.8, and 1477.8 from compounds isolated from HPLC peaks 1 to 4, respectively). To determine the peptide sequences of these substances, FAB-mass spectrometry with a B/E linked scanning method was performed. The representative CAD mass spectrum of the protonated molecular ion peak [M+H]+ of HPLC peak 1 is shown in Fig.3B. In the case of proline-containing cyclic peptides, like iturin A (10, 29) or tyrocidine (37), the initial ring opening occurs preferentially at the N terminus of proline (8). As the plipastatin also contains proline in its cyclic portion, it was assumed that the ring opening occurred preferentially between alanine and proline, as shown in Fig.3A. In fact, the observed protein fragment ion peaks (m/z = 225.9, 389.0, 502.4, 1162.6, 1263.6, and 1392.7) fit the calculated mass of the fragmentation of a linear peptide with a ring opening located between alanine and proline (Fig.3A and B). Furthermore, protein fragment ion peaks (m/z= 966.4, 1080.5, and 1209.5) coincided with the predicted mass of the fragmentation of the branched portion of plipastatin A1 (Fig. 3A and B).

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

(A) Calculated mass from the fragment ion peaks of plipastatin A1 (left) and its ring form opened between Ala and Pro (right). (B) FAB-linked scanning CAD mass spectrum of the protonated molecular ion peak ([M+H]+; m/z, 1463.8) of the substance purified from peak 1 as shown in Fig. 2.

These substances exhibited the same molecular weight and CAD mass spectra (data not shown), although peaks 1 and 2 were isolated separately in the HPLC preparation. We thought that these compounds differed in the structure of their β-hydroxy fatty acids, so1H NMR spectra of these compounds were compared. They exhibited similar patterns except for the shape of the signals corresponding to the methyl substituent at high field. There was a methyl triplet signal at 0.88 ppm, which suggested the structure of 3-hydroxyhexadecanoic acid (n-C16h3) (27) in peak 2, whereas there were two methyl signals at 0.85 ppm (doublet) and at 0.86 ppm (triplet) in peak 1, which implied the structure of 13-methyl-3-hydroxypentadecanoic acid (a-C15h3) (27). Therefore, we determined peak 2 to be plipastatin A1 (28) and peak 1 to be a new plipastatin A which was an isomer of plipastatin A1. As the 1H NMR spectra of peaks 3 and 4 were similar to those of peaks 2 and 1 at high field, respectively (data not shown), we identified peak 3 as plipastatin B1 (28) and peak 4 as plipastatin A2 (28). From these results, the antifungal substances produced by strain 406 were determined to be a group of plipastatins.

Identification of NotI fragment with mini-Tn10 inserted.Chromosomal DNAs from strain 406 and its plipastatin-defective mutants were digested with restriction enzyme NotI and separated by PFGE (Fig.4A). Following electrophoresis, the DNAs were transferred to a nylon membrane and were hybridized with a probe for mini-Tn10 to determine the location of the insertion of mini-Tn10 in the chromosome, as shown in Fig. 4B. Three sizes of NotI fragments, 13 kb (6 of 29 mutants), 24 kb (20 of 29 mutants), and 144 kb (3 of 29 mutants), were detected. The 144-kb fragment was judged to be equivalent to the NotI fragment designated 5N (12), because the value of 144 kb agreed well with the sum of 1 kb from the integrated mini-Tn10 and 143 kb from the 5N NotI fragment (12) of strain 168. In addition, the existence of 12-kb (12,313 bp) and 23-kb (22,859 bp)NotI fragments between 5N and 10N (122 kb) in strain 168 is known (12, 17), and we surmised that they correspond to the detected 13- and 24-kb fragments.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Southern blot analysis to identify the location of the gene cluster responsible for plipastatin production. Samples were digested with restriction enzyme NotI prior to PFGE. (A) Ethidium bromide (EtBr) staining. (B) Detection of mini-Tn10insertion-containing NotI fragments by using the 1-kbEcoRV fragment of pHV1249 as a probe. (C) Identification of the pNEXT24 homologous fragment by using pNEXT24 as a probe. (D) Identification of the pNEXT44 homologous fragment by using pNEXT44 as a probe.

To identify these fragments precisely, rehybridization was performed by using pNEXT24 (12) (Fig. 4C) and pNEXT44 (12) (Fig. 4D) as probes. Plasmid pNEXT24 contains a fragment of chromosomal DNA from strain 168, derived from the region containing the 12- and 23-kb NotI fragments which link fragments 5N and 10N. In contrast, plasmid pNEXT44 contains the 23-kb fragment linking region and the 5N NotI fragment, as shown in Fig.5. Since all three of the mini-Tn10 fragments hybridized with pNEXT24 or pNEXT44, the gene cluster responsible for plipastatin production was located in the region between 5N and 10N (167 to 171°) in strain 168 (12).

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

ORFs and NotI restriction map in the region between the two NotI fragments, 5N and 10N. This figure is compiled from data in references 38 and39. Five ORFs which encode plipastatin synthetase are indicated. The putative amino acid-activating domain, racemase domain (dotted area), and thioesterase domain (black area) are also shown. Note that this amino acid-activating domain arrangement is different from that proposed by Tosato et al. (39). The cloned region in pNEXT24 and pNEXT44 and the insertions in the chromosome of strains 751, 752, and 753 are displayed above. + and − indicate plipastatin production positive and negative, respectively.

Inactivation of plipastatin synthetase gene with pNEXT24 and pNEXT44.The cloned fragments of strain 168 chromosomal DNA in pNEXT24 and pNEXT44 were sequenced. The sequences of thePstI fragment of pNEXT24 and the EcoRI fragment of pNEXT44 matched that previously determined by Tognoni et al. (38). These results implied that the large open reading frames (ORFs), believed to correspond to putative peptide synthetases in strain 168 (38, 39), encode plipastatin synthetases.

To confirm that the chromosomal fragments cloned in plasmids pNEXT24 and pNEXT44 were part of the plipastatin synthetase operon, pNEXT44 was integrated into strain 406 by Campbell-type insertion, but all the Cmr transformants, which were produced by the insertion of pNEXT44, did not lose the ability to produce plipastatin. In fact, as pNEXT44 contains the end of ppsD and the beginning ofppsE (strain 753 in Fig. 5), the duplication of this region by Campbell integration was thought to result in an intactppsE gene, which was probably expressed by transcriptional read-through or by the activity of the Cmr promoter of pNEXT44.

To disrupt ppsD completely, plasmid pNEXT44B2 was constructed by the insertion of an Nmr cassette into the NotI site of pNEXT44 and was introduced into strain 406. All the Nmr colonies which appeared on the selection plate were defective in the production of plipastatin. Similarly, plasmid pNEXT24A, which also had an Nmr cassette inserted into the NotI site of pNEXT24, was introduced into strain 406. The resultant colonies exhibited no plipastatin production. Representative clones of these plipastatin-negative mutants are shown in Fig. 5 as 752 and 751, respectively. From these results, we conclude that this region encodes plipastatin synthetase.

Production of plipastatin by strains carrying lpa-8.To determine whether strain 168(pC81AP), which expresses lpa-8contained on a plasmid, can produce plipastatin, we constructed appsB disruption strain of strain 168(pC81AP) by a double crossover recombination of the linearized plasmid pNEXT24A. The newly constructed strain was named strain 790(pC81AP), and we compared the HPLC peak pattern of 168(pC81AP) with that of 790(pC81AP) (Fig.6). They showed almost the same pattern except for the difference observed in the fractions taken at 18 to 22 min, when the plipastatin group is eluted (×16 area in Fig. 6). Although the concentration of plipastatin B1 in 168(pC81AP) was very low (approximately 1 ppm), it was reproducible.

Fig. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

HPLC analysis of ethanol extracts of the acid precipitate from the culture broths of B. subtilis168(pC81AP), 790(pC81AP), and 791(pC81AP). SF and PL indicate the surfactin group and plipastatin group, respectively. ×16, 16-fold magnification of the optical density (OD) at 205 nm.

Role of degQ of YB8 in plipastatin production.We cloned a 0.8-kb EcoRV fragment from YB8 by shotgun cloning, which had enhanced extracellular protease activity when expressed in strain 168 in a previous experiment. The sequence of this fragment completely matched that of degQ of strain 168, but the upstream sequence of degQ has several base substitutions compared with that of strain 168 (Fig.7). Especially, degQ of strain YB8 has a single base substitution of C for T at the promoter position −10 like degQ36, which has been known to lead to the hyperexpression of the degQ gene (47) (Fig. 7). For convenience, we will refer to degQ of YB8 asdegQYB8 and to degQ of 168 asdegQ0. To study the effect ofdegQYB8 on plipastatin production in YB8, we constructed a degQYB8 disruption mutant, YB8degQYB8::Nmr. The plipastatin B1 productivity of YB8degQYB8::Nmr was 5 ppm, which was about 10 times lower than that of YB8 (54 ppm). Introduction of a plasmid containing degQYB8 into YB8degQYB8::Nmr restored plipastatin B1 production (48 ppm) to the level of YB8 (Fig.8). These results indicate that thedegQYB8 gene was responsible for the hyperproduction of plipastatin in YB8.

Fig. 7.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

DNA sequence of the 0.8-kb EcoRV fragment containing degQYB8. The nucleotides of the strain 168 sequence that differ from that of strain YB8 are shown above. Boxes indicate −10 and −35 regions.Embedded Image, termination codon; >> <<, inverted repeat sequence.

Fig. 8.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

HPLC analysis of ethanol extracts of the acid precipitate from the culture broths of B. subtilis YB8, YB8degQYB8, and YB8degQYB8(pCRV). SF and PL indicate the surfactin group and plipastatin group, respectively. OD, optical density.

Furthermore, a plasmid containing degQYB8 was transformed into strain 168(pC81AP), and the obtained transformant 791(pC81AP), which possesses both lpa-8 anddegQYB8, produced plipastatin B1 at about 10 ppm (Fig. 6) and showed fungicidal activity in vitro. This productivity is 10-fold greater than that of 168(pC81AP) and the same as that of strain 406. From this result, we determined that the introduction ofdegQYB8 into strain 168(pC81AP) on a plasmid enhances plipastatin production.

DISCUSSION

Tognoni et al. (38) and Tosato et al. (39) determined the DNA sequence of this region of the chromosome of strain 168 and suggested the existence of large proteins which contain structural motifs associated with the subunits of previously characterized peptide synthetases. From these reports, there are five ORFs (from ppsA to ppsE) organized into 10 amino acid-activating domains, and the second, fourth, sixth, and ninth domains have putative racemase activity (Fig. 5). Furthermore, at some positions the first and fifth domains showed homology to the glutamic acid-activating domain of surfactin synthetase, and the second domain was remarkably similar to the ornithine-activating domain of gramicidin S synthetase. From these sequencing results, Tosato et al. proposed that this region is the fengycin operon (39). Fengycin is a lipopeptide antibiotic produced by B. subtilis F29-3, and it has the same amino acid composition as plipastatin except for one amino acid. One glutamic acid in fengycin is a glutamine in plipastatin, and it was concluded that fengycin contains three glutamic acid residues and no glutamine from elemental analysis (45). However, ambiguity still exists regarding the structure of fengycin. The fengycin operon had been cloned and sequenced from B. subtilis F29-3 (2, 20) and has significant homology with the putative peptide synthetase operon in strain 168 (20, 39).

In this study, we demonstrated that the antibiotic produced by strain 406 had the same sequence as plipastatin. Considering the biosynthesis of surfactin (4), we think that plipastatin is first synthesized in linear form, according to the amino acid-activating domain order on the pps operon, and then is cyclized by the formation of a lactone bond between the hydroxyl group ofl-Tyr and the carboxyl group of l-Ile. The amino acid sequence of the linear form of the plipastatin precursor is thought to be as follows: β-hydroxy fatty acid–l-Glu–d-Orn–l-Tyr–d-allo-Thr–l-Glu–d-Ala(Val)–l-Pro–l-Gln–d-Tyr–l-Ile. In the putative peptide synthetase as well, homology is observed among the first, fifth, and eighth amino acid-activating domains. The amino acid sequence of the first domain is 98% identical to that of the fifth. However, the amino acid sequence of the eighth domain is 49% identical to that of the first and fifth, indicating that the eighth domain activates glutamine but not glutamic acid. This peptide sequence and chiral pattern agree well with the domain arrangement of the putative peptide synthetase of strain 168. We propose the amino acid-activating domain assignment of the pps operon that is shown in Fig. 5. This assignment is not the same as that for the fengycin operon proposed by Tosato et al. (39). Recently,fenB, which is a fengycin synthetase gene and a homolog ofppsE, was cloned and sequenced. FenB overexpression revealed that FenB is responsible for isoleucine activation (20). This result agrees with our prediction of activation of isoleucine by PpsE. Indeed, since the 13C NMR spectrum of plipastatin resembles that of fengycin (data not shown), it is probable that fengycin has almost the same structure as plipastatin. From these results, we conclude that the gene cluster located between 167 and 171° is the plipastatin synthetase operon and propose thatppsA, ppsB, ppsC, ppsD, andppsE be renamed pliA, pliB,pliC, pliD, and pliE, respectively, as shown in Fig. 5.

Strain 168 also has a peptide synthetase for surfactin biosynthesis (4) but could not produce surfactin because of a mutation insfp, which encodes 4′-phosphopantetheinyl transferase (19). We have previously cloned lpa-8, which is identical to sfp from strain YB8, and determined that this gene was essential for the production of both surfactin and plipastatin in YB8 (41). The introduction of a plasmid containinglpa-8 into strain 168 resulted in both plipastatin and surfactin production, but plipastatin production was very poor (Fig.6), suggesting that there was some other gene responsible for plipastatin production.

In our previous investigation, we had cloned thedegQYB8 gene, which enhanced the protease activity in strain 168 (data not shown), and we think thatdegQYB8 is a hyperexpression type ofdegQ. When we introduced degQYB8 into strain 168(pC81AP), which has lpa-8 on the plasmid, the resultant strain 168 derivative 791(pC81AP), which possessed bothlpa-8 and degQYB8, produced a detectable amount of plipastatin when analyzed by HPLC. This shows thatdegQYB8 is responsible for the enhancement of plipastatin production. This gene is not essential, because adegQYB8 disruption in YB8 reduced the plipastatin production by 1/10. A similar observation has been reported for degradative enzyme production (18, 30).

We also sequenced the degQ region of strains 406 and MI113 and confirmed that plipastatin-producing 406 has thedegQYB8 promoter while the host strain MI113 has a degQ0 promoter like strain 168. This result indicates that the degQ0 region of strain 406 was exchanged with degQYB8 of YB8 by transformation. However, strain 786, which is adegQYB8-disrupted mutant derived from strain 406, did not exhibit a change in its plipastatin production (Table2). To clarify whetherdegQYB8 of strain 406 is inactive or not, plasmid pCRV, which carries a copy of degQYB8, was introduced into strain 406, but no significant change in strain 406(pCRV) plipastatin production was observed. Although we cannot explain why, it would seem that there is another pathway which bypassesdegQ in chimera strain 406.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Relevant genotypes and plipastatin production

degQ expression is known to be controlled by DegS-DegU and ComP-ComA modulator-effector pairs (22). The srfAoperon, which comprises the surfactin synthetase gene andcomS, is also regulated by ComP-ComA (25, 33). However, competence development requires nonphosphorylated DegU, whereas degradative enzyme production needs phosphorylated DegU (5). In our previous study, plipastatin was produced by YB8 from late logarithmic phase to early stationary phase, whereas surfactin was produced from early to late logarithmic phase (40). This delay in plipastatin production may be due to the requirement for the phosphorylated form of DegU. This is the first report that relates degQ to the production of a metabolite other than degradative enzymes. We summarize the collation of genotypes and plipastatin-producing phenotypes in Table 2 and show the pedigree tree of the key strains used in this study in Fig.9.

Fig. 9.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 9.

Pedigree tree of the key strains used in this study.degQ and lpa-8 genotypes are also indicated in boxes. Arrows show the direction of evolution. The construction of strain MI113 from strain 168 (dotted arrow) was done by several steps (13, 36a).

Recently, researchers have developed targeted replacements of amino acid-activating domains within the srfA operon with a variety of other amino acid-activating domains cloned from bacteria and fungi by PCR (35, 43) and succeeded in the production of peptides with modified amino acid sequences (34, 35). On the other hand, de Ferra et al. replaced the integral thioesterase type I domain within surfactin synthetase and demonstrated that the synthesis truncated lipopeptides (6). Because of its high specificity and efficiency of genetic transformation (7), strain 168 is a good candidate as a recipient for recombinant peptide synthetase genes. Therefore, the identification of a new peptide synthetase is significant because it activates unique amino acids in strain 168. In this respect, the presence of plipastatin synthetase will increase the production of a variety of modified peptides.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Mitsuhiro Itaya of Mitsubishi Kasei Institute of Life Sciences for his gifts of the plasmids pNEXT24, pNEXT44, and pNEXT24A and Nobuhiro Kita of Kanagawa Prefectural Agricultural Research Institute for the use of the nucleotide sequencer.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 1 March 1999.
    • Returned for modification 1 June 1999.
    • Accepted 29 June 1999.
  • Copyright © 1999 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Anagnostopoulos C.,
    2. Spizizen J.
    Requirements for transformation in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 81 1961 741 746
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Chen C. L.,
    2. Chang L. K.,
    3. Chang Y. S.,
    4. Liu S. T.,
    5. Tschen J. S. M.
    Transposon mutagenesis and cloning of the genes encoding the enzymes of fengycin biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 248 1995 121 125
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Chu G.,
    2. Vollrath D.,
    3. Davis R. W.
    Separation of large DNA molecules by contour-clamped homogeneous electric fields. Science 234 1986 1582 1585
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cosmina P.,
    2. Rodriguez F.,
    3. de Ferra F.,
    4. Grandi G.,
    5. Perego M.,
    6. Venema G.,
    7. van Singeren D.
    Sequence and analysis of the genetic locus responsible for surfactin synthesis in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 8 1993 821 831
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Dahl M. K.,
    2. Msadek T.,
    3. Kunst F.,
    4. Rapoport G.
    The phosphorylation state of the DegU response regulator acts as a molecular switch allowing either degradative enzyme synthesis or expression of genetic competence in Bacillus subtilis. J. Biol. Chem. 267 1992 14509 14514
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. de Ferra F.,
    2. Rodriguez F.,
    3. Tortora O.,
    4. Tosi C.,
    5. Grandi G.
    Engineering of peptide synthetases: key role of the thioesterase-like domain for efficient production of recombinant peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 272 1997 25304 25309
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Dubnau D. A.
    Genetic transfomation in Bacillus subtilis The molecular biology of bacilli Dubnau D. A. 1 1982 175 220 Academic Press New York, N.Y
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Eckart K.
    Mass spectrometry of cyclic peptides. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 13 1994 23 55
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. 9.↵
    1. Imanaka T.,
    2. Himeno T.,
    3. Aiba S.
    Effect of in vitro DNA rearrangement in the NH2-terminal region of the penicillinase gene from Bacillus licheniformis on the mode of expression in Bacillus subtilis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 131 1985 1753 1763
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Ishikawa K.,
    2. Niwa Y.,
    3. Hatakeda K.,
    4. Gotoh T.
    Computer-aided peptide sequencing of an unknown cyclic peptide from Bacillus subtilis. Org. Mass Spectrom. 23 1988 290 291
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. 11.
    1. Itaya M.,
    2. Kondo K.,
    3. Tanaka T.
    A neomycin resistance gene cassette selectable in a single copy state in the Bacillus subtilis chromosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 17 1989 4410
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Itaya M.,
    2. Tanaka T.
    Complete physical map of the Bacillus subtilis 168 chromosome constructed by gene-directed mutagenesis method. J. Mol. Biol. 220 1991 631 648
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Itaya M.,
    2. Tanaka T.
    Predicted and unsuspected alternations of the genomes structure of genetically defined Bacillus subtilis 168 strains. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 61 1997 56 64
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kakinuma A.,
    2. Oushida A.,
    3. Shima T.,
    4. Sugino H.,
    5. Isono M.,
    6. Tamura G.,
    7. Arima K.
    Confirmation of the structure of surfactin by mass spectrometry. Agric. Biol. Chem. 33 1969 1669 1671
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Konz D.,
    2. Klens A.,
    3. Schorgendorfer K.,
    4. Marahiel M. A.
    The bacitracin biosynthesis operon of Bacillus licheniformis ATCC10716: molecular characterization of three multi-modular peptide synthetases. Chem. Biol. 4 1997 927 937
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kunst F.,
    2. Msadek T.,
    3. Rapoport G.
    Signal transduction network controlling degradative enzyme synthesis and competence in Bacillus subtilis Regulation of bacterial differentiation. Piggot P., Moran C. P. Jr., Youngman P. 1994 1 20 American Society for Microbiology Washington, D.C
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kunst F.,
    2. Ogasawara N.,
    3. Moszer I.,
    4. et al.
    The complete genome sequence of the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature 390 1997 249 256
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kunst F.,
    2. Rapoport G.
    Salt stress is an environmental signal affecting degradative enzyme synthesis in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 177 1995 2403 2407
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lambalot R. H.,
    2. Gehring A. M.,
    3. Flugel R. S.,
    4. Zuber P.,
    5. LaCelle M.,
    6. Marahiel M. A.,
    7. Reid R.,
    8. Khosla C.,
    9. Walsh C. T.
    A new enzyme superfamily—the phosphopantetheinyl transferases. Chem. Biol. 3 1996 923 936
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Lin G. H.,
    2. Chen C. L.,
    3. Tschen J. S. M.,
    4. Tsay S. S.,
    5. Chang Y. S.,
    6. Liu S. T.
    Molecular cloning and characterization of fengycin synthetase gene fenB from Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 180 1998 1338 1341
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Mootz H. D.,
    2. Marahiel M. A.
    The tyrocidine biosynthesis operon of Bacillus brevis: complete nucleotide sequence and biochemical characterization of functional internal adenylation domains. J. Bacteriol. 179 1997 6843 6850
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Msadek T.,
    2. Kunst F.,
    3. Klier A.,
    4. Rapoport G.
    DegS-DegU and ComP-ComA modulator-effector pairs control expression of the Bacillus subtilis pleiotropic regulatory gene degQ. J. Bacteriol. 173 1991 2366 2377
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Nakano M. M.,
    2. Corbell N.,
    3. Besson J.,
    4. Zuber P.
    Isolation and characterization of sfp: a gene that functions in the production of the lipopeptide biosurfactant, surfactin, in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Gen. Genet. 232 1992 313 321
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Nakano M. M.,
    2. Marahiel M. A.,
    3. Zuber P.
    Identification of a gene locus required for biosynthesis of the lipopeptide antibiotic surfactin in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 170 1988 5662 5668
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Nakano M. M.,
    2. Zuber P.
    Mutational analysis of the regulatory region of the srfA operon in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 175 1993 3188 3191
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Nishikiori T.,
    2. Naganawa H.,
    3. Muraoka Y.,
    4. Aoyagi T.,
    5. Umezawa H.
    The conformational studies of plipastatin A1 by 400 MHz proton magnetic resonance. J. Antibiot. 39 1986 860 863
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Nishikiori T.,
    2. Naganawa H.,
    3. Muraoka Y.,
    4. Aoyagi T.,
    5. Umezawa H.
    Plipastatins: new inhibitors of phospholipase A2, produced by Bacillus cereus BMG302-fF67. II. Structure of fatty acid residue and amino acid sequence. J. Antibiot. 39 1986 745 754
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Nishikiori T.,
    2. Naganawa H.,
    3. Muraoka Y.,
    4. Aoyagi T.,
    5. Umezawa H.
    Plipastatins: new inhibitors of phospholipase A2, produced by Bacillus cereus BMG302-fF67. III. Structural elucidation of plipastatins. J. Antibiot. 39 1986 755 761
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Niwa Y.,
    2. Ishikawa K.
    Mass spectrometry of proteins: peptide sequencing and precise molecular weight measurement. J. Natl. Chem. Lab. Ind. 86 1991 95 102
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Ogura M.,
    2. Tanaka T.
    Expression of alkaline protease gene in Bacillus subtilis mutants that lack positive regulatory genes degR,degQ,senS,tenA, and proB. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 61 1997 372 374
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Petit M. A.,
    2. Bruand C.,
    3. Jannière L.,
    4. Ehrlich S. D.
    Tn10-derived transposons active in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 172 1990 6736 6740
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Phae C. G.,
    2. Sakaki M.,
    3. Shoda M.,
    4. Kubota H.
    Characteristics of Bacillus subtilis isolated from composts suppressing phytopathogenic microorganisms. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 36 1990 575 586
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    1. Roggiani M.,
    2. Dubnau D.
    ComA, a phosphorylated response regulator protein of Bacillus subtilis, binds to the promoter region of srfA. J. Bacteriol. 175 1993 3182 3187
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Schneider A.,
    2. Stachelhaus T.,
    3. Marahiel M. A.
    Targeted alteration of the substrate specificity of peptide synthetases by rational module swapping. Mol. Gen. Genet. 257 1998 308 318
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Stachelhaus T.,
    2. Schneider A.,
    3. Marahiel M. A.
    Rational design of peptide antibiotics by targeted replacement of bacterial and fungal domains. Science 269 1995 69 72
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Steller S.,
    2. Vollenbroich D.,
    3. Leenders F.,
    4. Stein T.,
    5. Conrad B.,
    6. Hofemeister J.,
    7. Jacques P.,
    8. Thonart P.,
    9. Vater J.
    Structural and functional organization of the fengycin synthetase multienzyme system from Bacillus subtilis b213 and A1/3. Chem. Biol. 6 1999 31 41
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 36a.↵
    Tanaka, T. Personal communication.
  38. 37.↵
    1. Tang X. J.,
    2. Thibault P.,
    3. Boyd R. K.
    Characterization of the tyrocidine and gramicidin fraction of the tyrothricin complex from Bacillus brevis using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 122 1992 143 151
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. 38.↵
    1. Tognoni A.,
    2. Franchi E.,
    3. Magistrelli C.,
    4. Colombo E.,
    5. Cosmina P.,
    6. Grandi G.
    A putative new peptide synthase operon in Bacillus subtilis: partial characterization. Microbiology 141 1995 645 648
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 39.↵
    1. Tosato V.,
    2. Albertini A. M.,
    3. Zotti M.,
    4. Sonda S.,
    5. Bruschi C. V.
    Sequence completion, identification and definition of the fengycin operon in Bacillus subtilis 168. Microbiology 143 1997 3443 3450
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 40.↵
    1. Tsuge K.,
    2. Ano T.,
    3. Shoda M.
    Characterization of Bacillus subtilis YB8, coproducer of lipopeptides surfactin and plipastatin. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 41 1995 541 545
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  42. 41.↵
    1. Tsuge K.,
    2. Ano T.,
    3. Shoda M.
    Isolation of gene essential for biosynthesis of the lipopeptide antibiotics plipastatin B1 and surfactin in Bacillus subtilis YB8. Arch. Microbiol. 165 1996 243 251
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 42.↵
    1. Turgay K.,
    2. Krause M.,
    3. Marahiel M. A.
    Four homologous domains in the primary structure of GrsB are related to domains in a superfamily of adenylate-forming enzymes. Mol. Microbiol. 6 1992 529 546
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 43.↵
    1. Turgay K.,
    2. Marahiel M. A.
    A general approach for identifying and cloning peptide synthetase genes. Pept. Res. 7 1994 238 241
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 44.↵
    1. Umezawa H.,
    2. Aoyagi T.,
    3. Nishikiori T.,
    4. Okuyama A.,
    5. Yamagishi Y.,
    6. Hamada M.,
    7. Takeuchi T.
    Plipastatins: new inhibitors of phospholipase A2, produced by Bacillus cereus BMG302-fF67. I. Taxonomy, production, isolation and preliminary characterization. J. Antibiot. 39 1986 737 744
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. 45.↵
    1. Vanittanakom N.,
    2. Loeffler W.,
    3. Koch U.,
    4. Jung G.
    Fengycin—a novel antifungal lipopeptide antibiotic produced by Bacillus subtilis F-29-3. J. Antibiot. 39 1986 888 901
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 46.↵
    1. Yamada S.,
    2. Takayama Y.,
    3. Yamanaka M.,
    4. Ko K.,
    5. Yamaguchi I.
    Biological activity of antifungal substances produced by Bacillus subtilis. J. Pestic. Sci. 15 1990 95 96
    OpenUrl
  48. 47.↵
    1. Yang M.,
    2. Ferrari E.,
    3. Chen E.,
    4. Henner D. J.
    Identification of the pleiotropic sacQ gene of Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 166 1986 113 119
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
The Genes degQ, pps, and lpa-8(sfp) Are Responsible for Conversion of Bacillus subtilis 168 to Plipastatin Production
Kenji Tsuge, Takashi Ano, Mitsuyo Hirai, Yoshiyuki Nakamura, Makoto Shoda
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Sep 1999, 43 (9) 2183-2192; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.43.9.2183

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Genes degQ, pps, and lpa-8(sfp) Are Responsible for Conversion of Bacillus subtilis 168 to Plipastatin Production
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Genes degQ, pps, and lpa-8(sfp) Are Responsible for Conversion of Bacillus subtilis 168 to Plipastatin Production
Kenji Tsuge, Takashi Ano, Mitsuyo Hirai, Yoshiyuki Nakamura, Makoto Shoda
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Sep 1999, 43 (9) 2183-2192; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.43.9.2183
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596