Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

Cross-Resistance between Triclosan and Antibiotics inPseudomonas aeruginosa Is Mediated by Multidrug Efflux Pumps: Exposure of a Susceptible Mutant Strain to Triclosan Selects nfxB Mutants Overexpressing MexCD-OprJ

Rungtip Chuanchuen, Kerry Beinlich, Tung T. Hoang, Anna Becher, RoxAnn R. Karkhoff-Schweizer, Herbert P. Schweizer
Rungtip Chuanchuen
Department of Microbiology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1677,and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kerry Beinlich
Department of Microbiology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1677,and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tung T. Hoang
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Becher
Department of Microbiology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1677,and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RoxAnn R. Karkhoff-Schweizer
Department of Microbiology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1677,and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Herbert P. Schweizer
Department of Microbiology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1677,and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.2.428-432.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Triclosan is an antiseptic frequently added to items as diverse as soaps, lotions, toothpaste, and many commonly used household fabrics and plastics. Although wild-type Pseudomonas aeruginosaexpresses the triclosan target enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase, it is triclosan resistant due to expression of the MexAB-OprM efflux system. Exposure of a susceptible Δ(mexAB-oprM) strain to triclosan selected multidrug-resistant bacteria at high frequencies. These bacteria hyperexpressed the MexCD-OprJ efflux system due to mutations in its regulatory gene, nfxB. The MICs of several drugs for these mutants were increased up to 500-fold, including the MIC of ciprofloxacin, which was increased 94-fold. Whereas the MexEF-OprN efflux system also participated in triclosan efflux, this antimicrobial was not a substrate for MexXY-OprM.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a clinically significant pathogen, particularly in immunocompromised hosts (36). Infections caused by this bacterium are difficult to treat due to its many intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistances. Intrinsic resistance is mostly attributable to the expression of several multidrug resistance (MDR) efflux systems. TheP. aeruginosa genome (35) contains structural genes for at least 12 resistance nodulation type efflux systems, of which only 4, i.e., MexAB-OprM (27), MexCD-OprJ (26), MexEF-OprN (13), and MexXY (1, 21, 38), have been characterized. Exposure to selected substrates can select for their upregulated or constitutive expression (13, 14, 26, 38).

2-Hydroxyphenylethers are a class of compounds that exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. Triclosan is the most potent and widely used member of this class (2, 5) and is used in hand soaps, lotions, toothpastes, and oral rinses, as well as in fabrics and plastics. It was long thought to act as a nonspecific “biocide” (29), but recent biochemical and genetic studies have shown that triclosan acts on a defined bacterial target in the fatty acid biosynthetic pathway, enoyl-acyl carrier protein (ACP) reductase (FabI) (7, 9, 10, 12, 18, 20) or its homolog InhA in mycobacteria (18). Some bacteria possess triclosan-resistant enoyl-ACP reductase homologs (FabK), and to dateP. aeruginosa is unique among gram-negative bacteria in that it possesses both triclosan-sensitive and -resistant enzymes (8). Alterations in FabI active-site residues confer resistance to triclosan (9, 10, 20). Of particular concern is that such amino acid changes selected by exposure to triclosan lead to cross-resistance with other antimicrobial agents (9), including clinically used front-line drugs, since some mutations leading to triclosan resistance in Mycobacterium smegmatisalso caused resistance to isoniazid (18). Moreover, triclosan is a substrate of a multidrug efflux pump in clinical and laboratory Escherichia coli strains (19). We have recently shown that P. aeruginosa strain PAO1 is intrinsically resistant to triclosan by virtue of expression of the MexAB-OprM efflux pump (32), and the same is true for all strains of this species tested to date (our unpublished results).

While the contribution of antibiotic exposure to development of MDR due to efflux pump expression has clearly been documented in vitro and in vivo, little is known about antiseptic resistance mechanisms (30) and their possible contribution to MDR. In this paper we present results that triclosan is a substrate for multiple P. aeruginosa efflux pumps and that it is capable of selecting not just for mutants resistant to this particular antiseptic but, perhaps more importantly, also for MDR bacteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, culture conditions, and molecular biology techniques.The bacterial strains used in this study are shown in Table 1. Unless otherwise noted, bacteria were grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium or on LB agar (31) or in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB; Difco, Detroit, Mich.). For plasmid maintenance, P. aeruginosa media were supplemented with 200 μg of carbenicillin/ml. Unmarked efflux pump-negative mutants were derived using a previously described Flp/FRT recombinase technology (11). The sources for the mutant alleles were pPS952 for Δ(mexAB-oprM) (32), pPS1008 for Δ(mexCD-opJ) (derived by deletion of a 6,138-bp region encompassing three ClaI fragments from pKMJ002 [26]), and pPS1128 for Δ(mexXY) (derived by deletion of a 2,868-bp DNA fragment encompassing severalSalI-XhoI fragments from pAMR-1 [38]). The chromosomal deletions were verified by PCR and genomic Southern analyses. Standard molecular biology methods were used (31). Plasmid pKMM128 is pAK1900 (28) expressing oprM (16).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Bacterial strains used in this study

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.MICs were determined by the twofold broth microdilution technique according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines (22) or by the E-test system and the protocols provided by the supplier (AB Biodisk, Piscataway, N.J.) (ciprofloxacin and tetracycline only).

Selection and characterization of triclosan-resistant mutants.For isolation of triclosan-resistant derivatives of Δ(mexAB-oprM) strain PAO200, cells were grown in LB medium to stationary phase (A540, ∼2.6). Dilutions of these cells were plated on Pseudomonas isolation agar (PIA; Difco) whose formulation contained 25 μg of triclosan/ml. After an overnight incubation at 37°C, the colonies growing on the PIA plates were counted. For PCR amplification of the nfxB coding region from genomic DNA templates, two primers were designed:nfxB-up (5′-ACAATCtAGAAAAACCAACCGGG), which contained a single base mismatch (lowercase t) and which introduced an XbaI site (underlined) 27 bp upstream of thenfxB start codon, and nfxB-down (5′-CCGGAATTCCTGGGGGAGGTG), which primes to a region centered 236 bp downstream of nfxB containing anEcoRI site (underlined). PCRs were performed usingTaq DNA polymerase (Qiagen, Santa Clarita, Calif.). The 828-bp PCR fragments were cloned as XbaI-EcoRI fragments into pUCP21T (33). Nucleotide sequences were determined by automated sequencing in the University of Colorado at Boulder sequencing facility. Extensions were primed utilizing the commercially available 24-nucleotide pUC/M13 reverse and forward sequencing primers for sequencing the cloned PCR fragments and thenfxB-up primer for the direct sequencing of PCR fragments. Computer-assisted sequence analyses were performed utilizing the SeqEd (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) program.

Detection of outer membrane proteins.Cells of variousP. aeruginosa strains were grown in LB medium to log phase (A540, ∼1.0). Samples of cells (1 ml) were harvested, centrifuged, and resuspended in the appropriate volumes of 2× sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) sample buffer (0.125 M Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 5% β-mercaptoethanol) to adjust for differences in cell densities. The resuspended cells were boiled for 4 min, and samples corresponding to ∼25 μg of protein were analyzed by electrophoresis on 0.1% SDS–10% PAGE gel (pH 9.2) (15). The electrophoretically separated proteins were electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes, and the blots were processed as previously described (34). Hybridizing antibodies were detected using an antimouse antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP), and bound HRP activity was detected by exposure to luminogen substrate and X-ray film, according to the manufacturer's (Amersham, Arlington Heights, Ill.) protocol.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Triclosan is a substrate for multiple MDR efflux pumps.Our previous study (32) indicated that triclosan is a substrate for MexAB-OprM. Since MDR efflux systems export a variety of structurally unrelated substrates (23), we hypothesized that triclosan may be a substrate not only for MexAB-OprM but also for other P. aeruginosa efflux pumps. Defined mutants were obtained, and their triclosan susceptibilities were assessed by MIC determinations (Table 2). Triclosan was a substrate for all tripartite efflux pumps analyzed in this study, including MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexEF-OprN. Deletion mutants defective in these pumps all became triclosan susceptible. Mutant strain PAO267, expressing only MexXY, was triclosan susceptible and behaved the same as a strain (PAO280) expressing neither of the hitherto-characterized efflux pumps.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of P. aeruginosa strains used in this study

Since it has been proposed that MexXY requires OprM for function (1, 16, 21), we considered the possibility that strain PAO267 was not triclosan resistant because it lacks OprM. To test this hypothesis, we electroporated OprM-expressing pKMM128 and its vector control into PAO267 and its Δ(mexXY) derivative, PAO280. Only PAO267 containing pKMM128 effluxed tetracycline, gentamicin, erythromycin, trimethoprim, and ciprofloxacin (Table 2), indicating that it expressed a functional MexXY-OprM system. However, this strain did not efflux triclosan. The observed twofold increase in MIC from 32 μg/ml in the vector control to 64 μg/ml in the OprM-expressing strain was the same as the one observed in strain PAO280 harboring the same plasmids but lacking the MexXY system. We also tested KG2339/pKMM128, a strain known to express a functional MexXY-OprM system (16), and obtained similar results (Table 2). The MICs were slightly higher in the PAO267 background since MexXY expression is constitutive in this strain but inducible in KG2339 (16). These data conclusively demonstrated that triclosan was not a MexXY-OprM substrate.

Triclosan selects for multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa.When susceptible cells of Δ(mexAB-oprM) strain PAO200 were exposed to triclosan, resistant mutants were readily obtained. To assess the frequency with which triclosan-resistant mutants were derived, we plated PAO200 cells on PIA medium and selected spontaneous triclosan-resistant mutants. Such mutants were obtained at a frequency of 10−6. Three randomly picked triclosan-resistant derivatives, PAO200-2 to PAO200-4, were further analyzed, and all of them exhibited an MDR phenotype (Table 2), including resistance to the clinically administered drug ciprofloxacin, whose MIC for two of the three mutants analyzed was increased 94-fold.

Probing whole-cell extracts with anti-OprJ- and anti-OprN-specific monoclonal antibodies revealed that all three triclosan-resistant derivatives of PAO200 hyperexpressed OprJ but not OprN, demonstrating that their MDR phenotype was due to expression of the MexCD-OprJ efflux system (Fig. 1A). Although reference strain KG3056 was previously described as an OprJ type B hyperproducer (6), OprJ production in this strain was only a fraction of its expression in the three triclosan-resistant strains (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Western blots of P. aeruginosa cell lysates and mutations causing triclosan resistance. (A) Standardized amounts of whole-cell lysates were separated on a 0.1% SDS–10% PAGE gel and electroblotted on nitrocellulose membranes, and the membranes were probed with monoclonal antibodies against OprJ and OprN. The strains analyzed were PAO1 OprM+; KG3056 OprJ+; PAO7H OprN+; PAO200, an OprM null PAO1 mutant (Δ[mexAB-oprM]); and PAO200-2, PAO200-3, and PAO200-4, spontaneous triclosan-resistant nfxB derivatives of PAO200. (B) Mutations leading to triclosan resistance. The nfxBgenes from PAO200 and its three triclosan-resistant derivatives, PAO200-2, PAO200-3, and PAO200-4, were amplified by PCR from genomic DNA templates and sequenced. The nfxB sequence from each strain shown is the consensus obtained from six separate sequencing reactions; it was determined in duplicate from two separate clones, as well as in duplicate by directly sequencing the PCR products. Only portions of the nfxB sequence are shown, and codons are numbered as previously described (24). Arrows, changes from the PAO200 sequence. Amino acid residues constituting the putative helix-turn-helix DNA binding domain of NfxB are bracketed.

To genetically verify that the MexCD-OprJ efflux system was expressed in response to exposure of PAO200 to triclosan, we isolated two mexCD-oprJ deletion mutants, PAO238 and PAO239. These mutants no longer expressed OprJ (not shown), were triclosan susceptible, and lost their MDR phenotype (Table 2).

Triclosan selects for nfxB mutations.Expression of multidrug efflux systems is the result of exposure to antibiotics in both laboratory (6, 13, 26, 28) and clinical settings (39). Exposure of P. aeruginosa to norfloxacin selects for mutants which express MexCD-OprJ due to mutations in regulatory gene nfxB (6, 24, 26). Nucleotide sequence analysis of the PCR-amplified nfxB gene from strain PAO200 and its triclosan-resistant derivatives demonstrated that expression of the MexCD-OprJ efflux system in the triclosan-resistant mutant strains was indeed due to nfxB mutations (Fig. 1B). One strain, PAO200-4, contained a mutation that affected the helix-turn-helix DNA binding domain of NfxB, and strain PAO200-2 contained a mutation elsewhere in nfxB. The third strain, PAO200-3, contained two mutations in the helix-turn-helix region, and one of them also caused a frameshift and early termination at codon 35 of nfxB. Some of the mutations previously isolated by exposure to norfloxacin affected similar regions of NfxB; an Arg-to-Gly change at amino acid residue 42 caused by norfloxacin (24) corresponded to an Arg-to-His change caused by triclosan. To confirm that triclosan resistance was solely caused by nfxBmutations, we transformed a plasmid expressing a wild-typenfxB gene into the three mutant strains. In all three transformed strains, the MICs were similar to the ones observed with strain PAO200 (data not shown).

Implications of efflux-mediated triclosan resistance.Our results show that P. aeruginosa possesses multiple triclosan resistance mechanisms. These include efflux via the MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexEF-OprN systems and probably FabI target mutations (12). However, in contrast to that in E. coli, where exposure to triclosan readily selects fabI mutants and overproduction of FabI leads to increased triclosan resistance (9, 10, 20), the first line of defense against triclosan in P. aeruginosa seems to be efflux and/or other hitherto-unknown resistance mechanisms, e.g., decreased outer membrane permeability (17). Whereas in P. aeruginosaoverexpression of efflux pumps increased triclosan MICs by more than sixfold, overexpression of the AcrAB pump in E. coliincreased the MIC only twofold (19). The MexXY system did not efflux triclosan, even in the presence of OprM.

Although possible links of cross-resistance between antiseptics and antibiotics due to efflux have been suggested before (19, 30), our studies demonstrate for the first time that exposure of a clinically significant bacterium to the antiseptic triclosan efficiently can select for MDR derivatives, including high-level resistance to an antipseudomonas drug. Exposures to antibiotics and triclosan select for similar regulatory mutations leading to expression of a multidrug efflux system. Although MexEF-OprN exports triclosan, we have not yet observed MexEF-OprN-expressing triclosan-resistant derivatives when plating either Δ(mexAB-oprM) strain PAO200 or Δ(mexAB-oprM) Δ(mexCD-OprJ) strain PAO238 on triclosan-containing medium. Since we have not systematically searched for MexEF-OprN-expressing derivatives of these strains, we cannot yet explain the apparent lack of such mutants. MDR P. aeruginosais of foremost clinical importance since it is the leading cause of death in many hospital-acquired infections because of its intrinsic resistance to many antibiotics (36). Furthermore, most cystic fibrosis patients succumb to the debilitating effects of chronicP. aeruginosa infections due to eventual therapeutic failures caused by MDR-resistant bacteria (25). It has been well established that the massive prescription of antibiotics and their nonregulated and extensive usage are the main causes for the development of extensive antibiotic resistance in bacteria (3, 4). Since antimicrobial agents provide the selective pressure for the development of resistance, the control of antibiotic usage is essential to prevent the development of resistance to antibiotics. Our results raise the notion that widespread and unregulated use of triclosan may promote the selection of MDR bacteria and thus compound antibiotic resistance.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank N. Gotoh for providing pKMJ002 and the anti-OprJ and anti-OprN antibodies; N. Masuda for providing various strains, plasmids, and anti-MexX antibodies; and Keith Poole for various strains and plasmids. Triclosan was a gift from KCI Chemicals, Armonk, N.Y.

This study was supported in part by NIH grant GM56685 to H.P.S. R.C. is the recipient of a Royal Predoctoral Fellowship from the Government of Thailand.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 3 July 2000.
    • Returned for modification 7 September 2000.
    • Accepted 31 October 2000.
  • Copyright © 2001 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Aires J. R.,
    2. Köhler T.,
    3. Nikaido H.,
    4. Plesiat P.
    Involvement of an active efflux system in the natural resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to aminoglycosides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43 1999 2624 2628
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bhargava H. N.,
    2. Leonard P. A.
    Triclosan: applications and safety. Am. J. Infect. Control 24 1996 209 218
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Davies J.
    Inactivation of antibiotics and the dissemination of resistance genes. Science 264 1994 375 382
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Davies J.
    Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiologia 12 1996 9 16
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Furia T. E.,
    2. Schenkel A. G.
    New, broad spectrum bacteriostat. Soap Chem. Spec. 44 1968 47 50 and 116–122.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Gotoh N.,
    2. Tsujimoto H.,
    3. Tsuda M.,
    4. Okamoto K.,
    5. Nomura A.,
    6. Wada T.,
    7. Nakahashi M.,
    8. Nishino T.
    Characterization of the MexC-MexD-OprJ multidrug efflux system in ΔmexA-mexB-oprM mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42 1998 1938 1943
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Heath R. J.,
    2. Li J.,
    3. Roland G. E.,
    4. Rock C. O.
    Inhibition of the Staphylococcus aureus NADPH-dependent enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase by triclosan and hexachlorophene. J. Biol. Chem. 275 2000 4654 4659
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Heath R. J.,
    2. Rock C. O.
    A triclosan-resistant bacterial enzyme. Nature 406 2000 145 146
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Heath R. J.,
    2. Rubin J. R.,
    3. Holland D. R.,
    4. Zhang E.,
    5. Snow M. E.,
    6. Rock C. O.
    Mechanism of triclosan inhibition of bacterial fatty acid synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 274 1999 11110 11114
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Heath R. J.,
    2. Yu Y.-T.,
    3. Shapiro M. A.,
    4. Olson E.,
    5. Rock C. O.
    Broad spectrum antimicrobial biocides target the FabI component of fatty acid biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 273 1998 30316 30320
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Hoang T. T.,
    2. Karkhoff-Schweizer R. R.,
    3. Kutchma A. J.,
    4. Schweizer H. P.
    A broad-host-range FIp-FRT recombination system for site-specific excision of chromosomally-located DNA sequences: application for isolation of unmarked Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants. Gene 212 1998 77 86
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hoang T. T.,
    2. Schweizer H. P.
    Characterization of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase: a target for triclosan and its role in acylated homoserine lactone synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 181 1999 5489 5497
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Köhler T.,
    2. Michea-Hamzehpour M.,
    3. Henze U.,
    4. Gotoh N.,
    5. Curty L. K.,
    6. Pechere J. C.
    Characterization of MexE-MexF-OprN, a positively regulated multidrug efflux system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol. 23 1997 345 354
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Li X. Z.,
    2. Nikaido H.,
    3. Poole K.
    Role of mexA-mexB-oprM in antibiotic efflux in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39 1995 1948 1953
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Makowski G. S.,
    2. Ramsby M. L.
    pH modification to enhance the molecular sieving properties of sodium dodecyl sulfate-10% polyacrylamide gel. Anal. Biochem. 212 1993 283 285
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Masuda N.,
    2. Sagagawa E.,
    3. Ohya S.,
    4. Gotoh N.,
    5. Tsujimoto H.,
    6. Nishino T.
    Contribution of the MexX-MexY-OprM efflux system to intrinsic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44 2000 2242 2246
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. McDonnell G.,
    2. Russell A. D.
    Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12 1999 147 179
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. McMurry L. M.,
    2. McDermott P. F.,
    3. Levy S. B.
    Genetic evidence that InhA of Mycobacterium smegmatis is a target for triclosan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43 1999 711 713
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. McMurry L. M.,
    2. Oethinger M.,
    3. Levy S. B.
    Overexpression of marA,soxS, or acrAB produces resistance to triclosan in laboratory and clinical strains of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 166 1998 305 309
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. McMurry L. M.,
    2. Oethinger M.,
    3. Levy S. B.
    Triclosan targets lipid synthesis. Nature 394 1998 531 532
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Mine T.,
    2. Morita Y.,
    3. Kataoka A.,
    4. Mizushima T.,
    5. Tsuchiya T.
    Expression in Escherichia coli of a new multidrug efflux pump, MexXY, from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43 1999 415 417
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Eight informational supplement. Document M100–S8. 1998 National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Wayne, Pa
  23. 23.↵
    1. Nikaido H.
    Multidrug efflux pumps of gram-negative bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 178 1996 5853 5859
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Okazaki T.,
    2. Hirai K.
    Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa nfxB gene, conferring resistance to new quinolones. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 97 1992 197 202
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Pier G. B.
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a key problem in cystic fibrosis. ASM News 64 1998 339 347
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Poole K.,
    2. Gotoh N.,
    3. Tsujimoto H.,
    4. Zhao Q.,
    5. Wada A.,
    6. Yamasaki T.,
    7. Neshat S.,
    8. Yamagishi J.,
    9. Li X. Z.,
    10. Nishino T.
    Overexpression of the mexC-mexD-oprJ efflux operon in nfxB-type multidrug resistant strains. Mol. Microbiol. 21 1996 713 724
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Poole K.,
    2. Krebes K.,
    3. McNally C.,
    4. Neshat S.
    Multiple antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: evidence for involvement of an efflux operon. J. Bacteriol. 175 1993 7363 7372
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Poole K.,
    2. Tetro K.,
    3. Zhao Q.,
    4. Neshat S.,
    5. Heinrichs D.,
    6. Bianco N.
    Expression of the multidrug resistance operon mexA-mexB-oprM in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mexR encodes a regulator of operon expression. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40 1996 2021 2028
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Regos J.,
    2. Hitz H. R.
    Investigations on the mode of action of triclosan, a broad spectrum antimicrobial agent. Zentbl. Bakteriol. Hyg. Abt. 1 Orig. A 226 1974 390 401
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    1. Russell A. D.
    Bacterial resistance to disinfectants: present knowledge and future problems. J. Hosp. Infect. 43 1999 S57 S68
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Sambrook J.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 1989 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
  32. 32.↵
    1. Schweizer H. P.
    Intrinsic resistance to inhibitors of fatty acid biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is due to efflux: application of a novel technique for generation of unmarked chromosomal mutations for the study of efflux systems. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42 1998 394 398
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Schweizer H. P.,
    2. Klassen T. R.,
    3. Hoang T.
    Improved methods for gene analysis and expression in Pseudomonas Molecular biology of pseudomonads Nakazawa T., Furukawa K., Haas D., Silver S. 1996 229 237 American Society for Microbiology Washington, D.C.
  34. 34.↵
    1. Srikumar R.,
    2. Kon T.,
    3. Gotoh N.,
    4. Poole K.
    Expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa multidrug efflux pumps MexA-MexB-OprM and MexC-MexD-OprJ in a multidrug-sensitive Escherichia coli strain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42 1998 65 71
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Stover C. K.,
    2. Pham X.-Q.,
    3. Erwin A. L.,
    4. Mizoguchi S. D.,
    5. Warrener P.,
    6. Hickey M. J.,
    7. Brinkman F. S. L.,
    8. Hufnagle W. O.,
    9. Kowalik D. J.,
    10. Lagrou M.,
    11. Garber R. L.,
    12. Goltry L.,
    13. Tolentino E.,
    14. Westbrock-Wadman S.,
    15. Yuan Y.,
    16. Brody L. L.,
    17. Coulter S. N.,
    18. Folger K. R.,
    19. Kas A.,
    20. Larbig K.,
    21. Lim R.,
    22. Spencer D.,
    23. Wong G. K.-S.,
    24. Wu Z.,
    25. Paulsen I. T.,
    26. Reizer J.,
    27. Saier M. H.,
    28. Hancock R. E. W.,
    29. Lory S.,
    30. Olson M. V.
    Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature 406 2000 959 964
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. van Delden C.,
    2. Iglewski B. H.
    Cell-to-cell signaling and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 4 1998 551 560
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.
    1. Watson J. M.,
    2. Holloway B. W.
    Chromosome mapping in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 133 1978 1113 1125
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Westbrock-Wadman S.,
    2. Sherman D. R.,
    3. Hickey M. J.,
    4. Coulter S. N.,
    5. Zhu Y. Q.,
    6. Warrener P.,
    7. Nguyen L. Y.,
    8. Shawar R. M.,
    9. Folger K. R.,
    10. Stover C. K.
    Characterization of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa efflux pump contributing to aminoglycoside resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43 1999 2975 2983
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Ziha-Zafiri I.,
    2. Llanes C.,
    3. Köhler T.,
    4. Pechere J.-C.,
    5. Plesiat P.
    In vivo emergence of multidrug-resistant mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa overexpressing the active efflux system MexA-MexB-OprM. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43 1999 287 291
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Cross-Resistance between Triclosan and Antibiotics inPseudomonas aeruginosa Is Mediated by Multidrug Efflux Pumps: Exposure of a Susceptible Mutant Strain to Triclosan Selects nfxB Mutants Overexpressing MexCD-OprJ
Rungtip Chuanchuen, Kerry Beinlich, Tung T. Hoang, Anna Becher, RoxAnn R. Karkhoff-Schweizer, Herbert P. Schweizer
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Feb 2001, 45 (2) 428-432; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.2.428-432.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cross-Resistance between Triclosan and Antibiotics inPseudomonas aeruginosa Is Mediated by Multidrug Efflux Pumps: Exposure of a Susceptible Mutant Strain to Triclosan Selects nfxB Mutants Overexpressing MexCD-OprJ
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Cross-Resistance between Triclosan and Antibiotics inPseudomonas aeruginosa Is Mediated by Multidrug Efflux Pumps: Exposure of a Susceptible Mutant Strain to Triclosan Selects nfxB Mutants Overexpressing MexCD-OprJ
Rungtip Chuanchuen, Kerry Beinlich, Tung T. Hoang, Anna Becher, RoxAnn R. Karkhoff-Schweizer, Herbert P. Schweizer
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Feb 2001, 45 (2) 428-432; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.2.428-432.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Anti-Infective Agents, Local
Bacterial Proteins
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
triclosan

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596