Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Action: Physiological Effects

Unusual Susceptibility of a Multidrug-Resistant Yeast Strain to Peptidic Antifungals

Sławomir Milewski, Fiorenzo Mignini, Rajendra Prasad, Edward Borowski
Sławomir Milewski
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biochemistry, Technical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fiorenzo Mignini
Department of Cellular, Molecular and Animal Biology, University of Camerino, Camerino, Italy; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rajendra Prasad
School of Life Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward Borowski
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biochemistry, Technical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.1.223-228.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The susceptibility of Saccharomyces cerevisiae JG436 multidrug transporter deletion mutant, Δpdr5, to several antifungal agents was compared to that of JG436-derived JGCDR1 and JGCaMDR1 transformants, harboring the CDR1 and CaMDR1 genes, encoding the main drug-extruding membrane proteins ofCandida albicans. The JGCDR1 and JGCaMDR1 yeasts demonstrated markedly diminished susceptibility to the azole antifungals, terbinafine and cycloheximide, while that to amphotericin B was unchanged. Surprisingly, JGCDR1 but not JGCaMDR1 cells showed enhanced susceptibility to peptidic antifungals, rationally designed compounds containing inhibitors of glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase. It was found that these antifungal oligopeptides, as well as model oligopeptides built of proteinogenic amino acids, were not effluxed from JGCDR1 cells. Moreover, they were taken up by these cells at rates two to three times higher than by JG436. The tested oligopeptides were rapidly cleaved to constitutive amino acids by cytoplasmic peptidases. Studies on the mechanism of the observed phenomenon suggested that an additive proton motive force generated by Cdr1p stimulated uptake of oligopeptides into JGCDR1 cells, thus giving rise to the higher antifungal activity of FMDP [N3-(4-methoxyfumaroyl)-l-2,3-diaminopropanoic acid]-peptides.

The phenomenon of multidrug resistance is considered to be the major challenge for modern chemotherapy. Although better recognized and characterized in the case of cancer and bacterial cells, it is also becoming an emerging problem in antifungal chemotherapy, thus making worse the already difficult situation resulting from an increasing number of immunocompromised patients, the appearance of new human pathogenic fungi, and the very limited number of available antifungal chemotherapeutic agents (11). The molecular mechanism underlying the multidrug resistance is an overexpression of membrane proteins belonging to different classes of energy-dependent efflux pumps. Most of these proteins are the members of a family of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. A number of them have been already identified in fungi, including Cdr1p and Cdr2p in Candida albicans (30, 32) and Pdr5p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (2). Moreover, transporters of another type, the major facilitator superfamily (MFS), have been also detected, including a product of the CaMDR1 gene in C. albicans (6). The substrate spectrum of fungal multidrug transporters covers most of the drugs used in clinics for the treatment of disseminated infections, including fluconazole and itraconazole (1). On the other hand, the multidrug-resistant fungi retain in most cases the susceptibility to membrane-affecting agents: amphotericin B (31) and basic oligopeptides (13). This is in agreement with a general rule assuming that the “classical” substrate for drug-extruding pumps is a predominantly hydrophobic molecule, usually bearing a localized positive or negative charge, penetrating the cell membrane by free diffusion (36). However, some intracellularly acting antifungal compounds are transported into the cells by active transport systems. This group includes a known drug, 5-fluorocytosine (8), and several antifungal agents that have not reached clinics so far, including peptidic compounds, containing FMDP [N3-(4-methoxyfumaroyl)-l-2,3-diaminopropanoic acid], an inhibitor of glucosamine-6-phosphate (GlcN-6-P) synthase (24). Any data on the affinity of these compounds to multidrug efflux pumps have not been reported yet.

We present here the results of our recent studies on antifungal activity of FMDP-peptides against multidrug-resistant and drug-sensitive yeasts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Antifungal agents and other chemicals.Cycloheximide was from Sigma, St. Louis, Mo. Fluconazole and tioconazole were from Pfizer, Milano, Italy. Amphotericin B was from Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, N.Y., and terbinafine was from Sandoz, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland. FMDP, Nva-FMDP, and Lys-Nva-FMDP were synthesized by R. Andruszkiewicz, Technical University of Gdańsk. All other chemicals were from Sigma.

Yeast strains and growth conditions. S. cerevisiaeATCC 9763 cells were stored on Sabouraud agar slants and propagated in Sabouraud liquid medium at 30°C with shaking. S. cerevisiae JG436 (MATa pdr5::Tn5 leu2 met5 ura3-52 mak71 KRB1) was a kind gift from J. Golin, Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. This strain was hypersensitive to cycloheximide and some other unrelated antifungal agents (20). JG436 was transformed withCaMDR1-carrying plasmid pNC39 and CDR1-carrying plasmid pS12, which had a common vector background of pYEUra3 (12, 30). The resulting JG436 transformants are designated as JGCaMDR1 and JGCDR1. The JG436 yeast cells were propagated in a yeast nitrogen base-glucose (YNBG) minimal medium containing 0.67% YNB without amino acids (Difco), 2% glucose,l-methionine at 20 μg ml−1,l-leucine at 40 μg ml−1, and uracil at 30 μg ml−1, while the transformant strains were maintained in a similar medium but lacking uracil.

Antifungal susceptibility tests.MICs were determined by the serial twofold dilution method in 96-well microtiter plates in the minimal YNBG medium described above for the JG436 strain. The inoculum size was 104 cells ml−1. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 30°C. The MIC was defined as the lowest drug concentration preventing visible growth. Each compound was tested at least three times. Determination of the pH dependence of the MIC was performed in RPMI 1640 medium with glutamine, without sodium bicarbonate but containing 2% glucose, buffered with 0.165 M MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid), with the pH adjusted to the appropriate level with 1 M HCl or 1 M NaOH (26). The inoculum size, incubation conditions, and MIC definition were the same as those described above.

Determination of peptide uptake rates.Yeast cells grown exponentially in YNBG medium were harvested by centrifugation (3,000 × g, 5 min), washed with 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 5.0 or 6.5), and suspended in the same buffer containing 1% glucose to a final cell density corresponding to anA660 of 1.0. The cell suspension was incubated at 30°C. After 10 min, an oligopeptide solution was added to give a final concentration of 100 μM. At that moment and at 5-min intervals thereafter, 2-ml samples of the cell suspension were withdrawn and immediately filtered through the Whatman GF/A filters, and the filtrates were used to determine the residual peptide concentration. Then, 1-ml portions of the filtrates were taken and combined with 1.25-ml aliquots of a solution containing 4% Na2B4O7 · 10H2O and 0.8 mg of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonate (TNBS) ml−1. The reaction was carried out at 37°C for 30 min. TheA420 value was measured, and the peptide concentration was read from the appropriate standard curve. Data were plotted as nanomoles of oligopeptide taken up by 1 mg (dry weight) of cells versus time. The initial uptake velocities were determined from the slopes of the linear part of the curves, in the 0- to 10-min region.

TLC.Qualitative analysis of the spent medium used for the determination of peptide uptake rate was performed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC). Small aliquots of filtrates were applied to silica gel-coated aluminum sheets. Chromatograms were developed in two solvent systems: system A, n-butanol–acetic acid–water (4:1:1), and system B, chloroform-ethanol (2:1). The amino acids and peptides were visualized by ninhydrin staining and FMDP-containing compounds by quenching of UV light.

Preparation of cell extract.Yeast cells from the overnight culture on YNBG were harvested by centrifugation and washed with cold 25 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5). Cells were then suspended in a minimal amount of the buffer and disrupted with French press. The resulting suspension was centrifuged (35,000 × g, 4°C, 45 min), and the supernatant was used as a cell extract for the determination of peptide cleavage rates.

Determination of peptide cleavage rates.The incubation mixtures, consisting of 10 ml of a 200 μM peptide solution in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and 2 ml of appropriately diluted crude extract (final protein concentration, 0.1 to 0.5 mg ml−1), were incubated at 30°C. At 5-min intervals, 2-ml aliquots were withdrawn and heated at 100°C for 3 min. The resulting suspensions were centrifuged to remove protein precipitates, and the concentration of free amino acids in the supernatant was determined by the Cd-ninhydrin procedure (9).

Determination of initial velocity of proton efflux.The initial velocities of proton extrusion by mutant yeast cells were determined according to the procedure described previously (14). Briefly, yeast mutant cells grown in the YNBG medium lacking uracil were harvested in the mid-exponential phase of growth, washed twice with water, and suspended in fresh, unbuffered water at 108 cells ml−1. Cell suspensions were preincubated for 5 min at 30°C in a water-circulating chamber with constant stirring. The incubation was continued, and the pH of the cell suspensions was monitored with a PHM-62 pH meter (Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark). The release of protons was recorded for 5 min. The corresponding amount of proton released was then calculated after we corrected for the buffer capacity of the yeast suspension, as determined by the addition of a known amount of 10 mM HCl solution.

Other methods.The protein concentration was measured by the Bradford procedure (7), using bovine serum albumin as a standard. The activity of GlcN-6-P synthase was assayed in cell extracts according to a previously published method (18). One unit of specific activity was defined as an amount of enzyme that catalyzed formation of 1 μmol of GlcN-6-P h−1 mg of protein−1.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Genetically modified yeast mutant cells, JG436, lacking the main yeast drug extruding pump Pdr5p and its transformants containingC. albicans genes encoding Cdr1p and CaMdr1p drug exporters, respectively, can serve as useful research tools for studies on substrate specificity of candidal drug efflux systems. We used these transformants for the determination of in vitro growth inhibitory activity of several antifungal agents. The results of this experiment are shown in Table 1. As could be expected, both JGCDR1 and JGCaMDR1 cells demonstrated reduced susceptibility to a number of antifungals compared to the parent JG436 strain, while the activity of the membrane-active antifungal compound amphotericin B was exactly the same against all types of mutant cells. On the other hand, JGCDR1 yeast cells demonstrated enhanced susceptibility to Nva-FMDP and Lys-Nva-FMDP, whereas JGCaMDR1 was unchanged compared to JG436. A similar phenomenon was also observed for other FMDP-oligopeptides, containing two to four amino acid residues (data not shown). The susceptibility of JG436 cells to antifungal agents under study was the same or slightly higher than that of the standard yeast strain ATCC 9763. The MIC values for FMDP-peptides against yeast transformants were two to four times lower, when the determination was made in YNBG medium containing l-glutamate at 2 mg ml−1, instead of ammonium sulfate as a nitrogen source (data not shown). This difference probably reflects the nitrogen catabolite repression of peptide transport systems, which is well known and characterized in S. cerevisiae (5). Moreover, it should be mentioned that FMDP-peptides are generally much more active against human pathogenic fungi, especially C. albicans (23, 24), than against baker's yeast.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Growth-inhibitory activity of several antifungal agents against yeast mutants and yeast standard straina

It was previously shown that FMDP-peptides are transported intoC. albicans cells by peptide permeases and cleaved intracellularly by peptidases, and the released FMDP inhibits activity of the enzyme l-glutamine:d-fructose 6-phosphate amidotransferase (EC 2.6.1.16, known as GlcN-6-P synthase) (24). In consequence, the biosynthesis of the glucosamine-containing cell wall macromolecules, chitin and mannoprotein, is inhibited (24). It was also evidenced that the relative rates of uptake of an oligopeptide antifungal agents determine their anticandidal activity (22). Therefore, trying to find an explanation for unusual susceptibility of JGCDR1 yeast to FMDP-peptides, we determined the uptake rates of these compounds and a few oligopeptides built exclusively of proteinogenic amino acids by JG436 transformants cells. Determinations of uptake rates of small molecules into microbial cells are usually made using radiolabeled compounds. However, it is known that in the case of oligopeptides this approach may result in false results due to the efflux of degradation products containing radioisotopes (28). We used our own method based on the colorimetric assay of yellow products of reaction between peptides and TNBS (23). This approach is based upon the assumption that a peptide is the only compound reacting with TNBS that is present in the external medium. Therefore, our experiment was carried out in a phosphate-buffered glucose solution, and no amino group-containing compounds were added except the tested oligopeptide. The examined peptides were continuously taken up by all tested types of yeast mutants. The uptake was linear for at least 15 to 20 min, and then its velocity gradually decreased, thus reflecting the influence of decreasing concentration of the oligopeptide in the medium. The initial uptake velocities of several oligopeptides by JG436 and JGCDR1 cells, determined from the slopes of the linear part of the experimental curves, are demonstrated in Table2. The results show that all tested oligopeptides were taken up by CDR1-expressing JGCDR1 cells at higher rates than by JG436 yeast lacking Cdr1p. On the other hand, the oligopeptide uptake by both yeast transformants was faster at pH 5.0 than at pH 6.5. This finding is consistent with the previous report on properties of yeast oligopeptide transport systems (4). It is also noteworthy that the differences between the uptake rates exhibited by JGCDR1 and JG436 were in most cases larger at pH 6.5 than at pH 5.0. The initial velocities of oligopeptide uptake by JGCaMDR1 cells were almost identical at both pH values to those demonstrated by JG436.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Initial velocities of oligopeptide uptake by yeast mutants

FMDP was very slowly taken up by yeast mutants. The initial velocities of its uptake were within the range of 0.1 to 0.3 nmol min−1 mg (dry weight)−1.

The TLC analysis revealed that the tested oligopeptides were the only ninhydrin-positive compounds present in the spent media. No spots corresponding to the constitutive amino acids were detected. We did not also detect any UV light-absorbing compounds in the spent medium separated from cells treated with Nva-FMDP or Lys-Nva-FMDP, except the FMDP-oligopeptides themselves. Nevertheless, some especially fast-absorbed oligopeptides (e.g., His-Met or Leu-Leu-Leu) were completely removed from the medium after 20 to 30 min, when no compound reacting with TNBS could be detected any longer. The same was true after 40 to 50 min for FMDP-peptides, which were taken up at lower rates. Moreover, the shapes of all experimental curves obtained by us in uptake experiments were similar, a result characteristic for the continuous inward transport by permease, and not affected by any efflux phenomena. We can therefore conclude that neither the tested oligopeptides nor their constitutive amino acids were effluxed from the yeast JG436 and its CDR1and CaMDR1 transformants.

It was previously shown that the effectiveness of anticandidal action of FMDP-peptides is influenced by three factors: the velocity of uptake, the rate of intracellular cleavage, and the affinity for the intracellular target, with the first factor being crucial for the overall activity (24). We therefore determined the rates of cleavage of Nva-FMDP and Lys-Nva-FMDP by peptidases present in cell extracts prepared from mutant yeast. The results of this experiment shown in Table 3 clearly demonstrate that the rates were practically the same, irrespectively of the source of the cell extract used for determination. On the other hand, the cleavage rates were much higher than the corresponding uptake velocities shown in Table 2. The TLC analysis of solutions containing FMDP-peptides (100 μM) incubated at 30°C in the presence of crude extracts (protein concentration, 1 mg ml−1) confirmed a very quick release of free amino acids. Spots corresponding to FMDP appeared as quickly as within 45 to 60 s. One may doubt whether the results of this in vitro experiment can be related to the intracellular conditions. However, a very fast cleavage of different oligopeptides internalized by yeast cells was previously demonstrated (4, 17), and a correlation between results obtained under in vitro and in vivo conditions was also shown (25).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Rates of cleavage of FMDP-peptides by peptidases present in crude extracts prepared from yeast mutant cells

There was no difference in the specific activity of GlcN-6-P synthase present in cell extracts prepared from yeast mutants and the sensitivity of this enzyme to inhibition by FMDP. The specific activity of the enzyme was 0.046 ± 0.003 U, and the 50% inhibitory concentration for FMDP was 7.5 ± 0.2 μM. It is therefore clear that neither the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis nor the interaction of FMDP with its intracellular target influence the growth-inhibitory activity of FMDP-peptides against yeast mutants. This seems to be exclusively determined by the inward transport rates. A similar conclusion was previously drawn for the anticandidal activity of FMDP-peptides (23) and some other peptidic antifungals (22).

Since we observed that the FMDP-peptide uptake rate was pH dependent (Table 2), it seemed reasonable to establish the pH dependence of the antiyeast activity of FMDP-peptides. This was done by determining the MICs in buffered RPMI media. The medium composition and conditions of this assay were in compliance with recommendations of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (26). The results (Fig. 1) clearly demonstrate that the growth-inhibitory activity of FMDP-peptides against both JG436 and JGCDR1 cells was strongly enhanced in acidic media. A similar phenomenon was also observed for JGCaMDR1 (data not shown).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

pH dependence of antifungal in vitro activity of Nva-FMDP (A) and Lys-Nva-FMDP (B) against JG436 and JGCRD1 cells. MICs were determined by microtiter serial twofold dilution method in RPMI medium buffered with 0.165 M MOPS. Inoculum size was 104 cells ml−1. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 30°C, and the results were read visually.

Oligopeptides containing two to six amino acid residues are transported into C. albicans and S. cerevisiae cells by energy-dependent permeases. The extensive studies on peptide transport system in C. albicans led to the identification and characterization of at least two components: the di- and tripeptide permease and the oligopeptide permease transporting tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexapeptides (3, 5, 21, 23). In S. cerevisiae, a product of thePTR2 gene was unequivocally identified as a di- and tripeptide permease, with very low affinity for longer oligopeptides (29). The molecular mechanism of peptide translocation by Ptr2p is not known, but the pH dependence of its activity, with a pH optimum of 5.5 (16) and a sequence homology to other members of the PTR family of transport proteins (35), indicate that this permease acts as an H+-oligopeptide symporter. We were able to confirm this assumption by demonstrating the strong inhibitory effect of the known proton shuttle, carbonyl cyanidem-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) on peptide uptake by yeast mutants and their transformants (Fig. 2). The presence of this agent (100 μM) practically completely stopped the oligopeptide uptake.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Influence of CCCP and verapamil on oligopeptide uptake by JG436 (A) and JGCDR1 (B) cells. The initial rates of oligopeptide uptake were determined in 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) containing 1% glucose. Other details were the same as those described in the legend to Table 2. Each bar represents the mean of three independent determinations ± the standard deviation.

The only difference between JG436 and JGCDR1 cells is the presence of the Cdr1p efflux pump in the latter. It is therefore clear that the unusually high susceptibility of the JGCDR1 cells to FMDP-peptides should be a consequence of a possible activity of this ABC transporter. One of the theoretical suggestions for the mechanism of this phenomenon could be the action of Cdr1p as an additional oligopeptide permease. This idea seemed very unlikely since this protein is known to act exclusively as an export pump, but experimental verification was required. Such evidence was provided by the results of the experiment in which the growth-inhibitory activity of FMDP-peptides and cycloheximide was determined in the presence of the calcium channel blocker, verapamil, which is known to be a very good substrate for P-glycoprotein (37). The data presented in Table4 show that the presence of this compound strongly increases the susceptibility of JGCDR1 cells to the action of cycloheximide and has no effect on susceptibility of JG436 yeast. This result was expected since Cdr1p blocked by verapamil was supposed to be switched off as a potential way of cycloheximide efflux. On the other hand, verapamil had no effect on the antifungal activity of FMDP-peptides against JG436 and JGCDR1. No effect was also observed in the case of JGCaMDR1 cells (data not shown). We did not note any substantial influence of verapamil on oligopeptide uptake to yeast transformants, except the very slight stimulation of their uptake in the case of JGCDR1 cells (Fig. 2). Any competition between FMDP-peptides and verapamil for Cdr1p can therefore be excluded.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Influence of verapamil on antifungal in vitro activity of FMDP-peptides and cycloheximide against JG436 and JGCDR1 cellsa

Another possibility which may be taken into account as a probable mechanism of observed supersensitivity is the creation of an additional driving force for peptide transport due to the presence of Cdr1p. This protein is a C. albicans homologue of the human Mdr1p efflux pump (30), well known as a P-glycoprotein. This is therefore likely that the substrate specificity of both drug exporters should be similar. In this respect, it is worth mentioning that P-glycoprotein is known to export some peptides. However, we must stress that this opinion concerns some very specific compounds, e.g., ionophoric peptides such as gramicidin and valinomycin or hydrophobic cyclic and linear modified peptides or peptide derivatives such as NAc-l-leucyl-l-leucyl-l-methioninal, pepstatin A, cyclosporin A, or leupeptin (33, 34). Ionophoric peptides were also shown to be the substrates for yeast Pdr5p (19). Small, unmodified linear peptides have never been studied in this respect. On the other hand, Fritz et al. reported quite recently that human Mdr1p (P-glycoprotein) overexpressed inS. cerevisiae, acts at low external pH as a H+efflux and Cl− influx pump, whereas at a pH of >8 it promotes ion translocation in the opposite directions (10). It was even suggested that biophysical perturbations due to abnormal ion transport might be a natural activity of this protein and the multidrug resistance phenotype could be fully explained by changes in the membrane potential and proton gradient generated by human Mdr1p (15). The structural homology between Cdr1p and human P-glycoprotein allows us to put forward a working hypothesis that Cdr1p expressed in S. cerevisiae may also create an additional proton motive force. This should in turn drive the oligopeptide transport by an H+-dependent peptide permease and thus enhance the antifungal activity of FMDP-peptides. In order to verify this hypothesis we determined the initial velocities of proton efflux from yeast mutant cells suspended in unbuffered water. The results of this experiment (Fig. 3) clearly demonstrate that the JGCDR1 cells effluxed almost three times more protons per minute than did the JG436 and JGCaMDR1 cells. Our hypothesis has been additionally strengthened by an identical growth-inhibitory activity of FMDP-peptides against JG436 and JGCaMDR1 and similar uptake rates of oligopeptides by both transformant cells. The drug efflux pump CaMdr1p present in JGCaMDR1 belongs to the MFS of drug exporters. The MFS proteins act as H+-substrate antiporters (27), so that their action cannot create any additional proton motive force. Since, on the other hand, our data show that CaMdr1p extrudes neither FMDP-peptides nor their constitutive amino acids, it is not surprising that the presence of this pump has no effect on antifungal activity of FMDP-peptides.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Initial velocities of proton efflux by yeast mutants. The initial rates of proton efflux were determined by monitoring the pH changes of yeast cell suspensions. Yeast mutant cells were transferred from the minimal growth medium to unbuffered water, and pH changes were recorded. Each bar represents the mean of three independent determinations ± the standard deviation.

To our best knowledge, FMDP-peptides are the first reported example of antimicrobial agents that are more active against multidrug-resistant cells. Although the hypothesis on the molecular mechanism of this supersensitivity needs further experimental evidence, the phenomenon itself seems to open the new possibilities of overcoming the multidrug resistance problem. In our opinion this could be done by the application of structural mimics of natural metabolites: peptides, amino acids, or sugars as antimicrobial agents. Such compounds are transported unidirectionally into the cells by respective permeases and are less likely to be extruded by drug efflux pumps than xenobiotics. Moreover, our results presented above indicate that, at least in some cases, i.e., agents transported into the cells by H+-substrate symporters, there is a chance for the paradoxically enhanced susceptibility of potentially “resistant” cells. Work is in progress in our laboratory to verify this hypothesis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The partial financial support of these studies by Chemical Faculty of the Technical University of Gdańsk and University of Camerino is gratefully acknowledged.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 24 May 2000.
    • Returned for modification 10 July 2000.
    • Accepted 23 October 2000.
  • Copyright © 2001 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Albertson G. D.,
    2. Niimi M.,
    3. Cannon R. D.,
    4. Jenkinson H. F.
    Multiple efflux mechanisms are involved in Candida albicans fluconazole resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40 1996 2835 2840
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Balzi E.,
    2. Wang M.,
    3. Leterme S.,
    4. Van Dyck L.,
    5. Goffeau A.
    PDR5, a novel yeast multidrug resistance conferring transporter controlled by the transcription regulator PDR1. J. Biol. Chem. 269 1994 2206 2214
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Basrai M. A.,
    2. Lubkowitz M. A.,
    3. Perry J. R.,
    4. Miller D.,
    5. Krainer E.,
    6. Naider F.,
    7. Becker J. M.
    Cloning of a Candida albicans peptide transport gene. Microbiology 141 1995 1147 1156
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Becker J. M.,
    2. Naider F.
    Peptide transport in yeast: uptake of radioactive trimethionine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 178 1977 245 255
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Becker J. M.,
    2. Naider F.
    Fungal peptide transport as a drug delivery system Peptide-based drug design: controlling transport and metabolism. Taylor M., Amidon G. 1995 369 384 American Chemical Society Washington, D.C.
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ben-Yaacov R.,
    2. Knoller S.,
    3. Caldwell G. A.,
    4. Becker J. M.,
    5. Koltin Y.
    The Candida albicans gene encoding resistance to benomyl and methotrexate is a multidrug resistance gene. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38 1994 648 652
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bradford M. M.
    A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein using the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72 1976 248 254
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Diasio R. B.,
    2. Bennett J. E.,
    3. Myers C. E.
    Mode of action of 5-fluorocytosine. Biochem. Pharmacol. 27 1978 703 707
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Doi E.,
    2. Shibata D.,
    3. Matoba T.
    Modified colorimetric ninhydrin method for peptidase assay. Anal. Biochem. 118 1981 173 184
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Fritz F.,
    2. Howard E. M.,
    3. Hoffman M. M.,
    4. Roepe P. D.
    Evidence for altered ion transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae overexpressing human MDR 1 protein. Biochemistry 38 1999 4214 4226
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Ghannoum M. A.,
    2. Rice L. B.
    Antifungal agents: mode of action, mechanisms of resistance, and correlation of these mechanisms with bacterial resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12 1999 501 517
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Gupta V.,
    2. Kohli A.,
    3. Krishnamurthy S.,
    4. Puri N.,
    5. Aalamger S. A.,
    6. Panwar S.,
    7. Prasad R.
    Identification of polymorphic mutant alleles of CaMDR1, a major facilitator of Candida albicans which confers multidrug resistance, and its in vitro transcriptional activation. Curr. Genet. 34 1998 192 199
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Helmerhorst E. J.,
    2. Reijnders I. M.,
    3. van't Hoff W.,
    4. Simoons-Smit I.,
    5. Veerman E. C.,
    6. Amerongen A. V.
    Amphotericin B- and fluconazole-resistant Candida spp., Aspergillus fumigatus, and other newly emerging pathogenic fungi are susceptible to basic antifungal peptides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43 1999 702 704
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hofer M.,
    2. Misra P. C.
    Evidence for a proton/sugar symport in the yeast Rhodotorula gracilis (glutinis). Biochem. J. 172 1978 15 22
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hoffman M. M.,
    2. Li-Yong W.,
    3. Roepe P. D.
    Are altered pHi and membrane potential in hu MDR 1 transfectants sufficient to cause MDR protein-mediated multidrug resistance? J. Gen. Physiol. 108 1996 295 313
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Horak J.
    Yeast nutrient transporters. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1331 1997 41 79
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Island M. D.,
    2. Naider F.,
    3. Becker J. M.
    Regulation of dipeptide transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by micromolar amino acid concentration. J. Bacteriol. 169 1987 2132 2136
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kenig M.,
    2. Vandamme E.,
    3. Abraham E. P.
    The mode of action of bacilysin and anticapsin and biochemical properties of bacilysin-resistant mutants. J. Gen. Microbiol. 94 1976 46 54
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Kolaczkowski M.,
    2. Rest M. V.,
    3. Kolaczkowska A. C.,
    4. Soumillion J. P.,
    5. Konings W. N.,
    6. Goffeau A.
    Anticancer drugs, ionophoric peptides and steroids as substrates of the yeast multidrug transporter Pdr5. J. Biol. Chem. 271 1996 31543 31548
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Leppert G.,
    2. Mc Devitt R.,
    3. Falco S. C.,
    4. Van Dyk T. K.,
    5. Ficke M. B.,
    6. Golin J.
    Cloning by gene amplification of two loci conferring multiple drug resistance. Genetics 125 1990 13 20
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Lubkowitz M. A.,
    2. Hauser I.,
    3. Breslav M.,
    4. Naider F.,
    5. Becker J. M.
    An oligopeptide transport gene from Candida albicans. Microbiology 143 1997 387 396
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. McCarthy P. J.,
    2. Newman D. J.,
    3. Nisbet L. J.,
    4. Kingsbury W. D.
    Relative rates of transport of peptidyl drugs by Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 28 1985 494 499
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Milewski S.,
    2. Andruszkiewicz R.,
    3. Borowski E.
    Substrate specificity of peptide permeases in Candida albicans. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 50 1988 73 78
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. 24.↵
    1. Milewski S.,
    2. Andruszkiewicz R.,
    3. Kasprzak L.,
    4. Mazerski J.,
    5. Mignini F.,
    6. Borowski E.
    Mechanism of action of anticandidal dipeptides containing inhibitors of glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35 1991 36 43
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Moneton P.,
    2. Sarthou P.,
    3. LeGoffic F.
    Transport and hydrolysis of peptides in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Gen. Microbiol. 132 1986 2147 2153
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing for yeast: proposed standards. Document M27-A. 1997 National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Wayne, Pa
  27. 27.↵
    1. Paulsen I. I.,
    2. Brown M. H.,
    3. Skurray R. A.
    Proton-dependent multidrug efflux systems. Microbiol. Rev. 60 1996 575 608
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Payne J. W.,
    2. Nisbet T. M.
    Limitations to the use of radioactively labelled substrates for studying peptide transport in microorganisms. FEBS Lett. 119 1980 73 76
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Perry J. R.,
    2. Basrai M. A.,
    3. Steiner H.-Y.,
    4. Naider F.,
    5. Becker J. M.
    Isolation and characterization of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae peptide transport gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14 1994 104 115
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Prasad R.,
    2. De Wergifosse P.,
    3. Goffeau A.,
    4. Balzi E.
    Molecular cloning and characterisation of a novel gene of Candida albicans,CDR1, conferring multiple resistance to drugs and antifungals. Curr. Genet. 27 1995 320 329
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Sanglard D.,
    2. Ischer F.,
    3. Monod M.,
    4. Bille J.
    Susceptibilities of Candida albicans multidrug transporter mutants to various antifungal agents and other metabolic inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40 1996 2300 2305
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Sanglard D.,
    2. Ischer F.,
    3. Monod M.,
    4. Bille J.
    Cloning of Candida albicans genes conferring resistance to azole antifungal agents: characterisation of CDR2, a new multidrug ABC transport gene. Microbiology 143 1997 405 416
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Sharom F. J.,
    2. DiDonato G.,
    3. Yu X.,
    4. Ashbourne K. J. D.
    Interaction of the P-glycoprotein multidrug transporter with peptides and ionophores. J. Biol. Chem. 270 1995 10334 10341
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Sharom F. J.,
    2. Lu P.,
    3. Liu R.,
    4. Yu X.
    Linear and cyclic peptides as substrates and modulators of P-glycoprotein: peptide binding and effects on drug transport and accumulation. Biochem. J. 333 1998 621 630
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Steiner H.-Y.,
    2. Naider F.,
    3. Becker J. M.
    The PTR family: a new group of peptide transporters. Mol. Microbiol. 16 1995 825 834
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. White T. C.,
    2. Marr K. A.,
    3. Bowden R. A.
    Clinical, cellular, and molecular factors that contribute to antifungal drug resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11 1998 382 402
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Yusa K.,
    2. Tsuruo T.
    Reversal mechanism of multidrug resistance by verapamil. Direct binding of verapamil to P-glycoprotein on specific sites and transport of verapamil outward across the plasma membrane of K562/ADM cells. Cancer Res. 49 1989 5002 5006
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Unusual Susceptibility of a Multidrug-Resistant Yeast Strain to Peptidic Antifungals
Sławomir Milewski, Fiorenzo Mignini, Rajendra Prasad, Edward Borowski
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jan 2001, 45 (1) 223-228; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.1.223-228.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Unusual Susceptibility of a Multidrug-Resistant Yeast Strain to Peptidic Antifungals
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Unusual Susceptibility of a Multidrug-Resistant Yeast Strain to Peptidic Antifungals
Sławomir Milewski, Fiorenzo Mignini, Rajendra Prasad, Edward Borowski
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Jan 2001, 45 (1) 223-228; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.1.223-228.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Anti-Bacterial Agents
antifungal agents
Drug Resistance, Microbial
Drug Resistance, Multiple
Fumarates
peptides
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
beta-Alanine

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596