Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Antiviral Agents

Phosphorylation of β-d-Ribosylbenzimidazoles Is Not Required for Activity against Human Cytomegalovirus

Paula M. Krosky, Katherine Z. Borysko, M. Reza Nassiri, Rodrigo V. Devivar, Roger G. Ptak, Michelle G. Davis, Karen K. Biron, Leroy B. Townsend, John C. Drach
Paula M. Krosky
1Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, School of Dentistry
2Interdepartmental Graduate Program in Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine Z. Borysko
1Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, School of Dentistry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Reza Nassiri
1Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, School of Dentistry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rodrigo V. Devivar
2Interdepartmental Graduate Program in Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger G. Ptak
1Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, School of Dentistry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle G. Davis
3University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, and Department of Molecular and Cellular Virology, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen K. Biron
3University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, and Department of Molecular and Cellular Virology, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leroy B. Townsend
2Interdepartmental Graduate Program in Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John C. Drach
1Department of Biologic and Materials Sciences, School of Dentistry
2Interdepartmental Graduate Program in Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jcdrach@umich.edu
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.2.478-486.2002
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Structures of benzimidazole ribonucleosides. The asterisk indicates the position of the tritium label in [3H]BDCRB. The moieties at positions R1 and R2 were as follows: in DRB, H and OH, respectively; in TCRB, Cl and OH, respectively; in BDCRB, Br and OH, respectively; in 5′-TCRB, Cl and H, respectively; and in 5′-BDCRB, Br and H, respectively.

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Reverse-phase HPLC of extracts from uninfected CEM cells incubated with [3H]BDCRB. The cells were incubated with 10 μCi of (9.1 μM) [3H]BDCRB per ml for 48 h, after which nucleosides and nucleotides were isolated by trichloroacetic acid precipitation and Freon extraction. Reverse-phase separations were performed on a μBondapak C18 column (3.9 by 300 mm), as detailed in the text. The retention times of naturally occurring nucleoside monophosphates (NMP’s) and BDCRB-5′-MP were determined by addition of standards to the extract and are indicated by horizontal bars.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Cesium sulfate isopycnic gradient separation of cellular RNA and DNA. CEM cells were incubated with [3H]BDCRB (•) at 1 μM (1.1 μCi/ml) for 48 h, and the amount of labeled acid-precipitable material was determined. Parallel incubations were performed under identical conditions with 1 μCi of [3H]Urd per ml (○) as a marker for incorporation into RNA and DNA (following metabolism to dTTP). (Inset) Nature of gradient determined by refractive index (R.I.).

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Anion-exchange HPLC analysis of an extract from HCMV-infected HFF cells incubated with [3H]BDCRB. Following infection at an MOI of 0.15, the cells were incubated with 10 μCi of (9.1 μM) [3H]BDCRB per ml for 5 days. Nucleosides and nucleotides were extracted and separated by anion-exchange HPLC on an Ultrasil-AX 10-μm column (4.6 by 250 mm), as detailed in the text. The dotted line is the response from the UV detector; the line defined by solid circles is the counts per minute from labeled metabolites. Horizontal bars indicate the ranges in which naturally occurring nucleoside monophosphates (NMP’s) and nucleoside diphosphates (NDP’s) eluted. The retention time of BDCRB-5′-MP was determined by the addition of a nonradioactive standard to the infected cell extract. That of BDCRB-5′-diphosphate (BDCRB-5′-DP) was determined in a separate run.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    Benzimidazole nucleosides inhibited HCMV replication but not viral DNA synthesis. Selected concentrations of TCRB (▪) and 5′-dTCRB (▵) were incubated in duplicate wells with HFF cells infected with HCMV at 3 PFU/cell. Viral DNA was detected by DNA-DNA hybridization, and yield was quantified by serial dilution of supernatants across 96-well culture plates seeded with HFF cells.

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    Inhibition of cleavage of concatemeric DNA to monomeric genomic units by benzimidazole nucleoside analogs. Selected concentrations of TCRB (▪), BDCRB (◊), 5′-dTCRB (▵), and 1263W94 (•) were incubated in duplicate wells with HFF cells infected with HCMV at 3 PFU/cell. After 3 days, the cells were suspended in agarose and digested to release DNA. The DNA was separated by contour-clamped homogeneous electric field separation, transferred to a nylon membrane, and probed for HCMV-specific sequences. The amount of genomic-length monomeric DNA is expressed as a percentage of the total amount of viral DNA in the well. In the absence of test compounds, monomeric DNA was 25% ± 5% of the total DNA in three determinations.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Activities of benzimidazole nucleosides against HCMV isolates sensitive and resistant to TCRB and BDCRB

    CompoundMean ± SD IC50 or IC90 (μM)a for virus isolateb:
    Towne (wild type)B11 (UL89)D10 (UL89)C4 (UL56 + UL89)
    TCRB2.8 ± 1.116 ± 4.917 ± 7.656 ± 31
    BDCRB1.2 ± 0.7812 ± 6.77.3 ± 5.828 ± 7.4
    5′-dTCRB0.58 ± 0.46c2.9 ± 0.5c3.1 ± 0.14c13d
    5′-dBDCRB0.15 ± 0.001c
    5′-dBDCRBe0.06 ± 0.013.0 ± 0.8
    GCV1.5 ± 0.63.1 ± 0.2c4.6 ± 2.15.5 ± 3.2
    • ↵ a Results are from plaque reduction assays performed in duplicate with the indicated isolates of HCMV selected for resistance to TCRB, as described in the text. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50s) were calculated from three to six separate experiments with at least four drug concentrations each, unless marked otherwise.

    • ↵ b The genotype of each isolate is given in parentheses. The UL number specifies the gene with the mutation that confers resistance to TCRB; the UL89 mutation is D344E, and the UL56 mutation is Q204R (25). B11 and D10 are different isolates with the same mutation that results in resistance to TCRB, which we have described previously (25).

    • ↵ c The experiment was performed twice, in duplicate, by using at least four drug concentrations.

    • ↵ d The experiment was performed once, in duplicate, by using five drug concentrations.

    • ↵ e The results are presented as 90% inhibitory concentrations (IC90s) from two yield reduction experiments performed in duplicate or triplicate wells by using at least five drug concentrations.

  • TABLE 2.

    Mode-of-action comparisons among benzimidazole nucleosides

    Test compoundIC90a (μM) by:IC50 (μM) for DNA synthesisd
    Maturation assaybYield assayc
    BDCRB0.080.29 ± 0.15>25e
    5′-dBDCRB<0.04e0.018 ± 0.003>5
    5′-dTCRB0.030.36 ± 0.26>25
    1263W94270.55 ± 0.060.3
    • ↵ a IC90, 90% inhibitory concentration.

    • ↵ b The maturation assay was a single-cycle yield reduction experiment in which 20 μM BDCRB was removed from HCMV-infected cultures and replaced at 96 h postinfection by the test compound.

    • ↵ c Data are from two or three single-cycle yield reduction experiments in which the test compound was present for the entire experiment.

    • ↵ d The assay was a single-cycle yield experiment in which the amount of DNA was measured by a hybridization assay. IC50, 50% inhibitory concentration.

    • ↵ e The 50 or 90% inhibitory concentration was not reached at the noted highest or lowest concentration tested.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Phosphorylation of β-d-Ribosylbenzimidazoles Is Not Required for Activity against Human Cytomegalovirus
Paula M. Krosky, Katherine Z. Borysko, M. Reza Nassiri, Rodrigo V. Devivar, Roger G. Ptak, Michelle G. Davis, Karen K. Biron, Leroy B. Townsend, John C. Drach
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Feb 2002, 46 (2) 478-486; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.2.478-486.2002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Phosphorylation of β-d-Ribosylbenzimidazoles Is Not Required for Activity against Human Cytomegalovirus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Phosphorylation of β-d-Ribosylbenzimidazoles Is Not Required for Activity against Human Cytomegalovirus
Paula M. Krosky, Katherine Z. Borysko, M. Reza Nassiri, Rodrigo V. Devivar, Roger G. Ptak, Michelle G. Davis, Karen K. Biron, Leroy B. Townsend, John C. Drach
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Feb 2002, 46 (2) 478-486; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.2.478-486.2002
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

antiviral agents
Benzimidazoles
cytomegalovirus
Ribonucleosides

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596