Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About AAC
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Mechanisms of Resistance

TEM Derivative-Producing Enterobacter aerogenes Strains: Dissemination of a Prevalent Clone

P. Dumarche, C. De Champs, D. Sirot, C. Chanal, R. Bonnet, J. Sirot
P. Dumarche
Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. De Champs
Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Christophe.DECHAMPS@u-clermont1.fr
D. Sirot
Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Chanal
Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Bonnet
Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Sirot
Faculté de Médecine, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.4.1128-1131.2002
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

TEM-24 (CAZ-6) extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) was detected in 1988 in Clermont-Ferrand, France, in Klebsiella pneumoniae (blaTEM-24) and Enterobacter aerogenes (blaTEM-24b), and since 1994, a TEM-24-producing E. aerogenes clonal strain has been observed elsewhere in the country. To determine if the spread of this clonal strain was restricted to TEM-24-producing E. aerogenes strains, 84 E. aerogenes strains (non-TEM/SHV-producing strains, TEM-1- or -2-producing strains, and different ESBL-producing strains), isolated from 1988 to 1999 in Clermont-Ferrand (n = 59) and in 11 other French hospitals in 1998 (n = 25), were studied. A clonal strain was found for TEM-24- but also for TEM-3- and TEM-1- or 2-producing isolates. This study shows that there is a clonal strain dependent on acquisition of the TEM-type enzyme (TEM-24 and other TEM types).

In 1988, TEM-24 (CAZ-6) extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) encoded by the blaTEM-24 gene was reported in Klebsiella pneumoniae in Clermont-Ferrand, France (5). The enzyme spread quickly in Enterobacter aerogenes (7) but was encoded by the blaTEM-24b gene. Since 1994, there have been several reports of a TEM-24-producing E. aerogenes clone in France (4, 9, 11, 14, 15) and in Belgium (8).

The aim of this study was to determine if the dissemination of the clone dated from 1988 and whether the other TEM derivates were produced by the same E. aerogenes clone.

Eighty-four clinical nonrepetitive isolates of E. aerogenes were randomly selected among samples taken from January 1988 to December 1999 at the teaching hospital of Clermont-Ferrand (n = 59) and at 11 other French hospitals (n = 25) in 1998. These strains, identified by the rapid Id 32E System (bioMérieux, La Balme les Grottes, France) according to the manufacturer's instructions, were as follows (Table 1): 60 ESBL-producing strains (22 for TEM-3, 1 for TEM-8, 33 for TEM-24, and 4 for SHV-4) identified by isoelectric focusing and direct sequencing of PCR products, 12 TEM-1- or -2-producing strains (11 for TEM-1 and 1 for TEM-2), and a control group with 12 non-TEM/SHV-producing strains (intrinsic resistance to β-lactams amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cephalothin, and cefoxitin) identified by resistance phenotype and isoelectric focusing. Of the 60 ESBL-producing strains, 35 strains were from Clermont-Ferrand (up to two isolates selected a year and by ESBL type) and 25 strains were from 11 other French hospitals (up to two isolates selected by the center and by ESBL type). For TEM-1- or -2-producing strains and non-TEM/SHV-producing strains, one isolate a year was selected from Clermont-Ferrand.

The 84 strains were typed by ribotyping and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus-PCR (ERIC-PCR). With both methods, bacterial DNA was prepared by growing E. aerogenes overnight in Mueller-Hinton broth at 37°C. Cells were obtained by centrifugation at 4,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in 300 μl of a solution containing Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, sucrose, lysozyme, and 120 μl of 0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0. The suspension was mixed and allowed to stand on ice for 10 min. The cells were lysed by adding 1.4 ml of 6 M guanidium chloride followed by 100 μl of 7.5 M ammonium acetate and by incubation at room temperature with shaking for 1 h. Contaminating proteins were digested with 15 μl of proteinase K (10 mg/ml) and 200 μl of 10% (wt/vol) Sarkosyl for 60 min at 60°C. High-molecular-weight DNA was precipitated with 100% ethanol and recovered by centrifugation. The DNA was resuspended in a solution containing 6 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 6 mM NaCl, and 0.1 mM EDTA.

For ribotyping, we used the procedure of Bingen et al. (1) for restriction fragment length polymorphisms of ribosomal DNA region analysis with restriction endonuclease EcoRI. Sixteen profiles (A to P) were obtained from the 84 E. aerogenes isolates (data not shown), of which the most frequent was profile A, found in all hospitals (Table 2). It was observed in 62 isolates (74%). All 33 E. aerogenes TEM-24-producing strains (100%), 16 of 22 TEM-3-producing strains (73%), the one strain producing TEM-8, and 11 of 12 TEM-1- or TEM-2-producing strains (92%) had this profile, but only one non-TEM/SHV-producing strain did.

For ERIC-PCR, each 50-μl reaction mixture contained 50 pmol of each primer (Eurogentec): ERIC1R (5′-ATGTAAGCTCCTGGGGATTCA-3′) and ERIC2(5′-AAGTAAGTGACTGGGGTGAGCG-3′), 500 ng of DNA, 0.2 mM of each of 4 dNTPs, 1.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Appligene) in a buffer with 10% dimethyl sulfoxide. PCR amplifications were performed in an automated thermal cycler (Perkin-Elmer/Cetus DNA Thermal Cycler) with initial denaturation (95°C, 7 min) followed by 30 cycles of denaturation (90°C, 30 s), annealing (52°C, 1 min), and extension (65°C, 8 min) with a single final extension (65°C, 16 min). Twenty-five microliters of each PCR was then electrophoresed directly on a 1% agarose gel containing 0.5 × Tris borate-EDTA and 0.5 μg of ethidium bromide/ml. Ten profiles (1 to 10) were obtained from the 84 E. aerogenes isolates, of which the most frequent was profile 1, found in all hospitals (Table 2). It was observed in 67 isolates (80%). All 33 E. aerogenes TEM-24-producing strains (100%), 17 of 22 TEM-3-producing strains (77%), 1 of the 4 SHV-4-producing strains, and all TEM-1- or TEM-2-producing strains (100%) had this profile, but only 4 non-TEM/SHV-producing strains did.

The results obtained with the two techniques were concordant, and by combining both methods (ribotyping and ERIC-PCR) we obtained 18 profiles, of which the most frequent was profile A/1 (100% TEM-24, 73% TEM-3, 92% TEM-1 or -2, and one non-TEM/SHV-producing strain). The 12 strains without acquired β-lactamases were distributed in 12 different types. This variety of types and the low frequency of type A/1 among non-TEM/SHV-producing strains of E. aerogenes were confirmed by studies in progress (data not shown).

Sixty four of 84 strains were studied for plasmid DNA analysis: the 12 TEM-1 or -2 strains, 12 non-TEM/SHV-producing strains, and 40 of 60 ESBL-producing strains were selected by ESBL type, year, and center (Table 3). The size of the plasmids was estimated after plasmid DNA extraction by the method of Kado and Liu (10) and electrophoretic migrations in a 1% agarose gel in comparison with standard plasmids (Rsa, 39 kb; TP114, 61.5 kb; CF204, 85 kb; CF604, 180 kb). Labeling of TEM probe was performed by random priming with the 2,4-dinitrophenyl-DNA-labeling kit purchased from Appligene Oncor (Illkirch, France). Hybridization with TEM probe and revelation were performed as previously described (3) according to the manufacturer's recommendations on DNA extracts denatured and immobilized on Nytran filters.

All of the E. aerogenes strains producing ESBL harbored one or two large plasmids (180 and/or 85 kb). These plasmids were found in only one non-TEM/SHV-producing strain, which had the profile A/1 (180 kb). Hybridization with the TEM probe showed that the bla genes were always on large plasmids: 85 kb (11 strains) or 180 kb (38 strains). The TEM-24-encoding gene was originally located in 1988 on an 85-kb plasmid. Since then it has always been observed on a 180-kb plasmid, except for one strain in 1991. The TEM-3-encoding gene was located alternately on 85- or 180-kb plasmids. TEM-1- or -2-encoding genes were always located on 180-kb plasmids.

For 24 of 64 strains selected according to plasmid content, ESBL type, year, and center, a transfer experiment by conjugation was performed for 40 min at 37°C as previously described (16) with Escherichia coli K12 C600 resistant to rifampin used as the recipient strain. The 180-kb plasmid (n = 19) encoding TEM-24 (13 of 15 strains), TEM-3 (1 of 4), TEM-1 (3 of 3), or TEM-2 (1 of 1) and present in one non-TEM/SHV-producing strain had the following associated resistance markers (Table 4): sulfonamides (19 of 19), trimethoprim (17 of 19), and chloramphenicol (16 of 19). The 85-kb plasmid (n = 5) encoding TEM-24 or TEM-3 always had sulfonamides and tetracycline resistance as associated markers (5 of 5 strains). The AAC6′-I type was associated with ESBL in all but one strain (LY-98).

For digestion of plasmids and hybridization with the TEM probe, 10 strains were selected according to plasmid size, ESBL type, and cotransferred resistances. The β-lactamase-encoding plasmids were extracted by the alkaline lysis method (2) and digested with EcoRI and HindIII restriction endonucleases according to the recommendations of the manufacturer (Boehringer Mannheim, Meylan, France). The five profiles obtained with 180-kb plasmids encoding TEM-1, TEM-2, TEM-3, and TEM-24 and that of the non-TEM/SHV-producing strain were similar. The three profiles obtained with the 85-kb plasmid encoding TEM-3 or TEM-24 were the same. Whatever the size of the plasmid, the TEM probe hybridized on the same large fragment (>10 kb) (data not shown).

By a combination of both typing methods, we showed the existence of an epidemic clone (A/1) not only for TEM-24-producing E. aerogenes isolates but also for the other TEM-type enzyme-producing E. aerogenes strains. That suggests a possible “in-clone” evolution of β-lactamase in this species. TEM-24 seemed to be less frequently encountered in other Enterobacteriaceae than in E. aerogenes, as reported in a 1998 survey (6), probably in correlation with the epidemic spread of E. aerogenes. However, dissemination of TEM-24 by in vivo transfer of encoding plasmid among different species of Enterobacteriaceae, including the E. aerogenes clonal strain, had been reported in France previously (12, 13, 14, 15). All strains belonging to type A/1 harbored one or two plasmids. These large plasmids (180 or 85 kb) with multiple resistance markers conferred to this host (clone A/1) resistance under selective antibiotic pressure. This selective factor could be responsible for the exceptional adaptation of the E. aerogenes clone A/1 to the hospital environment and for its dissemination via patient transfer from one hospital to another. When there is transfer in vivo, plasmids encoding β-lactamases transfer from different species of Enterobacteriaceae into the different clones of E. aerogenes, among which only clone A/1 is able to maintain the plasmid. To test this hypothesis, experiments are currently being performed in our laboratory to transfer these large plasmids into the different clones of. E. aerogenes.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Distribution of β-lactamases produced by 84 E. aerogenes strains selected from Clermont-Ferrand hospital and 11 other centers

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Distribution of the main profile obtained by ribotyping and ERIC-PCR according to different β-lactamases produced

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Plasmid content of 64 selected E. aerogenes strains

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

Associated resistance markers in tranconjugants of 24 selected E. aerogenes strains

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dominique Rubio, Rolande Perroux, and Marlène Jan for technical assistance and Jeffrey Watts for his revision of the English manuscript.

This work was supported in part by a grant from Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de la Recherche et de la Technologie.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 30 April 2001.
    • Returned for modification 21 September 2001.
    • Accepted 13 January 2002.
  • American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Bingen, E., C. Boissinot, P. Desjardins, H. Cave, N. Brahimi, N. Lambert-Zechovsky et al. 1993. Arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction provides rapid differentiation of Proteus mirabilis isolates from a pediatric hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:1055-1059.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Birnboim, H. C., and J. Doly. 1979. A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:1513-1523.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    Bonnet, R., C. De Champs, D. Sirot, C. Chanal-Claris, R. Labia, and J. Sirot. 1999. Diversity of TEM mutants in Proteus mirabilis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2671-2677.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Bosi, C., A. Davin-Regli, C. Bornet, M. Mallea, J. M. Pages, and C. Bollet. 1999. Most Enterobacter aerogenes strains in France belong to a prevalent clone. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2165-2169.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Chanal, C., D. Sirot, A. Petit, R. Labia, A. Morand, J. Sirot, and R. Cluzel. 1989. Multiplicity of TEM-derived beta-lactamases from Klebsiella pneumoniae strains isolated at the same hospital and relationships between the responsible plasmids. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33:1915-1920.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    De Champs, C., D. Sirot, C. Chanal, R. Bonnet, J. Sirot, and the French Study Group. 2000. A 1998 survey of extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae in France. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:3177-3179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    De Champs, C., D. Sirot, C. Chanal, M. C. Poupart, M. P. Dumas, and J. Sirot. 1991. Concomitant dissemination of three extended-spectrum beta-lactamases among different Enterobacteriaceae isolated in a French hospital. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 27:441-457.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    De Gheldre, Y., M. J. Struelens, Y. Glupczynski, P. De Mol, N. Maes, C. Nonhoff, H. Chetoui, C. Sion, O. Ronveaux, and M. Vaneechoutte. 2001. National epidemiologic surveys of Enterobacter aerogenes in Belgian hospitals from 1996 to 1998. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:889-896.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Galdbart, J. O., F. Lémann, D. Ainouz, P. Féron, N. Lambert-Zechowsky, and C. Branger. 2000. TEM-24 extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacter aerogenes: long-term clonal dissemination in French hospitals. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 6:316-323.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    Kado, C. I., and S. T. Liu. 1981. Rapid procedure for detection and isolation of large and small plasmids. J. Bacteriol. 145:1365-1373.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Mammeri, H., G. Laurans, M. Eveillard, S. Castelain, and F. Eb. 2001. Coexistence of SHV-4- and TEM-24-producing Enterobacter aerogenes strains before a large outbreak of TEM-24-producing strains in a French hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2184-2190.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Marchandin, H., H. Jean-Pierre, C. De Champs, D. Sirot, H. Darbas, P. F. Perigault, and C. Carriere. 2000. Production of a TEM-24 plasmid-mediated extended-spectrum beta-lactamase by a clinical isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:213-216.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Marchandin, H., C. Carriere, D. Sirot, H. J. Pierre, and H. Darbas. 1999. TEM-24 produced by four different species of Enterobacteriaceae, including Providencia rettgeri, in a single patient. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 43:2069-2073.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Neuwirth, C., E. Siebor, A. Pechinot, J. M. Duez, M. Pruneaux, F. Garel, A. Kazmierczak, and R. Labia. 2001. Evidence of in vivo transfer of a plasmid encoding the extended-spectrum beta-lactamase TEM-24 and other resistance factors among different members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:1985-1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Neuwirth, C., E. Siebor, J. Lopez, A. Pechinot, and A. Kazmierczak. 1996. Outbreak of TEM-24-producing Enterobacter aerogenes in an intensive care unit and dissemination of the extended-spectrum beta-lactamases to other members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:76-79.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed., vol. 1. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
TEM Derivative-Producing Enterobacter aerogenes Strains: Dissemination of a Prevalent Clone
P. Dumarche, C. De Champs, D. Sirot, C. Chanal, R. Bonnet, J. Sirot
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Apr 2002, 46 (4) 1128-1131; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.4.1128-1131.2002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
TEM Derivative-Producing Enterobacter aerogenes Strains: Dissemination of a Prevalent Clone
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
Share
TEM Derivative-Producing Enterobacter aerogenes Strains: Dissemination of a Prevalent Clone
P. Dumarche, C. De Champs, D. Sirot, C. Chanal, R. Bonnet, J. Sirot
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy Apr 2002, 46 (4) 1128-1131; DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.4.1128-1131.2002
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About AAC
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #AACJournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0066-4804; Online ISSN: 1098-6596