Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Susceptibility

Mutant Prevention Concentration as a Measure of Antibiotic Potency: Studies with Clinical Isolates ofMycobacterium tuberculosis

Yuzhi Dong, Xilin Zhao, Barry N. Kreiswirth, Karl Drlica
Yuzhi Dong
Public Health Research Institute, New York, New York 10016
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xilin Zhao
Public Health Research Institute, New York, New York 10016
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry N. Kreiswirth
Public Health Research Institute, New York, New York 10016
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karl Drlica
Public Health Research Institute, New York, New York 10016
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.44.9.2581-2584.2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The mutant prevention concentration (MPC) of a C-8-methoxy fluoroquinolone exhibited a narrow distribution for 14 genetically diverse clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, indicating that results from single-isolate studies are likely to be representative. When one isolate was challenged with a variety of antituberculosis agents, C-8-methoxy fluoroquinolones were exceptional in having MPCs below the maximum concentration attained in serum by use of commonly recommended doses.

Antibiotic resistance is becoming an increasingly serious problem for many bacterial diseases (12). To help halt further selection of resistant mutants, we have defined a drug concentration threshold above which bacterial cells require the presence of two or more resistance mutations for growth (20). The simultaneous occurrence of multiple mutations is a rare event relative to the number of cells present during infection; consequently, administration of antibiotic above the concentration threshold, which we call the mutant prevention concentration (MPC), should severely restrict selection of resistant mutants. Experimentally, MPC has been taken as the drug concentration that allows no mutant to be recovered from a susceptible population of more than 1010 cells (7). For MPC to be therapeutically useful, it must be below the concentration achievable in serum or tissue with safe doses of antibiotic. Whether such situations exist has not been determined.

In earlier work we found that addition of a methoxy group to the C-8 position of N-1-cyclopropyl fluoroquinolones makes the compounds particularly effective against quinolone-resistant mutants ofEscherichia coli (13, 22), Staphylococcus aureus (7, 21), Mycobacterium bovis BCG (6, 7), and Mycobacterium tuberculosis(19). For M. bovis BCG the MPC of a C-8-methoxy fluoroquinolone was only 12% of that observed of its C-8-hydrogen derivative or a clinical standard, ciprofloxacin (7). Thus, C-8-methoxy fluoroquinolone attack of a pathogenic mycobacterium could provide a good experimental system for determination of whether MPC can be lower than the serum drug concentration.

In the present study we measured the susceptibilities of 14 M. tuberculosis isolates to PD161148, the fluoroquinolone that had previously been shown to have the most activity against mycobacteria, to determine whether diverse isolates respond to fluoroquinolones in the same general way. Test isolates with different IS6110DNA types were chosen (18). To minimize potential bias, we studied several clinical isolates from each of the three main genetic groups of M. tuberculosis (16). As an additional geographical test we examined strains collected from both the United States and Russia. We then chose one isolate, an outbreak strain from New Jersey (3), to compare the abilities of several new C-8-methoxy fluoroquinolones (Fig. 1) and conventional antituberculosis agents to restrict the selection of resistant mutants.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Fluoroquinolone structures.

Clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis were cultured as described previously (6). The MIC was determined by plating dilutions of cultures on 7H10 agar plates containing various concentrations of antibiotic (6). The concentration that reduced the number of colonies recovered by at least 99% relative to the number of untreated control colonies recovered was taken as the MIC. For mutant selection, cultures were grown to the stationary phase in liquid medium, concentrated by centrifugation (3,000 × g for 10 min), resuspended in fresh 7H9 medium (10), and applied in various amounts to agar plates containing different concentrations of antibacterial agent. More than 1010 CFU was plated for the highest antibiotic concentrations (>2 × 109 CFU to each of five agar plates). Colonies were counted after incubation at 37°C for 4 weeks, and they were retested for growth on drug-containing agar plates to confirm that they were resistant mutants.

Increasing the quinolone concentration caused colony recovery to decline sharply and then level to a plateau (Fig.2). A concentration was reached for the C-8-methoxy compound (PD161148) at which no mutant was recovered when more than 1010 cells were applied to agar plates (arrowhead on abscissa of Fig. 2). A plot of the plateau region using a linear scale, shown as an inset in Fig. 2, illustrates restriction of mutant selection by the C-8-methoxy compound under conditions in which mutant colonies were readily recovered with its C-8-H derivative, PD160793. Similar curves were obtained for all 14 strains, although in a few cases it was necessary to extrapolate linear plots (Fig. 2, inset) to estimate the MPC. The MPCs of PD161148 ranged from 1 to 4 μg/ml, with the MPC being 1 to 3 μg/ml for 85% of the isolates (Table1). The narrow range of MPCs indicates that measurement of MPC is likely to be useful for comparison of the potencies of fluoroquinolones against diverse isolates of M. tuberculosis.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Effect of fluoroquinolone concentration on selection of resistant mutants. M. tuberculosis isolate TN7804 was applied to agar plates containing the indicated concentrations of PD161148 (C-8-methoxy; open circles) or PD160793 (C-8-H; filled circles). After incubation, the number of drug-resistant colonies was recorded and plotted relative to the number of CFU applied to the drug-free agar plates. The arrowhead indicates the drug concentration at which no colony was recovered from plates containing C-8-methoxy fluoroquinolone when more than 1010 cells were applied. (Inset) Data for points where the fraction of cells recovered was below 10−7, replotted using a linear scale.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Effect of the C-8-methoxy fluoroquinolone PD161148 against clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis

The average MIC of PD161148 was approximately 0.2 μg/ml (Table 1), which was about half that observed for PD160793 (data not shown). For isolates for which MICs were low, MPCs tended to be low. Neither the MIC nor the MPC displayed a relationship with the genotypic group or the IS6110 DNA polymorphism type.

To compare antituberculosis agents for the ability to restrict selection of mutants, we recovered resistant mutants at a variety of concentrations of different drugs using M. tuberculosisstrain TN6515, a pan-susceptible isolate of the W4 IS6110DNA type (3). Mutation frequency was a complex function of drug concentration (Fig. 3). The several inflection points observed with isoniazid (Fig. 3A) and streptomycin (Fig. 3C) suggest that different resistance alleles may dominate at different antibiotic concentrations. This prediction is being tested. For ciprofloxacin (Fig. 3D), we showed previously that many different alleles are selected and that the abundance of any particular resistance allele depends on the drug concentration (22a).

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Effect of antituberculosis agent concentration on selection of resistant mutants. M. tuberculosis isolate TN6515 was applied to agar plates containing the indicated concentrations of isoniazid (A), rifampin (B), streptomycin (C), and ciprofloxacin (D). After incubation, the number of drug-resistant colonies was recorded and was plotted relative to the number of CFU applied to drug-free agar plates.

The MPCs of standard antituberculosis agents and C-8-methoxy fluoroquinolones were estimated by plating more than 1010 cells on drug-containing agar and determining the concentration that allowed recovery of no colony (Table2). These data show that MPC determinations are not limited to fluoroquinolones. However, for rifampin, streptomycin, and kanamycin we failed to find concentrations that prevented the recovery of mutants; for these compounds we obtained only minimum estimates of MPCs. Table 2 also lists the maximum concentrations of the commonly recommended doses of each compound achieved in serum. The concentrations of traditional antituberculosis agents in serum failed to exceed the MPCs; consequently, these compounds will select resistant mutants whenever they are administered as monotherapy (8, 20). In contrast, the C-8-methoxy fluoroquinolones moxifloxacin and PD135432 (gatifloxacin) had MPCs below the maximum concentration achievable in serum (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Potencies of anti-tuberculosis agents against M. tuberculosisa

The data described above indicate that tuberculosis may be treatable with C-8-methoxy fluoroquinolones at concentrations that will severely restrict the selection of resistant mutants. It may be possible to develop an effective dual-drug therapy by combining one of the C-8-methoxy fluoroquinolones with another antituberculosis drug: when the concentrations of both compounds are kept above their MICs and the concentration of the fluoroquinolone is above its MPC, three mutations would be required for bacterial growth. As discussed elsewhere (20), the key to preventing resistance from arising in the dual-drug situation is to have the pharmacokinetic profiles of the two compounds match such that no time exists when the concentration of only one compound is above its MIC and below its MPC. We are now examining potential partners for C-8-methoxy fluoroquinolones to create a highly effective combination therapy for the treatment of infections caused by strains of M. tuberculosis that are already resistant to isoniazid and rifampin.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank John Domagala, Marila Gennaro, Sam Kayman, and Tao Lu for critical comments on the manuscript. We also thank John Domagala and Glenn Tillotson for supplying fluoroquinolones.

The work was supported by grant AI35257 from the National Institutes of Health.

ADDENDUM IN PROOF

MIC99 and MPC of PD161148 were 0.06 and 2.3 μg/ml, respectively, for the laboratory strain H37Rv.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 16 August 1999.
    • Returned for modification 1 October 1999.
    • Accepted 19 June 2000.
  • Copyright © 2000 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    1. Acocella G.,
    2. Conti R.,
    3. Luisetti M.,
    4. Pozzi E.,
    5. Grassi C.
    (1985) Pharmacokinetic studies on antituberculosis regimens in humans. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 132:510–515.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.
    1. Acocella G.,
    2. Nonis A.,
    3. Perna G.,
    4. Patane E.,
    5. Gialdroni-Grassi G.,
    6. Grassi C.
    (1988) Comparative bioavailability of isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide administered in free combination and in a fixed triple formulation designed for daily use in antituberculosis chemotherapy. II. Two-month, daily administration study. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 138:886–890.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bifani P.,
    2. Mathema B.,
    3. Liu Z.,
    4. Moghazeh S.,
    5. Shopsin B.,
    6. Tempalski B.,
    7. Driscoll J.,
    8. Frothingham R.,
    9. Musser J.,
    10. Alcabes P.,
    11. Kreiswirth B.
    (1999) Identification of a W variant outbreak of Mycobacterium tuberculosis via population-based molecular epidemiology. JAMA 282:2321–2327.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.
    1. Black H. R.,
    2. Griffith R. S.,
    3. Peabody A. M.
    (1966) Absorption, excretion and metabolism of capreomycin in normal and diseased states. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 135:974–982.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.
    1. Cabana B.,
    2. Taggart J.
    (1973) Comparative pharmacokinetics of BB-KS and kanamycin in dogs and humans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 3:478–483.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Dong Y.,
    2. Xu C.,
    3. Zhao X.,
    4. Domagala J.,
    5. Drlica K.
    (1998) Fluoroquinolone action against mycobacteria: effects of C-8 substituents on bacterial growth, survival, and resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:2978–2984.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Dong Y.,
    2. Zhao X.,
    3. Domagala J.,
    4. Drlica K.
    (1999) Effect of fluoroquinolone concentration on selection of resistant mutants of Mycobacterium bovis BCG and Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:1756–1758.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Harris H. W.
    (1995) Chemotherapy of tuberculosis: the beginning. in Tuberculosis. eds Rom W. N., Garay S. M. (Little, Brown & Co. Boston, Mass), pp 745–749.
  9. 9.
    1. Israel D.,
    2. Gillum G.,
    3. Turik M.,
    4. Harvey K.,
    5. Ford J.,
    6. Dalton H.,
    7. Towle M.,
    8. Echols R.,
    9. Heller A.,
    10. Polk R.
    (1993) Pharmacokinetics and serum bactericidal titers of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin following multiple oral doses in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:2193–2199.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Jacobs W. R.,
    2. Kalpana G. V.,
    3. Cirillo J. D.,
    4. Pascopella L.,
    5. Snapper S. B.,
    6. Udani R. A.,
    7. Jones W.,
    8. Barletta R. G.,
    9. Bloom B. R.
    (1991) Genetic systems in mycobacteria. Methods Enzymol. 204:537–555.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.
    1. Kreiswirth B.,
    2. Moss A.
    (1995) Genotyping multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis in New York City. in Tuberculosis. eds Rom W. N., Garay S. M. (Little, Brown & Co. Boston, Mass), pp 199–209.
  12. 12.↵
    1. Levy S. B.
    (1998) Multidrug resistance—a sign of the times. N. Engl. J. Med. 338:1376–1378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Lu T.,
    2. Zhao X.,
    3. Drlica K.
    (1999) Gatifloxacin activity against quinolone-resistant gyrase: allele-specific enhancement of bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity by the C-8-methoxy group. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2969–2974.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.
    1. Montay G.
    (1996) Pharmacokinetics of sparfloxacin in healthy volunteers and patients: a review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 37 (Suppl. A):27–39.
  15. 15.
    1. Nakashima M.,
    2. Uematsu T.,
    3. Kosuge K.,
    4. Kusajima H.,
    5. Ooie T.,
    6. Masuda Y.,
    7. Ishida R.,
    8. Uchida H.
    (1995) Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of AM-1155, a new 6-fluoro-8-methoxy quinolone, in humans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39:2635–2640.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Sreevatsan S.,
    2. Pan X.,
    3. Stockbauer K.,
    4. Connell N.,
    5. Kreiswirth B.,
    6. Whittam T.,
    7. Musser J. M.
    (1997) Restricted structural gene polymorphism in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex indicates evolutionarily recent global dissemination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:9869–9874.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.
    1. Sullivan J. T.,
    2. Woodruff M.,
    3. Lettieri J.,
    4. Agarwal V.,
    5. Krol G. J.,
    6. Leese P. T.,
    7. Watson S.,
    8. Heller A. H.
    (1999) Pharmacokinetics of a once-daily oral dose of moxifloxacin (Bay 12-8039), a new enantiomerically pure 8-methoxy quinolone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2793–2797.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. van Embden J. D.,
    2. Cave M. D.,
    3. Crawford J. T.,
    4. Dale J. W.,
    5. Eisenach K. E.,
    6. Gicquel B.,
    7. Hermans P.,
    8. Martin C.,
    9. McAdam R.,
    10. Shinnick T. M.,
    11. Small P. M.
    (1993) Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:406–409.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Zhao B.-Y.,
    2. Pine R.,
    3. Domagala J.,
    4. Drlica K.
    (1999) Fluoroquinolone action against clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: effects of a C-8 methoxyl group on survival in liquid media and in human macrophages. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:661–666.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Zhao, X., and K. Drlica. A general strategy for restricting the selection of antibiotic-resistant mutants derived from fluoroquinolone studies. Clin. Infect. Dis., in press.
  21. 21.↵
    1. Zhao X.,
    2. Wang J.-Y.,
    3. Xu C.,
    4. Dong Y.,
    5. Zhou J.,
    6. Domagala J.,
    7. Drlica K.
    (1998) Killing of Staphylococcus aureus by C-8-methoxy fluoroquinolones. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:956–958.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Zhao X.,
    2. Xu C.,
    3. Domagala J.,
    4. Drlica K.
    (1997) DNA topoisomerase targets of the fluoroquinolones: a strategy for avoiding bacterial resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:13991–13996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 22a.
    Zhou, J., Y. Dong, X. Zhao, S. Lee, A. Amin, S. Ramaswamy, J. Domagala, J. Musser, and K. Drlica. Selection of antibiotic-resistant bacterial mutants: allelic diversity among fluoroquinolone-resistant mutations. J. Infect. Dis., in press.
  24. 23.
    1. Zitkova L.,
    2. Tousek J.
    (1974) Pharmacokinetics of cycloserine and terizidone. Chemotherapy (Basel) 20:18–28.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Mutant Prevention Concentration as a Measure of Antibiotic Potency: Studies with Clinical Isolates ofMycobacterium tuberculosis
Yuzhi Dong, Xilin Zhao, Barry N. Kreiswirth, Karl Drlica
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Sep 2000, 44 (9) 2581-2584; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.44.9.2581-2584.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mutant Prevention Concentration as a Measure of Antibiotic Potency: Studies with Clinical Isolates ofMycobacterium tuberculosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
Share
Mutant Prevention Concentration as a Measure of Antibiotic Potency: Studies with Clinical Isolates ofMycobacterium tuberculosis
Yuzhi Dong, Xilin Zhao, Barry N. Kreiswirth, Karl Drlica
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Sep 2000, 44 (9) 2581-2584; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.44.9.2581-2584.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • ADDENDUM IN PROOF
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596