Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • COVID-19 Special Collection
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • AAC Podcast
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Susceptibility

Epigallocatechin Gallate Synergistically Enhances the Activity of Carbapenems against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Zhi-Qing Hu, Wei-Hua Zhao, Nozomi Asano, Yoshiyuki Yoda, Yukihiko Hara, Tadakatsu Shimamura
Zhi-Qing Hu
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Showa University School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: zqhu@med.showa-u.ac.jp
Wei-Hua Zhao
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Showa University School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nozomi Asano
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Showa University School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshiyuki Yoda
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Showa University School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yukihiko Hara
2Tokyo Food Techno Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tadakatsu Shimamura
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Showa University School of Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.2.558-560.2002
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Combinations of carbapenems and epigallocatechin gallate (EGCg; a main constituent of tea catechins) showed potent synergy against 24 clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). MICs of imipenem in the presence of EGCg at 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, and 25 μg/ml, were restored to the susceptible breakpoint (≤4 μg/ml) for 8, 38, 46, and 75% of the MRSA isolates, respectively. Similar results were also observed for combinations of panipenem or meropenem and EGCg. Therefore, the combinations may be worthy of further evaluation in vivo against MRSA infection.

TEXT

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become a major nosocomial pathogen in the past 2 decades. Therapeutic options for MRSA infection are very limited because most MRSA strains are resistant not only to β-lactams but also to multiple antimicrobial agents, such as macrolides, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones (8). The emergence of MRSA strains with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin suggests that MRSA may eventually become fully resistant to vancomycin (1, 2). Therefore, new chemotherapeutic agents and new approaches are urgently needed to combat such multiple-antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Carbapenems are relatively new β-lactams that have a broad spectrum and strong activity against many pathogens. However, the carbapenems (imipenem [IPM], panipenem [PAPM], and meropenem [MEM]) do not show high levels of activity against MRSA.

It has been previously demonstrated that epigallocatechin gallate (EGCg; a main constituent of tea catechins) is able to act synergistically with β-lactams against MRSA (5, 12). Two groups using an aqueous extract of tea further confirmed the synergy between tea and β-lactams (14, 15). It was recently demonstrated that the EGCg-induced damage of the bacterial cell wall and interference with its integrity through direct binding with peptidoglycan are responsible for the synergism between EGCg and β-lactams against MRSA (16).

In determining the possible clinical use of EGCg against MRSA infections, the bioavailable concentration of EGCg in vivo is the most crucial factor. In this study, therefore, we examined carbapenems in combination with the lowest possible concentrations of EGCg in vitro.

EGCg was extracted from green tea, and the purity of the EGCg was confirmed to be 98% by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. The following antibiotics were used: IPM (Banyu Pharmaceutical Co., Tokyo, Japan), PAPM (Sankyo Organic Chemicals Co., Kawasaki, Japan), and MEM (Sumitomo Pharmaceuticals Co., Osaka, Japan).

The twenty-four clinical isolates of MRSA used were from specimens submitted for routine culture at the clinical microbiology laboratories of Showa University Hospital. All 24 isolates carried the mecA gene, which was confirmed by PCR analysis as described previously (6, 16). Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 25 mg of Ca2+/liter, 12.5 mg of Mg2+/liter, and 2% NaCl was used for susceptibility tests and time-kill assays. MICs were determined by the broth microdilution and checkerboard methods (11) with a final inoculum concentration of >5 × 105 CFU/ml. After stationary incubation of the isolates at 35°C for 24 h, the lowest concentration of the twofold-serial-diluted antibiotic(s) and/or EGCg at which no visible growth occurred was defined as the antibiotic's or EGCg’s MIC. The bacteria were also cultured in 3 ml of Mueller-Hinton broth, and their growth was detected with a spectrophotometer (optical density at 600 nm) at 24 h. Synergy was measured by a fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index. The FIC of the combination was calculated by dividing the MIC of the antibiotic-EGCg combination by the MIC of the antibiotic or of EGCg alone, and the FIC index was obtained by adding the FIC of the antibiotic and that of EGCg. The FIC index results were interpreted as follows: ≤0.5, synergy; >0.5 to 1, additive effect; and >1 to 2, no effect. In the killing curves, synergy was defined as present when the decrease in CFU per milliliter between results of treatment with the combination and those of its most active constituent after 24 h was ≥2-log10 and when the number of surviving organisms after treatment with the combination of β-lactams and EGCg at their sub-MICs was ≥2-log10 CFU/ml below the starting concentration of inoculum. The data from time-kill assays are presented as the means ± standard deviations (see Fig. 1).

The MIC of EGCg alone for the MRSA isolates was 100 μg/ml. Synergy was observed when β-lactams were combined with EGCg at a concentration of less than one-fourth the MIC of EGCg alone. Among the tested β-lactams, which included penicillins (benzylpenicillin, ampicillin, oxacillin, and methicillin), cephems (cephalexin, cefmetazole, and cefotaxime), and carbapenems (IPM, PAPM, and MEM), the combinations between carbapenems and EGCg showed the most potent synergy.

The effects of combination of carbapenems and EGCg are summarized in Table 1. The synergistic or additive effects were observed to occur against 100% of the MRSA strains tested in a dose-dependent manner. The MIC at which 50% of the isolates treated with IPM were inhibited decreased from 128 μg/ml to 64, 32, 8, 8, and 0.25 μg/ml when in combination with 1.56, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, and 25 μg of EGCg/ml, respectively. Furthermore, the MICs of IPM in the presence of EGCg at 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, and 25 μg/ml were restored to the susceptibility breakpoint (≤4 μg/ml) for 8, 38, 46, and 75% of MRSA isolates, respectively.

Figure 1Ashows the results for the IPM-EGCg combination against strain F-74, which has a high level of resistance to carbapenems (MIC, 128 μg/ml). The growth of F-74 was inhibited by EGCg even at the low concentration of 1.56 μg/ml. Figure 1B, shows the results of time-kill assays of strain F-74. The combination of 32 μg of IPM/ml and 25 μg of EGCg/ml (concentrations that are one-fourth their MICs) showed synergistic bactericidal activity, resulting after 24 h in a >2-log10 decrease in CFU per milliliter from that resulting from treatment with IPM or EGCg alone and from the starting inoculum. PAPM-EGCg and MEM-EGCg combinations also showed similar results (data not shown).

Tea, one of the most popular beverages in the world, is consumed every day by billions of people. Capsules of tea catechins and EGCg are becoming available for research and preclinical trials. The safe consumption of tea for thousands of years indicates the low toxicity of tea and EGCg. However, it is hard to predict synergistic effects in vivo on the basis of the presented in vitro evidence alone because it is difficult to estimate the in vivo concentration of EGCg, especially the bioavailable concentration of free (active) EGCg, after tea has been drunk or EGCg capsules have been ingested.

Recently, researchers began to pay attention to the effects of the pharmacokinetics of EGCg and tea catechins on their absorption, distribution, and elimination in animals and humans (3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 13, 17). Usually the EGCg concentration in tea is 2 to 3 mg/ml. EGCg is absorbed through the digestive tract and distributed to many organs in both animals and humans. EGCg at 5.6 μg/ml in rat blood plasma was detected after the administration of EGCg at 500 mg/kg of body weight (9). Total catechins, including epicatechin, epicatechin gallate, and EGCg, were detected in rat blood plasma at 15 to 112 μg/ml at 2 h after oral administration of catechins at 5,000 mg/kg (17). EGCg was detected at 2 μg/ml in human blood plasma 90 min after 525 mg of EGCg in capsule form had been ingested (10). Therefore, the combination of carbapenems and EGCg against MRSA may be worthy of further evaluation in vivo.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Synergistic anti-MRSA effects of combinations of IPM and EGCg. (A) Growth inhibition curves. ○, IPM alone; •, IPM plus EGCg at 1.56 μg/ml; ▴, IPM plus EGCg at 3.12 μg/ml; ▾, IPM plus EGCg at 6.25 μg/ml; ⧫, IPM plus EGCg at 12.5 μg/ml; ▪, IPM plus EGCg at 25 μg/ml; OD, optical density. (B) Time-kill curves. ○, no addition; ▵, IPM at 32 μg/ml alone; ▿, EGCg at 25 μg/ml alone; •, IPM at 4 μg/ml plus EGCg at 3.125 μg/ml (1/32 of their MICs); ▴, IPM at 8 μg/ml plus EGCg at 6.25 μg/ml (1/16 of their MICs); ▾, IPM at 16 μg/ml plus EGCg at 12.5 μg/ml (1/8 of their MICs); ▪, IPM at 32 μg/ml plus EGCg at 25 μg/ml (1/4 of their MICs).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Effects of carbapenems in combination with EGCg against 24 MRSA isolates

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 13 April 2001.
    • Returned for modification 22 August 2001.
    • Accepted 25 October 2001.
  • Copyright © 2002 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1997. Update: Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin—United States, 1997. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.46:813-815.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1997. Update: Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin—Japan, 1996. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.46:624-635.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Chen, L., M. J. Lee, H. Li, and C. S. Yang. 1997. Absorption, distribution, elimination of tea polyphenols in rats. Drug Metab. Dispos.25:1045-1050.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T. 1995. Antimicrobial properties of tea (Camellia sinensis L.). Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.39:2375-2377.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Hu, Z.-Q., W.-H. Zhao, Y. Hara, and T. Shimamura. 2001. Epigallocatechin gallate synergy with ampicillin-sulbactam against 28 clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.48:361-364.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Kohner, P., J. Uhl, C. Kolbert, D. Persing, and F. Cockerill III. 1999. Comparison of susceptibility testing methods with mecA gene analysis for determining oxacillin (methicillin) resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp. J. Clin. Microbiol.37:2952-2961.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Lee, M. J., Z. Y. Wang, H. Li, L. Chen, Y. Sun, S. Gobbo, D. A. Balentine, and C. S. Yang. 1995. Analysis of plasma and urinary tea polyphenols in human subjects. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.4:393-399.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  8. 8.↵
    Maple, P. A. C., J. M. T. Hamilton-Miller, and W. Brumfitt. 1989. World-wide antibiotic resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet i:537-540.
  9. 9.↵
    Nakagawa, K., and T. Miyazawa. 1997. Absorption and distribution of tea catechin, (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate in rats. J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. (Tokyo)43:679-684.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Nakagawa, K., S. Okuda, and T. Miyazawa. 1997. Dose-dependent incorporation of tea catechins, (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate and (−)-epigallocatechin, into human plasma. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.61:1981-1985.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Norden, C. W., H. Wentzel, and E. Keleti. 1979. Comparison of techniques for measurement of in vitro antibiotic synergism. J. Infect. Dis.140:629-633.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Takahashi, A., Z. Cai, M. Toda, Y. Hara, and T. Shimamura. 1995. Appearance of antibacterial activity of oxacillin against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the presence of catechin. J. Jpn. Assoc. Infect. Dis. 69:1126-1134. (In Japanese.)
  13. 13.↵
    Unno, T., K. Kondo, H. Itakura, and T. Takeo. 1996. Analysis of (−)-epigallocatechin gallate in human serum obtained after ingesting green tea. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem.60:2066-2068.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Yam, T. S., J. M. T. Hamilton-Miller, and S. Shah. 1998. The effect of a component of tea (Camellia sinensis) on methicillin resistance, PBP2" synthesis, and β-lactamase production in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.42:211-216.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Yamazaki, K. 1996. Enhancing effect of Japanese green tea extract on the growth-inhibitory activity of antibiotics against clinically isolated MRSA strains. Jpn. J. Chemother. 44:477-482. (In Japanese.)
  16. 16.↵
    Zhao, W.-H., Z.-Q. Hu, S. Okubo, Y. Hara, and T. Shimamura. 2001. Mechanism of synergy between epigallocatechin gallate and β-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.45:1737-1742.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Zhu, M., Y. Chen, and R. C. Li. 2000. Oral absorption and bioavailability of tea catechins. Planta Med.66:444-447.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Epigallocatechin Gallate Synergistically Enhances the Activity of Carbapenems against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Zhi-Qing Hu, Wei-Hua Zhao, Nozomi Asano, Yoshiyuki Yoda, Yukihiko Hara, Tadakatsu Shimamura
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Feb 2002, 46 (2) 558-560; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.2.558-560.2002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Epigallocatechin Gallate Synergistically Enhances the Activity of Carbapenems against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Epigallocatechin Gallate Synergistically Enhances the Activity of Carbapenems against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Zhi-Qing Hu, Wei-Hua Zhao, Nozomi Asano, Yoshiyuki Yoda, Yukihiko Hara, Tadakatsu Shimamura
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Feb 2002, 46 (2) 558-560; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.2.558-560.2002
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • TEXT
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

antioxidants
carbapenems
Catechin
methicillin resistance
Staphylococcus aureus

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • AAC Podcast
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596