Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Susceptibility

Antipneumococcal Activities of GAR-936 (a New Glycylcycline) Compared to Those of Nine Other Agents against Penicillin-Susceptible and -Resistant Pneumococci

Dianne B. Hoellman, Glenn A. Pankuch, Michael R. Jacobs, Peter C. Appelbaum
Dianne B. Hoellman
Department of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033,and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Glenn A. Pankuch
Department of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033,and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael R. Jacobs
Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter C. Appelbaum
Department of Pathology, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033,and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.44.4.1085-1088.2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

GAR-936, a new glycylcycline, had lower MICs (≤0.016 to 0.125 μg/ml) for 201 penicillin- and tetracycline-susceptible and -resistant pneumococcal strains than tetracycline (≤0.06 to 128 μg/ml), minocycline (≤0.06 to 16.0 μg/ml), or doxycycline (≤0.06 to 32.0 μg/ml). GAR-936 was also bactericidal against 11 of 12 strains tested at the MIC after 24 h, with significant kill rates at earlier time points.

The incidence of pneumococcal resistance to penicillin G and other ß-lactam and non-ß-lactam compounds has increased worldwide at an alarming rate (1, 6, 7). In the United States, a recent survey of 1,476 strains showed that 49.6% were penicillin susceptible, 17.9% were of intermediate resistance (penicillin intermediate), and 32.5% were penicillin resistant. Macrolide MICs rose with those of penicillin G, with an overall macrolide resistance level of 33% (8).

Resistance to conventional oral tetracyclines (including minocycline and doxycycline) occurs with increased frequency among penicillin-intermediate and -resistant pneumococci, and genes coding for macrolide and tetracycline resistance are carried on the same transposon (6, 7). GAR-936 is a new broad-spectrum parenteral glycylcycline. Preliminary studies have shown that this drug is active against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci (13, 15).

This study compares the activity of GAR-936 against 201 penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate, or -resistant pneumococcal strains with those of three other tetracyclines, four ß-lactams, clarithromycin, and vancomycin. Additionally, the activities of these compounds against 12 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains of pneumococci were determined by the broth MIC and time-kill methods.

For determination of MICs by agar dilution, 51 penicillin-susceptible, 72 penicillin-intermediate, and 78 penicillin-resistant strains of pneumococci were utilized. For time-kill studies, four penicillin-susceptible, four penicillin-intermediate, and four penicillin-resistant strains were tested; of these, five were tetracycline susceptible (MIC, ≤2.0 μg/ml), 1 was tetracycline intermediate (MIC, 4.0 μg/ml), and six were tetracycline resistant (MIC, ≥8.0 μg/ml).

The agar dilution method used in this study to determine MICs of various antimicrobial agents for 201 pneumococcal strains has been used routinely for many years by our group (6, 7); Mueller-Hinton agar (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) supplemented with 5% sheep blood was employed. Microbroth MIC determinations for 12 strains were performed in accordance with the protocol recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (9). Standard quality control strains, includingStreptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 49619 (9), were included in each run of agar and broth dilution MIC determinations. All MIC studies were performed in air. All strains, recently isolated from stocks stored at −70°C and subcultured twice, grew in air and did not require added CO2 for growth. The susceptibility patterns of these strains are representative of those commonly encountered in the United States (8).

For time-kill studies, methods described previously were used (11, 12). The final inoculum was 5 × 105 to 5 × 106 CFU/ml. Growth controls with inoculum but no antibiotic were included with each experiment (11, 12). Viable-cell counts of antibiotic-containing suspensions were performed according to standard methods (11, 12). Colony counts were performed on plates yielding 30 to 300 colonies. The lower limit of sensitivity of colony counts was 300 CFU/ml. As mentioned above, all incubations were in ambient air without added CO2.

Time-kill assays were analyzed by determining the number of strains which yielded a Δlog10 CFU/ml of −1, −2, and −3 at 0, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h compared to counts at time zero. Antimicrobial agents were considered bactericidal at the lowest concentration that reduced the original inoculum by ≥3 log10 CFU/ml (99.9%) at each of the time periods, and they were considered bacteriostatic if the inoculum was reduced by 0 to 3 log10 CFU/ml. With the sensitivity threshold and inocula used in these studies, no problems were encountered in delineating 99.9% killing when it occurred. The problem of bacterial carryover was addressed by dilution, as described previously (11, 12). For tetracycline and clarithromycin time-kill testing, only strains with MICs of <8.0 and <4.0 μg/ml, respectively, were tested. In all cases, growth controls grew satisfactorily, without spontaneous autolysis.

The results of agar dilution MIC testing are presented in Table1. GAR-936 had lower MICs (≤0.016 to 0.125 μg/ml) than tetracycline (≤0.06 to 128 μg/ml), minocycline (≤0.06 to 16.0 μg/ml), and doxycycline (≤0.06 to 32.0 μg/ml) against all strains. MICs of all ß-lactams rose with those of penicillin G, with imipenem being the most active, followed by meropenem, ceftriaxone, and amoxicillin. Macrolide and tetracycline resistance occurred mainly in penicillin-intermediate and -resistant strains, and all strains were susceptible to vancomycin.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Agar dilution MICs for 201 pneumococcal isolates

Microbroth MICs of the 12 strains tested by the time-kill method were either identical to or differed by one dilution from those obtained by agar dilution (Table 2). Time-kill results are presented in Table 3. GAR-936 was bactericidal at the MIC after 24 h for 11 of the 12 strains tested; the remaining strain (for which the GAR-936 MIC was 0.06 μg/ml) was killed at eight times the MIC (0.5 μg/ml). GAR-936 showed significant kill rates at earlier time periods: at 12 h, 90% killing of all 12 strains occurred at twice the MIC, while after 6 h, 90% killing of all strains occurred at four times the MIC. The killing rates of other tetracyclines for the six susceptible strains were slightly lower than those of GAR-936. The bactericidal activities of ß-lactams were similar, with uniform bactericidal activity being exhibited at twice the MIC for amoxicillin, ceftriaxone, and imipenem and at eight times the MIC for meropenem after 24 h. Clarithromycin was bactericidal against six of seven strains with clarithromycin MICs of <4.0 μg/ml at twice the MIC after 24 h; vancomycin was bactericidal against 11 of 12 strains at twice the MIC at the same time point. The kill kinetics of GAR-936 against a tetracycline-resistant strain is depicted in Fig.1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Microbroth MICs for 12 strains tested by the time-kill method

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Results of time-kill assays of 12 pneumococcal strains

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Graphical depiction of GAR-936 kill kinetics versus a tetracycline-resistant (MIC, 64.0 μg/ml) strain of S. pneumoniae.

The glycylcyclines are semisynthetic tetracyclines exhibiting a broad spectrum of activity compared to conventional tetracyclines, with activity against gram-positive and -negative aerobes, anaerobes, chlamydiae, and mycoplasmas (2-5, 10, 14, 16, 17). GAR-936 is a newly described 9-t-butylglycylamido derivative of minocycline. This compound possesses activity against isolates possessing the two major determinants of tetracycline resistance, ribosomal protection and efflux (13, 15).

In the present study, MICs of GAR-936 against all pneumococci, irrespective of their susceptibility to ß-lactams, macrolides, or other tetracyclines, ranged between ≤0.016 and 0.125 μg/ml. These results are similar to those obtained by Petersen et al (13). Bactericidal activity was also found after 24 h for all 12 strains tested at ≤0.5 μg/ml. At the MIC, after 24 h, GAR-936 showed better kill kinetics, relative to the MIC, than other tetracyclines and was bactericidal for more strains than were the ß-lactams tested. It should be emphasized, however, that he relatively small number of strains tested makes interpretation of relatively small differences in kill kinetics problematic. More strains must be tested before such conclusions can be considered valid. Although tetracyclines are traditionally thought to be bacteriostatic agents, the present study shows that GAR-936 (and other tetracyclines, relative to their MICs) may be bactericidal after 24 h.

Of the other tetracyclines tested, minocycline and doxycycline had lower MICs than tetracycline; the significance of this phenomenon is unknown at this time. The MICs of and time-kills results for the other compounds tested are similar to those reported by others (7, 11, 12).

Although the results of toxicologic and pharmacokinetic studies are awaited, GAR-936 appears to be a promising new agent for treatment of infections caused by drug-resistant pneumococci.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by a grant from Wyeth-Ayerst Research Laboratories, Pearl River, N.Y.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 25 June 1999.
    • Returned for modification 26 November 1999.
    • Accepted 16 January 2000.
  • Copyright © 2000 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Appelbaum P. C.
    Antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae—an overview. Clin. Infect. Dis. 15 1992 77 83
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bergeron J.,
    2. Ammirati M.,
    3. Danley D.,
    4. James L.,
    5. Norcia M.,
    6. Retsema J.,
    7. Strick C. A.,
    8. Su W.-G.,
    9. Sutcliffe J.,
    10. Wondrack L.
    Glycylcyclines bind to the high-affinity tetracycline ribosomal binding site and evade Tet(M)- and Tet(O)-mediated ribosomal protection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40 1996 2226 2228
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Eliopoulos G. M.,
    2. Wennersten C. B.,
    3. Cole G.,
    4. Moellering R. C.
    In vitro activities of two glycylcyclines against gram-positive bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38 1994 534 541
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Goldstein F. W.,
    2. Kitzis M. D.,
    3. Acar J. F.
    N,N-Dimethylglycyl-amido derivative of minocycline and 6-demethyl-6-desoxytetracycline, two new glycylcyclines highly effective against tetracycline-resistant gram-positive cocci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38 1994 2218 2220
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Hamilton-Miller J. M. T.,
    2. Shah S.
    Activity of glycylcyclines CL 329998 and CL 331002 against minocycline-resistant and other strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 37 1996 1171 1175
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Jacobs M. R.
    Treatment and diagnosis of infections caused by drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin. Infect. Dis. 15 1992 119 127
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Jacobs M. R.,
    2. Appelbaum P. C.
    Antibiotic-resistant pneumococci. Rev. Med. Microbiol. 6 1995 77 93
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Jacobs M. R.,
    2. Bajaksouzian S.,
    3. Zilles A.,
    4. Lin G.,
    5. Pankuch G. A.,
    6. Appelbaum P. C.
    Susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae to 10 oral antimicrobial agents based on pharmacodynamic parameters: 1997 U.S. surveillance study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43 1999 1901 1908
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically 3rd ed. 1997 Approved standard M7-A4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, Pa.
  10. 10.↵
    1. Nord C. E.,
    2. Lindmark A.,
    3. Persson I.
    In vitro activity of DMG-Mino and DMG-DM Dot, two new glycylcyclines, against anaerobic bacteria. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 12 1993 784 786
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Pankuch G. A.,
    2. Jacobs M. R.,
    3. Appelbaum P. C.
    Study of comparative antipneumococcal activities of penicillin G, RP 59500, erythromycin, sparfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and vancomycin by using time-kill methodology. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38 1994 2065 2072
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Pankuch G. A.,
    2. Lichtenberger C.,
    3. Jacobs M. R.,
    4. Appelbaum P. C.
    Antipneumococcal activities of RP 59500 (quinupristin-dalfopristin), penicillin G, erythromycin, and sparfloxacin determined by MIC and rapid time-kill methodologies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40 1996 1653 1656
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Petersen P. J.,
    2. Jacobus N. V.,
    3. Weiss W. J.,
    4. Sum P. E.,
    5. Testa R. T.
    In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of a novel glycylcycline, the 9-t-butylglycylamido derivative of minocycline (GAR-936). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43 1999 738 744
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Testa R. T.,
    2. Petersen P. J.,
    3. Jacobus N. V.,
    4. Sum P.-E.,
    5. Lee V. J.,
    6. Tally F. P.
    In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activities of the glycylcyclines, a new class of semisynthetic tetracyclines. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37 1993 2270 2277
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Van Ogtrop M. L.,
    2. Andes D.,
    3. Craig W. A.,
    4. Vesga O.
    In vivo activity of two glycylcyclines (GAR-936 and WAY 152,288) against tetracycline-sensitive and -resistant bacteria, abstr. F-133 Abstracts of the 38th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 1998 266 American Society for Microbiology Washington, D.C.
  16. 16.↵
    1. Weiss W. J.,
    2. Jacobus N. V.,
    3. Petersen P. J.,
    4. Testa R. T.
    Susceptibility of enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae to the glycylcyclines. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 36 1995 225 230
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Wise R.,
    2. Andrews J. M.
    In vitro activities of two glycylcyclines. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38 1994 1096 1102
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Antipneumococcal Activities of GAR-936 (a New Glycylcycline) Compared to Those of Nine Other Agents against Penicillin-Susceptible and -Resistant Pneumococci
Dianne B. Hoellman, Glenn A. Pankuch, Michael R. Jacobs, Peter C. Appelbaum
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Apr 2000, 44 (4) 1085-1088; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.44.4.1085-1088.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Antipneumococcal Activities of GAR-936 (a New Glycylcycline) Compared to Those of Nine Other Agents against Penicillin-Susceptible and -Resistant Pneumococci
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Antipneumococcal Activities of GAR-936 (a New Glycylcycline) Compared to Those of Nine Other Agents against Penicillin-Susceptible and -Resistant Pneumococci
Dianne B. Hoellman, Glenn A. Pankuch, Michael R. Jacobs, Peter C. Appelbaum
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Apr 2000, 44 (4) 1085-1088; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.44.4.1085-1088.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Anti-Bacterial Agents
minocycline
Streptococcus pneumoniae

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596